
Human rights panel steps in after elderly Gurugram couple found living in neglect
Acting on a complaint filed by residents and representatives of the Ridgewood Estate Condominium Association, the commission noted that the couple had been living in a state of grave neglect. Residents reported hearing the elderly man frequently cry out in pain, causing emotional distress not only to his wife but also to other senior citizens living nearby.
In response, HHRC chairperson Justice Lalit Batra directed the Gurugram deputy commissioner to form a multi-disciplinary team. This team is to include the Gurugram police commissioner, sub-divisional magistrate, civil surgeon, and district social officer. The team has been tasked with visiting the couple's residence to conduct a comprehensive medical, psychological, and social assessment of their condition. The findings must be submitted to the commission before the next hearing on July 3.
The commission's order noted that despite multiple appeals made to the son and local authorities, no substantial action had been taken, necessitating the commission's intervention.
Justice Batra expressed grave concern over the prolonged physical and mental suffering endured by the elderly couple. He underscored that such neglect amounts to a violation of Article 21 of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to live with dignity. He emphasised that this issue should not be dismissed as a private family matter but recognised as a serious public human rights concern, especially when society and the state fail to protect vulnerable citizens.
Justice Batra also referenced the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, particularly Section 20, which obligates the state to ensure adequate healthcare services for senior citizens—such as reserved hospital beds, separate queues, and subsidised treatment.
'If the neglect is found to be intentional, criminal liability under Section 24 of the Act may be invoked against the responsible individual,' Justice Batra added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
10 hours ago
- Indian Express
Gujarat HC upholds state government's move to levy VAT on sale of medicines, implants by private hospitals to indoor patients
The Gujarat High Court on Friday upheld the state government's decision to levy VAT on the sale of medicines, implants, prosthetics, stents, and other consumables supplied by private hospitals to their indoor patients during the course of treatment. The HC was hearing a 2011 petition moved by private hospitals in the state challenging the notices issued and demand by the state government to levy VAT on certain hospitals. Leading hospitals, including Sterling, Bankers Cardiology, Shalby, CIMS, and Wockhardt, had challenged the tax demands issued under the Gujarat Value Added Tax (VAT) Act, 2003, contending that healthcare services rendered to indoor patients constitute a composite medical service and cannot be classified as a 'sale' for the purpose of taxation. Countering the petitions on behalf of the State, Advocate General Kamal Trivedi, assisted by Assistant Government Pleader Vinay Bairagra, argued that following the 46th Amendment to the Constitution, health care services provided by private hospitals fall within the ambit of 'works contract' as defined under Article 366 (29A) of the Constitution read with Section 2(23) of the Gujarat VAT Act. The State contended that tax was being levied not on the entire medical service, but only on the transfer of goods involved during the course of treatment. 'A Division Bench comprising Justice B D Karia and Justice D N Ray accepted the State's contentions, ruling that after the 46th Constitutional Amendment, all composite contracts, including those involving healthcare services to indoor patients, can be treated as 'works contracts'. Consequently, the tax component on the transfer of goods embedded in such services is justified and valid,' Advocate General Trivedi said. The judgment clears the way for the VAT department to recover dues from private hospitals on the sale value of consumables and medical goods like medicaments, prosthetics, implants, stents, etc. provided during treatment to their patients. The ruling is seen as a landmark clarification on the taxability of medical services under the VAT regime. While dictating the order orally, the court observed, 'Rendering services together with supply of implants, stents, medicine etc, for treatment of indoor patients cannot be given a restricted meaning by excluding the same from 'works contract'. On the basis that the 'works contract' as a concept was originally confined to contracts involving properties alone…' The court said, 'However, after the 46th amendment to the Constitution, definition of works contract was widened. It is broad based, taking within its fold every possible and conceivable contract involving transfer of property, providing service. Therefore… It can include hospitals, health and medical services involving composite contracts with the provision of service also including supply of goods with medical service. And the definition takes within its fold such services also and therefore, the respondent state was justified in proposing demand for tax…'


Time of India
13 hours ago
- Time of India
Turkish Tanks Enter Syria
News • 3 days ago Jagdeep Dhankhar has suddenly resigned as Vice President, effective immediately, citing health concerns – two years before his term was set to end. This shocking move, coming right after the Monsoon Session began, has sparked intense speculation. Was it truly health-related, or was there more to his abrupt exit? Known for his outspoken views and frequent clashes with the judiciary and opposition, Dhankhar's tenure was tumultuous. From questioning Supreme Court rulings to allowing a motion for Justice Yashwant Varma's removal (after wads of cash were found at his home), his actions often stirred controversy. Now, the focus shifts to who will be the next Vice President of India. Names like Rajya Sabha deputy chairman Harivansh Singh are in the running, but social media is abuzz with other possibilities, from Nitish Kumar to Shashi Tharoor. The Constitution mandates that the vacancy must be filled "as soon as possible."


Time of India
13 hours ago
- Time of India
Thailand deploys U.S. F-16s, Cambodia uses China's guns
News • 3 days ago Jagdeep Dhankhar has suddenly resigned as Vice President, effective immediately, citing health concerns – two years before his term was set to end. This shocking move, coming right after the Monsoon Session began, has sparked intense speculation. Was it truly health-related, or was there more to his abrupt exit? Known for his outspoken views and frequent clashes with the judiciary and opposition, Dhankhar's tenure was tumultuous. From questioning Supreme Court rulings to allowing a motion for Justice Yashwant Varma's removal (after wads of cash were found at his home), his actions often stirred controversy. Now, the focus shifts to who will be the next Vice President of India. Names like Rajya Sabha deputy chairman Harivansh Singh are in the running, but social media is abuzz with other possibilities, from Nitish Kumar to Shashi Tharoor. The Constitution mandates that the vacancy must be filled "as soon as possible."