Boston Leaders Push to Bring HBCU Campus to the City
Boston City Council Vice President Leads the Charge
Boston City Council Vice President Brian Worrell is spearheading the initiative. According to The Boston Herald, Worrell recently called for a public hearing to explore bringing an HBCU to Boston-a city that was once a leader in Black education during the 19th century.
"An HBCU presence would provide role models for current Black students by showing them a tangible pathway to success," Worrell said during a council meeting. "Boston led the way in educating Black students in the first half of the 19th century, with the opening of the Abiel Smith School. We need to rediscover that trailblazing spirit."
Worrell's proposal is closely tied to Boston's Building Bridges HBCU program, which he describes as a direct response to the recent national pushback against diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives.
Growing Demand for HBCUs in the North
The hearing order notes that while there are more than 100 HBCUs in the U.S., most are located in the South-a reflection of their historical role in countering Jim Crow laws. Today, the need for culturally responsive educational spaces is growing, particularly in areas like Boston where Black students have limited access to HBCU environments.
Worrell's office told The Boston Herald that updates on the city's efforts to attract an HBCU partner will be shared this fall. Boston Public Schools Chief of Student Support Cory McCarthy emphasized the increasing interest, saying, "The appetite for an HBCU has grown immensely within the last five years."
He added, "Bringing an HBCU to Boston would further showcase the city's commitment to building an educational ecosystem that values, supports, and elevates Black students."
The Impact of HBCUs Nationwide
Worrell highlighted that despite making up just 3% of U.S. higher education institutions, HBCUs produce a disproportionate number of Black professionals:
40% of Black engineers and members of Congress50% of Black lawyers and doctors70% of Black dentists
These statistics underscore the enduring importance and success of HBCUs in advancing Black excellence.
California's HBCU Expansion as a Model
Boston's vision aligns with similar efforts on the West Coast. In 2024, Huston-Tillotson University, based in Austin, Texas, announced plans to open a satellite campus in California. However, the university's California branch is not expected to open until August 2025, pending accreditation approval from the state.
According to the university's website, the California campus will initially offer coursework aligned with the university's Liberal Studies requirements and plans to fully establish a branch campus by August 2025.
The post Boston Leaders Push to Bring HBCU Campus to the City appeared first on HBCU Gameday.
Copyright HBCU Gameday 2012-2025
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
11 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Letters: Don't criticize Trump for enforcing immigration laws. Change them. Here's who can
The party most responsible for the deplorable American situation involving immigrants is Congress. Many are outraged by the recent deportations of undocumented immigrants, calling it shameful that they are being treated like criminals. Sorry. They are still law-breakers even if it is just a misdemeanor. President Donald Trump should not be vilified for enforcing the law. However, the U.S. became a global power because of immigration. The labor of immigrants has and is fueling the largest economy in the world. Inexplicably, because of our laws, a significant portion of this powerful force entered the country illegally. We should not be outraged that the laws are being enforced. We should be outraged that Congress has let such economically suicidal laws remain unchanged. The vast majority of undocumented immigrants in our country are hard-working, many in agricultural, hospitality and manufacturing jobs. They are taxpayers contributing to our economy while seeking a future for their families. Let's find a way to let this contribution continue. Instead of decrying the enforcement of our laws, let's change the law. I think that the Trump administration's messy deportation efforts could produce bipartisan support for immigration reform. Don't go back This year is the 100th anniversary of the publication of F. Scott Fitzgerald's 'The Great Gatsby,' and I am reminded of the novel's last line: 'So on we beat, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.' Fitzgerald was the chronicler of the Jazz Age, an era of white, male homogeneity. Black musicians were emerging as exemplars of jazz, but Black people remained excluded from society. In the ingravescent attacks on diversity, equity and inclusion, we are seeing ourselves borne back to that era, when fascism emerged in Europe and eugenics gained a following. In a year in which a judge is arrested for opposing the government, universities are sanctioned for DEI initiatives and law firms are punished for defending those who defy government priorities, we begin to sniff the stench of fascism again. If those who vilify DEI are reluctant to oppose its ideals, their real intent becomes obvious: the homogeneity of white male dominance, inequity and exclusion. They have dynamited the dam of decency to let the rushing river sweep us out to a deep sea of depravity and despair. Perhaps, as Fitzgerald intimates, we need to stretch our arms further toward a receding future. F. Kevin Murphy, Reno Fight the good fight I say, Gov. Gavin, fight fight fight! Trump must be defeated at all costs, lest America spread a dark shadow of tyranny around the world.
The Hill
11 hours ago
- The Hill
Zohran Mamdani's education agenda would set New York City up for failure
Zohran Mamdani's recent victory in the New York City Democratic mayoral primary has drawn widespread attention for his affiliation with the Democratic Socialists of America and what some see as antisemitic rhetoric. But beyond the headlines, it's the education platform Mamdani champions that could pose the greatest threat to New York City families — especially those striving to access better schools and brighter futures for their children. At the core of Mamdani's approach is an unambiguous rejection of school choice. He opposes vouchers, charter school expansion, and even co-location policies that allow high-performing charters to operate in underutilized public school buildings. His platform calls for a funding overhaul that could severely reduce resources for charter schools, even though they serve 15 percent of city students. Mamdani opposes charter schools and vouchers based on the claim that they divert public resources, lack accountability and mainly benefit wealthier families at the expense of low-income students. He argues that voucher programs, despite being marketed as tools to help struggling students, are often used by affluent families already in private schools. As President Trump pushes for a national voucher initiative, Mamdani insists that New York must instead invest in a fully funded public school system to ensure true educational equity. But the evidence paints a sharply different picture. Success Academy, New York City's largest and most scrutinized charter network, enrolls a student population that is 98 percent made up of minority students, with the vast majority coming from low-income households. Despite these demographics, its academic results are nothing short of exceptional: 96 percent of its students passed the state math exam, and 83 percent passed the English Language Arts exam. By contrast, the citywide public school proficiency rate hovers around just 49 percent, underscoring the extent to which charter schools like Success Academy are not undermining public education but outperforming it. By restricting charter expansion and threatening funding, Mamdani's platform effectively removes one of the few viable paths to academic success for students in underserved neighborhoods. The families who rely on charters are not opting out of public education — they are opting out of failure. As a co-author of the 'People's Budget' proposed by the Black, Puerto Rican, Hispanic and Asian Legislative Caucus, Mamdani supports targeted spending initiatives that prioritize political messaging over tangible educational outcomes. The 2025 budget included an initiative aimed at increasing teacher diversity, with the caucus demanding an $8 million investment in recruitment, training and retention programs to make the teaching workforce more diverse. This initiative is particularly ironic given that New York City's public school system — the largest in both the state and nation — already has a teaching staff that is approximately 42 percent Black, despite African Americans comprising only 22 percent of the city's population. In the same budget, Mamdani's caucus allocated $250,000 to promote 'racial and cultural inclusivity' in K–12 classrooms and dedicated $351,500 for statewide conventions aimed at supporting 'underrepresented' educators, supposedly to address barriers faced by educators of color. But the problem isn't with diversity — it's with Mamdani's misaligned priorities. New York City already boasts one of the most diverse populations in the country. Meanwhile, student performance in core subjects continues to falter, and chronic absenteeism nears 40 percent. Despite spending more per student than any other state — over $36,000 annually — New York continues to fall short on basic benchmarks. Mamdani's answer is more spending, with little accountability and no meaningful strategy to improve outcomes. School choice, in contrast, offers a proven mechanism to elevate student achievement without pulling funding from traditional public schools. Programs in states like Florida and North Carolina show that scholarship and charter models can coexist with public education. In many cases, they drive improvement system-wide. A 2019 study even found modest academic gains in public schools that must compete with nearby choice-based alternatives. Mamdani dismisses these successes, framing school choice as an ideological threat rather than a practical solution. But for many families, school choice lets parents select the best educational environment for their children, whether that's a high-performing charter, a faith-based school, or specialized instruction that better fits a student's needs. Mamdani's plan offers the opposite. It preserves a rigid system that too often fails the students most in need, while redirecting resources toward symbolic programs that do little to improve reading, math, or attendance. His vision elevates bureaucracy over results and ideology over opportunity. New York City doesn't lack funding, it lacks alignment between spending and outcomes. What the city needs are policies that empower families, reward effective schools and confront failure with urgency — not just slogans. Mamdani is not the kind of leader New York City students can afford to have in office. Gregory Lyakhov is a high school student from Great Neck, N.Y.
Vox
11 hours ago
- Vox
How Black artists are reclaiming the American flag
is the host of Explain It to Me, your hotline for all your unanswered questions. She joined Vox in 2022 as a senior producer and then as host of The Weeds, Vox's policy podcast. Imagine your average Fourth of July party. There are probably hot dogs on the grill, everyone is clad in red, white, and blue, and it culminates in a fireworks show. It may sound like a lovely way to spend a day off. But for a lot of Americans, the celebration, and the flag itself, are more complicated than that. That's the question that Explain It to Me, Vox's weekly call-in show, is setting out to tackle this holiday weekend: What's the relationship like between Black people and the American flag? Specifically, one listener wanted to know, in the wake of the red-white-and-blue spectacle of Beyoncé's Cowboy Carter and Kendrick Lamar's Super Bowl halftime show, how that conversation has evolved over time. This is something Ted Johnson thinks a lot about. Johnson, who is Black, is an adviser at the liberal think tank New America, a columnist at the Washington Post, and a retired US Navy commander. 'The flag has sort of been hijacked by nationalists — folks who believe either America is perfect and exceptional, or at the very least, anything that it's done wrong in the past should be excused by all the things that it's done well,' Johnson told Vox. 'And that is not my relationship with the flag. It's much more complicated because there has been tons of harm done under that flag.' How do Black Americans square that harm and that pride? And how has that relationship changed through the years? Below is an excerpt of the conversation with Johnson, edited for length and clarity. You can listen to Explain It to Me on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get podcasts. If you'd like to submit a question, send an email to askvox@ or call 1-800-618-8545. One way to tease out this relationship between Black Americans and the flag is to talk about the experience of Black service members. What's that history? One of the earliest instances is the story of an enslaved man named Jehu Grant in Rhode Island during the Revolutionary War. The man that owned him was a loyalist to the Brits. Grant was afraid that he was going to be shipped off and sold to the Brits to fight for them. So he runs away, joins Washington's army and fights in the Continental Army, and then his master shows up and says, 'You've got my property, and I want it back.' And the Army turns him back over to the guy that owns him, where he serves for many years and eventually buys his freedom. When Andrew Jackson becomes president in the 1820s, he makes it policy to provide pensions for those Revolutionary War folks still alive. And so Grant applies for his pension and is denied. The government says that services rendered while a fugitive from your master are not recognized. That is the relationship of Black service members to the flag. It represents a set of principles that many would be willing to die for and also a way of life that intentionally excluded Black folks for no other reason than race and status of their servitude. And so if you look at any war, you will find Black folks in uniform who have both been oppressed in the country they represent, and are willing to die for that country because of the values it stands for and for their right to be able to serve and benefit from the programs that the military has made available to folks. My grandfather served in the military and I never got the chance to really talk with him about that experience. But I'm curious if you can speak to the motivations of Black Americans who continue serving, especially during the Jim Crow era. Pre-Civil War, a lot of enslaved Black folks that decided to fight did so because they believed their chances at liberty, emancipation, and freedom were connected to their willingness to serve the country. Then we get the draft and a lot of the Black folks that served in the early part of the 20th century were drafted into service. They weren't eager volunteers lining up as a way of earning their citizenship, but the fact that the vast majority of them honored that draft notice even though they were treated as second-class citizens was a sort of implicit demand for access to the full rights of the Constitution. 'There is a belief that the United States is ours as well. We have a claim of ownership. And to claim ownership also means you must sort of participate in the sacrifice.' I'd be remiss if I say that folks joining today, for example, are doing so because they love the flag. The military has a great pension program. The military offers great programs if you want to buy a home or if you want to get an education. So there's a sort of socioeconomic attractiveness to the military that I think explains why Black folks continue to join the military post-draft. But it is also because there is a belief that the United States is ours as well. We have a claim of ownership. And to claim ownership also means you must sort of participate in the sacrifice. When a lot of those service members came back from war, they were met with systemic institutionalized racism. How were people continuing to foster that sense of patriotism despite all that? When Black folks were coming home from World War I and II, many were lynched in weren't even excused from the racial dynamics by being willing to die for the country. One of the most famous genres of music in this period was called coon music. One of the songs was about Black people not having a flag. They talked about how white folks in the Northeast could fly flags from Italy, Ireland, wherever they're from. And white people in the States could just fly the American flag. Black people could fly none of those because we didn't know where we were from and the United States is not ours. And so in this song, they say the Black flag is basically two possums shooting dice and that would be an accurate representation. Wow. That is some classic old-school racism. Yeah, the song is called 'Every Race Has a Flag, but the Coon.' And so we are very familiar with the red, black, and green pan-African flag. This was Marcus Garvey's response to this coon genre of music. There's this idea among Black Americans of, We built this. Of course I'm going to reclaim this. Of course I'm going to have pride in it because I built it. I think that's what we're seeing with a lot of the imagery now. But what about Black artists and also Black people in general who say, Our ancestors may have done all this work, but there really is no way to be a part of this and maybe we should not be trying to be a part of this? If you take pride in the flag because you believe America is exceptional, you're going to find a lot fewer subscribers to that belief system than one where your pride in the country means being proud of the people you come from and proud of the arc of your people's story in this country. On the latter, you will find people who are very proud of what Black people have accomplished in this country. For me, patriotism means honoring those sacrifices, those people that came before us. It does not mean excusing the United States from its racism, from its perpetuated inequality, or for putting its national interests ahead of the people that it's supposed to serve. So it is very complicated, and there's no easy way through it. I will say that I think part of the reason we're seeing more folks willing to sort of reclaim the flag for their own is because of Gen X. My generation was the first one born post-Civil Rights Act of 1964, so Jim Crow was the experience of our parents. Those experiences connected to the hijacking of the flag to connect it to explicit statutory racism feels generations removed from folks who have grown up in America where opportunity is more available, where the Jim Crow kind of racism is not as permitted. And while the country is not even close to being the kind of equal nation it says it was founded to be, it's made progress. I think a reclamation of that flag by Beyoncé and others is a sort of signal that yes, we built it. Yes, we've progressed here. And no, we're not leaving. There's no 'go back to Africa.' This is home. And if this is home, I'm going to fly the flag of my country. There's lots to be proud of about what the country has achieved and by Black Americans in particular. And for me, that is all the things that patriotism represents, not the more narrow exclusive version that tends to get more daylight. I think one thing we need to discuss is the definition of Black we're using here. I am what they would call Black American. My ancestors are from Alabama and Arkansas. They were formerly enslaved. But Blackness in America now has a much wider net. I have so many friends whose parents are immigrants from the Caribbean or Africa. And it's interesting in this moment where there are lots of conversations about what it means to be Black, and who gets to claim it, we're also seeing this flag resurgence. I think probably true that there are more Black people who are first-generation Americans today than there have been since they started erasing our nations of origin during slavery. That means Black American doesn't just mean people who descended from slaves. It means Black people of all kinds. When we talk about Black politics, we don't consider the Black immigrant experience. When we talk about Black Americanism or Black patriotism, we often don't account for the Black immigrant experience, except to the extent that that experience is shed and the American one is adopted. Those views sort of get thrown into this pot of Blackness instead of disaggregated to show how Black folks from other places who become Americans have a distinct relationship with the country that also affects their relationship with the iconography of the country like the flag, the national anthem, and this reclamation of red, white, and blue. There may be some Black artists — I think of Beyoncé — who are reclaiming this imagery, but we also can't ignore who has a majority stake in it. When people think of the flag, they think of white people. Is that changing? It is, but slowly. If you ask people from around the world to picture a stereotypical American, they're not picturing LeBron James, despite the medals he's won at the Olympics. They're probably picturing a white man from the Midwest.
