In landmark decision, judge rules California FAIR Plan's smoke-damage policy illegal
Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Stuart Rice on Tuesday said that the California FAIR Plan Assn's policy violates the insurance code because it provides less coverage than what is required by the state's Standard Form Fire Insurance Policy, which provides coverage for all "loss by fire" damages without making any distinction for smoke damage.
Since 2017, the plan has required that fire claims must result in "direct physical loss" as defined by "permanent physical changes" to a property, which owners allege has made it more difficult to be compensated for smoke damage.
The plan issued a notice to its customers that year that said the new definition of direct physical loss "will result in the denial of claims that might have been paid under prior policy wording," Rice noted in his decision, in a case brought by a former Mono County property owner.
"This notice seems to admit that the CFP Policy is less favorable to insureds than the Standard Form Policy," the judge wrote, in declaring the policy illegal.
Hilary McLean, a spokesperson for the plan, said it did not have an immediate comment on the ruling.
Rex Frazier, president of the Personal Insurance Federation of California, which represents major property and casualty insurers, said the ruling could lead to untenable increases in costs for the plan.
"If the case stands for the proposition that the FAIR Plan needs to pay for very expensive lab testing in order to deny a smoke claim, then we will all suffer," Frazier said. "That would dramatically increase claims expenses, which would, without doubt, lead to rate increase needs for the FAIR Plan."
The FAIR Plan's handling of smoke-damage claims has angered homeowners who say that instead of being promptly offered industrial hygienic testing for toxic substances and professional cleaning services - even after homes were infiltrated by soot, ash and other fire debris - they were told to try to clean up their properties and given low-ball offers to close their claims.
The decision could have broad implications given the fast growth of the FAIR Plan, which is based in Los Angeles and operated by the state's licensed home insurers. Long a minor player in homeowners market, it has seen its rolls skyrocket in the last several years as insurers have pulled out of California's home insurance market, citing a growing risk from climate change, resulting in a series of catastrophic fires.
The plan covered less than a quarter-million California homeowners in 2021, but as of March its residential enrollment had reached 556,000. The number of homes on the plan in the Palisades and Eaton fire zones rose nearly 50% last year to 28,440, according to a Times analysis.
"This is a complete game changer," said attorney Dylan Schaffer, who represents the plaintiff in the case.
He said this is the first time a judge has ruled the plan's smoke-damage policy illegal and it could ultimately result in the FAIR Plan changing its policy. "This decision clearly says you can't not pay for these claims. You can't have a policy that doesn't provide coverage for this kind of damage."
Rice also struck down the plan's requirement that smoke damage must be something perceptible rather than detected by laboratory testing. But Schaffer said the plan had already abandoned that provision of its policy since June 2024 after a state Supreme Court ruling in another insurance case.
Plaintiff Jay Aliff sued in 2021 after his river-front cabin south of Lake Tahoe was damaged by the Mountain View fire in November 2020.
The blaze damaged the roof and broke windows, allowing soot and ash to infiltrate the interior. However, the plan only agreed to pay $2,724.03 after subtracting depreciation and his deductible, even though Aliff claims the on-site adjuster estimated the damage at $7,034, according to his lawsuit. Aliff has since sold the property.
The plan amended its fire dwelling policy in 2012, when it added language that said smoke damage must be "visible to the unaided human eye" or capable of being "detected by the unaided nose of an average person" rather than being perceptible "by the subjective senses of (the insured) or by laboratory testing."
Schaffer said that provision led to the rejections of more smoke claims, a problem that escalated after 2016. That was when the FAIR Plan sought approval from the state Department of Insurance for a new policy form that changed the definition of "direct physical loss" to require "permanent physical changes."
In seeking approval from the department, the plan told regulators that the new policy language might result in a "broadening" of coverage, according to the Aliff lawsuit. But after receiving complaints about how the plan was handling smoke-damage claims, state regulators in 2022 conducted a market conduct examination of the plan's smoke-policy language and claims procedure.
The report found that in seeking approval of its new definition of "direct physical loss," the FAIR Plan "omitted relevant facts and misrepresented revised language as providing broad or broader coverage than the policy provided previously." The plan denied its policy was illegal, prompting the department to threaten possible "administrative action."
The report also found that from Jan. 1, 2017, through March 18, 2021, the plan violated California's Code of Regulations and Insurance Code 418 times. The violations included issuing fire policies that failed to meet state codes, failing to cover all by fires and failing to "diligently pursue a thorough, fair and objective investigation" of claims, including more than 200 involving smoke damage.
Victoria Roach, the plan's president, defended the insurer's handling of smoke-damage claims during an Assembly Insurance Committee hearing this year. She contended that the policy provides adequate coverage, even though it asks policyholders to first try to clean up their own properties.
"Smoke or ash in a house is not necessarily covered if it hasn't damaged anything. Now, sometimes smoke, in and of itself, will damage things, right? It'll damage the walls. It'll damage porous surfaces, a lot of times, the carpets, the couches, the mattresses, things like that. If it's beyond repair, we'll cover it if it needs to be repaired," she said.
The lawsuit originally sought class action status but that request was rejected by Rice in December. In his most recent decision, the judge also ruled that the FAIR Plan did not violate the state's Unfair Competition Law, because it was not proved that Aliff had actually suffered any economic loss due to the policy.
Rice admitted this was an "incongruous" result, but said that was only because it was a high legal hurdle to prove such a matter before trial - and that Aliff may eventually win on this issue at trial.
Schaffer said he plans to file additional unfair competition motions with more evidence prior to trial, because a favorable decision on the law would allow him to seek a court injunction forcing the plan to change its smoke-damage policy statewide.
That might apply not only to new and outstanding claims, but also to cases closed since 2017, the attorney said. The plan has received thousands of such claims since then, including those from the Jan. 7 fires, he said.
Amy Bach, an attorney and executive director of United Policyholders, a San Francisco insurance advocacy group, said the judge's decision was "profound" and would force the FAIR Plan to change how it handles smoke-damage claims aside from any injunction.
"You have a court of law telling the FAIR Plan, what we have been telling them, what people have been telling them, what lawyers have been telling them, what the Department of Insurance told them: 'Your language is is illegal. You can't use it, and now you're going to have to make it right.'"
The losses suffered by Los Angeles County homeowners have spawned multiple lawsuits against insurers and the plan.
Schaffer's Oakland-based firm Kerley Schaffer has filed lawsuits against the plan over its smoke-damage policy dating back to 2017, including proposed class actions in Alameda and Butte counties.
Most recently his firm has teamed with Edelson, a large Chicago-based law firm, to represent victims of the Palisades and Eaton fires who have filed multiple lawsuits against the plan over its smoke-damage policy.
Other law firms have filed lawsuits over the plan's policies since the Jan. 7 fires. Two lawsuits filed in April accuse hundreds of insurers of colluding to drop policyholders and force them onto the plan, which offers limited policies that typically cost more.
Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
California senior dropped by her insurer went from paying $1,100 to nearly $8,000 under 'last resort' plan
Sandy Vignolo is speaking out after her annual insurance premiums increased a staggering amount. The Dutch Flat, California senior is paying nearly $8,000 for fire insurance alone — plus a separate liability policy — after she spent $1,100 to cover her home just a few years ago before her insurer dropped her policy, according to ABC10. 'We've had to dip into savings to pay that,' Vignolo told the broadcaster in a story published July 4. 'There's a lot of people around here … that it has gone beyond what they have.' Don't miss Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it Vignolo signed up for the state's FAIR plan, the high-cost fire insurance of last resort, for coverage when she was dropped by her insurer. Suzanne Vidal, another Dutch Flat resident, told ABC10 an elderly neighbor of hers is now paying $15,840 on the FAIR plan, compared to just $1,800 in 2020. 'People are losing their homes,' Vidal told the broadcaster. 'Even if they don't have a mortgage and they're paying that much for insurance, that's hard to come by if you're on fixed income. Let's say you're making $1,200 to $1,800 a month in Social Security. There's just no way you can do it.' 'Maybe next year' However, the state is promising better insurance offerings to come. Reforms being rolled out by insurance commissioner Ricardo Lara's 'Sustainable Insurance Strategy' are meant to help homeowners get off the FAIR plan and into better private insurance offerings. 'Definitely by no later than the end of this year, starting of next year, you'll start seeing more correction in the market,' Lara told state lawmakers on July 2. Deputy insurance commissioner Michael Soller says a market correction means more competition, per ABC 10. But Vidal, a real estate broker, remains skeptical. Read more: Americans are 'revenge saving' to survive — but millions only get a measly 1% on their savings. 'They told us this in my industry a year ago, that this year was going to be totally different. The first of the year, a lot of these companies were going to come back into our market with insurance available at reasonable or sensible prices,' Vidal said. 'Now it's, 'Maybe next year.'' Meanwhile, she and Vignolo warn that many elderly residents of California simply can't wait that long for insurance prices to come down. Cope with high insurance costs If you are living in a high-risk area, one that is prone to severe weather and high crime rates, you are advised to shop around as much as possible for coverage. Homeowners can contact their insurer if they receive a non-renewable notice to find out if there are any steps they can take to retain their coverage. If you feel your non-renewal was unfair, you may be able to file a complaint with your state insurance department. If your home is deemed uninsurable due to old plumbing, outdated electrical or other issues, it may be necessary to find a means of bringing these up to code so that you can retain your insurance coverage. California's Department of Insurance recommends that homeowners who have tried to find private insurance look into the non-admitted/surplus lines market to find coverage. For users of the FAIR plan, they also recommend supplementing your coverage with a private policy to extend your coverage beyond fire protection. If your insurance costs have increased substantially, it may be time to consider shopping for a new plan, or even reducing your coverage to bring down the total cost of your bill. The California Department of Insurance offers a Homeowner Coverage Comparison Tool to help you compare offers and find the right insurance plan for you. What to read next Robert Kiyosaki warns of 'massive unemployment' in the US due to the 'biggest change' in history — and says this 1 group of 'smart' Americans will get hit extra hard. Are you one of them? How much cash do you plan to keep on hand after you retire? Here are 3 of the biggest reasons you'll need a substantial stash of savings in retirement Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


San Francisco Chronicle
3 days ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
California wants regular insurers to grow. But it's the FAIR Plan that's growing faster than ever
A decade ago, the California FAIR Plan was a true insurer of last resort. It insured less than two in every 100 homes in the state. Today, it is one of the largest insurers in California. New data from the FAIR Plan shows the insurers' presence is growing faster than ever before, adding nearly 90,000 new policies in the first half of 2025 alone — a sign that California's insurance crisis remains in full swing, despite tentative signs of progress. Homeowners on the FAIR Plan describe it as unaffordable and inadequate. A base FAIR Plan policy only covers damage from fire, lightning and explosions, requiring policyholders to pay for a separate, second policy to cover burst pipes, liability and anything else. It also caps overall coverage at $3 million per residential policy — enough for most homes, but not at the high end. But for more than 591,000 homeowners, condo owners and renters, there is in essence no other choice. 'The more we grow, it's just indicative of a less stable market. It shows that the market is in an unhealthy state right now, because more and more people are coming to the FAIR Plan,' FAIR Plan President Victoria Roach testified to the Assembly Insurance Committee in May. For Matt Wiser, affording insurance now means deferring repairs on his car and cutting back on the number of trips he makes to the bookstore or to have dinner with his girlfriend. Wiser was forced on to the FAIR Plan last year when his previous insurer, State Farm General, informed him they wouldn't renew his policy unless he'd complete a laundry list of wildfire mitigation measures — including tearing down the shed that's been on the property since Wiser's great-grandfather owned it. The amount of work was overwhelming and unaffordable, and so Wiser set out to find new insurance. He learned from local brokers that no private insurer would write new policies in his ZIP code — a swath of Fresno County that stretches from the relatively flat and grassy part of Auberry, where Wiser lives, deep into Sierra National Forest. Wiser does what he can to reduce his wildfire risk. He regularly mows, weedwhacks and brings in horses and mules to graze grasses that might otherwise fuel a fire. He passes annual inspections from Cal Fire and has a letter from his local fire department testifying to his efforts. Still, because of the overall high risk in his ZIP code, Wiser said no insurance company will send someone out to recognize the work he does. 'It is incredibly maddening, incredibly frustrating. The people who are making those decisions are city folks in air-conditioned offices, and by and large, they've never even been to the areas where they're making these decisions,' he said. 'We are judged by the ZIP code and not individual circumstances.' Now, Wiser is on the FAIR Plan, alongside 277 others in his ZIP code. Since 2019, the FAIR Plan's policy count in his ZIP code has more than doubled, now making up an estimated 47% of all insured residences. If Wiser had done all of the work and kept his State Farm policy, his premium still would have risen by about 60%, he said. But now he's paying about $5,200 a year, 85% higher than he used to, for the FAIR Plan plus a wraparound policy. Data disclosed by the FAIR Plan earlier this month shows that its policyholders pay anywhere from $91 to more than $20,000 per year, but it's not the price that weighs the heaviest on Berkeley hills resident Sharon Drager — it's the coverage limits. Three decades ago, Drager's home burned down in the 1991 Oakland Hills fire, a wind-whipped blaze that destroyed more than 3,000 homes and set a record at the time for the deadliest urban wildfire in California. But through insurance, Drager was eventually able to recover and rebuild. Both the home that burned and the one she rebuilt were insured by State Farm — at least up until last fall, when she was one of nearly 30,000 customers to be told their insurance would not be renewed due to risk of wildfires and fires following earthquakes. (A State Farm spokesperson said the decision to nonrenew thousands of customers was 'not made lightly' and was a necessary step to stabilize the company's financial condition.) Drager searched for a replacement, but no private insurer was willing to give a quote for the full value of her home. So she turned to the non-admitted, or surplus line, market — insurance companies that are not subject to California's pricing regulations. Even when she chose a high deductible, none of the quotes were remotely affordable. 'The numbers were astronomical. One quote was $40,000 a year,' Drager said. 'I had to give up. There was nothing available to me that I could afford.' So Drager wound up on the FAIR Plan, though she fears she is still underinsured. Over the past few years, as insurers cut back on writing new policies and not renewing existing customers, the FAIR Plan has grown faster and faster. Still, its recent growth doesn't mean the insurance crisis is still getting worse — it just means it hasn't yet begun to get better, said David Russell, a professor of insurance at CSU Northridge. While some of the FAIR Plan's growth comes from homeowners like Drager and Wiser who were dropped by their insurers, much of it likely reflects people moving, or purchasing a home for the first time, only to find the FAIR Plan is their only option. Many home insurers have restricted where they'll write new policies, and others — including State Farm and Allstate — have stopped taking on new customers at all. Once homeowners get on the FAIR Plan, it's hard to get off — Roach, the insurer's president, told legislators that in 2023, the average FAIR Plan customer had been with the FAIR Plan for about five-and-a-half years. New regulations, finalized at the end of last year and slated to take full effect soon, aim to get more private insurers to take up customers like Drager and Wiser. These reforms alter the way insurance companies are allowed to set their prices, which align California more closely with the rules in other states, but are also expected to lead to increased prices for many homeowners. In order to use these new regulations, private insurers will have to commit to writing more policies in designated 'distressed' areas — counties and ZIP codes where wildfire risk and the share of FAIR Plan policies is high. Those who already write a significant number of high-risk policies will be required to maintain their presence there. Deputy Insurance Commissioner Michael Soller said the department expects insurance companies to submit their first filings under the new reforms this summer. Part of that will include explicitly telling regulators how many more policies they'll be writing and by when. Throughout the process, Soller said regulators will be keeping a close eye on whether companies are truly writing more policies and where they're writing them. Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara has said a key measure of success will be seeing people move off from the FAIR Plan. Some insurers have already begun writing more policies in anticipation, Soller added. Drager is eager for the day a traditional insurer will take her again — but it hasn't come yet. Having rebuilt her home after a wildfire once, she's well aware of how coverage limits that seem high can be quickly eaten up by the costs of debris removal, replacing personal belongings and rebuilding a house from the foundation up — especially in an area like the Berkeley Hills, where construction is expensive. When she first made the switch to the FAIR Plan, the overwhelming anxiety of being underinsured kept her awake at night. Now she has resigned to it. 'I can't fight it,' she said. 'There was nothing personally I could do. My whole neighborhood is affected by this.'


Bloomberg
6 days ago
- Bloomberg
Food Is Once Again a Hot Election Issue as Japan Goes to Polls
Soaring rice prices have become a flashpoint for public frustration in Japan, and a key issue in the upcoming election. Welcome to the new Business of Food newsletter, covering how the world feeds itself in a changing economy and climate, from farming to supply chains to consumer trends. This week, Sakura Murakami looks at the political power of rice in Japan. Any tips or feedback? Email food czar Agnieszka de Sousa. And if you aren't yet signed up to receive this newsletter, please do so here.