Thousands demonstrate in Israel for hostage deal
"The window of opportunity to bring home all 50 hostages - living and dead - is open now, and it won't be for long," one speaker, Eli Sharabi, said at the central rally in Tel Aviv on Saturday, according to the Israeli newspaper Haaretz.
Sharabi was himself abducted during the Hamas-led October 7, 2023 attacks, and held hostage for 16 months in Gaza.
After his release in early February, he learned that his wife and two young daughters had been murdered during the attacks. The body of Sharabi's brother, Yossi, is still being held in Gaza.
Addressing the Israeli government, Sharabi said: "You were elected to serve this people. With humility, with modesty. It is arrogance that brought disaster upon us - and we must not return to this pattern of behaviour".
According to official Israeli figures, 50 people kidnapped from Israel are still being held in the Gaza Strip, at least 20 of whom are believed to be alive.
Israel and Hamas are currently holding indirect talks in the Qatari capital Doha on a 60-day ceasefire, which would also lead to the release of 10 living hostages and the remains of several others.
Sources told dpa on Saturday that the talks had stalled, with the warring parties blaming each other for the lack of progress.
The protesters accuse Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government of dragging out the process with critics saying he is trying to secure his own political survival by delaying steps to end the war.
Thousands of people have demonstrated in Tel Aviv and other Israeli cities, calling for the government to secure the release of the hostages still held in the Gaza Strip.
"The window of opportunity to bring home all 50 hostages - living and dead - is open now, and it won't be for long," one speaker, Eli Sharabi, said at the central rally in Tel Aviv on Saturday, according to the Israeli newspaper Haaretz.
Sharabi was himself abducted during the Hamas-led October 7, 2023 attacks, and held hostage for 16 months in Gaza.
After his release in early February, he learned that his wife and two young daughters had been murdered during the attacks. The body of Sharabi's brother, Yossi, is still being held in Gaza.
Addressing the Israeli government, Sharabi said: "You were elected to serve this people. With humility, with modesty. It is arrogance that brought disaster upon us - and we must not return to this pattern of behaviour".
According to official Israeli figures, 50 people kidnapped from Israel are still being held in the Gaza Strip, at least 20 of whom are believed to be alive.
Israel and Hamas are currently holding indirect talks in the Qatari capital Doha on a 60-day ceasefire, which would also lead to the release of 10 living hostages and the remains of several others.
Sources told dpa on Saturday that the talks had stalled, with the warring parties blaming each other for the lack of progress.
The protesters accuse Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government of dragging out the process with critics saying he is trying to secure his own political survival by delaying steps to end the war.
Thousands of people have demonstrated in Tel Aviv and other Israeli cities, calling for the government to secure the release of the hostages still held in the Gaza Strip.
"The window of opportunity to bring home all 50 hostages - living and dead - is open now, and it won't be for long," one speaker, Eli Sharabi, said at the central rally in Tel Aviv on Saturday, according to the Israeli newspaper Haaretz.
Sharabi was himself abducted during the Hamas-led October 7, 2023 attacks, and held hostage for 16 months in Gaza.
After his release in early February, he learned that his wife and two young daughters had been murdered during the attacks. The body of Sharabi's brother, Yossi, is still being held in Gaza.
Addressing the Israeli government, Sharabi said: "You were elected to serve this people. With humility, with modesty. It is arrogance that brought disaster upon us - and we must not return to this pattern of behaviour".
According to official Israeli figures, 50 people kidnapped from Israel are still being held in the Gaza Strip, at least 20 of whom are believed to be alive.
Israel and Hamas are currently holding indirect talks in the Qatari capital Doha on a 60-day ceasefire, which would also lead to the release of 10 living hostages and the remains of several others.
Sources told dpa on Saturday that the talks had stalled, with the warring parties blaming each other for the lack of progress.
The protesters accuse Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government of dragging out the process with critics saying he is trying to secure his own political survival by delaying steps to end the war.
Thousands of people have demonstrated in Tel Aviv and other Israeli cities, calling for the government to secure the release of the hostages still held in the Gaza Strip.
"The window of opportunity to bring home all 50 hostages - living and dead - is open now, and it won't be for long," one speaker, Eli Sharabi, said at the central rally in Tel Aviv on Saturday, according to the Israeli newspaper Haaretz.
Sharabi was himself abducted during the Hamas-led October 7, 2023 attacks, and held hostage for 16 months in Gaza.
After his release in early February, he learned that his wife and two young daughters had been murdered during the attacks. The body of Sharabi's brother, Yossi, is still being held in Gaza.
Addressing the Israeli government, Sharabi said: "You were elected to serve this people. With humility, with modesty. It is arrogance that brought disaster upon us - and we must not return to this pattern of behaviour".
According to official Israeli figures, 50 people kidnapped from Israel are still being held in the Gaza Strip, at least 20 of whom are believed to be alive.
Israel and Hamas are currently holding indirect talks in the Qatari capital Doha on a 60-day ceasefire, which would also lead to the release of 10 living hostages and the remains of several others.
Sources told dpa on Saturday that the talks had stalled, with the warring parties blaming each other for the lack of progress.
The protesters accuse Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government of dragging out the process with critics saying he is trying to secure his own political survival by delaying steps to end the war.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
7NEWS
44 minutes ago
- 7NEWS
Gazan children collecting water killed by Israeli missile
At least eight Palestinians, most of them children, have been killed and more than a dozen wounded in central Gaza when they went to collect water, in an Israeli strike which the military said missed its target. The Israeli military said the missile had intended to hit an Islamic Jihad militant in the area on Sunday, but a malfunction had caused it to fall 'dozens of metres from the target'. 'The IDF regrets any harm to uninvolved civilians,' it said in a statement, adding that the incident was under review. The strike hit a water distribution point in Nuseirat refugee camp, killing six children and injuring 17 others, emergency physician at Al-Awda Hospital Ahmed Abu Saifan said. Water shortages in Gaza have worsened sharply in recent weeks, with fuel shortages causing desalination and sanitation facilities to close, making people dependent on collection centres where they can fill up their plastic containers. Hours later, 12 people were killed by an Israeli strike on a market in Gaza City, including a prominent hospital consultant, Ahmad Qandil, Palestinian media reported. The Israeli military did not immediately comment on the attack. Gaza's health ministry says more than 58,000 people have been killed since the start of the war between Israel and Hamas in October 2023, with 139 people added to the death toll over the past 24 hours. The ministry does not distinguish between civilians and fighters in its tally, but says over half of those killed are women and children. US President Donald Trump's Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff said on Sunday that he was 'hopeful' on Gaza ceasefire negotiations underway in Qatar. He told reporters in Teterboro, New Jersey, that he planned to meet senior Qatari officials on the sidelines of the FIFA Club World Cup final. However, negotiations aimed at securing a ceasefire have been stalling, with the two sides divided over the extent of an eventual Israeli withdrawal from the Palestinian enclave, Palestinian and Israeli sources said at the weekend. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was set to convene ministers late on Sunday to discuss the latest developments in the talks, an Israeli official said. The indirect talks over a US proposal for a 60-day ceasefire are being held in Doha, but optimism that surfaced last week of a looming deal has largely faded, with both sides accusing each other of intransigence. Netanyahu in a video he posted on Telegram on Sunday said Israel would not back down from its core demands — releasing all the hostages still in Gaza, destroying Hamas and ensuring Gaza will never again be a threat to Israel. The war began on October 7, 2023, when Hamas-led militants stormed into Israel, killing about 1200 people and taking 251 hostages into Gaza. At least 20 of the remaining 50 hostages there are believed to still be alive. Netanyahu and his ministers were also set to discuss a plan on Sunday to move hundreds of thousands of Gazans to the southern area of Rafah, in what Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz has described as a new 'humanitarian city' but which would be likely to draw international criticism for forced displacement. An Israeli source briefed on discussions in Israel said that the plan was to establish the complex in Rafah during the ceasefire, if it is reached. On Saturday, a Palestinian source familiar with the truce talks said that Hamas rejected withdrawal maps which Israel proposed, because they would leave around 40 per cent of the territory under Israeli control, including all of Rafah.
Perth Now
2 hours ago
- Perth Now
Ousted Nedlands boss sells house for $2.9m after court fight
Sacked Nedlands mayor Fiona Argyle has sold her Nedlands property as a development site, blaming neighbours who built next door for 'destroying' her privacy. Argyle sold the 1012sqm Kinninmont Avenue block for $2.9 million last month, with an advert that promised a 'compelling blank canvas' for a 'sought-after development offering'. Speaking while abroad yesterday, Ms Argyle said she sold the property — which included the separate sale of the weatherboard house structure — because her family did not want to live with the neighbouring home looking into her children's bedrooms. 'They destroyed our privacy,' she told House That!. She maintained the neighbouring house was an overdevelopment — a claim she made regularly during a year-long battle to prevent construction — because it did not strictly comply with the R Codes. But she rejected claims that it was a bit rich to play up the density potential in an appeal to developers, and at odds with her highly-publicised stance on promoting green space. Argyle's home in Nedlands sold as a development site. Credit: supplied Her property advert highlighted in-principal approval for three lots and the capacity to 'increase the density significantly' under the R60 zoning, which would allow the block to be carved into six 150sqm lots. 'The choice is yours as to how far you subdivide and how you develop the site,' the advert said. But Ms Argyle yesterday said the advert spoke only about what could be achieved under the planning code. Fiona Argyle house structure has been sold seperately to the block. Credit: supplied Her fight against the neighbours, however, was over breaching aspects of that code. 'I know it sounds ironic but (the advert discusses what is possible under) the planning laws,' she said. 'That is the zoning of the block, and the people who bought it can build what they want with it.' The house is set on a 1012sqm block on Kinninmont Avenue. Credit: supplied Back in 2022, the Argyle-led council rejected plans for the neighbouring home, despite advice from city planning staff that they should approve it. Councillors again refused the application months later after the design was altered during mediation. Ms Argyle had recused herself from voting due to her interest, but it was revealed she had texted a councillor who spoke in favour of the neighbour's application that her comments were 'appalling'. Inside the Nedlands home. Credit: supplied Argyle then applied to intervene as an interested third party when her neighbours took the matter to the State Administrative Tribunal, but her request was rejected. Taking the battle to epic proportions, she then appealed the SAT decision in the Supreme Court, but again failed, with the neighbours securing the right to build. Yesterday she said the failed bid had cost her $90,000 in legal fees. The council also had a costly legal bill of $30,000, while the neighbours had complained of their expenses too. At the time, Ms Argyle tole The West Australian it was her duty to fight. 'The Mayor should be setting the example,' she told The West Australian at the time. 'If I do not have the courage to defend my home from over-development and non-compliance, then what does that signal to the other people in the City of Nedlands?' Ms Argyle said. The family will move into another home in the city of Nedlands.
7NEWS
7 hours ago
- 7NEWS
Does Donald Trump deserve the Nobel Peace Prize? We asked 5 experts
This article first appeared in The Conversation. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has formally nominated US President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize. He says the president is 'forging peace as we speak, in one country, in one region after the other'. Trump, who has craved the award for years, sees himself as a global peacemaker in a raft of conflicts from Israel and Iran, to Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo. With the conflict in Gaza still raging, we ask five experts – could Trump be rewarded with the world's most prestigious peace prize? Emma Shortis Adjunct Senior Fellow, School of Global, Urban and Social Studies, RMIT University. NO Nominating Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize is like entering a hyena in a dog show. Of course Trump does not deserve it. That we're being forced to take this question seriously is yet another indication – as if we needed one – of his extraordinary ability to set and reset the terms of our politics. There is no peace in Gaza. Even if Trump announced another ceasefire tomorrow, it would not last. And it would not build genuine peace and security. Trump has neither the interest nor the attention span required to build long term peace. His administration is not willing to bear any of the costs or investments that come with genuine, lasting diplomacy. And he is not anti-war. There is no peace in Iran. Trump's bombing of Iran simply exacerbates his decision in 2018 to end nuclear negotiations with Tehran. It pushes the world closer to, not further from, nuclear catastrophe. Under the Trump administration, there will be no peace in the Middle East. Both the US and Israeli governments' approach to 'security' puts the region on a perpetual war footing. This approach assumes it is possible to bomb your way to peace – a 'peace' which both Trump and Netanyahu understand as total dominance and violent oppression. The Trump administration is deliberately undermining the institutions and principles of international and domestic law. He has deployed the military against American citizens. He is threatening the United States' traditional allies with trade wars and annexation. His administration's dismantling of USAID will result, according to one study, in the deaths of 14 million people, including 4.5 million children, by 2030. Indulging Trump's embarrassing desire for trophies might appease him for a short time. It would also strip the Nobel Peace Prize of any and all credibility, while endorsing Trump's trashing of the international rule of law. What kind of peace is that? Ali Mamouri Research Fellow, Middle East Studies, Deakin University NO The nomination of Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize by a man who is facing charges of war crimes is an unprecedented and deeply dark irony that cannot be overlooked. Trump's role in brokering the Abraham Accords was hailed as a diplomatic breakthrough. It led to the normalisation of relations between Israel and several Arab countries, including the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and Morocco. But this achievement came at a significant cost. The accords deliberately sidelined the Palestinian issue, long recognised as the core of regional instability, and disregarded decades of international consensus on a two-state solution. Trump's administration openly supported Israeli policies widely considered to violate international law, including the expansion of illegal settlements and the proposed annexation of Palestinian territory. His silence in the face of a growing humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza was equally telling. Perhaps most disturbing was the tacit or explicit endorsement of proposals to forcibly relocate Palestinians to neighbouring Arab countries, a position that evokes ethnic cleansing and fundamentally undermines principles of justice, dignity and international law. In addition, there is Trump's unconditional support for Israel's military campaigns across the region, including his authorisation of attacks on Iranian civilian, military and nuclear infrastructure. The strikes lacked any clear legal basis, contributed further to regional instability and, according to Tehran, killed more than a thousand civilians. His broader disregard for international norms shattered decades of post-second world war diplomatic order and increased the risk of sustained and expanded conflict. Against this backdrop, any serious consideration of Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize seems fundamentally at odds with its stated mission: to honour efforts that reduce conflict, uphold human rights and promote lasting peace. Whatever short-term diplomatic gains emerged from Trump's tenure are eclipsed by the legal, ethical and humanitarian consequences of his actions. Ian Parmeter Research Scholar, Middle East Studies, Australian National University. NO Netanyahu's nomination of Donald Trump for one of the world's most coveted awards was clearly aimed at flattering the president. Trump is clearly angling for the laurel, which his first term predecessor, Barack Obama, won in his first year in office. Obama was awarded the prize in 2009 for promotion of nuclear non-proliferation and fostering a 'new climate' in international relations, particularly in reaching out to the Muslim world. Given neither of these ambitions have since borne fruit, what claims might Trump reasonably make at this stage of his second term? Trump has claimed credit for resolving two conflicts this year: the brief India–Pakistan clash that erupted after Pakistani militants killed 25 Indian tourists in Kashmir in May; and the long-running dispute between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi disputes Trump brokered peace. He says the issue was resolved by negotiations between the two countries' militaries. With regards to the Rwanda–DRC conflict, the countries signed a peace agreement in the Oval Office in June. But critics argue Qatar played a significant role which the Trump administration has airbrushed out. Trump can legitimately argue his pressure on Israel and Iran forced a ceasefire in their 12-day war in June. But his big test is the Gaza war. For Trump to add this to his Nobel claim, he will need more than a ceasefire. The Biden administration brokered two ceasefires that enabled the release of significant numbers of hostages, but did not end the conflict. Trump would have to use his undoubted influence with Netanyahu to achieve more than a temporary pause. He would have to end the war definitively and effect the release of all Israeli hostages. Beyond that, if Trump could persuade Netanyahu to take serious steps towards negotiating a two-state solution, that would be a genuine Nobel-worthy achievement. Trump isn't there yet. Jasmine-Kim Westendorf Associate Professor of Peace and Conflict and Co-Director of the Initiative for Peacebuilding, The University of Melbourne. NO The Nobel Peace Prize recognises outstanding contributions to peace globally. Although controversial or politicised awards are not new, awardees are generally individuals or groups who've made significant contributions to a range of peace initiatives. They include reducing armed conflict, enhancing international cooperation, and human rights efforts that contribute to peace. Inspiring examples include anti-nuclear proliferation organisations and phenomenal women peacemakers. And Nadia Murad and Denis Mukwege, who won in 2011 for their work trying to end the use of sexual violence as a weapon of war. Trump has declared his 'proudest legacy will be that of a peacemaker and unifier'. But he is neither. The president has fuelled escalating insecurity, violent conflict and human rights violations globally, and actively undermined international cooperation for peace. This includes the decision to sanction judges of the International Criminal Court. There has been a concerning trend towards using the Nobel Peace Prize to encourage certain political directions, rather than reward achievements. Barack Obama's 2008 Prize helped motivate his moves toward diplomacy and cooperation after the presidency of George W. Bush. Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed's 2018 award was for efforts to resolve the 20-year war with Eritrea. The peace prize encouraged Ahmed to fulfill his promise of democratic elections in 2020. Embarrassingly, within a year Ahmed launched a civil war that killed over 600,000 people and displaced 3 million more. This week's nomination follows efforts by global leaders to flatter Trump in order – they hope – to secure his goodwill. These motivations explain why Netanyahu has put forward Trump's name to the Nobel Committee. It comes at the very moment securing Trump's ongoing support during ceasefire negotiations is critical for Netanyahu's political survival. Trump has also been nominated by the government of Pakistan and by several Republican figures. Flattery is the currency Trump trades in. These nominations pander to a president who has bemoaned They will never give me a Nobel Peace Prize […] It's too bad. I deserve it, but they will never give it to me. Prizes to genuine peacemakers amplify their work and impact. 1984 winner Desmond Tutu said: 'One day no one was listening. The next, I was an oracle.' A Nobel can be a powerful force for peace. Trump is no peacemaker, he doesn't deserve one. Shahram Akbarzadeh Director, Middle East Studies Forum (MESF), Deakin University NO Benjamin Netanyahu would have us believe Donald Trump is a peacemaker. Nothing could be further from the truth. His record is stained with blood and misery. The fact Trump believes himself to be worthy of the Nobel Peace Prize only attests to his illusions of grandeur in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary. The war in Gaza has gone into its 20th month because Trump did not use the levers at his control to bring the senseless war to a close. Some estimates put the true Gaza death toll at 100,000 people, and counting. They have been killed by American-made bombs Israel is dropping across the densely populated strip; from starvation because Israel has enforced a blockade of the Gaza Strip and prevented UN food delivery with the blessings of America; and from gunshots at food distribution centres, set up with US private security. All under Trump's watch. Trump could do something about this. Israel is the largest recipient of US aid, most of it military support. This has multiplied since Israel commenced its attack on Gaza in response to Hamas terrorism on October 7 2023. Trump has approved the transfer of US military hardware to Israel, knowing full well it was being used against a trapped and helpless population. This is not the act of a peacemaker. Now the Israeli government is planning to 'facilitate' population transfer of Gazans to other countries – a euphemism for ethnic cleansing. This is the textbook definition of genocide: deliberate and systematic killing or persecution of people. Trump legitimised this travesty of decency and international law by promising a Gaza Riviera. The outlandish extent of Trump's ideas would be laughable if their consequences were not so devastating. When Israel attacked Iran in the middle of nuclear talks, Trump had a momentary pause, before jumping to Netanyahu's aid and bombing Iran. He then claimed his action paved the way for peace. Trump's idea of peace is the peace of the graveyard. Disclosure statement: Emma Shortis is Director of International and Security Affairs at The Australia Institute, an independent think tank. Ali Mamouri and Ian Parmeter do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment. Jasmine-Kim Westendorf has received funding from the Australian Research Council. Stream free on
