
The world wants China's rare earth elements – what is life like in the city that produces them?
But a short drive into the city's suburbs reveal another typical, less hospitable, Chinese scene. Factories crowd the city's edges, with chimneys belching white plumes of smoke. As well as steel and silicon plants, Baotou is home to China's monopoly on rare earths, the metallic elements that are used in oil refining equipment and car batteries and that have become a major sticking point in the US-China trade war.
More than 80% of China's rare earth reserves are in Baotou. Metals such as cerium and lanthanum are crucial for modern technologies ranging from smartphone screens to vehicle braking systems. Certain rare earths, such as samarium, are used in military-grade magnets, including by the US.
That has made them a useful bargaining chip for Beijing in the trade war. China has long objected to Washington's embargo on the export of advanced semiconductors to China, and now appears to be returning in kind by cutting off western manufacturers from critical elements in their supply chain.
In April, Beijing restricted the export of several rare earths, before agreeing to reinstate export licences for some of them after recent talks in London.
The restrictions have already had global effects, with Ford temporarily closing a car factory in Chicago because of the shortage. On Monday, a Ford executive said the company was living 'hand to mouth' to keep its factories open. In a fiery speech last week, the president of the European commission, Ursula von der Leyen, accused China of 'weaponising' its dominance of the rare earths supply chain. Access to the commodities is reportedly top of the agenda for an upcoming EU-China summit.
Rare earths have been central to life in Baotou since long before the region's geology made global headlines.
The metals were first discovered in China in Bayan Obo, a mining district 150km north of Baotou, in the 1930s. But production did not ramp up until the 1990s, when China entered a period of rapid economic reform and opening up. Between 1990 and 2000, China's production increased by 450% to 73,000 metric tonnes. At the same time, production in other countries, namely the US, declined, giving China a near monopoly on the global supply. In 2024, the government's quota for rare earths production was 270,000 tonnes. The Bayan Obo mining district is now a closely guarded community of people living in the shadow of massive mines and their toxic waste products.
Baotou's rich reserves of natural resources have been good for the economy. The city's GDP per capita is 165,000 yuan (£17,000), compared with the national average of 95,700 yuan, although locals grumble about an economic slowdown, which is affecting the whole country. According to state media, last year the industry generated more than 100bn yuan for the city for the first time. But the industry also has an environmental impact.
Toxic, often radioactive byproducts of rare earths processing are dumped into man-made ditches known as 'tailings ponds'. One of the most notorious tailings ponds in the area is the Weikuang tailings dam, owned by the state-owned Baogang Group. For many years it was the world's biggest dumping ground for rare earths waste products. It was not properly lined and there were fears about its toxic contents seeping into the groundwater and towards the nearby Yellow River, a major source of drinking water for northern China. According to the Ministry for Ecology and Environment, a clean-up project of one of the Yellow River's tributaries in Baotou resulted in levels of ammonia nitrogen, a rare earths processing byproduct, decreasing by 87% between 2020 and 2024.
In the 2000s and 2010s, investigations into the villages around Baotou revealed orthopaedic problems, birth defects and an 'epidemic' of cancer. Because microscopic rare earth elements can cross the blood-brain barrier and deposit in the brain, exposure has been linked to a number of neurological problems such as motor and sensory disabilities, and they can also affect the neurological development of foetuses in pregnant women.
A study published in 2020 found that children in Baotou were particularly likely to be exposed to rare earth elements through road dust, something that the researchers described as a 'serious risk'. Another study found that the daily intake of airborne rare earths elements in mining areas was up to 6.7mg, well above the 4.2 mg level that is considered to be relatively safe.
'Large-scale extraction quite often proceeds at the expense of the health and well-being of surrounding communities, pretty much regardless of the context,' says Julie Klinger, an associate professor at the University Delaware who specialises in rare earths.
Although the technologies to process rare earths in less environmentally harmful ways exist in theory, they are rarely used because of cost.
'I doubt they could maintain their production costs if they took such steps,' says Craig Hart, a lecturer at John Hopkins University who focuses on rare earths.
Environmentalists note that part of the reason that China has been able to dominate global supplies of rare earths at competitive prices is because, as well as being rich in natural resources, it has also been willing to let poor, rural people bear the brunt of the toxic, dirty work. But now China wants to clean up its image.
In 2022, state media announced that Baotou's major tailings pond had been transformed into an urban wetland. Birdwatchers could come and enjoy the pristine waters of the newly purified pond, which apparently attracted a range of migratory birds. When the Guardian visited the site of the new birders paradise, however, most of the site was blocked from view behind a newly built concrete wall. A peek over the wall revealed an expanse of arid mud. Around the area the demolished remains of the once notorious 'cancer villages' were scattered among rusting pipes and dilapidated warehouses. One overgrown, abandoned dumpling restaurant was the only evidence of the communities that used to live there.
At the site of another village once cited locally as having particularly high cancer rates, a large silicon factory occupied the area.
It's not clear where the residents have been moved to. A nearby, newly built complex of multi-storey apartment buildings appeared to be intended as housing for the relocated villagers, but few people roamed the streets. Local officials physically blocked the Guardian from speaking to any residents around the villages.
Baotou's local government did not respond to a request for comment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


North Wales Chronicle
23 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Amazon and Microsoft harming competition in cloud computing, finds CMA
The final report from an independent inquiry group of the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has found that Microsoft and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are hurting competition in the cloud computing sector. Microsoft came under particular fire, with the panel's report saying it has 'significant market power' with some of its software products. It raised concerns over the way Microsoft charges Amazon and Google to use its software, which it said is driving up costs. The report recommends that the CMA uses new powers to give Microsoft and AWS so-called strategic market status in order to 'remedy the harms to competition that we have found'. 'This would enable the CMA to impose targeted and bespoke interventions to address the concerns we have identified, including with respect to features where there are specification risks around the design of effective market interventions,' according to the report. The CMA will now launch a probe into whether to hand them 'strategic market status', but this would not start until 2026 as it focuses efforts on proposals announced last week to assign this status to Google and Apple over their mobile platforms. The panel found that a lack of competition in the £9 billion cloud sector could be leading to higher costs, less choice and innovation, and a lower quality of services for businesses across the UK. AWS and Microsoft's Azure each have up to around a 40% share of consumer spend in the market, with Google lagging behind in third place. On Microsoft, the report said: 'Microsoft's licensing practices are adversely impacting the competitiveness of AWS and Google in the supply of cloud services, particularly in competing for customers that purchase cloud services which use the relevant Microsoft software as an input. 'As a result, Microsoft faces weaker competitive constraints from AWS and Google, its most significant competitors, which is reducing competition in cloud services markets.' Annual results from Microsoft on Wednesday showed booming sales in its Azure cloud computing business, with revenues for the division surpassing 75 billion US dollars (£57 billion) on an annual basis. A Microsoft spokesperson said: 'The CMA panel's most recent publication misses the mark again, ignoring that the cloud market has never been so dynamic and competitive, with record investment and rapid, AI-driven changes. 'Its recommendations fail to cover Google, one of the fastest-growing cloud market participants. 'Microsoft looks forward to working with the digital markets unit toward an outcome that more accurately reflects the current competition in cloud that benefits UK customers.' A spokesperson for AWS said the report 'disregards clear evidence of robust competition in the UK's IT services industry'. They added: 'The action proposed by the inquiry group is unwarranted and undermines the substantial investment and innovation that have already benefited hundreds of thousands of UK businesses. 'It risks making the UK a global outlier at a time when businesses need regulatory predictability for the UK to maintain international competitiveness.' But Google welcomed the findings and called for 'swift action'. Chris Lindsay, Google Cloud's vice president of customer engineering in the EMEA (Europe, the Middle East and Africa) region, said: 'The conclusive finding that restrictive licensing harms cloud customers and competition is a watershed moment for the UK. 'Swift action from the (CMA's) Digital Markets Unit is essential to ensure British businesses pay a fair price and to unleash choice, innovation and economic growth in the UK.' The Computer and Communications Industry Association (CCIA) cautioned there was a risk that the 'overly broad and prescriptive intervention' recommended could hamper investment in the UK and access to new technology. Matthew Sinclair, CCIA UK senior director, said: 'If the CMA goes ahead with these changes it would undermine the UK's competitiveness as business users here no longer get access to the latest cloud services.'


Auto Car
23 minutes ago
- Auto Car
The CEO of Jaguar and Land Rover is retiring after two years in the top job
In a recent interview with Autocar, Mardell revealed that he had driven the new GT and said it was the "most fun I've had" in his time as JLR boss. "It was stunning in terms of its speed, its acceleration, its performance, but also how it delivered the power with a real sense of character," he said. "The chassis team are really excited about the possibilities of the vehicle.' Speaking more generally about Jaguar's prospects as an all-electric luxury brand, Mardell said he was "certain we will have wait lists which are significant relative to the volumes we aspire for with the first product'. He continued: "In today's market conditions, I don't see anything which is going to concern me about the success of the new Jaguar in this new world at all, actually.' Mardell leaves JLR in a position of far greater stability than that it was in when he took the top job, but the company still faces strong headwinds. Chief among those is the imposition of new tariffs on foreign-built cars in the crucial US market, which accounts for a huge proportion of sales of JLR's most profitable models. The UK recently secured a trade deal that reduced the US import tariff on its exported cars from an initially mooted 25% to 10%, which is good news for the Solihull-built Range Rover models and the Halewood-produced Range Rover Evoque and Discovery Sport. But that levy only applies to the first 100,000 cars shipped to the US in a year, meaning any JLR models shipped above that number are liable to attract the higher 25% fee. Similarly, while the EU has now struck a deal with the US, cars shipped from the region to North America will still attract a 15% tariff, which will have significant implications for the Defender and Discovery, both built in Slovakia. Mardell's eventual replacement will also have to negotiate JLR's inevitable shift to a pure-electric line-up over the coming years, in the face of waning global demand for premium EVs.


The Guardian
24 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Canada braces as tariff deadline looms and talks with the ‘chaos machine' in the US drag
After months of tariff threats from the US and escalating trade tensions that have sowed anger in Canada and fractured a once-close alliance, the country is now fast approaching a 1 August deadline to reach a deal with the Trump administration – which has shown no signs of backing down. And observers are keeping a close eye on negotiations this week to determine whether too large a chasm has grown between the countries, resulting in what could be an explosive end to what was decades of free-flowing trade. Canada is also in a highly vulnerable position, as it has closely intertwined its economy with the US's, and is extremely reliant on a low-barrier trade environment, said William Huggins, an assistant professor in economics at McMaster University in Ontario. 'Canada has tried to negotiate sort of forcefully from a position of not acquiescing to every demand, but by the same token, has also realised it's not in the strongest position to do so … We've had to navigate carefully,' said Huggins. The Canadian public is also anxiously awaiting the deadline to strike up a deal. Economists and political scientists say the country's prime minister, Mark Carney, was elected on the belief that he's the right person to be at the helm of negotiations and lead Canada through a tenuous period with their southern neighbour. His successes or failures in this arena could affect public perception – as he has characterised his government as being the most adept in the crisis around its sovereignty due to the tariffs and Donald Trump's persistent claims that he'd like to make Canada the 51st state. '[Carney] is in a situation where he doesn't hold all the cards and whoever we put in was going to have to figure out a way through this … [His] ability to plan is severely limited by the chaos machine that is operating south of the border,' said Dennis Pilon, the chair of the politics department at York University in Ontario. On Monday, Carney said at a news conference on Prince Edward Island that the trade negotiations are at an 'intense pace' and that they are 'complex'. But he projected tentative optimism, stating that the negotiations are 'tough' because the government is standing up for Canadian interests. 'There is a landing zone that's possible but we have to get there. We'll see what happens,' he told reporters. But Trump spoke of the negotiations flippantly when asked by reporters outside the White House last Friday. 'We haven't really had a lot of luck with Canada … Canada could be one where there's just a tariff, not really a negotiation,' he said. So far, much of the talks have happened behind closed doors. There was a glimpse into what could be the dynamic between Carney and Trump when the prime minister had his first meeting with the president in the Oval Office in early May. There were positive tones in both initially offering praise for each other, but the encounter quickly grew tense as Trump repeated his annexation claims, which were subsequently rebuffed by Carney. Since March, Trump has imposed several tariffs on Canadian goods and energy resources. There is a 25% tariff on all goods, excluding potash and energy products. But there's separately a 10% tariff on energy resources, including potash. Additionally, there's a further 50% tariff on steel and aluminum imports and a 25% tariff on autos and auto parts. At this stage, the tariffs have seemingly not delivered a significant blow to Canada's economy, but that could change quickly. The Royal Bank of Canada noted in its June forecast that nearly 90% of Canadian goods are exempt from tariffs under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), the free trade deal that replaced Nafta in 2020 and which provides a degree of insulation. In an assessment published by the Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD) on Tuesday, it reported that energy exports have not been significantly affected by the tariffs, as most exports are compliant under the USMCA, and are therefore exempt from tariffs. Some of the insulation so far from tariffs could be from opening Canada up to other markets. TD said that in the past four months, Canadian businesses rapidly moved to reorient supply chains and export to non-US markets. Now about 30% of exports go outside the US – a level not seen since the pandemic, when TD notes there was disorientation in trade. But TD also warned that the negative effects of the tariffs might be beginning to emerge. It said that Canadian exports to the US are 'generally underperforming' in tariff-targeted industries, particularly steel and automaking. Canada's auto exports fell to levels not seen since late 2022, following the April imposition of tariffs. Automakers have also 'slashed' production in response, it said. Andrea Lawlor, an associate professor of political science at McMaster University, said that while there haven't been many layoffs or a complete reorientation of production lines yet, industries targeted by tariffs are preparing to do so. Lawlor also said that Carney has been prudent in his negotiation strategy so far, and right in waiting for deals to be brokered between the US and other nations, as they were this month with Japan and the EU, to help inform Canada's strategy. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion And despite concerns about marred relationships with First Nations people, pushing forward controversial infrastructure legislation and his quick scrapping of Canada's digital services tax – which many, including top former diplomats, viewed as fawning capitulation toward Trump – the prime minister is still enjoying fairly positive polling in his term's infancy. Abacus Data reported at the end of June that 52% of Canadians surveyed approve of the Carney government. The research firm states it shows that his post-election honeymoon period is 'far from over'. Lawlor said the best outcome for Carney in the negotiations is a favourable trade deal – however, there has been signalling from Carney, in his discussion of 'tough' talks so far, that Canadians may have to accept a baseline of tariffs. 'Many Canadians just simply will not be satisfied if that is the outcome,' she said. But due to Carney facing limited criticism of his interactions with the Americans so far, Lawlor said she believes the prime minister will not face extreme negative blowback if he doesn't trounce tariffs for good this week. But he will be more vulnerable if the tariffs start to place downward pressure on multiple industries, she said. As Canadians are waiting and watching for the Friday deal deadline, the real fears are around the cementing of a new world order and whether long-term business and consumer decisions need to be made in response, said Preetika Joshi, an assistant professor at McGill University in Quebec that specialises in taxation. 'If you were a business owner and you knew Trump is going to be in power for only three, four years, would you necessarily make big, significant changes in your supply chain … or would you just wait it out?' she said. But given some grim messaging from those close to Carney – Canadians might be facing tough decisions. Dominic LeBlanc, the federal minister responsible for Canada-US trade, said last week there's a lot of work ahead of them and minimised the 1 August deadline. 'We're going to continue to work toward the 1 August deadline,' said LeBlanc to reporters in Washington. 'But all of these deadlines are with the understanding that we'll take the time necessary to get the best deal,' he said. Deal or no deal, the negotiations might reveal that there isn't a best-case scenario, said Joshi. 'What we were used to before Trump, where there were very little tariffs, that reality is slightly over,' she said. 'We'll have to wait and see … but the reality is that there are going to be some tariffs.'