
When it comes to Iran, failure isn't an option for Trump, US
Iran's long-standing quest for nuclear weapons was at least set back for many months, and probably several years.
Many parties had much to gain from the ceasefire:
For Israel, a relief from the imminent threat of Iran, and from the punishment of the Iranian missiles.
For Iran, an end to Israeli efforts at regime change; for the neighbors in the region, a relief from the fear of a widening conflict.
For Russia, the preservation of its strategic partner, Iran.
For China, an end to the imminent threat to its fuel and gas transiting the Strait of Hormuz.
For President Trump, a validation of his judgment that overwhelming American power could be effective in ending a conflict without embroiling us in a "forever war," an end to the split of his MAGA supporters, and wide acknowledgement of his personal role in creating the ceasefire.
Crown prince of Iran: Israel weakened Iran regime. World must help finish the job | Opinion
What happens now for Iran and the rest of the world?
But now what?
Israel has been highly successful in the use of military force over many decades in the region - from the 1948 war of independence, through the 1956 war in Sinai, the 1967 preemptive war against Egypt, Jordan and Syria, the 1973 war, the 1982 invasion of Lebanon, strikes against the PLO in Tunisia in 1985, and later operations in Lebanon and Gaza.
U.S. military action in the Gulf War in 1991 and the invasion of Iraq in 2003 were also highly successful. At this time, Israel, with U.S. help, has stripped Iran of its protective shields of Hezbollah and Hamas, and Iran, without effective air defenses, is laid bare.
But outstanding military operations are not sufficient - they must be followed by successful work to end the roots of the conflict. Not once has this happened in the Middle East. Hatred, resentment, anger, terrorism and war have become endemic to the region.
This is the moment to end the pattern of continuing conflict. But that requires new appreciation among the leaders in the region of the realities underscored by this latest bout of conflict.
Iran, you're not going to have a nuclear bomb, no matter what. And if you continue to seek it, your regime will be defeated along with the destruction of your country. Israel, you cannot continue to use force with impunity - even with the best technology, your own people are vulnerable.
To others in the region: Israel and the Palestinians are both permanently in the region; and with all due respect to the different religion, sects, and ethnicities at play, and the pain of history, both must be accommodated, accepted, and, ultimately, embraced as part of a thriving and prosperous Middle East.
If there was ever a moment for fundamental change within the region, this is it. The world has come face to face with the potential of a spiraling conflict. Many of the Gulf States have achieved unprecedented wealth and are on the path to world-leading economic, social and technical advances. The region is still and will likely remain the center of global energy production, distribution and investment. There is everything to gain from seizing this moment.
Gen. Wesley Clark: Trump needs to push Putin hard to end war in Ukraine - now | Opinion
This is the moment for American leadership
But how to proceed?
Based on the model followed by President Clinton in dealing with the Balkans in the 1990's, it is best to start with a set of principles agreed upon objectively, by those outside the conflict but with the influence and will to deal with the respective parties. The principles must be fair and practicable. It required many weeks of shuttle diplomacy for the much simpler issues in the Balkans, and then, ultimately a 78-day air campaign by NATO in parallel with Presidential-level mediation by outside parties. In all, it entailed more than five years of continuous effort by the United States.
In this region, the issues are deeper and more complex, but certainly among the principles, Iran must renounce its efforts, overt and covert, to destroy the state of Israel, and Israel must respect the rights of the Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza to govern and develop their own self-governing state.
Terrorism against Israel must be halted. Countries in the region must participate in rebuilding the Palestinian homeland in the West Bank and Gaza. Sanctions against Iran will be lifted, and Iran will be provided the materials it needs for peaceful nuclear energy. Progress must be phased and accompanied by confidence-building measures. Perhaps the Abraham Accords will be fully implemented, and the U.S. will provide a security umbrella for all in the region. International organizations will no doubt remain part of the solution. Perhaps Russia and China, and other interested parties will be invited as observers.
Iran today is a wounded tiger. Maybe 400 kilograms of highly enriched uranium is still available, maybe some other country will provide nuclear weapons or materials. Revenge will be sought. We cannot permit the next conflict - it could well go "nuclear." So neglect or failure are not options.
This is the moment for American leadership. It is the moment for President Trump to exercise his broader vision for strategic realignment of the region, and in so doing, to end the Middle East as a cockpit for continuing conflict.
Wesley K. Clark is a retired four-star general who served as commander of U.S. Southern Command and then as commander of U.S. European Command/Supreme Allied Commander, Europe.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
32 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on Donald Trump's China deal: rare earths pave the green road to militarisation
It's an irony that the minerals needed to save the planet may help destroy it. Rare earth elements, the mineral backbones of wind turbines and electric vehicles, are now the prize in a geopolitical arms race. The trade agreement between Washington and Beijing restores rare earth shipments from China to the US, which had been suspended in retaliation against Donald Trump's tariffs. Behind the bluster, there has been a realisation in Washington that these are critical inputs for the US. They are needed not just by American icons such as Ford and Boeing but for its fighter jets, missile guidance systems and satellite communications. This understanding suggests that Washington will scale back some of its countermeasures once Beijing resumes delivery of rare earths. The paradox is that to reduce its dependence on China, the US must depend on Beijing a little longer. This is not yet decoupling; it's deferment. That, however, may not last. Mr Trump has signed an executive order to boost production of critical minerals, which encourages the faster granting of permits for mining and processing projects. He eyes Ukraine and Greenland's subterranean riches to break dependence on China. The west became so reliant on a single geopolitical rival for such materials – materials it once extracted and refined domestically before shuttering operations – due to cost and environmental concerns. China, for its part, has come to dominate global rare earth processing. It has used that market power before – notably against Japan in 2010. It's hard not to think that it was strategic complacency that led to the west relying so heavily on China for key minerals. This month's Nato summit has seen the west push to reindustrialise via rearming itself. This is also reawakening long-dormant extractive ambitions in the global north. Canada, flush with critical mineral deposits, says its planned mining resurgence will be a new foundation for alliance solidarity. This month the EU called for strategic reserves of rare earths 'to prevent supply chain disruptions and economic blackmail from China' – highlighting their importance not just for electric vehicles but for defence and aerospace industries. 'Resilience' means digging deeper at home and controlling extraction abroad. The same minerals we need for net zero are being justified in terms of zero-sum rivalry. It is uncomfortable that 'green growth' and militarism have merged into a single policy frame, collapsing the distinction between ecological transition and arms buildup. A magnet for an electric car is also a magnet for a hypersonic missile. And meanwhile, the human and ecological toll continues to rise – largely out of sight and out of sync with the idea of environmental sustainability. A Guardian dispatch last week from Baotou, China's rare earth capital, found evidence of toxic ponds, poisoned soil and demolished 'cancer villages' – the hidden cost of our digital and electric age. Framing this as an inconvenient necessity risks repeating past mistakes. For mineral-rich nations, the surge in global demand brings opportunity. But as a UN report this year noted, without strong institutions and safeguards, it risks a familiar fate: corruption, conflict and environmental ruin. Today's scramble for critical minerals must not see the promises of responsible sourcing give way to a familiar logic – extract first, moralise later.


The Independent
44 minutes ago
- The Independent
Man dies after medical incident at music festival with event forced to shut early and crowds evacuated
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.


Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
‘Bombs went through like butter' Trump declares as he rips critics who claim US attacks didn't destroy Iran nuke sites
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) DONALD Trump has celebrated his blitz on Iran again as he described US bombs as going through enemy nuclear sites "like absolute butter". The proud president has been on a week long victory lap since he dropped 12 30,000lb bunker busting bombs on Tehran. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 7 Donald Trump has celebrated his blitz on Iran again as he described US bombs as going through enemy nuclear sites 'like absolute butter' Credit: Fox 7 The Fordow plant before and after the the US bombed the site Credit: Reuters 7 The moment the missile hit the earth in the test footage 7 The US joined Israel on decimating Iran's key nuclear facilities on June 21. Trump hailed the strikes at the time and said they obliterated their targets as planned despite some claiming the hits were less successful than first thought. Three sites were reportedly hit including the main target - the Fordlow nuke plant. Tehran has admitted since that Operation Midnight Hammer and the joint Israeli attacks did cause "excessive and serious" damage. read more in Donald Trump WARPED CROWD 'Death to America' chants ring out at funeral for Iran top brass killed in war Speaking this morning with Fox News' Maria Bartiromo on Sunday Morning Futures, Trump said the bombs easily performed as expected. He explained: "The bomb went through it, like it was butter, like it was absolute butter. "It was obliterated like nobody's ever seen before. And that meant the end to their nuclear ambitions at least for a period of time." Trump also hit out again as those who had tried to say his strikes have only set back Iran's nuclear development program a few months rather than years. A leaked Defense Intelligence Agency report first casted doubt on President Trump's "obliterated" claim. The report, published by CNN and The New York Times, claimed they did not destroy Iran's nuclear capability by any genuine means. White House fuming over top secret leak on Iran nuke site bombing as Don attends key summit Others had speculated online that Iran had been trying to remove the enriched uranium from the base so they could rebuild their operations once the US left. The preliminary report even stated that Iran had managed to shift much of the uranium safely out - a claim Trump and US officials vehemently deny. Responding to those claims, a defiant Trump said: "A lot of people have said, well, 'do you think they're going to start again?' "I said, the last thing they want to do right now is think about nuclear. They have to put themselves back into condition, in shape." The war in the Middle East lasted just 12 days as it quickly turned into a major conflict when Trump decided to strike the Iranian nuclear sites. The attacks helped to end the war, according to Trump, with both Israel and Iran quickly declaring they had won the fight afterwards. Iranian Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, 86, claimed victory over Israel and America despite his country being hammered for almost two weeks. The supreme leader ludicrously claimed Iran had almost crushed Israel and the government in Tel Aviv was on the verge of collapse. That's despite the IDF controlling the skies over Tehran, assassinating dozens of top generals and nuclear scientists, and destroying dozens of valuable missile batteries in just 12 days of fighting. Even with a ceasefire being agreed upon, Trump made it clear he would "absolutely" consider bombing Iran again if it was ever needed. He told reporters in the White House he would "without question" attack the country if US intelligence pointed towards Iran enriching uranium to concerning levels. It comes as Iran held a funeral for the commanders wiped out in the war. The event was severely plagued by "Death to America" chants and the burning of Israeli flags across the day. 7 Trump sat in the Situation Room of the White House a day before the US strikes Credit: AFP 7 Trump had posted this Truth shortly after launching the strikes Credit: Truth Social