One month on, what are Lee Jae Myung's top policy priorities?
Less than a month into the Lee Jae Myung administration, several of his key policy priorities are starting to take shape.
Below is a breakdown of top policy moves based on the announcements from the presidential State Affairs Planning Committee, tasked with coming up with a blueprint for how Lee will run the country for the next five years, and the ruling Democratic Party of Korea.
As a candidate, Lee had pledged to take away the public prosecution service's investigative functions entirely.
Shortly after Lee took office, the Democratic Party announced sweeping bills that would abolish the prosecution service and set up new bodies instead.
Under the bills, prosecutors would completely lose their authority to investigate, including any supplementary role in police investigations. Prosecutors would only decide whether or not to indict the accused, based on the results of an investigation they did not conduct.
This raises concerns that gaps in police investigations, which would have been revisited by prosecutors under the existing system, could be left open. It would also no longer be the prosecution's job to ensure an investigation is properly executed.
Until now, prosecutors have handled white-collar crimes involving powerful people, while the police have taken charge of "street crime."
According to the rival People Power Party, the Democratic Party's push to significantly slash the prosecution's role in the criminal justice process is motivated by the criminal charges against the president as well as the allegations surrounding his close aides.
The Lee administration has proposed a supplementary budget totaling some 13.2 trillion won for cash handouts to all South Koreans. Each person would get up to 520,000 won in the form of digital vouchers under the proposal. This is intended to encourage spending and stimulate the economy, according to the Democratic Party.
On top of the direct cash aid, small businesses will be eligible for the cancelation of up to 50 million won per business in outstanding and defaulted loans. The Democratic Party says debts accumulated during national crises such as COVID-19 and the "insurrection" -- referring to former President Yoon Suk Yeol's controversial martial law decree that lasted six hours -- should be the government's responsibility.
The People Power Party says these stimulus measures only promote moral hazard and raise inflation concerns. "What kind of message does it send to people who have worked hard to pay back their loans themselves?" said Rep. Park Soo-young, a People Power Party member on the parliamentary finance committee.
A shift in emphasis away from nuclear power as an energy source and toward renewables was one of Lee's main policy pledges.
In the supplementary budget proposal, some 120 billion won has been set aside for renewable energy such as solar and wind. Key renewable energy clusters in the country are located in the Jeolla provinces, which are traditional Democratic Party strongholds. One policy challenge is how to build a system that will transport power generated in these southern provinces to Seoul and rest of the country.
This marks a reversal of the focus on nuclear power under the previous Yoon administration.
One of the most frequent key phrases in announcements by the Lee administration has been artificial intelligence.
Last week, Lee recruited two AI experts from the country's largest tech companies -- Ha Jung-woo from portal site Naver's AI innovation team as his chief aide for AI policies, and Bae Kyung-hoon of LG's AI research as minister of science and technology.
Lee pledged to make South Korea the world's top AI power, vowing to invest some 100 trillion won into the sector.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
31 minutes ago
- Korea Herald
Judges' meeting on judicial independence ends without consensus
Judges divided over Supreme Court case involving President Lee A national meeting of South Korean judges ended without agreement on Monday, as members remained divided over how to respond to the Supreme Court ruling on President Lee Jae Myung's alleged election law violations. According to the National Association of Judges, the Monday meeting was to address the ongoing controversy surrounding the judiciary, sparked by the Supreme Court ruling issued during President Lee's presidential campaign. Proposals related to key issues such as judicial independence and public trust in the courts were largely opposed, and all five motions put to a vote were rejected. The judges previously decided not to pass a resolution, opting instead to continue discussions after the June 3 presidential election due to concerns that their decision could influence the election. One of the key issues was the association's commitment to ensuring fair trials by monitoring the legal procedures in Lee's case, analyzing the causes of the controversy and discussing measures to resolve it. Among the 90 judges who attended the meeting, 56 expressed the view that the proceedings of Lee's election law violation case were conducted legally, and so the association decided not to issue an additional statement on the matter. Another item on the agenda was whether judicial independence was undermined by the Democratic Party of Korea's lawmaker-led decision to summon and investigate Supreme Court Chief Justice Jo Hee-de after the ruling. While 19 judges believed that the then main opposition party's measure constituted a serious breach of judicial independence, 67 opposed the proposal. The remaining proposals were all voted down. These included proposals that would have addressed criticism directed at the Supreme Court's unusually swift handling of Lee's criminal case -- including its expedited appeal trial and selective review of the lengthy case record -- which raised doubts about the court's political neutrality. The National Association of Judges announced that it would not announce any official statement or make proposals as its members were divided, with some believing the top court's ruling undermined public trust in the judiciary, while others argued that a collective opinion on the validity of the ruling could be seen as judicial overreach. The special meeting, held by judges from courts at all levels nationwide, is convened to express opinions or make recommendations on judicial administration and the independence of the judiciary.
Korea Herald
an hour ago
- Korea Herald
South Korea to have 118 days off next year
More holidays may be added if substitute days are designated South Koreans will have a total of 118 days off, including weekends and holidays, in 2026, a day fewer compared to this year, the Korean Aerospace Administration's calendar guideline showed Monday. The longest holiday will be the five-day Lunar New Year set from Feb. 14 to 18. Korea will see 52 Sundays and 20 additional public holidays, including substitute ones, amounting to a total of 72 days off work for a regular employee who works five days a week. But the actual number of days off for holidays would be 70, with the March 1 Independence Movement Day and Buddha's Birthday falling on Sundays. It remains unclear whether substitute holidays will be designated for either day. Public holidays combined with weekends would result in 122 days off. However, with some holidays falling on Saturdays, the number effectively stands at 118. There will be eight holidays that span three days or more. This includes Lunar New Year and the Chuseok holidays from Sept. 24 to 27. There will be five cases of three-day 'long' weekends next year, such as National Foundation Day and Christmas. Details of the calendar guideline can be found on the KASA website (
Korea Herald
2 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Korea's softspoken COVID-19 hero poised to return as health chief
Jeong Eun-kyeong, trusted pandemic leader to face looming virus threat, aftermath of unresolved doctor-government conflict As a public health official, Jeong Eun-kyeong is a rare name that many South Koreans recognize. While Jeong had served in public health for decades prior to the pandemic, most came to know her from her leadership at the top of the country's main disease control agency as COVID-19 raged and eventually subsided. When President Lee Jae Myung named Jeong to lead the Health Ministry on Sunday, many of the public health experts who had worked with her cheered. For over two years from COVID-19's onset in February 2020, Jeong was the national doctor that South Koreans counted on for guidance as the country navigated through an unprecedented virus crisis. At least for the first year, she led briefings watched by the whole country, several times a week if not daily, on the COVID-19 situation and safety rules to follow. Jeong was the trusted face of the government's virus response, while politicians and non-experts in higher offices fumbled. The word in the community of infectious disease experts in South Korea at the time was that Jeong was the lonely voice of science in the government, while politicians attempted to meddle in efforts to fight the virus by trying to ease or drop measures too early. Aidedby high compliance with masking and other rules from the public, South Korea was, during its first few waves of infections at least, a model country to the world. Then-President Moon Jae-in and the politicians in the administration tried to claim the credit, but the true hero behind the scenes was Jeong, those with intimate knowledge of what went on agree. Jeong was so well-liked by South Koreans that she was spared by lawmakers of both sides from the annual National Assembly hearings throughout the time she was in charge of COVID-19. This bipartisan decision to let Jeong off the hook in parliamentary hearings scrutinizing the government's response to the pandemic was met by little protest at the time. When Jeong joined Lee's presidential campaign this April, it was a surprise. The softspoken COVID-19 leader, despite her level of public recognition, had made sure to keep a low profile. She rarely gave press interviews and avoided mixing with politics until she left office and disappeared from public sight in October 2022 to work at Seoul National University Hospital as a researcher. Jeong's nomination as health minister comes amid worries about the possible advent of a new virus. From the 2009 H1N1 flu to the 2015 Middle East respiratory syndrome to the 2020 COVID-19, past record shows that a novel virus outbreak tends to strike every five to six years. If another such public health emergency should occur, Korea would be in experienced hands with Jeong. COVID-19 isn't the first infectious disease Jeong had battled in public office. During the 2015 outbreak of MERS, a deadlier if less contagious coronavirus than COVID-19, she headed the disease prevention division at the public health agency. There are also warning signs of a COVID-19 resurgence in the summer. According to a government report published June 10, COVID-19 cases were on the rise for two consecutive weeks in wastewater surveillance. She also inherits an unresolved standoff between doctors and the government over the medical school admissions quota and a series of reforms introduced by former President Yoon Suk Yeol. How the Health Ministry under Jeong will navigate the aftermath of a conflict that partially disrupted the medical system remains unclear. Jeong is a preventive medicine specialist trained at Seoul National University. She first set foot in the public health agency in 1995. arin@
