logo
Labour's school guidance is Section 28 all over again for LGBTQ+ people

Labour's school guidance is Section 28 all over again for LGBTQ+ people

Metro4 days ago
'Schools should avoid materials that could encourage children to question their gender.'
That line comes straight from the government's new Relationships, Sex and Health Education (RSHE) guidance, due to come into force next year.
While to most this might even seem like a reasonable quote, for trans people like me it reads like a common right-wing talking point – that young people in the UK are being indoctrinated into questioning their gender by woke teachers.
It is a grim echo of the sentiments of Section 28. It's not just a red flag – it's a blaring siren.
For those who don't remember or weren't directly affected by it – Section 28 was a law introduced by the Thatcher government in 1988 that banned schools from 'promoting the teaching of the acceptability of homosexuality as a pretended family relationship.'
In practice, it meant teachers were forbidden from talking about LGBTQ+ people, and many have spoken of feeling forced to remain in the closet. Under Section 28, support for LGBTQ+ people in schools simply vanished, and silence and shame became policy.
I didn't grow up in the UK, but my partner did. They lived under Section 28, they protested against it at the time, and they're still living with the consequences like so many of their generation.
The shame that was distilled into people because of Section 28 is impossible to put into words, and that generation still bears the scars from it – I see it in my partner.
With thousands of members from all over the world, our vibrant LGBTQ+ WhatsApp channel is a hub for all the latest news and important issues that face the LGBTQ+ community.
Simply click on this link, select 'Join Chat' and you're in! Don't forget to turn on notifications!
And now, it seems to me that the Labour Government is dragging that same legacy into the present, this time targeting trans and non-binary youth.
It tells schools not to teach that everyone has a gender identity.
It says teachers should stick to teaching about 'facts' about biological sex and be cautious with not endorsing 'any particular view'.
Take it from a trans person – these are common dogwhistles. This isn't about safeguarding or protecting students. This is about painting transness as a politicised, contested issue, rather than a lived experience of countless people across the world.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
The idea that gender identity is too controversial to even mention in classrooms sends a devastating message to young LGBTQ+ people.
It tells teachers to retreat into silence, for fear of saying the wrong thing.
Yes, there are some parts of the guidance that seem positive on paper: more comprehensive detail on consent, online harms, pornography, misogyny, incel culture, and deepfakes.
These are important issues, and young people deserve clear, honest education about them.
But you cannot promote healthy relationships and consent while denying a whole group of young people the right to self-understanding and visibility.
This seems to me to be about politics, not safety. Labour wants to appear 'sensible' and 'balanced' on these so-called culture war issues, as shown in their abandonment of trans people and their rights.
Keir Starmer has U-turned on supporting self-ID for trans people altogether.
Now, his party seems to want to embed that same lack of support and integrity into school policy.
But queer and trans people know what happens when silence is the policy. We've lived it.
Now Labour is flirting with a new version of that same trauma – and we have to fight back.
To parents, I encourage you to ask questions. Ask schools how they intend to support your trans children. Ask them how they intend to make sure they don't feel shame about who they are. Ask them how they will protect them from bullying, as even this guidance points out is wrong
For teachers – know that you are the ones who can make a real difference to the lives of vulnerable students.
When I came out as trans at 17, my school counsellor was one of the first people I ever told. Her unquestioning support meant everything to me – she never made me feel ashamed for who I was. That was the first time I truly felt accepted by someone.
That's I want the young people who will be affected by this to remember – that you are loved. You are supported. You are valid. You have every right to explore and define who you are. No one can tell you otherwise.
Labour may think this guidance will earn them political points. And it might. But at what cost?
History will remember this time as a dark time for the UK. We already know how this story goes. We already know the harm it causes. And like before, we will fight for what's right. We will fight for love, acceptance and compassion. More Trending
Over 100,000 people showed up for Trans Pride London last weekend. That wasn't a celebration – it was a protest that sent a strong message. We are here. We are not going anywhere. Not now. Not ever.
No guidance, legislation, or political posturing can change that. The trans community is proud and resilient – we've weathered worse, and we will weather this too.
Because this isn't about whether we exist or not – we evidently do, proudly. The real question is: how will the Labour government choose to treat us?
And just like with Section 28, history will remember the answer.
Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing Ross.Mccafferty@metro.co.uk.
Share your views in the comments below.
MORE: I was burned by 'check-in chicken' – heed my warning
MORE: Britain's stance on Palestine is becoming increasingly embarrassing
MORE: Watch this terrifying film tonight – it might change your life
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Family of hostage shown in photo say Hamas is 'deliberately' starving him
Family of hostage shown in photo say Hamas is 'deliberately' starving him

Metro

time3 minutes ago

  • Metro

Family of hostage shown in photo say Hamas is 'deliberately' starving him

To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The family of one of the few hostages still being held in Gaza has slammed Hamas for 'deliberately' starving him as part of a 'propaganda' campaign. Evyatar David, 24, was taken hostage on October 7, 2023, while attending the Nova Music Festival in southern Israel. He's been held in Gaza ever since, but new video footage of David has been released by Hamas showing him in a tunnel. While digging what he said was his own grave, David was heard saying in the video: 'I haven't eaten for days… I barely got drinking water.' His family said in a statement: 'We are forced to witness our beloved son and brother, Evyatar David, deliberately and cynically starved in Hamas's tunnels in Gaza – a living skeleton, buried alive.' Israel's Minister of National Security, Itamar Ben-Gvir, slammed the footage as an attempt to 'pressure Israel'. Israel has come under increased scrutiny as thousands of Gazans have begun to starve, due to a lack of aid allowed in at checkpoints along the border. On October 7, 2023, 251 Israelis were taken hostage by Hamas during a cross-border attack. 49 remain in Gaza, 27 of which are believed to be dead. Elsewhere in Gaza, photos of starving Palestinians, some of them babies, have emerged in the past weeks, sparking public outcry for intervention in the conflict, which is about to enter its third year. Israel has denied any responsibility for what experts have deemed a famine, despite controlling the flow of all aid into the enclave. The UN documented dozens of deaths from malnutrition during the last week of July, citing some who collapsed in the streets while trying to reach food. The desperation for food has led to crowding at the few aid locations in Gaza. 73 people were killed by the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) while trying to reach aid. On July 30, blood mixed with flour as the dead were wheeled away in carts after the IDF opened fire at hundreds of Palestinians looking for food at an aid point in the Gaza Strip. The Israeli Defence Forces, who control the Zikim Crossing distribution point, admitted firing shots when their soldiers felt 'threatened'. Hours later, more than 48 were dead with hundreds more injured at the main entry point for humanitarian aid to northern Gaza, according to a local hospital. Hamas claimed the shooting lasted around three hours as thousands were funnelled towards the trucks delivering vital aid. More Trending The Palestinian NGOs Network (PNGO) say Israeli military has turned these humanitarian points into 'killing grounds, deliberately targeting civilians in their most vulnerable state'. In a statement, the IDF said: 'We place utmost importance on the delivery of humanitarian aid to the Gaza Strip and work to enable and facilitate the transfer of aid in coordination with the international community, and certainly do not intentionally act against humanitarian aid trucks.' What little food remains has been pushed to black-market extremities, as shown by prices shared with Metro by Christian Aid workers on the ground. A 25kg sack of flour is now more expensive than a Michelin-star dinner in Paris, costing as much as £414, compared to £8.80 before the start of the war. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: What does recognising Palestine as a state really mean? MORE: 'More than 48 Palestinians killed' while waiting for flour delivery in Gaza Strip MORE: Britain's stance on Palestine is becoming increasingly embarrassing

The backwardness of this Labour Government's obsession with class
The backwardness of this Labour Government's obsession with class

Telegraph

time8 hours ago

  • Telegraph

The backwardness of this Labour Government's obsession with class

SIR – The Civil Service is to restrict summer internships to students from 'lower socio-economic backgrounds' (report, August 2). I cannot quite see how this accords with the statement by Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, that 'there should be no barriers to young people having the chance to decide on their own futures' ('Reeves: Defence shut out at job fairs', report, August 2). Geoffrey Budden Norton, Suffolk SIR – Pat McFadden, the Cabinet Office minister, has defended the change to Civil Service internships. This Labour Government should be encouraging the Civil Service simply to take on the most promising people, rather than constantly agonising over individuals' backgrounds. The latest move is nothing but discrimination. Avril Wright Ingoldisthorpe, Norfolk SIR – The Government's apparent definition of 'working-class' is odious. Anyone who is employed, draws a wage or receives a salary is a worker. It's time we stopped thinking in crude class terms. Nigel Carter Devizes, Wiltshire SIR – Would the children of train drivers – some of whom earn about £65,000 – really be considered working-class? Brian Hoffmann York SIR – The trouble with insisting that the Civil Service is and must remain a 'meritocracy' is that we encourage a cohort that considers itself rather superior. Instead of faithfully assisting the government of the day to implement the will of the people, some civil servants prefer to promote their own political views, often to the detriment of official policy. We should recruit broadly into the Civil Service, but quickly root out those who consider their personal idealism to be above their service to the country. Colonel Mark Rayner (retd) Eastbourne, East Sussex SIR – The reference in your Leading Article (August 2) to the Northcote-Trevelyan report – which suggested that the Civil Service attracted the 'unambitious', 'indolent' and 'incapable' – reminded me of a conversation I had at a social event last summer. One of the guests, who worked in the private sector, was complaining how much more taxing her job was than that of her friend, who worked for Transport for London (not part of the Civil Service, but public-sector). When I asked her why she didn't apply to work there, her friend said there were few vacancies. No one wants to leave because it's such a cushy number.

Russian TikTokkers 'arrested for taking selfies outside oil depot inferno'
Russian TikTokkers 'arrested for taking selfies outside oil depot inferno'

Metro

time10 hours ago

  • Metro

Russian TikTokkers 'arrested for taking selfies outside oil depot inferno'

To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video A Ukrainian drone strike on an oil depot in Sochi – the Russian resort that hosted the 2014 Winter Olympic Games – was captured in a video shared online by two TikTok influencers. Footage circulating online shows two young women posing metres away from the inferno, allegedly caused by drone debris hitting a fuel tank. The pair have since been identified as Dasha Vladimirovna, 21, and Karina Evgenyevna, 19 – who have since been detained for accidentally exposing Vladimir Putin's failures to defend Russia. Flames are seen raging behind the two, with pillars of smoke rising into the sky, after the overnight attack. Dasha and Karina do not appear shocked – in the video, they are rapping to the track Crimson Dawn by singer Endshpil, a famous Russian rapper. Before they were identified, police had issued an appeal to members of the piublic, saying: 'During Internet monitoring, a publication was found of two girls filming a video against the backdrop of a fire in Sochi. 'The police have initiated an investigation, measures are being taken to identify the girls, and their actions will be legally assessed.' It was later confirmed that Dasha and Karina had been detained, and there were calls from pro-war outlets for them to issue a public apology over the stunt close to Sochi Airport. Police have not shared the real reason for their arrest, but it is likely that it is the potential glamourising of a Ukrainian strike on Putin's favourite Black Sea resort. The Kremlin has been taking an increasingly hard line against social media stunts seen as highlighting Ukraine's successes in the war. Ukraine's attack is seen as one of the most symbolically and strategically significant ones – deep within Russian territory since the start of the full-scale invasion. The oil depot sustained a direct hit, causing the explosion of a 2,000 cubic metre fuel reservoir and sparking a fire visible across Sochi. More than 120 firefighters and 35 emergency vehicles were deployed to the scene, and operations at the nearby airport were suspended as a precaution. Despite the official account from the governor of Krasnodar, Veniamin Kondratyev, describing the incident as a result of falling drone fragments, widespread footage circulating online paints a starkly different picture. More Trending Videos captured by local residents show towering plumes of black smoke, an orange-glowing night sky, and the sound of drones overhead. In one video, a panicked resident exclaims: 'It's flying, again! Right to the airport!' Moments later, another voice shouts, 'It's a tragedy! Everything's burning!' These images have sharply contrasted with the restrained language used by Russia's regional and federal authorities. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Trump moves nuclear submarines and threatens Russia over 'foolish' statements MORE: Ukrainian prisoner reveals what helped him survive 860 days in Putin's hellish jails MORE: I've studied tsunamis for 25 years – here are the deadly warning signs one is on its way

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store