"We Don't Watch News, YouTube Interviews": Chief Justice On Probe Agency Remark
In response to a remark asking the Supreme Court not to be swayed by the "narratives" against the central probe agency, Enforcement Directorate, Chief Justice B R Gavai on Monday said, "We do not watch news and watch YouTube interviews".
A bench of CJI Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandran was hearing a suo motu case over the ED summoning senior lawyers Arvind Datar and Pratap Venugopal for rendering legal opinions to their respective clients.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Centre, shared concerns and said the issue had been taken up at the highest level and the probe agency asked to not issue notices to the lawyers for rendering legal advice.
Mr Mehta, however, pointed out attempts to malign institutions by creating false narratives.
"As far as general observations are concerned, sometimes misconstrued, depending upon individual cases. I am saying this, not the ED, there is a concerted effort to create a narrative against an institution. My lords may find in a few cases where there is overstepping...," the solicitor general said.
"We are finding this (overstepping by ED) in many cases, it is not like we are not finding," the CJI said.
CJI Gavai, who was indisposed a week ago, added, "We don't watch the news; haven't seen YouTube interviews. Only last week I managed to watch a few movies."
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
Bihar SIR will disenfranchise lakhs, distort voter rolls ahead of polls, ADR warns Supreme Court
New Delhi: Ahead of the Supreme Court hearing on July 28, the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), a key petitioner challenging the Bihar Special Intensive Revision (SIR), has warned of the imminent exclusion of lakhs of electors ahead of the state assembly polls. ADR says this will distort the adult-to-elector ratio and vests "excessive discretionary power" in Electoral Registration Officers (EROs), enabling arbitrary disenfranchisement. ADR has also argued that the Election Commission's move to seek fresh proof of citizenship from already enrolled voters violates the Supreme Court's 1995 Lal Babu Hussain ruling, which held that the onus lies only on new applicants, not existing electors. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Cybersecurity others Digital Marketing Technology Public Policy healthcare Degree PGDM Leadership Project Management MCA Healthcare Finance Artificial Intelligence MBA Design Thinking Data Analytics Management Operations Management Data Science Others CXO Product Management Data Science Skills you'll gain: Duration: 10 Months MIT xPRO CERT-MIT xPRO PGC in Cybersecurity Starts on undefined Get Details RJD MP Manoj Jha , also a petitioner, has termed the exercise unconstitutional, contending that only the Centre, not the EC, has the legal authority to determine citizenship. He warned that with the final rolls due on September 30-just weeks before elections-appeals against wrongful deletions cannot be settled before polling, depriving citizens of their right to vote. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Why seniors are rushing to get this Internet box – here's why! Techno Mag Learn More Undo Draft roll 'meaningless' without documents Calling the SIR a "grave fraud" on Bihar's voters, ADR says inclusion in the draft rolls is meaningless without mandatory document submission. It has also held ECI has given' no valid reason' for exclusion of Aadhar, EPIC, and ration card from the list of documents. Citing ground surveys, including from Bharat Jodo Abhiyan, ADR says fewer than half of Bihar's 18-40 age group hold the EC-specified eligibility documents. With polls expected in October-November, many voters either without documents or missing from the draft roll will have no time to secure inclusion. The impact of deletions will be more severe if clusters of migrant voters are concentrated in a few constituencies, ADR warns. ERO 'unchecked discretion' ADR also challenges the procedure for EROs, who must verify each elector's inclusion or exclusion from August 1. It says the June 24 SIR order lacks a defined process for scrutinising forms or verifying supporting documents, giving EROs "broad, unchecked discretion" and risking large-scale disenfranchisement. Live Events A single ERO is expected to handle forms for over three lakh people, making due diligence "humanly impossible". With little time to hear appeals before final roll publication, voters in the midst of appeals risk being excluded and losing their franchise. Elector-adult ratio drops ADR points to a sharp drop in Bihar's elector-to-adult population ratio-from 102% in 2019 to 97% in 2024-signalling under-enfranchisement. With Bihar's adult population projected at 8.18 crore in July 2025, maintaining the 97% ratio should yield a roll of at least 7.93 crore. "Instead, SIR has slashed the figure further, bringing the total to just 7.24 crore. That leaves 94 lakh eligible adults off the draft electoral rolls ," ADR's rejoinder says.
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
YouTuber with 50 lakh followers held for dressing as priest & uploading video
Meerut: A 25-year-old man from Moradabad has been arrested for allegedly uploading objectionable content on his YouTube channel, which has over 50 lakh subscribers. Police said a complaint was filed by a local resident accusing Mohd Aamir of producing "abusive, malicious, and propagandist content" while dressed as a priest. "Further investigation revealed that Aamir had uploaded videos containing hate speech and vulgar language following which he was arrested and produced before the court," said SP (City) Kumar Ranvijay Singh. An FIR was registered against Aamir and his team at Pakbara police station under BNS sections 197-1 (imputations prejudicial to national integration), 353-2 (public mischief), 352 ( breach of peace), and relevant provisions of the IT Act. After securing bail from a magistrate's court on Saturday, Aamir posted an apology video on social media. "My videos are meant purely for entertainment and I don't want to hurt anyone's religious sentiments. If I have hurt anyone with my videos, I apologise. From now on, I won't upload such content again and will only post entertaining videos," he said. Meanwhile, police said they have recovered more objectionable videos from Aamir and are searching for members of his team involved in scripting and filming them. "Our social media unit is actively monitoring such content. Others uploading similar videos will also face action," the SP added.
India Today
42 minutes ago
- India Today
There's still hope: Delhi's old vehicle ban to be reviewed by Supreme court
In a major development that could reshape how Delhi balances clean-air mandates with evolving vehicle technology, the Supreme Court will hear a crucial plea on July 28 regarding the absurd ban on older petrol and diesel vehicles in the Delhi-NCR region. The hearing comes in light of a petition filed by the Delhi government seeking a review of the court's 2018 order enforcing end-of-life restrictions, particularly on Bharat Stage VI (BS VI)-compliant matter will be heard by a bench led by Chief Justice B R Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandran, and is expected to explore whether the existing rules, originally designed for older, more so-called polluting vehicles, are still justified in an era of advanced emission norms.A ban rooted in air quality emergencyThe ban traces back to a 2015 order by the National Green Tribunal (NGT), which prohibited diesel vehicles older than 10 years and petrol vehicles older than 15 years from operating in Delhi-NCR. The Supreme Court upheld this directive in 2018, citing public health and environmental protection. Recently, the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM) sought to enforce a related measure by halting fuel supply to these 'end-of-life' vehicles from July 1, an order that has now been deferred to November due to public backlash and logistical petition: Science over age In its application, the Rekha Gupta-led Delhi government argues that the blanket age-based restriction is 'no longer scientifically or technically justified' in light of significant advancements in vehicle emissions technology, especially with the implementation of BS-VI norms in April 2020. These vehicles emit up to 80% less particulate matter and 70% less nitrogen oxides than BS IV the ban 'disproportionate and impractical,' the government emphasises that many well-maintained BS-IV and BS-VI vehicles with up-to-date Pollution Under Control (PUC) certificates and limited usage patterns contribute negligibly to overall pollution. The petition stresses that roadworthiness and emissions should be evaluated scientifically, through regular testing mechanisms under the Motor Vehicles Act and Central Motor Vehicles Rules, rather than being dictated by arbitrary age on the publicThe Delhi government warns that the current ban disproportionately affects middle- and lower-income groups who rely on used vehicles for essential mobility. For many, these vehicles remain roadworthy and compliant with emissions standards, yet face de-registration and denied access to fuel purely due to Minister Majinder Singh Sirsa underlined the government's position, stating, 'We need data-backed policy, not blanket bans. Pollution needs to be tackled, yes, but in a way that is fair and scientifically accurate.'Call for a scientific reviewadvertisementThe Delhi government has urged the Supreme Court to direct either the Centre or the CAQM to conduct a comprehensive scientific study to assess the actual environmental benefits of the age-based ban. The petition also highlights that vehicular emissions are only one of many contributors to Delhi's hazardous air quality, alongside stubble burning, industrial pollution, construction dust, and unfavourable weather lies ahead?If the Supreme Court acknowledges the merits of this review plea, it could pave the way for a landmark shift from age-based scrappage policies to more nuanced, emission-centric regulations. Such a move would not only protect cleaner vehicles from premature "death" but also bring India closer to adopting international best practices in pollution control and sustainable outcome of the July 28 hearing will be closely watched by policymakers, environmentalists, automakers, and millions of vehicle owners across Delhi-NCR, potentially setting a national precedent for the future of vehicle regulation in to Auto Today Magazine- EndsMust Watch
