
Looking to buy Singapore property in 2025? Here's what's different (and what could catch you off guard), Money News
Besides this, we'll also see the outcome of cooling measures implemented over many years: will a 60 per cent Additional Buyers Stamp Duty (ABSD) prevent affluent foreigners from rushing into Singapore's "safe haven" property market, as has occurred in the past?
Whatever the outcome, one thing is clear — the average homebuyer in 2025 may see fewer options in the near term: 1. Ageing and property replacement costs
This is really a combination of two factors, and it stems from the effects of age and the Total Debt Servicing Ratio (TDSR).
The TDSR restricts total monthly loan repayments to 55 per cent of the borrowers' income, inclusive of other debt obligations. So if they have a combined income of $12,000 a month, this restricts them to a total loan repayment of $6,600 (assuming they have no other loans).
There is another element to this, though: the loan tenure. The longer the loan tenure, the lower the monthly repayments — and hence the more likely it is that a borrower will pass the TDSR. Conversely, a shorter loan tenure means higher monthly repayments, and a higher risk of failing to meet the TDSR.
Keep in mind that if the loan tenure exceeds the retirement age of 65, the maximum loan quantum falls to 55 per cent.
As a 45 per cent down payment is usually not viable, this leaves borrowers having to settle for a shorter loan tenure (e.g., an upgrader aged 50 years will probably have to settle for a 15-year loan tenure).
Let's consider this scenario:
You and your spouse buy your first home, an HDB flat, at the age of 35. Fifteen years later, at age 50, you decide to upgrade to a private condo. Let's say your intended new home costs $2.1 million.
At this stage, you earn a combined monthly income of $12,000. As mentioned above, this gives you a TDSR limit of $6,600.
Now here's the issue: because you're already 50 years old, the maximum loan tenure you can take is just 15 years (as they cannot afford a 45 per cent down payment).
At a four per cent floor rate for the mortgage (required by MAS when assessing loan eligibility), a 15-year loan with monthly repayments of $6,600 can support a maximum loan of only around $878,000.
(Note: This maximum loan amount is not exact, and may vary slightly depending on the methods of the bank you go to)
Suppose you sell their flat for $600,000, and we assume it's fully paid off (no more outstanding flat loan or other costs).
That gives you a total budget of $1.478 million (i.e., total $878,000 loan + $600,000 from sale proceeds).
But with your dream condo costing $2.1 million, you still face a shortfall of $622,000; money they must pay in cash or from their CPF savings.
Our couple could possibly have made it when they were younger, but it's less viable for them now.
Those who can still upgrade at a later age would likely need (1) a huge windfall, like selling their flat for $1 million or more, (2) above-average income, or (3) huge savings for bigger down payments; possibly a combination of all three.
Lacking these, our couple may decide to simply not upgrade and hold on to their existing flat. Given Singapore's ageing demographic, this may be a factor that constrains the number of resale units entering the market. 2. Most upcoming new launches are in less family-friendly areas
The next batch of new launches will mainly be in the Core Central Region (CCR). Around 14 of the roughly 22 remaining launches are in this region; and already we've seen some projects like Aurea, One Marina Gardens, The Collective at One Sophia, and so forth.
While these locations are prestigious, they're typically associated with offices or sometimes high-end malls and entertainment; less so with family-friendly heartland living.
One Marina Gardens, for instance, doesn't have any primary schools within one kilometre. According to realtors we've spoken to, this is one of the most critical considerations among buyers.
It's also been said, by buyers on the ground, that prime-area malls are not as superior to heartland malls these days. Barring some luxury brands (which are not everyday needs anyway), everything you can find in a CCR mall can probably also be found in Tampines Central, Waterway Point, Clementi Mall, etc.
Decentralisation has eroded the importance of the CCR, while other amenities, such as coffee shops or food and market centres, may better serve homeowners in an everyday capacity.
While the government does intend to make CCR locations more balanced, it's not as if they can build a lot of schools or markets there overnight.
But unless you go for resale, where there are few sellers, there's not much choice in the near term. The CCR is where the new launches are going to be. 3. On the resale HDB front, time is needed for more supply to kick in
The number of flats reaching their Minimum Occupancy Period (MOP) this year is phenomenally low — about 6,974 units in 2025, as opposed to 30,920 units in 2022.
While HDB is ramping up construction (an intended 50,000 new flats released between 2025 to 2027), this doesn't provide immediate relief.
Those flats still have to be built and lived in for five more years before they join the resale market. With fewer people willing to let go of their flat right now (see point 1), it is unsurprising that buyers feel constrained.
For those who don't have the option to just sigh and join the BTO queue, 2025 is shaping up to be a rather frustrating year. What can buyers do about all these?
It's time to recognise that, in the face of these constraints, an ideal property may not be possible — it's now a matter of trade-offs. You may need to settle for a smaller two-bedder instead of a three-bedder, for example, if age prevents you from taking a bigger loan.
There may also have to be a compromise on location. We saw a good example of this way back in 2018, when Parc Esta was launched: part of the reason for brisk sales was its one-stop proximity to Paya Lebar Quarter (PLQ).
In the same way, you might want to consider a project that's much cheaper, despite being just a few minutes away by bus, MRT, etc.
For those looking at resale options, a final consideration is not to take too long. Resale buyers don't have much of an advantage in this market; and waiting even a week or two can result in having to come back with a much higher offer.
[[nid:717982]]
This article was first published in Stackedhomes.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
20 hours ago
- Business Times
Car ownership in Singapore is progressive through ARF: MOT
[SINGAPORE] Progressive car ownership in Singapore is already ensured through the additional registration fee (ARF) and therefore does not need further measures such as those found in additional buyer's stamp duty (ABSD) for housing, said the Ministry of Transport (MOT). MOT director for private and shared mobility Elaine Koh said this in a letter on Tuesday (Aug 5) in response to a recent commentary by The Business Times property correspondent Leslie Yee. Yee proposed the introduction of ABSD-like measures, such as levying a premium on those who buy more than one car, on permanent residents (PRs) and non-PR foreigners and companies buying cars, in a piece titled 'Should the COE (Certificate of Entitlement) system for cars borrow ideas from the ABSD regime for homes?'. ABSD was introduced in 2011 to 'promote a sustainable residential property market where prices move in line with economic fundamentals', said the Urban Redevelopment Authority at the time. Currently, it levies an additional 20 per cent on the purchase price or market value of the property on Singaporeans buying a second home, 5 per cent on a PR buying their first home, while a non-PR foreigner pays 60 per cent, and an entity or a trustee buying a home pays 65 per cent. Yee also proposed that COE premiums be a percentage of a car's open market value (OMV), which is the price paid for the car when it lands in Singapore, including shipping and insurance, but before any local taxes. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up This would overcome the 'possibly regressive' elements of COEs now, since the premium for Category A, for mainstream cars, is a much higher percentage of the total car cost compared with that for Category B, the category for larger, luxurious cars. But Koh pointed out that progressivity in the vehicular tax system is already achieved through ARF, which is a tiered tax that increases depending on vehicle cost, and that it has been increased twice in the past four years. The tax rate for the first tier, up to S$20,000, is 100 per cent of the OMV, while that for the next tier – S$20,001 to S$40,000 – is 140 per cent, eventually rising to 320 per cent of the OMV for S$80,001 and above. The tiered ARF was introduced in 2013, and increased in 2022 and 2023 . Koh said that levies on additional cars would not be effective as only 5 per cent of households here own more than one car, while foreigners account for less than 2 per cent of all successful COE bids. An ABSD-style system would also be costly to administer and enforce, she noted, without elaborating. She concluded by saying that the government cannot guarantee its one million resident households a car, but can guarantee every Singaporean affordable and high-quality transportation.
Business Times
20 hours ago
- Business Times
ARF ensures progressivity in car ownership
I REFER to Leslie Yee's Jul 28 article, ' Should the COE system for cars borrow ideas from the ABSD regime for homes? ' Progressivity in the vehicular tax system is mostly achieved through the additional registration fee (ARF), which is calculated based on the open market value of the car. Cars with higher open market value pay more ARF, with the highest tier rate of ARF set at 320 per cent. The Singapore government has raised the ARF rates twice in the last four years. Imposing additional buyer's stamp duty (ABSD) on multiple car ownership will not have a significant effect on Certificate of Entitlement (COE) prices, as only 5 per cent of households own more than one car, and foreigners account for less than 2 per cent of all successful COE bids. Such a system would also be costly to administer and enforce. In land-scarce Singapore, we cannot guarantee every of our one million resident households a car. But we can guarantee every Singaporean affordable and high-quality transportation. The government will continue to invest in our public transport system and point-to-point transport options to expand connectivity for all. Elaine Koh director, private and share mobility division, Ministry of Transport
Business Times
a day ago
- Business Times
Broadening bullishness in Singapore
In the latest episode of Mark To Market, a podcast by The Business Times, senior correspondent Ben Paul takes a hard look at Singapore's multi-billion-dollar shot in the arm for its flagging equity market and whether it's finally moving the needle. The spark? The Monetary Authority of Singapore's (MAS) Equity Market Development Programme (EQDP), which placed S$1.1 billion with three heavyweight fund managers Avanda, Fullerton and JP Morgan. The goal: to inject fresh capital beyond the usual STI suspects and revive interest in small to mid-cap stocks. Paul walks us through why this could be more than just a flash in the pan. Analysts are already flagging potential 'EQDP beneficiaries' like Food Empire, iFast and Sheng Siong whose stocks are seeing renewed investor interest. But the bigger story is how this could shift the way companies engage with shareholders, especially as MAS is also ramping up its GEMS scheme and introducing recourse mechanisms for investors burned by market misconduct. Paul delves into the critics' take and shares his opinion on these latest developments. The episode also unpacks MAS' upcoming consultations on investor recourse, including legal support for shareholder lawsuits and whistleblower protections. Why listen? Because this isn't just another reform package A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 8.30 am Asean Business Business insights centering on South-east Asia's fast-growing economies. Sign Up Sign Up MAS is putting real money behind market revitalisation and investors are paying attention. Because it's not just about liquidity, it's about accountability With more investor tools, underperformers can no longer hide behind excuses. Because the public market is getting a public reboot And Singapore Inc. needs to step up. Listen now to the full episode and stay ahead of market trends and corporate developments with Ben Paul. Mark To Market is a podcast of BT Correspondents. Look out for the next episode featuring wealth editor, Genevieve Cua. And if you have any thoughts or questions, feel free to reach out to us at btpodcasts@ . Written and hosted by: Ben Paul (benpaul@ Edited by: Howie Lim & Claressa Monteiro Produced by: Ben Paul, Howie Lim & Chai Pei Chieh A podcast by BT Podcasts, The Business Times, SPH Media --- Follow BT Correspondents: Channel: Amazon: Apple Podcasts: Spotify: YouTube Music: Website: Do note: This podcast is meant to provide general information only. SPH Media accepts no liability for loss arising from any reliance on the podcast or use of third party's products and services. Please consult professional advisors for independent advice. --- Discover more BT podcast series: BT Money Hacks: BT Podcasts: BT Market Focus: BT Branded Podcasts: