
Trump says he's deporting ‘the worst of the worst.' Here's what California ICE data really shows
A Chronicle analysis of Immigration and Customs Enforcement arrest data, released by the UC-affiliated Deportation Data Project, appears to contradict a persistent claim by the Trump administration that its efforts to deport undocumented immigrants targets 'the worst of the worst.'
ICE arrested about 1,730 people in the San Francisco 'area of responsibility' in just over five months from the start of 2025 to June 10, a 70% increase from the final six months of the Biden administration. The area covers a wide swath of California — Kern County and the counties north of it — as well as Hawaii, Guam and Saipan. The Chronicle's analysis excluded arrests that occurred outside of California.
While the number of arrests of convicted criminals did grow, the number of arrests of people suspected only of immigration-related violations — or those whose charges were still pending — grew much faster. In December, about 10% of the people ICE arrested had no criminal convictions. That share jumped to nearly 30% in January, and then about 40% in May. Data from the first 10 days of June showed that more than half of the people arrested didn't have criminal convictions.
Those convictions ranged broadly, from homicide and sexual assault to marijuana possession and reckless driving. Being in the U.S. without legal documentation is a civil offense rather than a crime, despite Trump administration officials labeling unauthorized migrants as 'criminals.' Many people arrested by ICE were in the process of seeking asylum or other relief.
While some of the people ICE arrests are allowed to avoid detention while they wait for their court date, many are booked into a detention center or deported.
National data compiled by the Transaction Records Access Clearinghouse at Syracuse University indicates that the number of people detained by ICE — excluding those arrested by Customs and Border Protection — nearly doubled from about 14,900 on Jan. 26 to 28,900 on April 6.
The largest relative increase in detentions was also among people with no criminal convictions nationally, jumping from 900 in late January to more than 5,000 in March. The number soon surged again as ICE continued its mass deportation efforts, nearing 11,800 as of mid-June, compared with 14,500 detainees with convictions.
Nationally, ICE arrests surged after President Donald Trump took office, though they remain far below Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller's goal of 3,000 arrests a day. Researchers and immigration advocates previously warned that setting such a high minimum would require ICE and Customs and Border Protection to begin arresting people who aren't suspected of the serious crimes the Trump administration said it was focusing on.
Those orders have resulted in chaotic immigration raids in Southern California, which mostly resulted in arrests of people without criminal convictions, the Los Angeles Times reported.
Austin Kocher, an immigration researcher at Syracuse University, argued in a recent blog post that the Trump administration's lofty goals may be intentionally impossible.
'The goal is not to solve a real problem, but to manufacture an ever-expanding crisis that justifies ever-expanding unregulated power,' Kocher said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Politico
37 minutes ago
- Politico
Senate Republicans make steep cuts to wind and solar in updated megabill text
Senate Republicans released updated megabill text late Friday that would make sharp cuts to the Inflation Reduction Act's solar and wind tax credits after a late-stage push by President Donald Trump to crack down further on the incentives. The text would require solar and wind generation projects seeking to qualify for the law's clean electricity production and investment tax credits to be placed in service by the end of 2027 — significantly more restrictive than an earlier proposal by the Senate Finance Committee that tied eligibility to when a project begins construction. The changes came after Trump urged Senate Majority Leader John Thune to crack down on the wind and solar credits and align the measure more closely with reconciliation text, H.R.1, that passed the House, as POLITICO reported earlier on Friday. The changes are likely to put some moderate GOP senators, who have backed a slower schedule for sunsetting those incentives, in a tough position. They'll be forced to choose between rejecting Trump's agenda or allowing the gutting of tax credits that could lead to canceled projects and job losses in their states — something renewable energy advocates are also warning about. The revised text would retain the investment and production tax credits for baseload sources, such as nuclear, geothermal, hydropower or energy storage, as proposed in the Finance Committee's earlier proposal. But it would make other significant changes, including extending a tax credit for clean hydrogen production until 2028. The panel's earlier proposal would have eliminated the credit after this year. And despite vocal lobbying by the solar industry, the proposal would maintain abrupt cuts to tax incentives supporting residential solar power. The committee's earlier proposal would have eliminated that credit six months after the enactment of the bill; now the updated draft proposes repealing it at the end of this year. It would also deny wind and solar leasing arrangements to residential customers from accessing the climate law's clean electricity investment and production tax credits. And it would move up the timeline for certain rules barring foreign entities of concern from accessing those credits. The bill would move up the termination date for electric vehicle tax credits to Sept. 30, compared to six months after enactment in the earlier Finance text. The credit for EV chargers would extend through June 2026. The new text also provides a bonus incentive for advanced nuclear facilities built in communities with high levels of employment in the nuclear industry. And the bill makes metallurgical coal eligible for the advanced manufacturing production tax credit through 2029.


American Military News
an hour ago
- American Military News
Have 34 felony counts against Trump been dropped after US presidential election?
This article was originally published by Radio Free Asia and is reprinted with permission. Manhattan District Attorney's Office dropped the case against President-elect Donald Trump in which he was convicted of 34 felony counts involving falsifying business records, following his presidential election victory. But the claim is false. Documents released by the court on Nov. 19 show that the prosecution intends to proceed with post-trial sentencing and denies Trump's impending presidency is sufficient grounds to dismiss the case. The claim was shared on X on Nov. 22, 2024. 'Donald Trump's sentencing for 34 criminal charges in the state of New York abruptly adjourned by Judge Merchan without explanation. All charges have been dropped,' the claim reads. Former President Trump secured a second, non-consecutive term by defeating Vice President Kamala Harris in the 2024 U.S. presidential election on Nov. 5. In March 2023, a Manhattan grand jury indicted Trump on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records. The indictment accused Trump of orchestrating hush money payments to adult film actress Stormy Daniels to suppress information about a sexual encounter that she says they had aiming to influence the 2016 presidential election. Trump denies any sexual encounter with Daniels. The payments were purportedly disguised in business records as legal expenses to conceal their true purpose. The claim that the felony accounts against Trump were dropped following the election is incorrect. Charge vs account Chinese social media users appear to have confused the terms 'charges' and 'counts.' A 'charge' refers to a specific crime someone is accused of committing, while a 'count' indicates the number of times the person is accused of committing that crime. In Trump's case, he was accused of one crime – falsifying business records – but was charged with committing it 34 separate times. To be proceeded The Manhattan district attorney offices' charge against Trump has not been dropped. Documents released by the court on November 19 show that the prosecution intends to proceed with post-trial sentencing and denies Trump's impending presidency is sufficient grounds to dismiss the felony counts against him. However, the prosecution noted that it will consider a stay of proceedings, which would pause sentencing until after Trump leaves office after his second term ends in four years. It stated this would allow the court 'to balance competing constitutional interests.' Uncertainties On Nov. 22, the presiding judge Juan Merchan postponed sentencing to receive more arguments from both sides. Trump's lawyers were ordered to file their arguments for dismissal by Dec. 2, while the prosecutors were given until Dec. 9 to submit their arguments for proceeding with the conviction. Given the unique situation of a president-elect awaiting criminal sentencing, the exact outcome of the case is still unclear. While the prosecution has signaled its plans to continue forward with sentencing at some point in the future, Trump's lawyers are still attempting to have the case dismissed. U.S. constitutional law expert Robert Mcwhirter said in an interview with the American broadcaster CBS that any sentencing against Trump would likely be enforced after leaving his second term in office. However, Mcwhirter noted there is 'a slim chance' that he could impose a short prison sentence on Trump before his inauguration in January 2025 or probationary measures during his time in office. Other cases In addition to the Manhattan court case, one other state-level criminal case in Georgia and two federal criminal cases have been brought against Trump . Following Trump's election victory, the Department of Justice dismissed the two federal cases against him on Nov. 25. The case in Georgia is stalled in pretrial procedures and its progress is unclear. A Supreme Court decision from July 2024 ruled that Trump was ineligible to be prosecuted for acts that fall under the president's 'core constitutional powers.' The president's 'unofficial acts' share no such immunity.

an hour ago
Trump's so-called 'One Big Beautiful Bill' inches closer to vote
The Senate is working through the weekend as many Republican leaders try to pass President Trump's so-called 'One Big Beautiful Bill".