Socialist Texas professor calls for University of Houston to be renamed 'George Floyd University'
While wearing a keffiyeh, McNally spoke on a panel in Chicago about what fighting the state would look like in the "context of growing an insurgent mass movement." Among McNally's ideas for the "de-stateification" of the University of Houston, which is a public university, included honoring Floyd after his highly publicized death in May 2020.
"We would open the university up in such a way that it becomes a resource of the broader community," McNally said. "And I can tell you with great confidence that in the Third Ward of Houston, that means that we will be renamed the George Floyd University."
He pointed out that Floyd grew up in the Third Ward and went to school close to the campus before moving to Minneapolis.
McNally also recounted his experience of watching the George Floyd Black Lives Matter protests in June 2020, where he saw police officers being overwhelmed by protesters.
"All of a sudden you got a glimpse of what it means when we control the streets because the cops were backing off. They were completely outnumbered," McNally recalled. "You begin to sense what happens when the balance of social forces, even in one small situation, shifts and how the horizons of possibility change. For that period of time, that part of downtown Houston was not in their hands anymore. It was in our hands. It was in insurgent hands."
In the aftermath of Floyd's death, the University of Houston hosted multiple courses and projects centered around racial oppression. This included 2022's Project on Race and Capitalism, which was directed by McNally.
McNally suggested that the "social insurgency" he's seen from the anti-Israel campus protests could be the next insurgent moment they would need to enact change if it could be "dramatically extended."
His other proposals were abolishing campus police and replacing them with "democratically constituted and elected safety committees," restoring the LGBTQ+ center, declaring the school a "sanctuary campus" from ICE officers and fighting to "abolish tuition and grades."
The University of Houston closed down its LGBTQ+ center in 2023 after Texas Gov. Greg Abbott signed into law Senate Bill 17, which banned diversity, equity and inclusion offices in public schools.
In a statement to Fox News Digital, a spokesperson for the school said that McNally's comments did not "represent the views of the University of Houston." However, they added, while faculty members enjoy First Amendment rights, the "context, setting or other circumstances" of the comments could "impact those rights."
Fox News Digital also reached out to McNally for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
History from News Journal July 13-19: ice rink debate, lottery problems, hero rescues two
"Pages of history" features excerpts from The News Journal archives including The Morning News and The Evening Journal. See the archives at July 13, 2000, The News Journal Four of five Wilmington City Council members at a stormy committee meeting Wednesday opposed Mayor James H. Sills Jr.'s proposed portable ice-skating rink in Rodney Square. The 13-member council is scheduled to vote next week on spending $1.3 million for the rink. Seven votes are needed to approve the expense. Council President James M. Baker said he prefers a permanent rink at a yet-to-be-built park near the Amtrak station on the Christina riverfront. That prompted Greg Williams, director of the city's parks and recreation department, to say the project has become politicized at the expense of Wilmington's children. He favors the Rodney Square site. Baker, who is running against Sills in the Sept. 9 Democratic mayoral primary, said the Sills administration has advocated the concept of a rink somewhere in the city for three years. The council's requests to explore several locations were not successful, Baker said. 'This is not a political football,' Baker told Williams in a raised voice. 'You guys failed us; we didn't fail you.' Councilman Gerald Brady, who presided over the park and recreation committee meeting, declared the meeting out of order. 'Bring it back to order then,' Baker said. He then left and did not return. Brady and Councilmen Paul Bartkowski and Kevin Kelley said the money should not be spent on the rink because there are more pressing concerns in the city, such as aging infrastructure and neighborhood projects. 'I've got sewers and sidewalks that need to be fixed,' Brady said. Councilwoman Stephanie Bolden said the mayoral race has impeded progress on the rink, which she thinks should be in Rodney Square…. If council approves the project, the rink would open this year or in 2001. The 157-by-75-foot rink would cost $275,000 a year to operate. Two corporations have pledged to pay operating costs for the first five years. City officials would not identify the corporations, saying they want to remain anonymous until the city decides whether to pay for the rink. Recent Wilmington-area news: Approved SEPTA budget would kill Delaware rail service in 2026 without more funding July 16, 1975, The Morning News The Delaware Lottery may not be well, but it is alive. Gov. Sherman W. Tribbitt has yet to appoint a new lottery director, and until he does the game can't start again. In the meantime, a loaned staffer and a volunteer have been kept busy for the past month paying the debts and settling the accounts of the defunct Loto-Superfecta, which ended in April after five money-losing weeks. Tribbitt said he has five or six candidates in mind for the lottery director's job, but has not been able to settle on one. He said one person, who was not named, accepted the post but refused it later for health reasons. ... Because bills need to be paid and accounts reconciled, Tribbitt asked the state planning office to temporarily assign Lou Jordan, a planning administrator, to the lottery. ... Jordan said since he started on June 16 he has paid about $90,000 to cover the rent through June, equipment rentals, payments, advertising and tickets. ... Jordan said he has sent out checks for five $100 tickets since June and another $70 to $80 for smaller prizes…. It is generally assumed that Delaware's second venture into public gaming will more closely follow the typical state lotteries rather than something new again. The Loto-Superfecta let people choose their own numbers and used a horse race to determine the winning number. However, there were no first place winners, and the public steadily lost interest. The General Assembly has put aside $130,000 for the revised lottery, bringing the total state investment to date to more than $600,000. ... The state auditor has charged that lottery officials illegally spent $186,000 more than they had in their $400,000 budget. ... Recent lottery news: Wilmington man hits Delaware Lottery twice in a week. Here's where he bought his tickets July 18, 1925, Wilmington Morning News A double rescue was made in Rehoboth yesterday afternoon when C.C. Thompson, of Seaford, fought a strong undercurrent to drag Miss Marcella Fairchild, 19, of Pittsburgh, Pa., and William Bounds, 12, of Salisbury, Md., from the water. Thompson, an all-round athlete who rescued a woman from drowning last summer, was walking along the beach with a lifeguard when they were attracted by the screams of a woman a short distance from the shore who had been caught in a heavy undertow. Both men jumped into the water and were also caught in the undertow, but Thompson managed to reach the young woman before she had been carried out very far. Keeping the girl's head above water, he waited until the lifeguard joined them, and the two of them managed to get her ashore. Just as they reached the shore, another cry from the water attracted Thompson's attention. Turning, he discovered a small boy who had gotten out in water beyond his depth and had also been caught in the undertow. Leaving the young woman in the care of the lifeguard and the large crowd that had congregated, Thompson swam out to the boy and caught him just as the boy was going down for the third time. After he succeeded in getting the boy ashore, it was discovered he was unconscious, and Thompson, although weakened from his double fight with the undertow, assisted in reviving him by using a stomach pump. Reach reporter Ben Mace at rmace@ This article originally appeared on Delaware News Journal: History from News Journal: ice rink debate, lottery problems, rescue
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mills' resignation will mean two Cheboygan council seats at stake in special election
CHEBOYGAN — Diane Mills has resigned from the Cheboygan City Council because she will be moving out of the city. Mills, who also serves as mayor pro tem, was appointed to council in 2021 to fill a vacant seat for a term ending in 2022. She won a special election in November 2021 to fill the remainder of that term. In November 2022, she ran again and won a second term that would have ended in 2026. "I will be moving out of the city about mid August. I'll be tendering my resignation on Tuesday (July 8) with (an) effective date of July 22. I don't have to resign until I actually leave Cheboygan, but handing in my resignation letter on the (July 8) will allow the position to be on the ballot for this November's special election as there's already one seat that will be on the ballot. It's all about not having to do another special election in May of 2026 and waste taxpayer money," she told the Daily Tribune. Mills' resignation was announced by Mayor Brett Mallory at the July 8 council meeting. Subscribe Check out our latest offers and read the local news that matters to you More: Cheboygan City Council picks Bedwin to temporarily fill open seat Also on the ballot in the November special election will be a council seat formerly held by Sierra Oliver, who resigned earlier this year because she, too, moved out of the city. Council appointed Adam Bedwin to temporarily fill the seat until the November special election. — Contact Paul Welitzkin at pwelitzkin@ This article originally appeared on Cheboygan Daily Tribune: Diane Mills resignation means two Cheboygan City Council seats at stake in November special election
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
President Donald Trump Broke His Social Security Vow -- and It May Be the Best Thing That's Happened to Retirees
President Donald Trump pledged to end the tax on Social Security benefits prior to and following his election. However, Trump's flagship tax and spending law excluded this popular proposal for two very good reasons. Even though the tax on benefits isn't going anywhere, retirees who needed the biggest boost were helped out by the One Big Beautiful Bill. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook › In May, Social Security retired-worker benefits made history. For the first time in the nine-decade history of the program, the average monthly check for retired workers topped $2,000. While this is a relatively modest monthly sum, Social Security income is indispensable for most retirees. National pollster Gallup has surveyed retirees annually for 24 years to gauge how important their monthly payout is from America's leading social program. In April 2025, a combined 86% responded that it represented a "major" or "minor" income source, which is in line with the 80% to 90% of respondents in prior surveys who have needed Social Security income, in some capacity, to make ends meet. Nothing bears more importance to retirees than knowing how much they'll receive each month from Social Security -- and arguably nothing excited these beneficiaries more than President Donald Trump's vow to remove the hated tax on the program's benefits. But with his "One Big Beautiful Bill" now signed into law, retirees have come to the realization that the president broke his promise. Ironically, however, this might be the best thing that has happened to retired beneficiaries. In 1983, with the asset reserves of Social Security's trust funds nearly exhausted, a bipartisan Congress passed the Social Security Amendments of 1983, which President Ronald Reagan signed into law. They gradually increased the payroll tax and full retirement age for working Americans and introduced the now-hated tax on the program's benefits. Beginning in 1984, up to half of benefits could be exposed to federal taxation if provisional income (defined as adjusted gross income + tax-free interest + one-half of benefits) topped $25,000 for single filers and $32,000 for couples filing jointly. A decade later, a second tax tier was added that exposed up to 85% of benefits in instances where provisional income surpassed $34,000 and $44,000 for single and married filers, respectively. What's made taxing Social Security benefits such a sensitive subject is that these income thresholds, which were introduced decades ago, haven't once been adjusted for inflation. Taxing benefits was expected to affect around 10% of all senior households in the mid-1980s. Today, it's applicable to approximately half of all senior households. During Donald Trump's presidential campaign, he proclaimed in all caps on Truth Social, "Seniors should not pay tax on Social Security." This was a sentiment that he reiterated at a town hall event months after his inauguration. Based on the overwhelming popularity among existing beneficiaries of eliminating the tax on benefits, the expectation was for Trump's budget bill to follow through on his campaign and post-election vow. But this didn't happen for two very good reasons. The prominent issue with Trump's popular proposal is that it would have financially crippled Social Security. The Old-Age and Survivors Insurance trust fund (OASI), which is responsible for paying retired workers and survivor beneficiaries each month, is an estimated eight years away from exhausting its asset reserves. Though the OASI fund doesn't require a cent in asset reserves to continue doling out payments, the existing payout schedule is at risk of being slashed by 23% for retired workers and survivors come 2033. If the president's proposal was somehow signed into law and the tax on Social Security benefits was eliminated, it would have removed one of the program's three sources of funding and expedited the timeline to the depletion of OASI asset reserves. More than likely, it would have also widened how much benefits would need to be cut to sustain payouts through 2099. The other reason eliminating the tax on benefits was shelved has to do with politics. Whereas most tax and spending provisions in what is now Trump's flagship law could be dealt with through a process known as reconciliation (where a simple majority of votes in the House and Senate determines passage), amending the Social Security Act can't be done through reconciliation. It requires 60 votes in the Senate, which would necessitate bipartisan cooperation given that Republicans hold only 53 seats in the upper house of Congress. Instead of holding up the budget bill or risking defeat, the "no tax on Social Security" provision was left out. On the surface, the prospect of still having to pay tax on some portion of Social Security benefits probably isn't sitting well with retirees -- especially with President Trump pledging to remove this disliked tax on a number of occasions. But when push comes to shove, Trump bailing on his Social Security vow may actually be the best possible news for retirees on two fronts. To begin with, abandoning the "no tax on Social Security" provision ensures the OASI asset reserves won't be exhausted demonstrably faster than they're currently projected to. While doing nothing isn't the right answer for Social Security, eliminating the tax on benefits was unequivocally the wrong answer with regard to the financial health of the program. However, the real victory for retirees is the provision that replaced this vow to eliminate the tax on benefits. Trump's flagship tax and spending law offers a number of tax breaks, including no tax on overtime or tips for select workers from 2025 through 2028, as well as a quadrupling in the deduction for state and local tax (SALT) from $10,000 to $40,000 through 2029. But the highlight of Trump's newly signed law is the beefed-up standard deduction for seniors age 65 and above from 2025 through 2028. Retirees will receive an added $6,000 standard deduction -- or $12,000 (combined) when filing jointly -- if their adjusted gross income (AGI) is less than $75,000 for single filers and $150,000 if filing jointly. A 6% phase-out begins above these income thresholds, with single filers and married couples with AGIs above $175,000 and $250,000, respectively, not eligible for this added deduction. Removing the tax on benefits would have specifically aided middle- and high-earning recipients who are currently paying tax on some portion of their benefits. Meanwhile, the temporary deduction boost from the One Big Beautiful Bill is aimed at reducing tax liability for low- and middle-income beneficiaries. In other words, this provision helps the retirees more likely to need a financial boost. Ultimately, this is the best possible outcome for a majority of Social Security retirees. If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Join Stock Advisor to learn more about these Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. President Donald Trump Broke His Social Security Vow -- and It May Be the Best Thing That's Happened to Retirees was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
