A cheesecake phenomenon bids farewell to the Bay Area
Basuku Cheesecakes, whose Japanese-style Basque burnt cheesecakes exploded in popularity during the pandemic, is shutting down after five years. Owner Charles Chen is moving to Asia after several years of traveling back and forth for restaurant consulting work.
'The whole thing is a little bittersweet,' said Chen. 'I'm still selling out every week. It just came time to make a personal decision.'
Chen, an industry consultant, started selling cheesecakes on Instagram during the pandemic shutdown. The lush, rich cakes quickly became the dessert of the moment and sold out rapidly at popups and restaurants. Chen expanded his repertoire to include flavors like black sesame, roasted banana, yuzu and passionfruit. Basuku became so popular it spawned fake imitations.
Former Chronicle restaurant critic Soleil Ho wrote of the cake's 'intense caramel aroma' and 'phenomenal' texture, 'reminiscent of when you leave a triple-creme soft cheese out on the kitchen counter and its fat wilts and softens, leaving you with something you can effortlessly scoop up and smear on a cracker with a spoon.
Despite the cake's popularity, it was a challenging business to sustain. Chen has made every laborious cheesecake himself over the last five years, driving them to pickup locations all over the Bay Area. He has been wary of expanding into a permanent space in the costly Bay Area. 'I see people who have moved on from the popup stage to brick-and-mortar stage and aren't maybe as successful as they thought they were going to be,' he said. 'There's a massive financial strain at that point, which becomes a personal strain.'
Chen also tried unsuccessfully to find a local bakery to license the cakes and sell them in his absence. (He does now sell them in Japan and soon will expand to Taipei.)
Basuku will offer several more sales in the coming weeks at its regular pickup locations at Vina Enoteca in Palo Alto, Dolores Deluxe in San Francisco and Commis in Oakland. Check Instagram for dates and ordering information.
This isn't to say that local fans will never get to taste Basuku cheesecakes again. If Chen is back in the Bay Area, he may host sporadic popups.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
$1 million lottery winner who hoped to ‘get off the streets' officially identified
The California Lottery has identified a homeless man who once lived in the Bay Area as the winner of a $1 million prize from a scratcher purchased in San Luis Obispo earlier this year. The winner, Armando Vidal, said he bought two $10 Triple Red 777 Scratchers in April at Sandy's Deli & Liquor, where he is a regular customer. At first, Vidal believed he had just won $200. When he returned to the store to verify the tickets, the scan suggested he might have won $100,000 — until the store's manager, Wilson Samaan, took a closer look at the printout. 'What are you going to do with a million dollars?' Samaan asked him, according to Vidal. 'I was like, huh?' Vidal said. 'And that's how I found out I'd won a million dollars.' Vidal became homeless in 2008 after an injury left him unable to work. He spent years living on the streets in Santa Maria and San Luis Obispo. He told lottery officials that the win marks a dramatic turning point for him. He plans to use the money to secure stable housing – ideally with a bed and room for a couple of dogs – and hopes to invest the rest to ensure long-term financial security. The odds of winning a $1 million prize on a Triple Red 777 scratcher are 1 in 2,047,423, according to the California Lottery. Samaan, who built a rapport with Vidal over the years, personally drove him to the Lottery office in Fresno to help him claim the prize securely. 'He tried to mail it,' Samaan told the Chronicle in April. 'I told him, I'll help you out. I offered him a bus ticket or for me to drive him. I didn't want a million dollars to get lost in the mail.' Vidal told lottery officials that the media attention following his win in April was overwhelming, after another local business owner — Adam Kemp of the vintage shop Thrifty Beaches — shared his story on Instagram. 'My friend here just won $1 million in the lottery in SLO,' Kemp said in a viral video, pointing at Vidal. He now plans to keep a much lower profile.
Engadget
an hour ago
- Engadget
Threads users still barely click links
Two years in, Threads is starting to look more and more like the most viable challenger to X. It passed 350 million monthly users earlier this year and Mark Zuckerberg has predicted it could be Meta's next billion-user app. But Threads still isn't sending much traffic to other websites, which could make the platform less appealing for creators, publishers and others whose businesses depend on non-Meta owned websites. According to Similarweb, a marketing intelligence firm, outbound referral traffic from Threads climbed to 28.4 million visits in June. That's a notable jump from 15.1 million visits a year ago, but still relatively tiny considering Threads is currently averaging more than 115 million users a day on its app, according to Similarweb. Regular Threads users have long suspected that Meta deprioritizes posts with links. For most of the last two years of Threads' existence the common wisdom was that users shouldn't share links, or should only share them as replies to a primary post. Instagram chief Adam Mosseri, who also oversees Threads, hasn't exactly encouraged linking either. He said last year that Threads doesn't intentionally downrank links but that "we don't place much value on" them because "people don't like and comment on links much." Meta's reluctance wasn't just about users' preferences, though. The company was also concerned about how spammers and other bad actors might abuse links on the text-based platform. More recently though, Meta has changed course , and has been taking steps to surface more "good" links in recommended posts. "We've been working on making sure links are ranked properly," Mosseri said in June . "Links have been working much better for more than a month now." The company has also bolstered links on the platform by allowing users to add more links to their Threads profiles and providing link-specific analytics to its "insights" feature. "We want Threads to be a place that helps you grow your reach – even outside of Threads," Meta said in a May update. But despite these changes, Threads is still sending very little traffic to websites. Data shared by Similarweb shows that during May and June of last year — when Threads had more than 150 million monthly users — it sent just 24.8 million referrals to outside websites. During May and June of this year, that number more than doubled, rising to 51.8 million. Those numbers still suggest, though, that the majority of Threads' users are rarely, if ever, clicking on links they see on Threads. Lia Haberman, a social media marketing consultant and author of the ICYMI newsletter, said she's not surprised. "People just got trained not to look for them, not to include them, not to think about them," she tells Engadget. "You can't just flip a switch and all of a sudden expect people to embrace links." Publishers, a group that likely posts more links on Threads than anyone else, don't seem to be seeing significant traffic from Threads either. Data provided by Chartbeat, a company that provides analytics data to publishers, shows that publisher page views from Threads have nearly doubled since the start of the year, rising from 8.8 million in January to 15.1 million in June. Interestingly, according to both Similarweb and Chartbeat's data for 2025, referrals from Threads peaked in March. That month, Threads sent 28.8 million outbound referrals to websites, according to Similarweb, while Chartbeat publishers saw 25 million page views from the platform. But while the latest stats show that traffic from Threads has grown significantly over the last year, it still represents a tiny proportion of the publishers' traffic overall. According to Chartbeat, over the last year and a half Threads has consistently accounted for less than one tenth of a percent of sites' referral traffic. By comparison, Facebook referrals have hovered around 2 - 3 percent over the same period, while Google Discover has accounted for about 13 - 14 percent of referrals. Even among other "small" sources of referrals, like chatGPT, Reddit and Perplexity, Threads is only ahead of Perplexity in terms of the number of referrals it sends. Threads referrals even pale in comparison to Twitter's, which was never known as a major traffic driver even before Elon Musk's takeover of the company. In January of 2018, Twitter accounted for 3 percent of publishers' page views, according to Chartbeat data reported by the Press Gazette . By April of 2023, after Musk's takeover but before he rebranded the site to X, that number had fallen to 1.2 percent. Chartbeat's data isn't a complete picture — stats provided to Engadget were based on an analysis of 3,000 sites that have opted in to anonymized data sharing — but the slight increase in referral traffic roughly lines up with another major change Meta made this year. In January, following Mark Zuckerberg's move to end fact checking and walk back content moderation rules, Threads also ended its moratorium on recommending political content to all users. Following this change, some publishers of political news, including Newsweek , Politico and Forbes saw a spike in referrals from Threads, Digiday reported . But those gains don't seem to be universal, and it's not clear why some publishers may be benefitting more than others. "Threads is trailing significantly in traffic, subscription conversions, and overall conversion rate," compared with Bluesky and X, the Boston Globe's VP of Platforms Mark Karolian recently shared on Threads. While Threads' growth so far hasn't been hampered by its inability to drive users off-platform, it could become an increasingly important issue for Meta if it really wants to bring more creators onto the platform. The company is also getting ready to flip the switch on ads on the platform. A user base that ignores links could complicate Meta's pitch to advertisers, who are already taking a cautious approach to Threads. Meta declined to comment. Haberman says that Threads' ambivalence toward links might be symptomatic of a larger identity crisis the platform is still facing. It has a large user base, but it's not always clear who Threads is really for. It isn't known as a destination to follow breaking news, like Twitter once was, or as a place with highly-engaged subcultures, she notes. "Threads needs to have a purpose," she says. "And right now, it seems very much like a suggestion box at work where people are just filing complaints and trauma dumping." Whether smaller platforms like Threads can reliably drive traffic to websites is an increasingly urgent question. At a time when online search feels like it's getting worse , AI is rapidly replacing many searches and cannibalizing websites' search traffic. Publishers, as The Wall Street Journal recently reported , are being hit especially hard by these shifts. Threads is extremely unlikely to fill those gaps on its own, even if referral traffic vastly improves. And publishers in particular have plenty of reasons not to become too reliant on a Meta-owned platform. At the same time, there's clearly an opportunity for Threads to play a bigger role in a post-search world. That would not only benefit the creators, publishers and small business owners Meta has long courted, it could help Threads establish an identity of its own.
Business Insider
2 hours ago
- Business Insider
Bitcoin is on a record-setting hot streak. 3 things are driving the latest rally in the top crypto.
Bitcoin's latest record-setting rally came gradually, then suddenly. After edging up to around $112,000 to snag its first record in months last Wednesday, the world's biggest cryptocurrency spiked dramatically over the following days. Its latest jump has pushed bitcoin's total market value to nearly $2.4 trillion, above that of mega-cap tech firms like Alphabet and Meta Platforms. Here are three things that have driven bitcoin's rapid climb above $120,000. 1. Crypto week Monday marked the start of crypto week in Washington, DC, with investors banking on lawmakers' debates over a series of crypto-related bills set to create fresh tailwinds. Here are the key bills that markets are watching for: The GENIUS Act: A Senate bill that provides a regulatory framework for issuing stablecoins. The CLARITY Act: A bill that allows regulators to categorize cryptocurrencies as either a commodity, a security, or a currency. The Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act: A House bill that bans the Federal Reserve from issuing a central bank digital currency. The prospect of new regulation is ironing out some of the uncertainty associated with crypto assets, and encouraging more institutional investment, Oku Markets' Mills added. Stablecoins have already been in the spotlight since the GENIUS Act passed in the Senate last month, and any legislative support for the broader space will likely be cheered by investors who have been clamoring for stronger government backing and regulatory clarity for digital assets. 2. Strong institutional demand According to an analysis published by CoinShare, digital asset investment products saw around $3.7 billion of inflows last week, the second-largest weekly amount on record. Meanwhile, spot bitcoin ETFs took in $1.22 billion last Thursday, according to data compiled by The Block, the largest daily inflow into bitcoin funds since Trump won the presidential election. Enthusiasm for bitcoin is also taking hold among corporates. Bitcoin treasury strategies are on the rise, looking to duplicate the success of Michael Saylor's bitcoin proxy, Strategy. Metaplanet, a Japanese bitcoin Treasury, said it purchased another 797 bitcoin on Monday for around $94 million. Strategy, for its part, also said it purchased more than 4,200 bitcoin in the last week for around $472 million, a regulatory filing shows. According to Bloomberg, Twenty One Capital, Nakamoto Holdings, and ProCap Financial are among the bitcoin holders that have initiated a SPAC or a reverse merger this year. 3. Tariff volatility Investors are flocking toward bitcoin, partly due to dampened confidence in other US assets as President Donald Trump adds fuel to his trade war. US stocks were under pressure again on Monday as traders weighed the impact of Trump's newly announced tariffs, which include a 30% tariff on the EU and Mexico announced over the weekend. Macroeconomic tailwinds are one factor that's helped push bitcoin's price higher, according to Prem Raja, the head of trading at Currencies 4 You. "With the Dollar under pressure, markets have entered a risk-on phase, driving capital into equities, tech and digital assets," Raja wrote in a note. "Bitcoin's nature as a decentralised, global asset, unaffected by corporate earnings or domestic currency exposure, has made it particularly attractive amidst trade tensions, corporate margin pressures and rising stagflation concerns," Anita Wright, a chartered financial planner, said.
