London's Iraqi-run Princess Diana cafe faces closure over illegal workers
Cafe Diana was opened in 1989 by the Iraqi -born entrepreneur Abdul Basit Daoud and is located near the late princess's residence, Kensington Palace. She became a regular customer, bringing her sons, princes William and Harry. Diana, who at the time was married to Prince Charles, could often be seen chatting with Mr Basit and waiters.
'She started coming more often, bringing the kids here sometimes for breakfast,' Mr Daoud recalled following Diana's death. 'She used to have cappuccino, cake, some croissants. But she sometimes had an English breakfast too.'
The Home Office's Immigration Enforcement Team found a total of seven illegal workers there from 2019 to last year, with one worker found there twice. The cafe was fined £135,000 for illegally employing the Egyptian, Algerian and Albanian nationals, who had no right to work in the UK.
One of the Egyptians came to Britain on a six-month business visa in January 2015 but stayed on and claimed asylum. He claimed to have been working for 'just under five months' and said his duties included 'making burgers and just helping in the kitchen in return for food', though he had also been caught working illegally during one of the previous raids.
During a raid in 2020, one of the workers 'sat down at a table attempting to disguise himself as a customer' when he was spotted by immigration enforcement officers. An Algerian worker claimed she had only been employed at the cafe for a day and said no checks had been carried out. She admitted to having paid €5,000 to obtain fake work identification.
The Home Office said in its report that 'workers admitted to being compensated with food instead of monetary payment, which raises concerns about labour exploitation taking place at the premises'. It goes on to say that 'it is clear to see that the premises licence holder along with management has failed to conduct mandatory employment checks in line with legal obligations to prevent illegal working'.
In an interview with immigration officers, Mr Daoud admitted to owning the property but claimed he had been leasing the business to another person, but was unable to provide contact details for them. He said he had arrived at the cafe a short time before the immigration officers to regain ownership of the property, as the person had not been keeping up with the payment of rent.
Immigration Enforcement has asked Kensington and Chelsea Council to revoke Café Diana's licence, which will be decided on Thursday.
In a letter to the council, Cafe Diana's solicitors said: 'Our client is deeply regretting the circumstances that prompted this review and sincerely apologises for any inconvenience, disruption or concerns caused to the community, local authorities and stakeholders.
'Immediately upon becoming aware of the reported issues, our client undertook swift and decisive action by evicting the tenant responsible for the unauthorised activities, The Corporate Meeting and Event Service Ltd.
'This prompt response underscores our client's unwavering commitment to upholding licensing conditions and ensuring compliance with all regulatory requirements.' Mr Daoud has been approached for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
13 hours ago
- The National
Migrants at US detention centre forced to eat ‘like dogs', report says
Migrants at a detention centre in Florida were forced to eat 'like dogs' with their hands tied behind their backs, according to a report published on Monday. The report by Human Rights Watch, which gathered testimony from detainees, relatives and lawyers, documented a series of alleged abuses at three facilities in southern Florida and said people were subjected to degrading treatment, a lack of medical care and overcrowding. Former detainee Harpinder Chauhan, a 56-year-old British entrepreneur and father of two, recounted an incident in April in which he said dozens of men were denied food for hours. They were crammed into a single cell with their feet shackled and their hands tied behind their backs. Food was eventually given to them on chairs, but they remained restrained, said Mr Chauhan, who Human Rights watch said was taken into Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) custody because of problems with his taxes. 'We had to bend over and eat off the chairs with our mouths, like dogs,' said Mr Chauhan. He was eventually deported back to the UK. ICE did not immediately respond to a request for comment. According to Human Rights Watch, Mr Chauhan had lived in the US since 2016 and first entered the country on an E-2 investors visa. ICE officers detained him on February 11 after he ran into tax problems. He and other former and current detainees paint a picture of filthy, overcrowded facilities where migrants are treated poorly. One woman described being held at Krome North Service Processing Centre, which is usually reserved for men in South Florida. 'There was only one toilet, and it was covered in faeces,' she said. 'We begged the officers to let us clean it, but they just said sarcastically, 'Housekeeping will come soon.' No one ever came.' Another man said the intake centre he was kept in was freezing. 'They turned up the air conditioning … You could not fall asleep because it was so cold. I thought I was going to experience hypothermia,' he said. Under President Donald Trump, the number of people detained by ICE has increased dramatically as he continues to crack down on illegal immigration. As of late last month, an average of 56,000 people were being held in immigration detention centres per day, a 40 per cent increase from the same time last year and the highest in US history.
Khaleej Times
18 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
Fifa boss Infantino offers support to England's Carter over racist abuse
Fifa President Gianni Infantino offered the governing body's support to England defender Jess Carter after she revealed she has been the target of racist abuse during Euro 2025. Carter, who is Black, on Sunday announced she is stepping away from social media for the duration of the tournament. The 27-year-old has started all four of England's games, but struggled in their quarterfinal win over Sweden on Thursday as the Lionesses conceded two first-half goals. Football Association CEO Mark Bullingham condemned the abuse, and said the FA has been in contact with UK police, who are in touch with the relevant social media platform, to "ensure those responsible for this hate crime are brought to justice". "We stand with Jess. We stand with every player and every individual who has suffered from racist abuse. No player should be discriminated against in any way, they should be free to be at their very best on the pitch," Infantino said in a statement. "In this instance, we will be offering our support with any further action required, as well as sharing data for appropriate action to be taken against any perpetrators." European soccer's governing body Uefa, Carter's club Gotham FC, the National Women's Soccer League, and the Lionesses all also posted statements in support of the player. Carter's teammate Lotte Wubben-Moy said in an Instagram post that she planned to come off social media as well. Fifa and global players' union FIFPRO reported that one in five players at the 2023 Women's World Cup were targets of online abuse. They found 152 players out of the 697 whose accounts were actively monitored through the Social Media Protection Service (SMPS) designed by Fifa and FIFPRO received targeted discriminatory, abusive or threatening messages. Players at the women's tournament were 29% more likely to be targeted for online abuse than players at the 2022 men's World Cup. The SMPS tool was launched at the 2022 World Cup to help moderate hate speech on social media and hide harmful content. It was made available to all 211 membeassociations and their teams last year. England forward Lauren James has been the target for online abuse, and told reporters recently that "the abuse never really stops. I'm used to it now so I kind of just brush it off my shoulder". British tennis player Katie Boultesaid last month that she had received death threats to herself and members of her family after matches.
The National
20 hours ago
- The National
Palestine Action ban challenged after arrests soar
Days after more than 100 protesters were arrested around the UK during regular demonstrations over the Gaza war, lawyers have blamed a government ban on Palestine Action for the wave of arrests. During a motion to reverse the proscription of the group, Blinne Ni Ghralaigh warned that the effect of proscription was already significant on the right to demonstrate against the conflict. 'Dozens and dozens of people have been arrested for protesting, seated and mostly silent protest,' she said. More than 100 people were arrested around the country during demonstrations this weekend protesting against the proscription, with protests held in London, Manchester, Edinburgh, Bristol and Truro on Saturday. Saturday's arrests brought the total number of people arrested since the ban came into force to more than 200, with more than 72 arrested around the UK last weekend and 29 the week before. On Saturday 55 people were held at a demonstration in London's Parliament Square under the Terrorism Act 2000 for displaying signs supporting Palestine Action, the Metropolitan Police said. The protesters held up placards reading: 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.' Another nine were detained at a separate London march, and a further eight were held in Truro in Cornwall. Other protests were held in north-western Manchester where 16 people were detained, in western Bristol where another 17 were arrested and in the Scottish capital Edinburgh, police said. The rallies were organised by campaign group Defend Our Juries, which had said they were intended to 'defy' the ban. The Home Office is defending Monday's legal challenge, arguing that Palestine Action could challenge the decision at the Proscribed Organisations Appeal Commission (POAC), a specialist tribunal, rather than at the High Court. Another Palestine Action lawyer Raza Husain told the court during opening arguments that the POAC was not 'convenient nor effective' in this case. 'It would be quite absurd to say that we should tolerate the consequences of the proscription … even if it is unlawful, and just go to POAC,' he told the judges. Ms Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action on June 23, stating that the vandalism of the two planes, which police said caused about £7 million of damage. The government contends the group the threshold of a terror organisation by carrying out an act of sabotage intended to change government policy. Since the Labour Party under Keir Starmer won power in the general election last year, ministers have tightened arms exports to Israel but not conceded to its critics in adopting a wholesale ban. Mr Husain argued however the proscription of Palestine Action was repugnant to the tradition of the common law and contrary to the European Convention on Human Rights. The barrister continued: 'The decision is so extreme as to render the UK an international outlier.' Mr Husain added: 'The decision to proscribe Palestine Action had the hallmarks of an authoritarian and blatant abuse of power.' 'The consequences are not just limited to arrest,' Mr Husain said, telling the court there was 'rampant uncertainty' in the aftermath of the ban.
