Rape of 11-year-old: Closing arguments presented in bail hearing
The matter will resume on June 12.
This follows the defence and the State presenting their closing arguments for the bail application.
The accused's lawyer, Frik van Rensburg, said the investigating officer's statement contains no supporting evidence and should not be relied upon.
He pointed out that the child initially denied the alleged rape when questioned by her mother, raising the question of how the court could then accept her version of events.
ALSO READ: State opposes bail as officer testifies in child rape case
'The prompting of the victim could, with all due respect, be indicative of an ulterior motive,' he said.
Van Rensburg said the child was only assisted by her mother when the statement was taken — in English, not her mother tongue.
State prosecutor Kagiso Ralethata argued that the State's case is not weak.
'The only thing outstanding is the DNA results, which could take about nine months. The victim was assessed by a doctor and no independent evidence was handed in to show that the applicant would be acquitted,' he said.
'The contentious point was the circumstantial evidence in the form of a statement from the victim's sister.
'It was highlighted that the witness is out of the country and that the investigating officer has not yet obtained her statement.
'We cannot say whether we will be able to obtain the statement. I will argue that, although the statement is important to a certain degree, it is not a crucial piece of evidence. The State can proceed without it.'
The suspect, who cannot be named to protect the child complainant, was arrested on April 22.
ALSO READ: Rape of 11-year-old: Investigating officer unsure when sibling will return to SA
At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
eNCA
20 hours ago
- eNCA
Worker in critical condition after US immigration raid on California farm
SACRAMENTO - A farm worker was in critical condition on Friday, his family said, after being injured during a raid by US immigration agents on a legal cannabis farm in California that resulted in the arrests of 200 undocumented migrants and clashes with protesters. President Donald Trump, meanwhile, called demonstrators involved in attacks on Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents "slimeballs" and said they should be arrested. In another development, a district judge ordered a halt to "roving patrols" in Los Angeles by federal agents who were detaining suspected undocumented migrants without probable cause and denying them due process. District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong ordered an end to the arrests, which she said were being made "based upon race alone," on whether a person was speaking Spanish or English with an accent or because of their place of work. Trump's remarks and the court order come a day after a chaotic raid on a cannabis plantation in Ventura County some 56 miles (90 kilometers) from Los Angeles left one farm worker critically injured. The United Farm Workers labor union had said in an X post on Friday that the worker had "died of injuries they sustained as a result of yesterday's immigration enforcement action." But the family on a GoFundMe page said he was in critical condition and unlikely to survive. "He was chased by ICE agents, and we were told he fell 30ft (9 meters). My uncle's life is in critical condition; doctors have told us he won't make it. His injuries are catastrophic. His heart is still beating." The Ventura County Medical Center, which told ABC News that he was in critical condition, did not respond to AFP calls for more details. Tricia McLaughlin, a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) spokeswoman, said he was never in custody. "Although he was not being pursued by law enforcement, this individual climbed up to the roof of a green house and fell 30 feet," McLaughlin said. "(Customs and Border Patrol) immediately called a medivac to the scene to get him care as quickly as possible." The DHS said 200 undocumented migrants were arrested during raids on marijuana growing sites in Carpinteria and Camarillo on Thursday and 10 children were rescued "from potential exploitation, forced labor, and human trafficking." Glass House Brands, which owns the farms, said in a statement that it has "never knowingly violated applicable hiring practices and does not and has never employed minors." AFP | BLAKE FAGAN DHS said more than 500 "rioters" had attempted to disrupt the operation and four US citizens are facing charges for assaulting or resisting officers. Tear gas was used against the protesters, some of whom were seen in television footage throwing projectiles at law enforcement vehicles. The department said immigration agency vehicles were damaged and a $50,000 reward was being offered for the arrest of an individual who allegedly fired a gun at law enforcement officers. - Showdown - AFP | BLAKE FAGAN In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump said he had watched footage of "thugs" throwing rocks and bricks at ICE vehicles, causing "tremendous damage." Trump said he was authorizing law enforcement officers who are "on the receiving end of thrown rocks, bricks, or any other form of assault, to stop their car, and arrest these SLIMEBALLS, using whatever means is necessary to do so." "I am giving Total Authorization for ICE to protect itself, just like they protect the Public," he said. Trump, who campaigned on a pledge to deport millions of migrants, has been involved in a showdown over immigration enforcement with Democratic-ruled California for weeks. The Republican president sent thousands of National Guard troops to Los Angeles last month to quell protests against roundups of undocumented migrants by federal agents. California Governor Gavin Newsom has said the troops were not necessary to address the mostly peaceful protests, but his legal efforts to have them removed have failed so far. The cannabis farm in Camarillo was calm during a visit by an AFP reporter on Friday as workers waited in line to collect their belongings and paychecks. AFP | Patrick T. Fallon "We've been here since six this morning asking questions but they're not giving us any information," said Saul Munoz, a 43-year-old Colombian whose son was detained on Thursday. "I just want to know how he's doing," Munoz said. "Bring him back to me and if it's time for us to leave, we'll leave. "The truth is the American dream is no longer really the American dream."
Mail & Guardian
2 days ago
- Mail & Guardian
International anti-corruption court can restore human dignity in Africa
The case for establishing an international anti-corruption court (IACCourt) has been mooted as a feasible solution to address the constraints of domestic systems. Such a court would fill the enforcement gap in the international framework. The right to human dignity is core to a basic understanding of rights and obligations. It is enshrined in the The right to dignity means every single one of us possesses an inherent quality that is intrinsic to our being, and there is an obligation on the state to enshrine and protect that right. Notably, the constitutional court has anchored some of its critical judgments that have defined South Africa's post-apartheid democracy on an understanding of what the right to human dignity means. These cases have touched on a broad range of issues including the The notion of human dignity is both a fundamental rule of law principle and has broader implications related to ubuntu and restorative justice. Following the democratic transition the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) was intended to usher in a new era of democratic accountability. Amnesty would be granted for those who came forward and spoke the truth, and prosecution and sanction would follow for those who refused to walk through the commission's open doors. The TRC, largely, did not achieve its restorative ideals. Political cases were suppressed, reparations have not followed and wide-scale prosecutions did not take place. Fast forward 20 years, the State capture was a crime against the dignity of the nation. Kleptocrats who abuse power to seek personal enrichment of themselves, their families and cronies can be viewed as akin to those who commit treason. Acts of self-interest are in direct contradiction with the interests of society. Private unelected persons, such as the Guptas, the Watsons and others, in collusion with state actors, siphoned off billions of rand from the government in various nefarious deals. These schemes largely involved capturing public procurement, diverting profits from those contracts and, in many cases, laundering the money offshore. Now we have the historical record, the findings and the recommendations. Where are the prosecutions? How much money has been stolen, how much has been traced, and how much has been recovered? It has been reported that Frustration remains that the criminal justice system in many countries is unable to deal with the weight and magnitude of high volume, multi-actor, multiple jurisdiction transactions. These are often linked to racketeering, money laundering, and corruption involving public officials, private persons, and organised crime. Dubai, for example, has become a notorious destination that harbours criminals such as the Guptas and provides a haven for stolen assets, complicating prosecution of crimes across borders. Even with commissions of inquiry, findings and recommendations, cases are slow to be lodged within national systems. This may be characterised by the independence of the prosecution services and judiciary, but they are fundamentally constrained when it comes to delivering quick and effective justice. Over the years, troves of information have been leaked pointing to how certain kleptocratic networks function, but prosecutions and stolen asset recovery have been meagre. In global systems, where no single jurisdiction can be relied upon to have the political will and modalities to go after kleptocrats and their stolen assets, we need alternative solutions. Presently, there is no international institution to hold kleptocrats accountable when the countries they rule are unwilling or unable to do so. The case for establishing an Countries who ratify the IACCourt treaty will give the court jurisdiction to prosecute the core Corruption erodes human dignity by depriving citizens of vital services like healthcare, education, and justice, especially affecting vulnerable communities in Africa. The IACCourt will hold corrupt officials and corporations accountable, restoring dignity through global accountability. By targeting high-ranking offenders and establishing an impartial framework, the court can address corruption where national systems are compromised, promoting justice in weakened states. The IACCourt would complement regional efforts, such as the Particularly through its asset recovery jurisdiction, the IACCourt will create a forum where stolen monies can be recovered and repatriated based on the demands of a particular case. Asset recovery is a critical strategy in the fight against corruption, but too often assets that are recovered, are then returned into a corrupt fiscus. The recovery of stolen assets must be linked to a notion of repatriation that has restorative justice values and provides direct benefits to victims of corruption. Repatriation would mean returning the stolen assets to their rightful place, ensuring that they are used for the benefit of the people who were harmed by the corruption. The As we commemorate the African Union's Anti-Corruption Day, focusing on the theme of Promoting Human Dignity in the Fight against Corruption, the establishment of the IACCourt could significantly contribute to this vision. The IACCourt aligns with the call for accountability and justice. It offers a platform to prosecute high-ranking corrupt officials and recover stolen assets, ultimately restoring human dignity to the communities that have been deprived by corruption. By filling gaps in the current legal system, the IACCourt provides an opportunity for Africans to stand up for their rights and dignity, as we work together to combat corruption across the continent. Karam Singh is the deputy director of Integrity Initiatives International, and Ruth Kolevsohn is the executive director of Good Governance Africa's group governance programmes.
IOL News
2 days ago
- IOL News
Life sentence for Facebook rapist after State's successful appeal
Convicted Facebook rapist, Philani Ndwandwe, had his sentence escalated to a life term imprisonment by the Durban High Court after the State took his 2023 rape sentence on appeal. Image: File A convicted rapist who lured his unsuspecting Facebook victims with the promise of employment before raping them at knife-point recently had his 15-year sentence escalated to life imprisonment. Philani Ndwandwe was sentenced in the Durban High Court after the State took his 2023 rape sentence on appeal. National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) spokesperson, Natasha Ramkissoon-Kara, said Ndwandwe, between July 2018 and April 2020, engaged the complainants on Facebook and promised them employment. 'He would then meet each of the complainants at a specified location in the Amaoti and Congo areas, where he would accompany them further. En route, he would force them into a bush/roadside and rob them at knifepoint and rape them. Following his appearance in the Ntuzuma Magistrate's Court, Ndwandwe pleaded guilty to the five counts of rape and was sentenced to 15 years' imprisonment on each count. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ 'Two of these rape counts attracted the minimum sentence of life imprisonment because one of the complainants was physically disabled and the other rape involved the infliction of grievous bodily harm. While the court did not find any substantial and compelling circumstances to deviate from the minimum sentence of life imprisonment, the court sentenced Ndwandwe to 15 years' imprisonment on each count (including the ones that attracted life imprisonment),' said Ramkissoon-Kara. Aggrieved by the sentences imposed on the two rape counts, which attracted the minimum sentence of life imprisonment, Chief Prosecutor of the Ntuzuma Cluster, Advocate Amy Kistnasamy, referred the matter to the office of the Director of Public Prosecutions in KwaZulu-Natal. 'Based on the merits, it was decided that the State would appeal the sentence. The State applied to the High Court for leave to appeal the sentences. This was granted,' said Ramkissoon-Kara. Representing the NPA, Advocate Kelvin Singh articulated the detrimental consequences faced by the victims, painting a vivid picture of the long-lasting trauma inflicted upon those affected. Singh argued that the trial court was obliged to impose life imprisonment in terms of the minimum sentencing legislation for those two counts of rape, where the minimum sentence of life was applicable. He told the court that the offences of rape violated the complainants' constitutional rights, including their rights to bodily integrity and humanity. Singh quoted cases from the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA), where the court had increased an accused's sentence from six years' imprisonment to life imprisonment, asking that the appeal court employ the same principle in Ndwandwe's matter. 'Further quoting the SCA, Singh mentioned that rape is one of the most invasive and horrendous criminal acts, and that despite the minimum sentencing legislation, this crime is at unprecedented high levels in South Africa,' said Ramkissoon-Kara. The Durban High Court agreed with the State's argument, setting aside the 15 years' imprisonment imposed on the two counts of rape and replacing them with life imprisonment. The court highlighted the violence used on the complainants, the premeditation involved, and the seriousness of gender-based violence as part of its judgment.
