UN adopts resolution on Afghanistan's Taleban rule over US objections
The resolution is not legally binding but is seen as a reflection of world opinion. The vote was 116 in favor, with two - the United States and close ally Israel - opposed and 12 abstentions, including Russia, China, India and Iran. Since returning to power in Afghanistan in 2021, the Taliban have imposed harsh measures, banning women from public places and girls from attending school beyond the sixth grade.
Last week, Russia became the first country to formally recognize the Taliban's government. Germany's UN Ambassador Antje Leendertse, whose country sponsored the resolution, told the assembly before the vote that her country and many others remain gravely concerned about the dire human rights situation in Afghanistan, especially the Taliban's "near-total erasure' of the rights of women and girls.
The core message of the resolution, she said, is to tell Afghan mothers holding sick and underfed children or mourning victims of terrorist attacks, as well as the millions of Afghan women and girls locked up at home, that they have not been forgotten. US minister-counselor Jonathan Shrier was critical of the resolution, which he said rewards "the Taleban's failure with more engagement and more resources." He said the Trump administration doubts they will ever pursue policies "in accordance with the expectations of the international community.'
"For decades we shouldered the burden of supporting the Afghan people with time, money and, most important, American lives,' he said. "It is the time for the Taliban to step up. The United States will no longer enable their heinous behavior.' Last month, the Trump administration banned Afghans hoping to resettle in the US permanently and those seeking to come temporarily, with exceptions.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Kuwait Times
an hour ago
- Kuwait Times
US-backed aid group proposed ‘Humanitarian Transit Areas' in Gaza
GAZA STRIP: A controversial US-backed aid group proposed building camps called 'Humanitarian Transit Areas' inside - and possibly outside - Gaza to house the Palestinian population, according to a proposal reviewed by Reuters, outlining its vision of 'replacing Hamas' control over the population in Gaza.' The $2 billion plan, created sometime after February 11 for the US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, or GHF, was submitted to the Trump administration and recently discussed in the White House, according to a source familiar with the matter. The plan, reviewed by Reuters, describes the camps as 'large-scale' and 'voluntary' places where the Gazan population could 'temporarily reside, deradicalize, re-integrate and prepare to relocate if they wish to do so.' The Washington Post made a reference to GHF plans to build housing compounds for Palestinian non-combatants in May. A slide deck seen by Reuters goes into granular detail on the 'Humanitarian Transit Zones,' including how they would be implemented and what they would cost. It calls for using the sprawling facilities to 'gain trust with the local population' and to facilitate US President Donald Trump's 'vision for Gaza.' Reuters could not independently determine the status of the plan, who submitted it, or whether it is still under consideration. The aid group, responding to questions from Reuters, denied that it had submitted a proposal and said the slides 'are not a GHF document.' GHF said it had studied 'a range of theoretical options to safely deliver aid in Gaza,' but that it 'is not planning for or implementing Humanitarian Transit Areas (HTAs).' Rather, the organization said it is solely focused on food distribution in Gaza. A spokesperson for SRS, a for-profit contracting company that works with GHF, told Reuters 'we have had no discussions with GHF about HTAs, and our 'next phase' is feeding more people. Any suggestion otherwise is entirely false and misrepresents the scope of our operations.' The document included the GHF name on the cover and SRS on several slides. On February 4, Trump first publicly said that the US should 'take over' the war-battered enclave and rebuild it as 'the Riviera of the Middle East' after resettling the population of 2.3 million Palestinians elsewhere. Trump's comments angered many Palestinians and humanitarian groups about the possible forced relocation from Gaza. Even if the GHF proposal is no longer under consideration, the idea of moving a large portion of the population into camps will only deepen such worries, several humanitarian experts told Reuters. The White House did not respond to a request for comment. The proposal was laid out in a slide presentation that a source said was submitted to the US embassy in Jerusalem earlier this year. The US State Department declined to comment. A senior administration official said, 'nothing of the like is under consideration. Also, no resources are being directed to that end in any way.' The source working on the project said that it had not moved forward due to a lack of funds. Reuters previously reported that GHF had attempted to set up a Swiss bank account from which to solicit donations, but UBS and Goldman Sachs declined to work with the organization. The Zionist Embassy in the US did not respond to a request for comment. Ismail Al-Thawabta, director of the Hamas-run Gaza government media office, to told Reuters it 'categorically' rejects the GHF, calling it 'not a relief organization but rather an intelligence and security tool affiliated with the Zionist occupation, operating under a false humanitarian guise.' The undated slide presentation, which includes photos dated February 11, said that the GHF is 'working to secure' over $2 billion for the project, to 'build, secure and oversee large-scale Humanitarian Transit Areas (HTAs) inside and potentially outside Gaza strip for the population to reside while Gaza is demilitarized and rebuilt.' The Humanitarian Transit Areas described in the slides would be the next phase in an operation that began with GHF opening food distribution sites in the enclave in late May, according to two sources involved in the project. – Reuters
Kuwait Times
an hour ago
- Kuwait Times
Musk should worry about his companies, not politics: Bessent
NEW YORK: US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Sunday threw some shade at Elon Musk after the tech billionaire announced he had created a political party, suggesting the Tesla and SpaceX boss focus on business and not politics. On Saturday, the South African-born Musk — an ally-turned-critic of President Donald Trump — said he was founding the 'America Party' to challenge what he called the country's 'one-party system.' When asked by CNN if Musk's plan bothered the Trump administration, Bessent offered a thinly veiled criticism of the world's richest person. 'I believe that the boards of directors at his various companies wanted him to come back and run those companies, which he is better at than anyone,' Bessent said. 'So I imagine that those board of directors did not like this announcement yesterday and will be encouraging him to focus on his business activities, not his political activities.' Bessent said the principles of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency, which Musk ran for several months as part of Trump's drive to slash government spending and jobs, were 'very popular.' But he added: 'I think, if you looked at the polling, Elon was not.' Musk and Trump were once very close, and Musk was the top donor to the Republican's 2024 presidential campaign. But the pair had a bitter falling out over the president's massive domestic spending plan, with Musk saying it would explode the US debt. The billionaire, who has held US citizenship since 2002, has vowed to do everything in his power to defeat lawmakers who voted for it. Musk left DOGE in May to focus full-time on his corporate responsibilities, with Tesla's sales and image especially suffering from his brief venture into Trump's inner circle. Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives, a longtime backer of Tesla who had encouraged Musk to step back from DOGE, said creating a political party was the wrong move. 'Musk diving deeper into politics and now trying to take on the Beltway establishment is exactly the opposite direction that Tesla investors/shareholders want him to take during this crucial period for the Tesla story,' Ives said. 'While the core Musk supporters will back Musk at every turn no matter what, there is a broader sense of exhaustion from many Tesla investors that Musk keeps heading down the political track,' he added. 'Initial relief' among Tesla shareholders over Musk's DOGE departure has 'taken a turn for the worst,' Ives said. – AFP
Kuwait Times
2 hours ago
- Kuwait Times
China threatens US with retaliation on supply chain deals
BEIJING: China warned the Trump administration on Tuesday against reigniting trade tension by restoring tariffs on its goods next month, and threatened to retaliate against nations that strike deals with the United States to cut China out of supply chains. Washington and Beijing agreed to a trade framework in June that restored a fragile truce, but with many details still unclear, traders and investors on both sides of the Pacific are watching to see if it will unravel or lead to a lasting detente. On Monday, President Donald Trump began notifying trade partners of sharply higher US tariffs from August 1, after he delayed all but 10 percent of his April duties on most countries to give them time to strike deals with the world's largest economy. China, initially singled out with tariffs exceeding 100 percent, has until August 12 to reach an agreement with the White House to keep Trump from reinstating additional import curbs imposed during tit-for-tat tariff exchanges in April and May. 'One conclusion is abundantly clear: dialogue and cooperation are the only correct path,' the official People's Daily said in a commentary, referring to the exchanges in the current round of China-US trade tension. The article was signed 'Zhong Sheng', or 'Voice of China', a term the paper uses to express views on foreign policy. Reiterating Beijing's view that Trump's tariffs amount to 'bullying', the paper added, 'Practice has proven that only by firmly upholding principled positions can one truly safeguard one's legitimate rights and interests.' The remarks set the stage for another round of tariff war should Trump stick to what the ruling Communist Party's official daily said was 'a so-called 'final deadline.'' The average US tariff on Chinese exports now stands at 51.1 percent, while the average Chinese duty on US goods is 32.6 percent, with both sides covering all their trade, the Peterson Institute for International Economics said. The paper also took a swipe at regional economies that are considering striking tariff reduction deals with the United States that cut China out of their supply chains. Last week, Vietnam secured a tariff reduction to 20 percent from 46 percent with a deal for goods 'transshipped' through it, typically originating from China, to be subjected to a levy of 40 percent. — Reuters 'China firmly opposes any side striking a deal that sacrifices Chinese interests in exchange for tariff concessions,' the paper said. 'If such a situation arises, China will not accept it and will respond resolutely to protect its legitimate interests.' – Reuters
