Eight artificial dyes will be phased out of US food supply, Health Secretary RFK Jr. says
These artificial dyes – detailed during an April 22 news conference in Washington – are used to offset color loss due to exposure to light, temperature extremes as well as to provide color to colorless and "fun" foods, according to the Food and Drug Administration.
For years, Kennedy has railed against Big Food and Big Pharma and blamed the nation's 'chronic disease epidemic' on additives and junk food, including during his campaign for president in the 2024 Democratic primaries and then as an independent. After he endorsed President Donald Trump, Trump incorporated those ideas into his own campaign and they're now part of the new administration's Make America Healthy Again agenda.
More: Robert F. Kennedy now heads Trump's MAHA commission: What to know
The dyes that will be phased out in less than two years are FD&C Blue Nos. 1 and 2, FD&C Green No. 3, FD&C Red No. 40, FD&C Yellow Nos 5 and 6. In the coming months, the process will begin to revoke authorization of Orange B, Citrus Red No. 2, according to the HHS.
Within weeks, the FDA will also authorize four new natural color additives and partner with the National Institutes of Health to conduct research on "how food additives impact children's health and development," according to the HHS.
Under the Biden administration, the FDA had already mandated by January 15, 2027, a ban on Red Dye No. 3, found in candy, desserts, and some medications. HHS said on April 22 that the Trump administration is requesting food companies move that deadline forward.More: RFK Jr. wants to get rid of food dyes. These 'crunchy moms' are ready.
Kennedy in the past has linked food dyes and additives to ADHD and chronic diseases, such as obesity. At the April 22 news conference, the Trump Cabinet member rattled off a litany of diseases and neurological disorders and appeared to link them to chemicals being added by the food and drug industries.
In March, Kennedy met in private with the leaders of food companies such as PepsiCo, General Mills, Tyson Foods, Kraft, Heinz and Kellogg's. During that meeting, Kennedy told CBS News that he demanded artificial food dyes would "all have to be out within two years."
Kennedy on April 22 recalled a conversation with his staff after that meeting with the food industry leaders and hinted at an initial reluctance by the CEOs to get rid of petroleum-based dyes.
"I said, if they want to add petroleum, they want to eat petroleum," he said. "They ought to add it themselves at home, but they shouldn't be feeding it to the rest of us without our knowledge or consent."
Kennedy also complained that there are "shockingly few studies" on the safety of food dyes and certain other ingredients because of conflicts of interest at the federal agencies he now oversees.
More: 'If you can't pronounce it, don't eat it': Meet the food blogger influencing RFK Jr.
A study by the California's Environmental Protection Agency in 2021 linked consumption of synthetic food dyes to hyperactivity and other neurobehavioral problems in some children. Similar studies also previously prompted the European Union to restrict food coloring.
'Evidence shows that synthetic food dyes are associated with adverse neurobehavioral outcomes in some children,' said California's Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Director Dr. Lauren Zeise. 'With increasing numbers of U.S. children diagnosed with behavioral disorders, this assessment can inform efforts to protect children from exposures that may exacerbate behavioral problems.'
Last year, California banned six dyes from use in public school lunches.
The Consumer Brand Association, which represents companies that manufacture food, beverages and household products, told its members that it was an 'urgent priority' for the Trump administration to remove certain artificial colors from the food supply – and that Kennedy wanted it 'done before he leaves office.
Food activist and blogger Vani Hari, who has run campaigns around ingredients and transparency against food companies for more than a decade, said Kennedy's efforts were a win for American parents.
"I never thought I'd see the day when the FDA actually did this," Hari told USA TODAY. "I had lost faith in my government leaders and now it's been restored. The FDA is no longer sleeping at the wheel."
Swapna Venugopal Ramaswamy is a White House Correspondent for USA TODAY. You can follow her on X @SwapnaVenugopal
(This story has been updated with more information and photographs.)
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: RFK Jr. bans eight artificial food dyes from nation's food supply
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
18 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Federal judge blocks Trump administration from ending temporary legal status for many Haitians
But last week, the Department of Homeland Security announced it was terminating those legal protections as soon as Sept. 2, setting Haitians up for potential deportation. The department said the conditions in the country had improved and Haitians no longer met the conditions for the temporary legal protections. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The ruling comes as President Donald Trump works to end protections and programs for immigrants as part of his mass deportations promises. Advertisement The judge's 23-page opinion states that the Department of Homeland Security 's move to terminate the legal protections early violates the TPS statute that requires a certain amount of notice before reconsidering a designation. 'When the Government confers a benefit over a fixed period of time, a beneficiary can reasonably expect to receive that benefit at least until the end of that fixed period,' according to the ruling. The judge also referenced the fact that the plaintiffs have started jobs, enrolled in schools and begun receiving medical treatment with the expectations that the country's TPS designation would run through the end of the year. Advertisement Manny Pastreich, president of the Service Employees International Union Local 32BJ, which filed the lawsuit, described the ruling as an 'important step' but said the fight is not over. 'We will keep fighting to make sure this decision is upheld,' Pastreich said in a statement. 'We will keep fighting for the rights of our members and all immigrants against the Trump Administration – in the streets, in the workplace, and in the courts as well. And when we fight, we win.' DHS did not immediately respond to an email from The Associated Press requesting comment. But the government had argued that TPS is a temporary program and thus 'the termination of a country's TPS designation is a possibility beneficiaries must always expect.' Haiti's TPS status was initially activated in 2010 after the catastrophic earthquake and has been extended multiple times, according to the lawsuit. Gang violence has displaced 1.3 million people across Haiti as the local government and international community struggle with the spiraling crisis, according to a report from the International Organization for Migration. There has been a 24% increase in displaced people since December, with gunmen having chased 11% of Haiti's nearly 12 million inhabitants from their home, the report said. In May, the Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to strip Temporary Protected Status from 350,000 Venezuelans, potentially exposing them to deportation. The order put on hold a ruling from a federal judge in San Francisco that kept the legal protections in place. The judge's decision in New York also comes on the heels of the Trump administration revoking legal protections for thousands of Haitians who arrived legally in the U.S. through a humanitarian parole program. Advertisement
Washington Post
31 minutes ago
- Washington Post
MS-13 leader to be sentenced in racketeering case involving 8 murders
CENTRAL ISLIP, N.Y. — The leader of an MS-13 clique in the suburbs of New York City faces sentencing Wednesday in a federal racketeering case involving eight murders, including the 2016 killings of two high school girls that focused the nation's attention on the violent Central American street gang. Alexi Saenz pleaded guilty last year for his role in ordering and approving the killings as well as other crimes during a rash of bloody violence that prompted President Donald Trump to make several visits to Long Island and call for the death penalty for Saenz and other gang members during his first term in the White House.
CNN
32 minutes ago
- CNN
Analysis: Trump's omnipotence in the GOP means Musk's political threats ring hollow
Politics isn't rocket science. If it were, President Donald Trump might have something more to worry about in his reignited feud with his estranged 'first buddy' Elon Musk. But nothing in the explosive and now-soured flirtation of the world's richest man with politics suggests he has the magic touch to spark the kind of creative disruption in the Republican Party that he set off in the orbital and electric vehicle industries. Musk's first-among-equals status as head of the Department of Government Efficiency at the start of Trump's second administration is now a memory. He's so livid over Trump's debt- and deficit-inflating 'big, beautiful bill,' which passed the Senate on Tuesday, that he's threatening to primary every GOP lawmaker who votes for it and to set up a new political party. Musk does wield considerable political weaponry. His enormous fortune means he can spend vast sums on favored candidates and issues. Trump knows this well, as a prime beneficiary of the nearly $300 million Musk threw at the 2024 election. And as the owner and an obsessive user of X, Musk can call up online mobs against lawmakers and even Trump himself – though he's been careful, this time, not to single out the president directly over the bill. Musk is the dominant force in the American space program. If Americans reach Mars, they'll probably get there on one of Musk's Starships. And technologies such as Musk's Starlink are vital on the battlefield – as the war in Ukraine shows. Yet for all his enormous power, Musk has not shown much political dexterity, nor, apparently, created his own base of support that could dominate the GOP. The chainsaw he wielded on stage at the Conservative Political Action Conference this year was meant to symbolize his slashing of costs in the US government. Looking back, it's a better metaphor for the severing of his relationship with the president over Trump's MAGA megabill. Once, Musk's alliance with Trump seemed a master stroke – opening an inside track that promised even greater benefits for his firms than his already vast array of federal contracts. Trump even did a stunning sales pitch for Tesla on the South Lawn of the White House – and bought one of the electric vehicles himself. So perhaps it's no surprise that falling out with Trump – and then goading him into a social media war of words – turned out to be a political and financial loser for Musk. Their new antagonism may expose his empire to presidential retribution. Trump on Tuesday warned darkly that 'DOGE is the monster that might have to go back and eat Elon.' This is a staggering statement for several reasons. First, it highlights the extent of the fracture between the patron and the man who he made the most powerful private citizen in the country only months ago. Second, it's a snapshot of an extraordinary time. Here is a president threatening to use executive power to ruin a private citizen and businessman. This would seem to fit most definitions of an impeachable offense, but it feels almost unremarkable in an administration that has shattered every norm of presidential behavior. Musk's dalliance with Trump also hurt him in other ways. It alienated many of his most enthusiastic customers, including in Europe, where his electric vehicles were popular and the market value of his companies plunged. And Musk's most prominent individual foray into electoral politics, aside from his alliance with Trump in 2024, was a disaster. His vehement rhetorical and enormous financial support for a conservative candidate in a Wisconsin Supreme Court race backfired: the more liberal candidate won by 10 points. The race might have been closer had Musk and his political baggage stayed at home. And the contest became an unexpected lesson that sometimes money isn't everything in American politics. But here's the biggest impediment to Musk becoming a political power player: Trump is indisputably the most significant figure in American political life in the first quarter of the 21st century. The president has dominated the GOP for 10 years. He's squelched the political aspirations of pretenders to his crown. Trump has a decadelong bond with the party base. He's already pulled off the kind of disruptive transformation of the GOP that Musk seems to be envisioning. 'My feeling is that Donald Trump is the one that has the huge following,' Lee Carter, a strategist and pollster who studies voters' emotional reactions to candidates, said on 'CNN News Central' on Tuesday. 'And Elon Musk certainly helped Donald Trump in the election,' Carter continued. 'There's no question about it. It gave him credibility. It gave him some voters that were on the fence – but it wasn't Elon Musk who was center-stage and I don't think that we're going to see people follow Elon Musk in the same way that we saw (with) the MAGA movement.' Musk is a recent convert to Trumpism, and while his star shined with blinding intensity late in last year's election and he was ubiquitous during the early months of the new administration, his break from Trump has shown that almost all power in the MAGA movement is reflected off its figurehead. Vice President JD Vance was the most visible barometer of this power dynamic. When the big break-up happened, he was forced to choose between Trump, who is responsible for his current prominence, and Musk, who could be a useful ally in a future presidential primary campaign. He picked the president. Another key question is whether Musk has his own political base. CNN's Aaron Blake assessed polling earlier last month that showed surprisingly comparative polling data among Republicans for Musk and Trump – at least before their latest bust-up. But beyond the tech world, where he used his rock star status to funnel young, disaffected male voters toward Trump, it's not clear that Musk has a broader constituency. By siding with the Republican Party's anti-debt wing, Musk now seems a natural ally of libertarians such as Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, who voted against the president's bill. But fiscal hawkishness and breaking with the GOP spending crowd isn't a reliable route to power – as the failed presidential campaigns of Sen. Paul and his father, former Rep. Ron Paul, demonstrated. Still, Musk's pledge to support Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie, who was lambasted by the president for his opposition to the bill and who may now face a primary challenge, could be significant. In a single race, Musk's wealth could be important, individual campaign contribution limits notwithstanding. It would be harder for the Tesla tycoon to go national. For one thing, he'd have to recruit primary candidates willing to take on lawmakers supported by Trump, the most powerful major party leader in generations. But Musk has grand ambitions. He promised that if the 'insane spending bill passes, the America Party will be formed the next day.' He wrote on X, 'Our country needs an alternative to the Democrat-Republican uniparty so that the people actually have a VOICE.' Barriers to creating a third political force are daunting. For one thing, it would require shattering the emotional and historical allegiances of millions of voters. Musk's best bet may be to wait out Trump – after all, he's a much younger man. If conservatives end up disillusioned with the president's legacy and politics more broadly, the CEO may find fertile ground for a third way. It's happened before. In the 1992 election, Ross Perot's on-again-off-again-on-again candidacy rooted in a populist call to balance the budget won 19% of the vote, even though the Texas tycoon didn't win a single state. At the time, Republicans blamed Perot for eating into President George H.W. Bush's support and helping to elect Bill Clinton. Three decades on, political scientists are still arguing about what really happened. Musk would need a surrogate. Unlike Perot, he can't run for president, since he is a naturalized foreign-born citizen. But if he could somehow break the stranglehold of the two major parties on US elections, he'd accomplish something like the political equivalent of his improbable invention of a rocket booster that scorches a spacecraft into orbit and then returns to the launchpad to be captured by two giant mechanical arms. Even Trump thought that was amazing. 'Did you see the way that sucker landed today?' Trump said at an October campaign rally. But that was in the first blush of his Musk bromance. On Tuesday, a senior White House official told CNN's Kristen Holmes: 'No one really cares what he says anymore.'
