
Is Pakistan's former PM Imran Khan dead?
Several fact-checking websites deemed the video fake and accused the press release of spreading unverified misinformation. Meanwhile, several social media users also spread false reports about Imran Khan escaping jail, adding to the confusion.
First Post claims that the press release was issued by someone impersonating Pakistan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Is Pakistan's former PM Imran Khan dead?
The letter stated, "It is with deep regret and solemnity that we confirm the passing of former Prime Minister Imran Khan in judicial custody. The incident occurred under circumstances that are currently under thorough investigation."
It added, "This development has sent shockwaves across the country and beyond, and the Government of Pakistan acknowledges the gravity of the situation. We are committed to ensuring complete transparency as we determine the causes and accountability behind this tragic event."
Fact-checking website, Boom Live, verified the fake news by contacting Khan's party, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, which confirmed that the press release is false, and pointed out flaws in the document issued.
Additionally, the video that flooded social media is old and was first shared in May 2013, when Imran Khan was injured during an election rally in Lahore, after falling 15 feet from a forklift at a stage.
What's factual is that Imran Khan has been serving a 14-year sentence in Adiala Jail since 2023 on charges of corruption and his involvement in an illegal case with Al-Qadir Trust.
On May 9, Tehreek-e-Insaf filed a court petition for fear of the former Pakistani PM getting targeted by drones from India.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Jordan News
2 days ago
- Jordan News
Jordanians Exempt as Syria Implements New Entry Fee Policy - Jordan News
A decision to revise entry and transit visa fees for Arab and foreign nationals entering Syria came into effect Sunday, as part of what the Syrian Ministry of Foreign Affairs described as a new security and economic entry policy. اضافة اعلان Under Decision No. 128, the fees are to be collected in U.S. dollars or their equivalent based on the official exchange rates set by the Central Bank of Syria. Any fractional amounts are rounded up, and the fees are paid directly at border crossings or Syrian airports. The decision classifies countries into 11 groups, with four countries fully exempt from all entry fees: Jordan, Lebanon, Malaysia, and Mauritania. Additionally, Serbian citizens are allowed to enter Syria free of charge. For other nationalities, the entry fee varies based on entry type (single or transit), length of stay (one, three, or six months), and number of entries. The highest visa fee was set for Iranian citizens, amounting to $400 for a single-entry visa valid for one month. The United States follows with a fee of $200, while citizens of most European countries are subject to a $75 fee. A standard $50 fee applies to any country not specifically listed in the groupings, for a single-entry visa valid for one month. The move comes amid increasing travel to Syria for tourism, investment, and family visits, and reflects the government's aim to regulate border entries and boost state revenue in the post-war recovery phase. Previously, the Syrian Ministry of Interior issued a separate decision grouping countries into ten categories based on bilateral relations and geopolitical importance, with special consideration given to Arab nations and countries with global influence. Key Groups and Entry Fee Details: Group 1 – Visa-Exempt Countries Citizens of these four countries are exempt from entry visas and may stay up to six months: Jordan Lebanon Mauritania Malaysia This exemption is part of Syria's effort to ease travel for citizens of neighboring or strategically aligned countries. Group 2 – Multiple-Entry Visa (3 Months) – $150 Applies to countries with strong bilateral ties with Syria: Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey Despite political fluctuations, Turkey is considered an important economic partner. Group 3 – Single-Entry Visa (15 Days) – $40 or Transit (3 Days) – $25 Includes nations with moderate diplomatic ties to Syria, primarily from: Latin America: Brazil, Argentina, Chile, Venezuela, Colombia, Mexico, Cuba Asia: Nepal, Bangladesh Caribbean/Pacific: Samoa, Fiji Arab world: Yemen (only Arab state in this group) Group 4 – Single-Entry Visa (15 Days) – $75 or Transit – $25 Includes: Eastern Europe/Central Asia: Armenia, Uzbekistan, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Turkmenistan, Ukraine Balkans: Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, North Macedonia, Serbia Asia-Pacific: South Korea, Singapore, New Zealand Group 5 – Single-Entry Visa (15 Days) – $125 or Transit – $30 Includes a large number of Arab and European countries: Arab countries: Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia, Sudan, Libya, Bahrain Western Europe: Spain, France, Germany, Italy The Syrian government says these adjustments reflect a balanced visa policy based on economic, geopolitical, and diplomatic considerations, while also targeting new revenue streams as Syria seeks to reengage with the region and the world.

Ammon
3 days ago
- Ammon
Jordan seeks input from 5 countries on new ambassadors, Qudah to Damascus
Ammon News - The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Expatriates is seeking input from five countries regarding ambassadorial transfers, including the appointment of a new ambassador to Damascus. The Jordanian government has nominated the Director of Operations at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ambassador Sufyan Qudah, to be Jordan's ambassador to Damascus. It also nominated ambassadors Amjad Mubaidin to Ethiopia, Saed Al-Radaydeh to Singapore, Khaled Nayef Al-Qadi to the Netherlands, and Rolan Samara to Kenya. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is also moving to appoint Omar Al-Atoum as Consul General in Dubai.


Roya News
7 days ago
- Roya News
Qatar submits new proposal for Gaza ceasefire: Details
Qatar has put forward a new proposal aimed at securing a ceasefire and a prisoner exchange between 'Israel' and Hamas, according to 'Israel's' public broadcaster Kan 11, citing diplomatic sources on Tuesday evening. The proposal outlines a 60-day truce in the Gaza Strip. On the first day of the ceasefire, eight 'Israeli' captives held alive would be released. Additional captives would be released on the 50th day of the truce, along with the gradual transfer of the remains of 18 deceased 'Israeli' captives, to be delivered in three separate phases. The plan also calls for the withdrawal of 'Israeli' forces to the Morag axis, a former 'Israeli' settlement located between Khan Younis and Rafah in southern Gaza, and a significant increase in the volume of humanitarian aid entering the territory. Sources familiar with the negotiations described the proposal as a 'serious opportunity' for a breakthrough, but acknowledged that key disagreements remain, particularly over the conditions for ending the war and the extent of the 'Israeli' military withdrawal from Gaza. The proposal comes amid intensified regional diplomacy aimed at restarting ceasefire talks, which have stalled in recent weeks. On Tuesday, Qatari Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Mohammed bin Abdulrahman bin Jassim bin Jaber Al Thani held a phone call with his Egyptian counterpart, Badr Abdelatty, to coordinate efforts with the US and explore pathways to a deal. According to a statement from Egypt's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, both ministers stressed the importance of halting the bloodshed in Gaza, securing the release of detainees and captives, and ensuring the unimpeded flow of humanitarian assistance into the Strip. On Monday evening, Egypt's Foreign Minister revealed that Cairo is working on a proposal involving a 60-day ceasefire in exchange for the release of 'Israeli' captives. Despite these efforts, Qatar's Foreign Ministry spokesperson Majed Al-Ansari appeared cautious about the status of the talks. Speaking on Monday, he stated that the current discussions had yet to reach the level of formal negotiations, and that 'it is too early to speak of a timeline for a ceasefire agreement.'