logo
Skateboarding-Hawk puts his history-making '900' skateboard up for auction

Skateboarding-Hawk puts his history-making '900' skateboard up for auction

Reuters4 days ago
June 30 (Reuters) - Skateboarding great Tony Hawk has announced that he is putting his most famous deck up for auction with the goal of raising money to build skateparks in underserved areas.
Hawk landed his groundbreaking "900" - 2-1/2 full mid-air rotations - at the 1999 X Games in a moment that helped propel the sport out of the subculture and into the mainstream.
The Birdhouse "Falcon 2" board is expected to fetch between $500,000 and $700,000 when it goes on the block in Los Angeles on September 23, according to Julien's Auctions.
Hawk called the moment he became the first skateboarder to land the trick in front of a roaring X Games crowd after several failed attempts on June 27, 1999 "the best day of my life."
"It was a huge moment in my career - the result of years of persistence and getting back up after every fall," he said in a press release.
Other items up for sale include Hawk's signed helmet, knee pads, sneakers, and the 1999 X Games Vert Finals bronze medal.
"I never imagined that my board, pads or helmet from that day would be of any interest to collectors," he said.
A portion of the sale proceeds will benefit The Skatepark Project (TSP), Hawk's foundation supporting skatepark construction in underserved communities.
TSP grant programs have awarded over $13 million to help fund nearly 700 public skateparks in all 50 U.S. states, enjoyed by an estimated 17 million people annually, according to the non-profit organisation's website.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Real Madrid vs Borussia Dortmund predictions: Club World Cup tips and odds
Real Madrid vs Borussia Dortmund predictions: Club World Cup tips and odds

Telegraph

time11 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Real Madrid vs Borussia Dortmund predictions: Club World Cup tips and odds

Our expert has tips for Saturday's Club World Cup quarter-final between Real Madrid and Borussia Dortmund at the MetLife Stadium, East Rutherford (kick-off, 9pm BST). We are expecting Madrid to progress to the last four of the tournament. Real Madrid vs Borussia Dortmund tips Madrid to win and under 4.5 goals @ 11/10 with Paddy Power Vinicius Junior 1+ shots on target and to be fouled 1+ times @ 1/1 with Paddy Power Odds courtesy of Paddy Power. Correct at the time of publication and subject to change. Already a Paddy Power member? Check out more free bets from the best betting sites, reviewed by our experts. Familiar outcome awaits Real's familiar foes Real Madrid face quarter-final opponents they know well, having beaten Dortmund 2-0 in the final of the 2023-24 Champions League and 5-2 in the league stage of last season's competition. So we know Madrid should get the better of the German club and they have just defeated European opposition of a similar standard with their 1-0 victory over Juventus in the round of 16. Los Blancos have switched between 4-3-3 and 3-5-2 formations under Xabi Alonso in the USA. With Kylian Mbappe available again, it will be interesting to see which strategy the new manager opts for. Madrid are still in the period of adjusting to new tactics and have yet to click. As such, we can expect a relatively narrow victory. I think that backing them to win, alongside under 4.5 goals, will prove to be a safe bet. Central role for Vinicius Junior? The possible inclusion of Mbappe raises questions regarding where he might slot into the attack. Alonso used a 3-5-2 formation in the last game, with Vinicius Junior partnering Gonzalo Garcia up front. The latter has scored three times and assisted once, so could keep his place, with Mbappe joining the pair in a 4-3-3. Either way, Vinicius seems likely to keep his place. Paddy Power has boosted his odds of having one or more shots on target and to be fouled once or more, from 8/11 to 1/1. The Brazilian has played for 324 minutes during Madrid's four games, having three shots on target and being fouled seven times in that time. All odds courtesy of Paddy Power. Correct at the time of publication and subject to change.

Fans fear The Last Of Us has been 'ruined' after creator quits
Fans fear The Last Of Us has been 'ruined' after creator quits

Daily Mail​

time17 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Fans fear The Last Of Us has been 'ruined' after creator quits

After news spread that the creator of The Last Of Us Neil Druckmann had quit many feared that the series had been 'ruined' before season three has even kicked off. The smash-hit drama, which is named after the highly successful video game, launched in 2023. Pedro Pascal and Bella Ramsey play the lead roles as Joel and Ellie and it follows a group of survivors two decades after a viral fungal infection almost wiped out humanity in its entirety. However, ahead of its third series, the show's creator sensationally quit. The 46-year-old Druckmann was responsible for the thriller's transition from a video game into a multi-season show. Announcing the news on Instagram Neil said: 'I've made the difficult decision to step away from my creative involvement in The Last Of Us on HBO. 'With work completed on season two and before any meaningful work starts on season three, now is the right time for me to transition my complete focus to Naughty Dog and its future projects.' '[This includes] writing and directing our exciting next game, Intergalactic: The Heretic Prophet, along with my responsibilities as Studio Head and Head Of Creative. 'Co-creating the show has been a career highlight. It's been an honor to work alongside Craig Mazin to executive produce, direct and write on the last two seasons.' Reacting to the news, fans flooded social media with comments, as one said: 'Oh god. This will be the final blow to the show.' A second posted: 'The episodes he was the director of were the best and highly rated either in season 1 or 2.' 'Season 3 already flopped even before filming,' said a third. While a fourth penned: 'Season 3 might lose its soul without Druckmann Mazin's good, but this story was born from Neil's mind.' The Last Of Us has proven popular with viewers and even critics, with the series receiving an impressive 94% score on Rotten Tomatoes. Series two concluded in May of this year, with some fans left furious over its ending they branded 'garbage'. It ended on a major cliffhanger over the character of Ellie (Bella Ramsey) and her fate following a confrontation with Abby (Kaitlyn Dever). The finale kicked off by following Ellie as well as Jesse (Young Mazino) and Dina (Isabela Merced) on their third day in Seattle - as Ellie continued her hunt for Abby to avenge Joel's (Pedro Pascal) death that occurred in episode two. The seventh episode - which is titled Convergence - built up to an explosive few minutes, leaving more than one character dead and questions left unanswered. However, viewers were less than thrilled with the finale, with some slamming its pacing and others simply calling it 'trash.'

Is ‘princess treatment' a harmless trend – or yet more fuel for misogyny?
Is ‘princess treatment' a harmless trend – or yet more fuel for misogyny?

The Guardian

time17 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Is ‘princess treatment' a harmless trend – or yet more fuel for misogyny?

Do you wish you were a princess? Do you crave being cosseted and showered with gifts, having every door opened and every chair pulled out? Perhaps you'd rather not pay for your clothes; maybe you're sick of deciding what to eat and where. Courtney Palmer can help. The self-proclaimed housewife princess has a series of TikTok videos on 'princess treatment' and how to get it. It's a matter of accepting compliments graciously, dressing the part, being unapologetically good to yourself (disappointingly, this seems to mean exercising and drinking water) but mostly ministering to your partner, who is treated as a weirdly needy and highly suggestible man-baby. Would-be princesses should create a calm, frictionless domestic paradise for their provider prince, 'speaking in a feminine way – we're not screaming, yelling; we're not cursing', thanking him for picking up his dirty underwear. Princess treatment is the reward and it comes in the form of diamond earrings, Chanel flats, flowers and old-school chivalry. It's emetic and, in a recent TikTok that catapulted Palmer into a more critical spotlight, disturbing. Explaining what princess treatment looks like at a restaurant, Palmer said: 'I do not interact with the waitress; I do not open any doors and I do not order my own food … You do not need to talk unless you are spoken to … You're not going to be laughing loudly, speaking loudly, demanding the attention of the restaurant.' Yikes. Palmer called it 'letting your husband lead and be masculine' and 'a fun princess treatment thing'. Commenters found it cult-like, concerning and bizarre. 'As a former waitress, I would have slipped you a note and asked if you're OK or if I should call the police,' one said. I do wonder how real any of this is. Does 'princess treatment' exist beyond its social-media shop window? Tradwives aren't tradwives, after all – they are content creators, and winding people up with jaw-droppingly regressive gender messaging generates revenue: outrage drives eyeballs and eyeballs mean dollars. Nara Smith, famed for wearing OTT dresses while making her own bubblegum and breakfast cereal, was recently reported by Cosmopolitan to be earning an estimated $200,000 a month on TikTok. Most relationships are nothing like what Palmer presents, or like other pearly-toothed, wholesome TikTok couples who jokily quiz each other on what constitutes princess treatment or a relationship 'bare minimum'. My own husband occasionally gives me 'goose treatment' – a careful wide berth – but our marriage is not a transactional game. Couples of all varieties mostly muddle through, trying to be decent to each other. But Palmer et al are servicing a real aspiration, or at least a relatable fantasy. I get it, kind of – it would be nice if every day were like my birthday (but not nice enough to spend my life cooking and cleaning while wearing broderie anglaise to achieve it). And I suppose that in a time of global turmoil, having a 'provider' can feel like security. But it's the opposite: relinquishing autonomy – bodily, financial, intellectual – leaves women dangerously vulnerable. And this stuff isn't anodyne: it confirms the manosphere's misogynistic assumptions about 'alphas' and 'high-value females', and empowers rollers-back of reproductive rights, reinforcing the idea that it's OK to take decisions on women's behalf (they don't even want to order a side of fries for themselves!). The 'princess' label is pretty accurate. Historically, princesses provided beauty and babies, and were largely powerless; royal marriages were transactional arrangements. And as Hilary Mantel was unfairly criticised for writing about the then-Duchess of Cambridge, princess life is still stultifying, mostly about projecting irreproachable, mute perfection. There's definitely no 'cursing'. Maybe some women enjoy imagining a life of calm, cared-for passivity – but could content at least get more creative? How about 'goddess treatment': demand offerings and sacrifices, keep people on their toes with the prospect of being turned into something nasty? If that's not passive enough, how about 'pet treatment'? Imagine being treated like a house cat: loved unconditionally and lavished with gifts for nothing more than napping, shedding hair, eating, demanding strokes and occasionally lashing out for no reason. If a TikToker could tell me how to get 'cat treatment', I'd definitely like and follow. Emma Beddington is a Guardian columnist

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store