Concerns Loom Over Japan-U.S. Tariff Talks After Trump Comment; Ishiba Unable to Make Certain Concessions Ahead of Upper House Election
With the July 9 deadline for the end of the suspension of the additional portion of 'reciprocal tariffs' approaching, some have begun making moves on the assumption that an agreement will not be reached anytime soon.
Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba spoke to the press at the Prime Minister's Office on Wednesday and stressed his intention to continue negotiations, saying: 'I will not comment on every one of [Trump's] remarks. Japan has been engaged in serious negotiations with our national interest at stake.'
Economic revitalization minister Ryosei Akazawa also said on the day, 'The negotiations are not supposed to be straightforward and easy, as the national interests of both countries are at stake.'
'We hope to reach an agreement while firmly defending our national interest,' Akazawa added.
The two countries held administrative-level talks on Monday that were followed by a series of talks over the phone and through other means, according to Akazawa.
As Japan's chief tariff negotiator, Akazawa has so far held seven ministerial-level talks with the U.S. side. However, disagreements have remained regarding the United States imposing tariffs on Japanese automobiles.
Some within the Japanese government said Trump's remark 'severely hurt negotiations.' Others consider it as a 'bluff to get Japan to make more concessions' and think the government should not be swayed by it.
With the House of Councillors election set to be held July 20, Ishiba has been unable to find something to negotiate with that is appealing for Trump. Ishiba cannot make concessions to increase rice imports from the United States — something that is strongly opposed by Japanese rice producers — or on automobile tariffs, which is a key industry in Japan.
If negotiations do not progress, it is possible that the additional 14% will be imposed after July 9. Furthermore, the additional 25% tariff imposed on automobiles since April will further impact the industry. The government has begun to consider possible measures to deal with the situation.
'I intend to protect industries in Japan through such measures as expanding domestic demand and export destinations,' Ishiba said, regarding possible support measures if fewer automobiles are exported to the United States, at a debate between party leaders on Wednesday.
'No point in getting nervous'
'There is no point in getting nervous every time Trump makes a comment,' said Ken Kobayashi, chairperson of the Japan Chamber of Commerce and Industry, at a press conference on Wednesday. 'I will remain calm.'
He also said the impact on the Japanese economy will be big if the tariff rates are raised.
'We might just have to bear with certain things to reach an agreement,' Kobayashi said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Times
26 minutes ago
- Japan Times
NATO's Donald Trump dilemma
NATO's just-completed summit in The Hague came at a time of extraordinary tension. Since returning to the White House, Donald Trump has repeatedly accused Europe of free riding on U.S. defense spending, raising serious concerns about the health of the Atlantic alliance. His decision to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities just three days before the summit — in coordination with Israel and without informing America's NATO allies — has only intensified those fears. Trump's strikes against Iran evoked memories of the post-9/11 interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq, when NATO expanded its role beyond addressing conventional military threats to include counter-terrorism operations. While the alliance supported the U.S.-led war in Afghanistan, the invasion of Iraq was far more divisive, owing to the lack of convincing evidence that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction and the absence of an explicit United Nations Security Council mandate. The resulting rift prompted then-U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to draw a controversial distinction between 'Old Europe' and 'New Europe.' But the current situation is even more alarming. Unlike in 2003, when the United States at least made an effort to consult its allies, Trump now keeps them in the dark. He provided no credible evidence to justify the attack on Iran and International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director-General Rafael Grossi contradicted his claims of an imminent nuclear threat, stating just days earlier that there was no proof of a 'systematic' Iranian effort to develop nuclear weapons. Strikingly, many NATO leaders were informed of the attack only after it had been carried out. By sidelining NATO, Trump has effectively reduced the alliance to a passive observer, undermining its core principles and signaling a dangerous shift in global diplomacy. Imagine if Iran had retaliated by targeting U.S. bases in Turkey, potentially dragging my country into war. And if a nuclear leak had occurred, endangering Turkish civilians, who would have borne responsibility? Although Israel and Iran accepted Trump's announcement of a ceasefire, NATO members had been thrust into a dangerous situation without warning. This was particularly worrisome for Turkey, which shares a border with Iran and is highly vulnerable to the consequences of regional escalation. Trump's behavior has jeopardized NATO's collective security. After all, there is no guarantee that Israel will not violate the ceasefire, as it did in Gaza in March. NATO members must now confront a fundamental question: Can the alliance survive if member states may launch unilateral military action that puts others at risk? The U.S. may have legitimate evidence that Iran violated the Non-Proliferation Treaty or was just about to do so. But if that were the case, the proper course would have been to present the evidence to the IAEA and pursue a coordinated response through the U.N. Security Council. Alternatively, the U.S. may have assumed that Iran would not retaliate and saw the attack as a way to force the Iranians back to the negotiating table. But talks between the two countries were already set to resume before Israel's intervention derailed them. A third explanation is more cynical but may be true: the attack was meant to divert attention from Israel's brutal war in Gaza. Whichever explanation proves true, Trump's actions could have far-reaching consequences for NATO and the alliance's future could depend on how its leaders respond. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, for example, must clearly outline the risks that regional instability poses to NATO's collective defense posture — especially given Turkey's proximity to Iran. As leaders of countries with permanent seats on the U.N. Security Council, French President Emmanuel Macron and U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer could play a vital role in strengthening coordination between NATO and the U.N. Likewise, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz will be instrumental in shaping NATO-EU relations, while Norwegian President Jonas Gahr Store and his Finnish counterpart, Alexander Stubb, could help reinvigorate diplomacy and restore the alliance's moral compass. Ultimately, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte's effectiveness will largely depend on leaders' commitment to pursuing rational, law-abiding security policies. Even beyond the immediate Iran crisis, NATO finds itself at a crossroads. The Hague summit may ultimately be seen as a defining moment — one that will determine whether the alliance can remain the world's most powerful defense organization, grounded in its members' shared concerns and contributions, or is destined to become a mere instrument of U.S.-Israeli strategic interests. If I were in office today, I would use the summit to highlight Israel's growing aggression and the security risks facing Turkey as the only NATO member in the region. I would ask Trump whether, in his 'America First' hierarchy, NATO allies now rank below nonmember Israel. Any leader willing to pose that question would take a principled stand against reckless military adventurism — and might just help save the alliance itself. Before the Iraq War, French President Jacques Chirac and German Chancellor Gerhard Schroder were dismissed as representatives of 'Old Europe' for opposing U.S. intervention. Had their warnings been heeded, the catastrophic costs of the war might have been avoided and Iran's regional influence would likely not be as significant as it is now. History has shown that wars launched before exhausting every diplomatic avenue lead to ruin for all involved. Russia's miscalculations in Ukraine serve as a grim reminder that while starting a war is easy, ending one is far more difficult. Today, as Trump's actions threaten further erosion of hard-won international laws, European leaders must push back. If NATO fails to uphold the rule of law, it risks forfeiting its role as the cornerstone of global security. The alliance's fate — and the future of global stability — will hinge on whether its leaders insist on pursuing peace rather than confrontation. Ahmet Davutoglu is a former prime minister (2014-2016) and foreign minister (2009-2014) of Turkey. © Project Syndicate, 2025
Nikkei Asia
an hour ago
- Nikkei Asia
Rubio postpones Japan, South Korean trip to focus on Mideast conflict
Marco Rubio was set to visit Japan and South Korea next week in his first visit to those countries as U.S. secretary of state. © Reuters KEN MORIYASU and KANA BABA WASHINGTON/TOKYO -- U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has called off his first visit to Japan and South Korea to focus on Middle East issues, Nikkei has learned. Rubio was expected land in Tokyo on Monday to kick off his first Asian tour. But Rubio has informed the Japanese and South Korean governments his schedule will be pushed back.
Nikkei Asia
an hour ago
- Nikkei Asia
Mitsubishi Gas Chemical to buy into Aussie hydrogen miner
Energy Toyota and Eneos unit will also invest in startup Gold Hydrogen Mitsubishi Gas Chemical hopes to use natural hydrogen to produce methanol from carbon dioxide and waste. © Reuters ARATA SHIGENO TOKYO -- Mitsubishi Gas Chemical will invest in an Australian startup that mines underground hydrogen, looking to use the gas for environmentally friendlier methanol production, the Japanese company announced Thursday. The investment will be made in Gold Hydrogen, which has discovered natural, or underground, hydrogen in the state of South Australia. The startup aims to mine the hydrogen commercially.
