"There Will Be No Hamas" In Postwar Gaza: Netanyahu
Hamas and Israel staked out their positions Wednesday ahead of expected talks on a Washington-backed ceasefire proposal, with the militant group suggesting it was open to an agreement while the Israeli prime minister vowed that "there will be no Hamas" in postwar Gaza.
Both sides stopped short of accepting the proposal announced Tuesday by US President Donald Trump. Hamas insisted on its longstanding position that any deal bring an end to the war in Gaza.
Trump said Israel had agreed on terms for a 60-day ceasefire in Gaza and urged Hamas to accept the deal before conditions worsen. The US leader has been increasing pressure on the Israeli government and Hamas to broker a ceasefire and hostage agreement.
Trump said the 60-day period would be used to work toward ending the war - something Israel says it won't accept until Hamas is defeated. He said a deal might come together as soon as next week.
But Hamas' response, which emphasized its demand that the war end, raised questions about whether the latest offer could materialize into an actual pause in fighting.
Hamas official Taher al-Nunu said the militant group was "ready and serious regarding reaching an agreement." He said Hamas was "ready to accept any initiative that clearly leads to the complete end to the war."
A Hamas delegation was expected to meet Wednesday with Egyptian and Qatari mediators in Cairo to discuss the proposal, according to an Egyptian official. The official spoke on condition of anonymity, because he wasn't authorized to discuss the talks with the media.
Disagreement on how the war should end
Throughout the nearly 21-month-long war, ceasefire talks between Israel and Hamas have repeatedly faltered over whether the war should end as part of any deal.
Hamas said in a brief statement Wednesday that it had received a proposal from the mediators and was holding talks with them to "bridge gaps" to return to the negotiating table.
Hamas has said it's willing to free the remaining 50 hostages, less than half of whom are said to be alive, in exchange for a complete Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and an end to the war.
Israel says it will only agree to end the war if Hamas surrenders, disarms and exiles itself, something the group refuses to do.
"I am announcing to you - there will be no Hamas," Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said during a speech Wednesday.
An Israeli official said the latest proposal calls for a 60-day deal that would include a partial Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and a surge in humanitarian aid to the territory. The mediators and the US would provide assurances about talks to end the war, but Israel isn't committing to that as part of the latest proposal, the official said.
The official wasn't authorized to discuss the details of the proposed deal with the media and spoke on condition of anonymity.
It wasn't clear how many hostages would be freed as part of the agreement, but previous proposals have called for the release of about 10.
"I'm holding my hands and praying that this will come about," said Idit Ohel, mother of Israeli hostage Alon Ohel. "I hope the world will help this happen, will put pressure on whoever they need to, so the war will stop and the hostages will return."
On Monday, Trump is set to host Netanyahu at the White House, days after Ron Dermer, a senior Netanyahu adviser, held discussions with top US officials about Gaza, Iran and other matters.
Trump issues another warning
On Tuesday, Trump wrote on social media that Israel had "agreed to the necessary conditions to finalize" the 60-day ceasefire, "during which time we will work with all parties to end the War."
"I hope, for the good of the Middle East, that Hamas takes this Deal, because it will not get better - IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE," he said.
Trump's warning may find a skeptical audience with Hamas. Even before the expiration of the war's longest ceasefire in March, Trump had repeatedly issued dramatic ultimatums to pressure Hamas to agree to longer pauses in the fighting that would see the release of more hostages and a return of more aid for Gaza's civilians.
Still, Trump views the current moment as a potential turning point in the brutal conflict that has left more than 57,000 dead in the Palestinian territory.
Gaza's Health Ministry said the death count passed the 57,000 mark Tuesday into Wednesday, after hospitals received 142 bodies overnight. The ministry does not differentiate between civilians and combatants in its death count, but says that more than half of the dead are women and children.
Since dawn Wednesday, Israeli strikes killed a total of 40 people across the Gaza Strip, the ministry said. Hospital officials said four children and seven women were among the dead.
The Israeli military, which blames Hamas for the civilian casualties because it operates from populated areas, was looking into the reports.
The war began on Oct. 7, 2023, when Hamas-led militants attacked southern Israel, killing 1,200 people and taking roughly 250 hostages.
The fighting has left the coastal Palestinian territory in ruins, with much of the urban landscape flattened in the fighting. More than 90% of Gaza's 2.3 million population has been displaced, often multiple times. And the war has sparked a humanitarian crisis in Gaza, pushing hundreds of thousands of people toward hunger.
Hospital director killed
The director of the Indonesian Hospital, Dr. Marwan al-Sultan, was killed in an apartment in an Israeli strike west of Gaza City, a hospital statement said. The hospital is the Palestinian enclave's largest medical facility north of Gaza City and has been a critical lifeline since the start of the war.
The hospital was surrounded by Israeli troops last month and evacuated alongside the other two primary hospitals in northern Gaza.
The bodies of the doctor, his wife, daughter and son-in-law, arrived at Shifa Hospital torn into pieces, according to Issam Nabhan, head of the nursing department at the Indonesian Hospital.
"Gaza lost a great man and doctor," Nabhan said. "He never left the hospital one moment since the war began and urged us to stay and provide humanitarian assistance. We don't know what he did to deserve getting killed."
In central Gaza, the Al Awda Hospital said an Israeli strike near the entrance of a school housing displaced Palestinians killed eight people, including three children, and wounded 30 others. The hospital also said Israel struck a group of Palestinians who gathered near the entrance of the hospital's administration building in Nuseirat refugee camp.
In other developments, Israel said an airstrike last week killed two Hamas members who allegedly took part in a June 24 attack in which seven Israeli soldiers were killed when a Palestinian attacker attached a bomb to their armored vehicle.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
United News of India
10 minutes ago
- United News of India
Trump threatens to slap 10 pec additional tariffs on BRICS countries for ‘Anti American' policies
Washington, July 7 (UNI) US President Donald Trump has threatened to slap an additional 10% trade tariffs which supported the alleged 'Anti-American' policies of BRICS nations. "Any Country aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies of BRICS, will be charged an ADDITIONAL 10% Tariff. There will be no exceptions to this policy," Trump said on Truth Social. The international multilateral bloc which was founded by Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa as an alternative platform to challenge Western hegemony and promote the voices of developing countries, has long been criticised by the US President. BRICS has been viewed as a favourable bloc by many countries who have expressed their wish to join, and last year expanded to include Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, with Vietnam becoming a partner nation this year. Trump's comments came the bloc's members criticised the US tariff policies as well as proposing reforms to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and how major currencies are valued, reports BBC. BRICS countries, who started a meeting in Rio de Janeiro this weekend, have called for reforms to global institutions and positioned the alliance as a platform for diplomacy amid escalating trade conflicts and geopolitical tensions. A joint statement by the bloc's Finance Ministers slammed the tariffs, labelling them as a threat to the global economy, and accused it of bringing "uncertainty into international economic and trade activities". The leaders also condemned the military strikes on Iran in June, criticising the attacks as a violation of international law. The summit was attended in person by world leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa. Russian President Vladmir Putin attended it online, while China was represented by Premier Li Qiang who stood in President Xi Jinping. UNI ANV GNK 1240
The Wire
10 minutes ago
- The Wire
Modi's 'Act East Policy' Requires Him to In Fact 'Act' at Home
Modi will find it difficult to commit to a trade deal with a maverick and unpredictable US President without exposing himself to criticism at home. Anybody who knows anything about the way politics works in this country would have known that US president Donald Trump's 9 July deadline for a US –India free trade agreement was unrealistic. While Union commerce minister Piyush Goyal and his officials have logged many flying miles travelling between New Delhi and Washington DC, it was only inevitable that in the end Mr. Goyal would say that India does not make trade deals based on deadlines. It would do so only on the basis of the national interest. While a deal may yet be struck at the eleventh hour and Mr. Goyal's tactics may pay off, it will be a politically risky gamble given that the Monsoon Session of Parliament is just two weeks away. Prime Minister Narendra Modi will find it difficult to commit to a trade deal with a maverick and unpredictable US president without exposing himself to criticism at home. While President Trump has promised a 'win-win' deal, he is now known to interpret every deal as a win for his 'America First' strategy. However balanced a trade deal might be between India and the US, in the competition between Mr. Trump's 'America First' and Mr. Modi's 'India First', the political Opposition in India would have enough to go to town accusing the Modi government of once again 'surrendering' to President Trump's diktat. Just as the BJP opposed trade deals signed by the Manmohan Singh government, the Congress and Left parties would oppose whatever deal India strikes with the United States, especially in the present context. The context is important. The Modi government is still pushing back on criticism that it agreed to a ceasefire with Pakistan under pressure from President Trump. It can ill afford to be seen as buckling under pressure on the trade front. The stakes are high. It is not just the criticism from the political Opposition that would worry the Modi government but, even more so, the criticism from within its own support ranks. Even on trade policy, there are as many protectionist hawks within the Sangh Parivar as there are in the Opposition. Given the difficulties associated with declaring victory on a trade deal with the United States, the Modi government had no option but to place the trade negotiations on the back burner. There can be no movement forward until the Monsoon Session of Parliament is over. A larger challenge stares India's trade negotiators in the face. Ever since the early 1990s, when India opted to enter into a multilateral trade agreement, the government has zealously defended the country's status as a developing economy. India signed on to the membership of the World Trade Organisation after being assured that, along with other developing economies, it would receive 'special and differential treatment' (SDT). India remains a protectionist economy by Asian standards. There was a time, during the tenures of the Atal Bihari Vajpayee and the Manmohan Singh governments, when India would declare that the objective of its trade policy was to bring India's tariffs down to 'ASEAN levels'. This objective has never been restated by the Narendra Modi government, which has in fact raised tariff barriers across many product lines over the past decade. India's trade partners have been protesting all along, and in President Donald Trump they have found a strong advocate of their grievances. There is, therefore, a two-fold problem for Prime Minister Modi with respect to trade and tariff policy. On the one hand, he remains under pressure from within the ranks of the Sangh Parivar to stick to a more protectionist stance. There are many reasons put forward to justify this. On the other hand, the world outside says that if India is indeed in its 'Amrit Kaal' and is the world's fourth or third largest economy and on its way to becoming 'Viksit Bharat' and is a 'rising power', a 'leading power', and so on and so forth, then why behave like a low-middle-income developing economy seeking 'special and differential' treatment? The argument for protecting the agrarian economy and the interests of farmers stands on an altogether different foundation. The highly developed economies of Europe and Japan have defended trade protectionism in agriculture on cultural, social and political grounds. The protection of farmers and the farming economy and the cultivation of local varieties of various products is a legitimate policy objective. India stands on firm ground in rejecting an open-ended policy of trade liberalisation in agriculture. If the United States continues to insist on this front, the Modi government will have no option but to reject and resist all pressure. Neither India nor Japan can agree to trade liberalisation in farm produce without risking a domestic political backlash. The protectionist argument in the case of manufactured goods is, however, much weaker. A policy option that can be pursued would be for the government to come out with a timetable for trade liberalisation and tariff reduction, setting firm dates for sectors, and gradually allowing the rupee to depreciate to partly compensate for tariff cuts. This would be in tandem with the earlier and oft-repeated promise of bringing Indian tariffs 'down to ASEAN levels'. This is a long-stated goal and is one that should be implemented. Rather than berate the ASEAN countries and call them the 'B-team' of China, as Mr Goyal has ill-advisedly done, it is time India caught up with ASEAN on the trade and manufacturing fronts. It may be recalled that India's trade and industrial policy liberalisation began in the early 1990s inspired by the experience of ASEAN. It was after his visit to Malaysia that the then prime minister Vishwanath Pratap Singh tasked an official in the Prime Minister's Office, Montek Singh Ahluwalia, to come up with a roadmap that would enable India to catch up with Malaysia. Mr Ahluwalia's 'M Paper' was the result and formed the basis of Prime Minister P. V. Narasimha Rao's trade and industrial policy. The time has come again for India to 'catch up' with East and Southeast Asia as far as trade and industrial policies are concerned. Mr Modi's 'Act East Policy' requires him to in fact act at home. This article was originally published in Deccan Chronicle. It has been lightly edited for style. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
India Gazette
12 minutes ago
- India Gazette
Trump threatens BRICS partners with extra tariffs
The US president has warned countries against aligning with anti-American policies US President Donald Trump has threatened to impose an additional 10% tariff on any country doing business with BRICS, with "no exceptions," accusing the economic bloc of adopting "anti-American policies." The warning came just hours after BRICS leaders concluded their summit in Rio de Janeiro. In their joint declaration, the bloc criticized unilateral tariff actions and condemned what they described as "indiscriminate" trade measures, without mentioning the US directly. "Any Country aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies of BRICS, will be charged an ADDITIONAL 10% Tariff. There will be no exceptions to this policy," Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social on Sunday. The warning echoes Trump's even harsher remarks in February, when he threatened BRICS members with tariffs as high as 100%. At the time, he declared that BRICS was "dead" if it established a common currency or otherwise challenged the US dollar's dominance in global trade. BRICS, originally formed by Brazil, Russia, India and China in 2006, has expanded to include South Africa, Egypt, Iran, Ethiopia, the United Arab Emirates and Indonesia. At the group's summit in the Russian city of Kazan last year, BRICS approved a new 'partner country' status in response to growing membership interest shown by more than 30 countries. Russian President Vladimir Putinsaidduring Sunday's BRICS summit in Rio de Janeiro that the bloc's combined GDP has surpassed that of the G7 when measured by purchasing power parity. The group now represents nearly half the world's population and about 40% of global GDP. Since returning to office in January, Trump has launched a tariff campaign aimed at protecting US manufacturers. It culminated on April 2 with a set of measures on what he called 'Liberation Day', including a blanket 10% tariff and up to 70% on countries he accused of treating the US most "unfairly." Most of the tariffs were paused for 90 days to allow negotiations. The deadline has been further extended to August 1, as Trump is writing letters to US trade partners, with the first "take it or leave it" deals set to be sent out on Monday. "I am pleased to announce that the UNITED STATES TARIFF Letters, and/or Deals, with various Countries from around the World, will be delivered starting 12:00 P.M. (Eastern), Monday, July 7th," he wrote in a separate post on Sunday. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told CNN that Trump would also send out letters to 100 smaller countries "where we don't have very much trade," many of which are "already at the baseline 10%." READ MORE: BRICS outperforming G7 Putin So far, the US has signed deals only with the UK, maintaining a 10% rate, and a minimum 20% tariff with Vietnam. Washington also reached a temporary deal with Beijing to limit the tariff at 30% - after hiking it to a whopping 145% in a series of tit-for-tat increases earlier this year. (
