Hepatitis C is curable. Why are Australians still dying from it?
The cure for hepatitis C is one such medical breakthrough - as significant as the discovery of penicillin.
It has saved millions around the world from developing severe liver disease and liver cancer by curing their hepatitis C.
It is the first ever drug to cure a virus and completely cure a chronic disease, and has been declared an "essential medicine" by the World Health Organisation.
It forms the backbone of treatments offered to people living with hepatitis C in Australia today - a painless cure of one tablet per day for up to 12 weeks.
It's a simple molecule that blocks the virus from replicating and is very effective, has minimal side effects, and is vastly superior to previous treatments like interferon.
Since it became available under the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme in 2016, 62.9 per cent of all people living in Australia with hepatitis C have received the cure.
Yet despite this, about 70,000 Australians still live with hepatitis C.
Why, in a country with universal health care and a commitment to disease elimination, are so many people still being left behind?
New analysis done by Hepatitis Australia shows that 84 per cent of people now living with hepatitis C no longer inject drugs or contracted the virus in other ways: through blood transfusions before blood screening was introduced in 1990; unsafe tattooing; or medical and dental procedures overseas in countries with less rigorous infection control.
In Australia, hepatitis C has primarily been associated with injecting drug use.
Significant progress has been made in working with people who inject drugs through community-led outreach, peer programs, and harm reduction services like needle and syringe exchanges.
With almost 30 per cent of the prison population injecting while they are incarcerated, prisons are the primary sites of transmission for hepatitis C.
Our analysis shows that in NSW, 40 per cent of all hepatitis C retreatments are delivered in prisons, and needle exchange programs are needed to prevent transmission and reinfection.
Australia's response to viral hepatitis needs to adapt to the changing nature of the population. While people who inject drugs must always be a priority in our work to eliminate viral hepatitis, a new focus is needed on the many people who might not realise they live with hepatitis C or were told in the past that there was nothing they could do about it.
This population is unlikely to be engaged with hepatitis programs offered through drug and alcohol, prisons and homelessness services. And so they go undiagnosed, untreated, and remain at risk of developing serious liver disease.
Community hepatitis organisations create stigma-free pathways for people to seek testing and treatment for hepatitis C.
When we look at the demographics of this "missing group" of about 59,000 people, they are on average aged 40 to 65, are predominantly male and might have injected drugs, even just once, in their youth or had a tattoo overseas.
The research tells us they are hesitant to talk about their life experiences with their regular GP, and this is where community outreach services, like those offered by community hepatitis organisations, become incredibly important.
Hepatitis C is a ticking time bomb that slowly damages and inflames the liver, leading to serious liver disease and, potentially, cancer if left untreated.
Most people have no symptoms of hepatitis C for many years until their liver is seriously affected.
No one should die from a curable disease because of stigma, silence or a missed opportunity.
Australia has what it takes to eliminate hepatitis C. We must act with urgency and compassion to make sure no one is left behind.
It can be hard to take the first step to getting cured for hepatitis C. That's why we launched HepLink with funding from the Australian government Department of Health, Disability and Ageing, a free, confidential service that helps people find hepatitis-friendly doctors in their area - no Medicare card required.
If you think you could be at risk or if you tested positive a long time ago and didn't realise there was a simple cure, call HepLink on 1800 437 222 or visit www.heplink.au for free, confidential information and support.
Every so often, a medical breakthrough reshapes the health landscape and offers new hope.
The cure for hepatitis C is one such medical breakthrough - as significant as the discovery of penicillin.
It has saved millions around the world from developing severe liver disease and liver cancer by curing their hepatitis C.
It is the first ever drug to cure a virus and completely cure a chronic disease, and has been declared an "essential medicine" by the World Health Organisation.
It forms the backbone of treatments offered to people living with hepatitis C in Australia today - a painless cure of one tablet per day for up to 12 weeks.
It's a simple molecule that blocks the virus from replicating and is very effective, has minimal side effects, and is vastly superior to previous treatments like interferon.
Since it became available under the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme in 2016, 62.9 per cent of all people living in Australia with hepatitis C have received the cure.
Yet despite this, about 70,000 Australians still live with hepatitis C.
Why, in a country with universal health care and a commitment to disease elimination, are so many people still being left behind?
New analysis done by Hepatitis Australia shows that 84 per cent of people now living with hepatitis C no longer inject drugs or contracted the virus in other ways: through blood transfusions before blood screening was introduced in 1990; unsafe tattooing; or medical and dental procedures overseas in countries with less rigorous infection control.
In Australia, hepatitis C has primarily been associated with injecting drug use.
Significant progress has been made in working with people who inject drugs through community-led outreach, peer programs, and harm reduction services like needle and syringe exchanges.
With almost 30 per cent of the prison population injecting while they are incarcerated, prisons are the primary sites of transmission for hepatitis C.
Our analysis shows that in NSW, 40 per cent of all hepatitis C retreatments are delivered in prisons, and needle exchange programs are needed to prevent transmission and reinfection.
Australia's response to viral hepatitis needs to adapt to the changing nature of the population. While people who inject drugs must always be a priority in our work to eliminate viral hepatitis, a new focus is needed on the many people who might not realise they live with hepatitis C or were told in the past that there was nothing they could do about it.
This population is unlikely to be engaged with hepatitis programs offered through drug and alcohol, prisons and homelessness services. And so they go undiagnosed, untreated, and remain at risk of developing serious liver disease.
Community hepatitis organisations create stigma-free pathways for people to seek testing and treatment for hepatitis C.
When we look at the demographics of this "missing group" of about 59,000 people, they are on average aged 40 to 65, are predominantly male and might have injected drugs, even just once, in their youth or had a tattoo overseas.
The research tells us they are hesitant to talk about their life experiences with their regular GP, and this is where community outreach services, like those offered by community hepatitis organisations, become incredibly important.
Hepatitis C is a ticking time bomb that slowly damages and inflames the liver, leading to serious liver disease and, potentially, cancer if left untreated.
Most people have no symptoms of hepatitis C for many years until their liver is seriously affected.
No one should die from a curable disease because of stigma, silence or a missed opportunity.
Australia has what it takes to eliminate hepatitis C. We must act with urgency and compassion to make sure no one is left behind.
It can be hard to take the first step to getting cured for hepatitis C. That's why we launched HepLink with funding from the Australian government Department of Health, Disability and Ageing, a free, confidential service that helps people find hepatitis-friendly doctors in their area - no Medicare card required.
If you think you could be at risk or if you tested positive a long time ago and didn't realise there was a simple cure, call HepLink on 1800 437 222 or visit www.heplink.au for free, confidential information and support.
Every so often, a medical breakthrough reshapes the health landscape and offers new hope.
The cure for hepatitis C is one such medical breakthrough - as significant as the discovery of penicillin.
It has saved millions around the world from developing severe liver disease and liver cancer by curing their hepatitis C.
It is the first ever drug to cure a virus and completely cure a chronic disease, and has been declared an "essential medicine" by the World Health Organisation.
It forms the backbone of treatments offered to people living with hepatitis C in Australia today - a painless cure of one tablet per day for up to 12 weeks.
It's a simple molecule that blocks the virus from replicating and is very effective, has minimal side effects, and is vastly superior to previous treatments like interferon.
Since it became available under the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme in 2016, 62.9 per cent of all people living in Australia with hepatitis C have received the cure.
Yet despite this, about 70,000 Australians still live with hepatitis C.
Why, in a country with universal health care and a commitment to disease elimination, are so many people still being left behind?
New analysis done by Hepatitis Australia shows that 84 per cent of people now living with hepatitis C no longer inject drugs or contracted the virus in other ways: through blood transfusions before blood screening was introduced in 1990; unsafe tattooing; or medical and dental procedures overseas in countries with less rigorous infection control.
In Australia, hepatitis C has primarily been associated with injecting drug use.
Significant progress has been made in working with people who inject drugs through community-led outreach, peer programs, and harm reduction services like needle and syringe exchanges.
With almost 30 per cent of the prison population injecting while they are incarcerated, prisons are the primary sites of transmission for hepatitis C.
Our analysis shows that in NSW, 40 per cent of all hepatitis C retreatments are delivered in prisons, and needle exchange programs are needed to prevent transmission and reinfection.
Australia's response to viral hepatitis needs to adapt to the changing nature of the population. While people who inject drugs must always be a priority in our work to eliminate viral hepatitis, a new focus is needed on the many people who might not realise they live with hepatitis C or were told in the past that there was nothing they could do about it.
This population is unlikely to be engaged with hepatitis programs offered through drug and alcohol, prisons and homelessness services. And so they go undiagnosed, untreated, and remain at risk of developing serious liver disease.
Community hepatitis organisations create stigma-free pathways for people to seek testing and treatment for hepatitis C.
When we look at the demographics of this "missing group" of about 59,000 people, they are on average aged 40 to 65, are predominantly male and might have injected drugs, even just once, in their youth or had a tattoo overseas.
The research tells us they are hesitant to talk about their life experiences with their regular GP, and this is where community outreach services, like those offered by community hepatitis organisations, become incredibly important.
Hepatitis C is a ticking time bomb that slowly damages and inflames the liver, leading to serious liver disease and, potentially, cancer if left untreated.
Most people have no symptoms of hepatitis C for many years until their liver is seriously affected.
No one should die from a curable disease because of stigma, silence or a missed opportunity.
Australia has what it takes to eliminate hepatitis C. We must act with urgency and compassion to make sure no one is left behind.
It can be hard to take the first step to getting cured for hepatitis C. That's why we launched HepLink with funding from the Australian government Department of Health, Disability and Ageing, a free, confidential service that helps people find hepatitis-friendly doctors in their area - no Medicare card required.
If you think you could be at risk or if you tested positive a long time ago and didn't realise there was a simple cure, call HepLink on 1800 437 222 or visit www.heplink.au for free, confidential information and support.
Every so often, a medical breakthrough reshapes the health landscape and offers new hope.
The cure for hepatitis C is one such medical breakthrough - as significant as the discovery of penicillin.
It has saved millions around the world from developing severe liver disease and liver cancer by curing their hepatitis C.
It is the first ever drug to cure a virus and completely cure a chronic disease, and has been declared an "essential medicine" by the World Health Organisation.
It forms the backbone of treatments offered to people living with hepatitis C in Australia today - a painless cure of one tablet per day for up to 12 weeks.
It's a simple molecule that blocks the virus from replicating and is very effective, has minimal side effects, and is vastly superior to previous treatments like interferon.
Since it became available under the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme in 2016, 62.9 per cent of all people living in Australia with hepatitis C have received the cure.
Yet despite this, about 70,000 Australians still live with hepatitis C.
Why, in a country with universal health care and a commitment to disease elimination, are so many people still being left behind?
New analysis done by Hepatitis Australia shows that 84 per cent of people now living with hepatitis C no longer inject drugs or contracted the virus in other ways: through blood transfusions before blood screening was introduced in 1990; unsafe tattooing; or medical and dental procedures overseas in countries with less rigorous infection control.
In Australia, hepatitis C has primarily been associated with injecting drug use.
Significant progress has been made in working with people who inject drugs through community-led outreach, peer programs, and harm reduction services like needle and syringe exchanges.
With almost 30 per cent of the prison population injecting while they are incarcerated, prisons are the primary sites of transmission for hepatitis C.
Our analysis shows that in NSW, 40 per cent of all hepatitis C retreatments are delivered in prisons, and needle exchange programs are needed to prevent transmission and reinfection.
Australia's response to viral hepatitis needs to adapt to the changing nature of the population. While people who inject drugs must always be a priority in our work to eliminate viral hepatitis, a new focus is needed on the many people who might not realise they live with hepatitis C or were told in the past that there was nothing they could do about it.
This population is unlikely to be engaged with hepatitis programs offered through drug and alcohol, prisons and homelessness services. And so they go undiagnosed, untreated, and remain at risk of developing serious liver disease.
Community hepatitis organisations create stigma-free pathways for people to seek testing and treatment for hepatitis C.
When we look at the demographics of this "missing group" of about 59,000 people, they are on average aged 40 to 65, are predominantly male and might have injected drugs, even just once, in their youth or had a tattoo overseas.
The research tells us they are hesitant to talk about their life experiences with their regular GP, and this is where community outreach services, like those offered by community hepatitis organisations, become incredibly important.
Hepatitis C is a ticking time bomb that slowly damages and inflames the liver, leading to serious liver disease and, potentially, cancer if left untreated.
Most people have no symptoms of hepatitis C for many years until their liver is seriously affected.
No one should die from a curable disease because of stigma, silence or a missed opportunity.
Australia has what it takes to eliminate hepatitis C. We must act with urgency and compassion to make sure no one is left behind.
It can be hard to take the first step to getting cured for hepatitis C. That's why we launched HepLink with funding from the Australian government Department of Health, Disability and Ageing, a free, confidential service that helps people find hepatitis-friendly doctors in their area - no Medicare card required.
If you think you could be at risk or if you tested positive a long time ago and didn't realise there was a simple cure, call HepLink on 1800 437 222 or visit www.heplink.au for free, confidential information and support.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
4 hours ago
- West Australian
Younger Australia is facing a loneliness 'epidemic'
A silent crisis is taking root among young Australians, with nearly half those aged 15 to 25 reporting they regularly feel lonely. One in seven experience persistent loneliness that lasts more than two years. The findings, from a new national report by Ending Loneliness Together, have prompted warnings loneliness is becoming endemic, exacerbated by digital isolation, rising living costs and a lack of community spaces to connect face-to-face. "There's a lot of misconceptions that just because young people are so much embedded within the structures of society that they shouldn't feel lonely," says Michelle Lim, scientific chair of Ending Loneliness Together and co-lead author of the A Call for Connection report. "This is a huge misconception because the way we define loneliness is very much a subjective feeling of the stress that comes up to you when you feel your relationships do not meet your current social needs." Naoka Cheah was just settling into student life at the University of Melbourne aged 19 when COVID-19 hit, forcing her to return to Malaysia and complete much of her degree remotely. "I went back thinking it's probably just going to be a few months at most ... not a huge impact. But I was stuck back in Malaysia for more than a year," she says. "It was a very unreal experience, being apart from your other students, being apart from friends … and also trying to ace those exams and not fail. I think that's something we were all struggling with." Now 25 and working as a data analyst in Melbourne, Ms Cheah reflects on how her forced isolation also came with unexpected benefits. "Initially it is a very scary experience but it pushes you to kind of face yourself," she says. "There's a stigma of loneliness but it's actually very important to then also have that time by yourself … to figure out what you actually love, what you actually hate." Like many young professionals in a post-COVID world, Ms Cheah now works mostly from home and makes a conscious effort to stay socially connected. "I'm very lucky to have a team that's very much inclusive and sociable but I will assume not everyone is lucky enough to have that environment," she says. "It can be very difficult to reach out. That first obstacle could be the hardest thing for people to overcome." Associate Professor Lim agrees that being alone is not the same as being lonely. "By definition, young people are not often socially isolated ... they're not actually physically alone ... but they are feeling very lonely," she says. Digital technology, while offering new ways to connect, is also part of the problem. "We haven't really introduced good digital literacy, not just for our children but even for us as parents. As parents we model behaviours and with the increases of digital communication, we're not doing a great job ourselves. "We know we have to be able to get young people to have healthy social relationships in that digital world." She adds that for some young Australians - particularly those from the LGBTQI community or in regional areas- digital spaces can be essential. "They say 'I need that digital community because I don't have people around me that are like me'. So there is a place for it but we haven't quite taught young people how to navigate this very tricky social media world and digital world and how to use it for their benefit." Darcy Gilmour, a 25-year-old graduate from Canberra, understands this complexity all too well. Hospitalised at age 10 for two years due to rare blood disorders, he says the loneliness he experienced during and after was profound. "That obviously created a big feeling of isolation," he says. "It was pretty tough. "When I went to high school, I was just trying to reintegrate ... it was a big adjustment and I also experienced a lot of loneliness there. It was like being thrown in the deep end." Despite being constantly surrounded by nurses, classmates and family, he still felt isolated. "I'd never spend any time actually alone but still had that incredible feeling of loneliness," he explains. Mr Gilmour says those experiences have given him a deeper understanding of what true connection means. "If I notice someone else is struggling to make friends, that's also when I can tend to reach out a bit more because I'm able to recognise that pretty easily," he says. His advice is to be proactive - even when it's hard. "I've had a lot of times where you're leading up to going to hang out with your friends and you're, like: 'oh, I don't know if I'll enjoy this. I'd rather just stay at home and just relax a bit alone and not stress'," he says. "But then you go out and you actually have a really good time." Loneliness isn't just an emotional issue, according to Prof Lim. It has measurable impacts on mental and physical health, especially for those under financial strain or from lower socio-economic backgrounds. "We are paying costs in other ways," she says. "We are very good at interventions. We're very good at dealing with problems. We're very good at throwing money at mental health and suicide. "But we're not very good at preventing these things." What's needed, Prof Lim says, is systemic change: from digital education in schools to more inclusive public spaces, and support that doesn't fall entirely on individuals or parents. "This should be a policy that we introduce on that systems level, where we're teaching that very actively in school, and what healthy social interaction can look like," she says. "We need something more than just relying on parents." While large-scale solutions are being debated, Prof Lim believes even small moments of connection can make a difference. "A quick hello, a chance encounter, an act of kindness, a compliment, a shared experience or interest, a new hobby or even a funny story - these small but meaningful interactions matter," she says. "They spark conversation and help us feel seen and valued."
Perth Now
4 hours ago
- Perth Now
Younger Australia is facing a loneliness 'epidemic'
A silent crisis is taking root among young Australians, with nearly half those aged 15 to 25 reporting they regularly feel lonely. One in seven experience persistent loneliness that lasts more than two years. The findings, from a new national report by Ending Loneliness Together, have prompted warnings loneliness is becoming endemic, exacerbated by digital isolation, rising living costs and a lack of community spaces to connect face-to-face. "There's a lot of misconceptions that just because young people are so much embedded within the structures of society that they shouldn't feel lonely," says Michelle Lim, scientific chair of Ending Loneliness Together and co-lead author of the A Call for Connection report. "This is a huge misconception because the way we define loneliness is very much a subjective feeling of the stress that comes up to you when you feel your relationships do not meet your current social needs." Naoka Cheah was just settling into student life at the University of Melbourne aged 19 when COVID-19 hit, forcing her to return to Malaysia and complete much of her degree remotely. "I went back thinking it's probably just going to be a few months at most ... not a huge impact. But I was stuck back in Malaysia for more than a year," she says. "It was a very unreal experience, being apart from your other students, being apart from friends … and also trying to ace those exams and not fail. I think that's something we were all struggling with." Now 25 and working as a data analyst in Melbourne, Ms Cheah reflects on how her forced isolation also came with unexpected benefits. "Initially it is a very scary experience but it pushes you to kind of face yourself," she says. "There's a stigma of loneliness but it's actually very important to then also have that time by yourself … to figure out what you actually love, what you actually hate." Like many young professionals in a post-COVID world, Ms Cheah now works mostly from home and makes a conscious effort to stay socially connected. "I'm very lucky to have a team that's very much inclusive and sociable but I will assume not everyone is lucky enough to have that environment," she says. "It can be very difficult to reach out. That first obstacle could be the hardest thing for people to overcome." Associate Professor Lim agrees that being alone is not the same as being lonely. "By definition, young people are not often socially isolated ... they're not actually physically alone ... but they are feeling very lonely," she says. Digital technology, while offering new ways to connect, is also part of the problem. "We haven't really introduced good digital literacy, not just for our children but even for us as parents. As parents we model behaviours and with the increases of digital communication, we're not doing a great job ourselves. "We know we have to be able to get young people to have healthy social relationships in that digital world." She adds that for some young Australians - particularly those from the LGBTQI community or in regional areas- digital spaces can be essential. "They say 'I need that digital community because I don't have people around me that are like me'. So there is a place for it but we haven't quite taught young people how to navigate this very tricky social media world and digital world and how to use it for their benefit." Darcy Gilmour, a 25-year-old graduate from Canberra, understands this complexity all too well. Hospitalised at age 10 for two years due to rare blood disorders, he says the loneliness he experienced during and after was profound. "That obviously created a big feeling of isolation," he says. "It was pretty tough. "When I went to high school, I was just trying to reintegrate ... it was a big adjustment and I also experienced a lot of loneliness there. It was like being thrown in the deep end." Despite being constantly surrounded by nurses, classmates and family, he still felt isolated. "I'd never spend any time actually alone but still had that incredible feeling of loneliness," he explains. Mr Gilmour says those experiences have given him a deeper understanding of what true connection means. "If I notice someone else is struggling to make friends, that's also when I can tend to reach out a bit more because I'm able to recognise that pretty easily," he says. His advice is to be proactive - even when it's hard. "I've had a lot of times where you're leading up to going to hang out with your friends and you're, like: 'oh, I don't know if I'll enjoy this. I'd rather just stay at home and just relax a bit alone and not stress'," he says. "But then you go out and you actually have a really good time." Loneliness isn't just an emotional issue, according to Prof Lim. It has measurable impacts on mental and physical health, especially for those under financial strain or from lower socio-economic backgrounds. "We are paying costs in other ways," she says. "We are very good at interventions. We're very good at dealing with problems. We're very good at throwing money at mental health and suicide. "But we're not very good at preventing these things." What's needed, Prof Lim says, is systemic change: from digital education in schools to more inclusive public spaces, and support that doesn't fall entirely on individuals or parents. "This should be a policy that we introduce on that systems level, where we're teaching that very actively in school, and what healthy social interaction can look like," she says. "We need something more than just relying on parents." While large-scale solutions are being debated, Prof Lim believes even small moments of connection can make a difference. "A quick hello, a chance encounter, an act of kindness, a compliment, a shared experience or interest, a new hobby or even a funny story - these small but meaningful interactions matter," she says. "They spark conversation and help us feel seen and valued."
West Australian
a day ago
- West Australian
Survivors call for more assistance with cancer costs
A young breast cancer survivor is calling for diagnostic tests to be made free because she fears high living costs could deter others seeking early examinations due to the expense. Despite significant improvements to treatments and survival rates, breast cancer remains the most diagnosed cancer among women worldwide. In Australia, 58 people receive the same news mum-of-two Aimee Glen did each day. Age is the greatest risk factor and screening is offered to women over 40. However young women should also be aware of their risk, particularly if they have a family history of the disease. Ms Glen was just 31 when she first noticed a lump in her breast and was soon after diagnosed with stage two ER/PR breast cancer. She had no family history but a reminder from the Instagram account Support Your Girls prompted her to do a self-check. She then booked in to see her GP who referred her for an ultrasound at the Geelong breast clinic which was followed by multiple diagnostic tests. "It was all very quick from when I was tested to when I started treatment," Ms Glen tells AAP. "I had 16 rounds of chemotherapy known as 'the red devil' which is very hard-hitting treatment but breast cancer responds well to it." Following this, she decided to undergo a double mastectomy and has recently finished three weeks of daily radiotherapy. "The entire cancer treatment was incredibly expensive but those initial diagnostic tests were a financial stressor which is very difficult for people," she says. So far Ms Glen has spent $1442 and been left $787 out of pocket after Medicare rebates. In the meantime, she has started a petition to make ultrasounds and mammograms free for diagnostic purposes, which has gained nearly 14,000 signatures in two weeks. "There are options to go through the public system but people often have to wait months to get in and sometimes it's not an option if you do have an aggressive cancer," she says. "The petition is gaining a lot of traction, which makes me realise it has affected a lot of women and men, because breast cancer doesn't discriminate and affects a lot of people." So Brave is a charity supporting Australians facing breast cancer and its founder, Rachelle Panitz, fears young women are putting off diagnostic scans due to out-of-pocket cost. They can also have trouble accessing a diagnosis in the first place because the cancer is generally thought to affect older women, she adds. "An initial diagnosis can cost up to $3000 when you factor in all the scans and tests," Ms Panitz says. "Young women are borrowing money from their parents; they may be in the workforce but don't have that spare income." Ms Panitz has met with federal politicians about making access to diagnosis easier and more affordable. "People put (the scans) off and that can lead to worse outcomes. These kinds of considerations are not new but they are exacerbated by the cost of living," she explains. Australia's BreastScreen program is free for women over 40 and women over 50 are invited for a mammogram every two years. There is no evidence to support routinely screening women under 40, unless they are at high risk of developing breast cancer due to genetic mutations, National Breast Cancer Foundation chair in cancer prevention Nehmat Houssami says. "A key message for women, including younger women, but relevant to all women even if they have recently screened, is if you notice a change in your breast ... then please see your family doctor and talk to them about being referred for testing," she says. Changes can include a lump in the breast or a change in the skin. "Medicare covers some of the cost of these tests but unless the service bulk bills there will be out-of-pocket expenses," Professor Houssami says. "So it is possible that some women may not be accessing tests due to out-of-pocket costs." According to the Department of Health, Disability and Ageing, federal, state and territory governments recently undertook a BreastScreen funding review, with the final report now being considered. "The review was a collaborative initiative aimed at enhancing the BreastScreen Australia program and was completed in mid-2025," a spokesperson says. "The latest evidence on breast cancer screening age range and screening technologies were considered as part of the review."
