Trump's Medicaid cuts threaten Florida's hospitals, most vulnerable residents
Why it matters: Curtailing funding will force health care providers to reduce or do away with necessary services, increase driving times for rural families seeking care and increase costs, advocates say.
The big picture: The bill, which Trump signed into law Friday, has three main Medicaid shifts making medical providers nervous:
Providers say adding work requirements for some recipients and conducting eligibility checks twice a year (instead of once) could lead to accidental coverage losses, starting Dec. 31, 2026.
Plus: Hospitals face cuts to Medicaid payments they rely on for funding (beginning 2028).
State of play: The phase-down effects of national cuts could cost the Sunshine State about $4 billion annually in Medicaid support, the Florida Health Justice Project projected.
The cuts, advocates say, will likely impact the most vulnerable residents.
By the numbers: As of 2024, about 4.3 million Floridians relied on Medicaid for their health care coverage — almost 19% of the state's population, according to state data.
77% of Florida's Medicaid recipients are children, seniors 65 and over, and people with disabilities, per the Health Justice Project.
In January, 23% of Florida's rural hospitals were at risk of closure, with Medicaid serving as a crucial source of revenue.
Medicaid serves more than 700,000 seniors and about 62% of nursing homes in the state rely on it.
What they're saying: The cuts are "not an accounting tactic" but an "extreme blow" to a system that is relied on by about one in five Florida residents, Mary C. Mayhew, president and CEO of the Florida Hospital Association, wrote prior to the bill's passing.
"Florida already ranks nearly dead last regarding per capita Medicaid spending," she added. Florida has "no fat to trim, no bloat to eliminate, no waste to minimize."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Business News
4 hours ago
- Time Business News
Nursing Home Lifespans: What they reveal About Elder Care Systems
The average nursing home resident in the United States lives just over a year after admission, according to new findings drawn from federal data and analyzed in a recent study by Gruber Law Offices. The report, based on data from the CDC, NIH, and other sources, reveals critical disparities in care length, quality, and end-of-life planning across the country. As America rapidly ages, the findings serve as a sobering reminder of the systemic vulnerabilities in our elder care model. With roughly 1.4 million Americans living in nursing homes and over 70% of them women, the spotlight is squarely on a fragmented system grappling with economic strain, uneven standards, and mounting demand. Stark Realities of Life in Care According to the data, the median nursing home stay before death is just five months. While the mean stretches to approximately 13.7 months, the short stays underscore how many individuals enter long-term care at the end stages of life. Women, who comprise the majority of nursing home residents, tend to live longer in care, a median of eight months compared to just three months for men. This discrepancy speaks not only to gendered longevity but also to resource allocation. Individuals with higher incomes and robust social support often transition more quickly to hospice or home-based care. By contrast, financially vulnerable individuals tend to remain longer in facilities, facing a high risk of institutional decline. The Geography of Longevity Regional disparities are another critical factor. Residents in the western U.S. have significantly shorter stays compared to those in the Midwest and Northeast. While stroke patients in the East might receive extended care, cancer or lung disease patients in western states often exit care more quickly a reflection of both medical urgency and care capacity. States such as Hawaii, Minnesota, and California report some of the highest life expectancies for nursing home residents. These states benefit from better staffing ratios, higher investment in palliative care, and stronger care coordination. On the other end of the spectrum, southern states including Mississippi, Alabama, and West Virginia face systemic obstacles such as underfunded Medicaid programs and staff shortages. The Financial Toll of Long-Term Care Cost remains one of the largest barriers to high-quality nursing care. A private room in a U.S. nursing home now costs over $8,800 per month, with semi-private rooms averaging $7,756. Medicaid covers around 61% of all nursing home care nationally, but the remaining gap often falls to families. Medicare, for all its importance in senior health, contributes just 6% to long-term care expenses. The economic stress is compounded by inadequate advance planning. Only 44% of residents have advance directives at the time of admission. Without these documents, families often struggle with complex, last-minute medical decisions, further eroding patient dignity in the final months of life. A Workforce in Crisis Staffing metrics present another bleak portrait. The average nursing home offers just 0.86 hours of registered nurse time and 2.21 hours of certified nursing assistant (CNA) time per resident per day. These numbers fall below many recommended care standards, and in states with low staffing, such as Wyoming, North Dakota, and Alaska, the impact is visible in both outcomes and resident satisfaction. In contrast, states like California, New York, and Florida maintain higher workforce levels and report better resident longevity and safety. Yet the problem is national: many facilities struggle to recruit and retain skilled professionals, especially in rural areas or regions with lower reimbursement rates. A Crisis of Falls, Hospitalizations, and Transitions Nursing home residents are among the most vulnerable patients in the health system. On average, a resident experiences 2.6 falls per year, and nearly 30% of individuals die within one month of being discharged. Hospitalizations frequently stem from preventable issues like respiratory infections, circulatory conditions, or unaddressed injuries. More than 1,800 older Americans die annually due to fall-related incidents in nursing homes. While not every fall is fatal, each represents a breakdown in the protective care environment these facilities are meant to provide. The Missing Link: Hospice and Palliative Access Perhaps the most urgent call to action from the report is the underutilization of hospice and palliative care. Despite well-documented benefits, only 10–30% of residents receive specialized end-of-life support. The reasons vary: Medicare restrictions, lack of trained staff, and inconsistent facility policies all contribute. Yet when hospice is implemented, family satisfaction and quality of life outcomes rise substantially. This gap points to a systemic failure to prioritize comfort, dignity, and planning at the most critical time in a person's life. Looking Ahead As demand for long-term care rises, with an estimated 70% of adults over 65 expected to require it, the need for reform is urgent. Policymakers and healthcare systems must align to fund quality improvements, boost staffing levels, and expand access to end-of-life care. Gruber Law Offices' analysis of the data shows clearly that where a person lives, how much they earn, and what medical support they can access all shape how—and how long—they live in nursing care. A system this fractured cannot keep pace with the aging of America. What emerges is not just a call for better nursing homes, but for a better system altogether, one that sees elder care not as a burden, but as a moral and medical obligation to honor lives from start to finish. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
The Hill
4 hours ago
- The Hill
Trump's CDC nominee set for Senate vote
The Big Story A Senate committee will vote Wednesday on advancing the nomination of Susan Monarez for director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). © The Hill, Greg Nash President Trump tapped Monarez in March to replace his previous choice David Weldon, a former Florida congressman whose nomination was withdrawn over concerns that he would not clear the Senate. Monarez served as the CDC's acting head from January until her nomination and was previously deputy director of the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health. If confirmed, she would be the first non-physician to hold the position in more than half a century. As director, Monarez would hold enormous power over the future of vaccines. She would be able to approve or reject vaccine recommendations made from the agency's advisory panel which Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr recently overhauled. During confirmation hearing, Monarez showed that she concurred with scientific consensus on issues like vaccinations and water fluoridation, topics that have come under intense scrutiny since the start of Kennedy's tenure. Former colleagues describe Monarez as a strong believer in science and data. She told senators she believes vaccines 'save lives' and that fluoridated water is safe. At the same time, Monarez was careful to not directly contradict either Kennedy or Trump. When asked by Sen. Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.) if she disagreed with Kennedy on anything, Monarez said, 'If I'm confirmed as CDC director, I look forward to supporting the secretary with science and evidence and making sure that I am giving him the best information possible to help support some of these critical decisions.' Welcome to The Hill's Health Care newsletter, we're Nathaniel Weixel, Joseph Choi and Alejandra O'Connell-Domenech — every week we follow the latest moves on how Washington impacts your health. Did someone forward you this newsletter? Subscribe here. Essential Reads How policy will be impacting the health care sector this week and beyond: GOP faces 'big, beautiful' blowback risk on ObamaCare subsidy cuts Medicaid cuts have received the lion's share of attention from critics of Republicans' sweeping tax cuts legislation, but the GOP's decision not to extend enhanced ObamaCare subsidies could have a much more immediate impact ahead of next year's midterms. Extra subsidies put in place during the coronavirus pandemic are set to expire at the end of the year, and there are few signs Republicans are interested in tackling … Few see falling birth rates as a priority: Survey Few Americans see falling birth rates as a national priority, according to a new survey from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. When asked in the Thursday survey about how large of a problem declining birth rates in the U.S. is, 28 percent of respondents said it is a major issue while 44 percent called it a minor one. Twenty-seven percent didn't consider it a problem at all. The U.S. birth rate … Trump floats 200 percent tariffs on pharma imports 'very soon' President Trump on Tuesday threatened to impose up to 200 percent tariffs on pharmaceutical products imported into the U.S. 'very soon.' 'If they have to bring the pharmaceuticals into the country, the drugs and other things into the country, they're going to be tariffed at a very, very high rate, like 200 percent,' Trump said during a Cabinet meeting. Trump said any tariffs would not take effect immediately. … In Other News Branch out with a different read from The Hill: Wisconsin Supreme Court clears way for conversion therapy ban A Wisconsin legislative committee controlled by Republicans violated the state constitution when it rejected a state agency rule to ban conversion therapy practices, the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled Tuesday, clearing the way for the state to enforce the rule and blunting the Legislature's power to block state regulations. The Wisconsin Legislature's powerful Joint Committee for Review of Administrative Rules … Around the Nation Local and state headlines on health care: What We're Reading Health news we've flagged from other outlets: What Others are Reading Most read stories on The Hill right now: Senate GOP not happy with Trump beatdown of Tillis Republican senators aren't happy about how President Trump treated Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), whom the president blasted last week on social … Read more Trump administration takes blows from Epstein conspiracy community it once embraced The Trump administration is stumbling as it seeks to unwind new details about the Jeffrey Epstein case, infuriating its key boosters with … Read more What People Think Opinion related to health submitted to The Hill: Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters here
The Hill
5 hours ago
- The Hill
GOP faces ‘big, beautiful' blowback risk on ObamaCare subsidies cuts
Medicaid cuts have received the lion's share of attention from critics of Republicans' sweeping tax cuts legislation, but the GOP's decision not to extend enhanced ObamaCare subsidies could have a much more immediate impact ahead of next year's midterms. Extra subsidies put in place during the coronavirus pandemic are set to expire at the end of the year, and there are few signs Republicans are interested in tackling the issue at all. To date, only Sens. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) have spoken publicly about wanting to extend them. The absence of an extension in the 'big beautiful bill' was especially notable given the sweeping changes the legislation makes to the health care system, and gives Democrats an easy message: if Republicans in Congress let the subsidies expire at the end of the year, premiums would spike, and millions of people across the country could lose health insurance. In a statement released last month as the House was debating its version of the bill, House and Senate Democratic health leaders pointed out what they said was GOP hypocrisy. 'Their bill extends hundreds of tax policies that expire at the end of the year. The omission of this policy will cause millions of Americans to lose their health insurance and will raise premiums on 24 million Americans,' wrote Senate Finance Committee Ranking Member Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), House Ways and Means Committee Ranking Member Richard E. Neal (D-Mass.) and House Energy and Commerce Committee Ranking Member Frank Pallone, Jr., (D-N.J.). 'The Republican failure to stop this premium spike is a policy choice, and it needs to be recognized as such.' More than 24 million Americans are enrolled in the insurance marketplace this year, and about 90 percent—more than 22 million people— are receiving enhanced subsidies. 'All of those folks will experience quite large out of pocket premium increases,' said Ellen Montz, who helped run the federal ObamaCare exchanges under the Biden administration and is now a managing director with Manatt Health. 'When premiums become less affordable, you have this kind of self-fulfilling prophecy where the youngest and the healthiest people drop out of the marketplace, and then premiums become even less affordable in the next year,' Montz said. The subsidies have been an extremely important driver of ObamaCare enrollment. Experts said if they were to expire, those gains would be erased. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), 4.2 million people are projected to lose insurance by 2034 if the subsidies aren't renewed. Combined with changes to Medicaid in the new tax cut law, at least 17 million Americans could be uninsured in the next decade. The enhanced subsidies increase financial help to make health insurance plans more affordable. Eligible applicants can use the credit to lower insurance premium costs upfront or claim the tax break when filing their return. Premiums are expected to increase by over 75 percent on average, with people in some states seeing their payments more than double, according to health research group KFF. Devon Trolley, executive director of Pennie, the Affordable Care Act exchange in Pennsylvania, said she expects at least a 30 percent drop in enrollment if the subsidies expire. The state starts ramping up its open enrollment infrastructure in mid-August, she said, so time is running short for Congress to act. 'The only vehicle left for funding the tax credits, if they were to extend them, would be the government funding bill with a deadline of September 30, which we really see as the last possible chance for Congress to do anything,' Trolley said. Trolley said three quarters of enrollees in the state's exchange have never purchased coverage without the enhanced tax credits in place. 'They don't know sort of a prior life of when the coverage was 82 percent more expensive. And we are very concerned this is going to come as a huge sticker shock to people, and that is going to significantly erode enrollment,' Trolley said. The enhanced subsidies were first put into effect during the height of the coronavirus pandemic as part of President Biden's 2021 economic recovery law and then extended as part of the Inflation Reduction Act. CBO said permanently extending the subsidies would cost $358 billion over the next 10 years. Republicans have balked at the cost. They argue the credits hide the true cost of the health law and subsidize Americans who don't need the help. They also argue the subsidies have been a driver of fraudulent enrollment by unscrupulous brokers seeking high commissions. Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), chairman of the Senate Health, Education Labor and Pensions Committee, last year said Congress should reject extending the subsidies. The Republican Study Committee's 2025 fiscal budget said the subsidies 'only perpetuate a never-ending cycle of rising premiums and federal bailouts — with taxpayers forced to foot the bill.' But since 2020, enrollment in the ACA marketplace has grown faster in the states won by President Trump in 2024, primarily rural Southern red states that haven't expanded Medicaid. Explaining to millions of Americans why their health insurance premiums are suddenly too expensive for them to afford could be politically unpopular for Republicans. According to a recent KFF survey, 45 percent of Americans who buy their own health insurance through the ACA exchanges identify as Republican or lean Republican. Three in 10 said they identify as Make America Great Again supporters. 'So much of that growth has just been a handful of southern red states … Texas, Florida, Georgia, the Carolinas,' said Cynthia Cox, vice president at KFF and director of the Program on the ACA. 'That's where I think we're going to see a lot more people being uninsured.'
