Hong Kong's business, political elite turn out for funeral of property Lee Shau-kee
Lee, who died at age 97 on March 17, was once ranked as the richest man in Asia. In Forbes' February ranking, he was listed as the city's second-richest person with $29.2 billion in assets.
Lee founded Henderson Land Development Co. Ltd. in 1976, and his empire helped shape the Asian financial hub's skyline. The company's portfolio includes landmarks such as the International Finance Centre complex and ifc mall in Central, a vibrant commercial district. His business interests also expanded into other sectors such as hotels, utilities and ferries in the city.
Nicknamed 'Uncle Four,' Lee was ranked the richest person in Asia and the world's fourth-wealthiest person by Forbes in 1996. He was Henderson Land's chairman and managing director before stepping down from the position in 2019. He was succeeded by his sons, Peter Lee and Martin Lee, the company's co-chairpersons.
Like other tycoons, who rose in the city's postwar economic boom and then thrived as mainland China abandoned orthodox Marxism, Lee met with former top Chinese leaders, including Deng Xiaoping and Jiang Zemin. In 2007, a decade after the end of British colonial rule, the Hong Kong government awarded him the Grand Bauhinia Medal in recognition of his outstanding contributions to education and community service.
According to Henderson Land, committee members overseeing his funeral included Hong Kong's leading official, John Lee, former city leaders Tung Chee-hwa and Leung Chun-ying, and Zheng Yanxiong, director of Beijing's liaison office in Hong Kong. Other business and political heavyweights were also part of the committee.
On Sunday, Zheng, Lee and other former and current government officials, as well as Richard Li, the younger son of Hong Kong's richest person Li Ka-shing, and property tycoons Thomas Kwok and Raymond Kwok, paid their respects to Lee during a vigil.
During Elections
Get campaign news, insight, analysis and commentary delivered to your inbox during Canada's 2025 election.
Buddhist rites were performed during the service on Monday. His body will be transported to his ancestral homeland in Shunde district, Guangdong province, the coastal region in southern China across from Hong Kong where Lee, like so many top Hong Kong business leaders, was born. He moved to the city in 1948, one year before the communists swept to power in mainland China, targeting land owners as they went, and became a key player in the city's real estate industry.
Known as Hong Kong's 'Warren Buffett' for his investment acumen, he was also a leading philanthropist who contributed significantly to the development of both Hong Kong and mainland China.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Forward
2 hours ago
- Japan Forward
Succession of the Dalai Lama and India's Tough Choices Ahead
The recent 90th birthday celebrations of the Dalai Lama have brought the issue of his succession into the limelight. Beijing objected to India's Minority Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju's statement that "All those who follow the Dalai Lama feel that the incarnation is to be decided by the established convention and as per the wish of the Dalai Lama himself." This is in sync with the position taken by the present Dalai Lama, who has noted that the institution of the Dalai Lama will continue. He made clear that the Gaden Phodrang Trust, a non-profit organization founded by his Office in 2015, would be tasked with carrying out the procedure. In addition, he emphasized, "No one else has any authority to interfere in this matter". The Chinese Foreign Ministry was quick to retort. It noted in a statement that "The reincarnation must be chosen by drawing lots from a golden urn, and approved by the central government (of China)." New Delhi joined the issue, and the Ministry of External Affairs of the Government of India clarified that: "We have seen reports relating to the statement made by His Holiness the Dalai Lama about the continuation of the Dalai Lama institution. Government of India does not take any position or speak on matters concerning beliefs and practices of faith and religion. [The] government has always upheld freedom of religion for all in India and will continue to do so." Tibet is important for China for a host of reasons. For one, Tibet shares a long boundary with India, and hence, control over Tibet also means control over the border. In addition, Tibet is home to some of the biggest rivers in Asia, and hence it is important for China's bid to control the discharge of water throughout much of Asia. Beijing also sees any kind of separatism as dangerous to the country as a whole. This is especially true in the light of what has been happening in Xinjiang. At the same time, Chinese President Xi Jinping has been trying to project himself as a strong leader. He believes that if the next Dalai Lama is appointed without China's tacit approval, it will reflect poorly on Xi Jinping. Indian Foreign Minister S Jaishankar and Chinese Vice President Han Zheng shake hands in Beijing on July 14. (©Xinhua via Kyodo) India has a role to play in the issue, as the Dalai Lama currently lives in Dharamshala. So, as well, does the Tibetan government in exile. Beijing has always objected when senior leaders from the Indian government have met the Dalai Lama or, in the past, travelled to the border state of Arunachal Pradesh in India. The issue dates back to 1959 when, facing Chinese aggression, the Dalai Lama fled on foot to India. He has been based in India ever since. Beijing will likely try to put pressure on India through the Dalai Lama issue to extract concessions on other aspects of the bilateral relationship. Recently, China has also been actively promoting an anti-India policy by using countries like Bangladesh. This may increase in the near future. China recently held a trilateral dialogue with Bangladesh and Pakistan in the Chinese city of Kunming. It was a not-so-subtle signal to India. There is a Japanese parliamentary support group which has been supporting the Tibetan cause. In February 2022, the Lower House of the Japanese Diet adopted a measure titled "Resolution regarding the serious human rights situation in Xinjiang Uyghur and other areas." It noted that: "In recent years, the international community has expressed concern over serious human rights situations including infringement of freedom of religion and forced incarceration in places including Xinjiang Uyghur, Tibet, Southern Mongolia and Hong Kong." Furthermore, there is strong public support for the Tibetan cause. The 14th Dalai Lama, November 2018, visiting Japan's National Diet. (©Sankei by Mina Terakochi) It is clear that China will use the succession issue as a means to strengthen its control over Tibet, and therein lies the catch. New Delhi will have to handle this issue very deftly. The ties between the two Asian behemoths are still reeling from the aftermath of the Galwan Valley clashes of June 2020. Those led to the first casualties between the two sides in 45 years and a huge mobilization of forces. In addition, during India's recent clashes with Pakistan, China provided quite a substantial share of the weapons used by Pakistan. China would like to keep India busy in the neighborhood, as seen with its so-called "String of Pearls" policy. As a part of this, Beijing has constructed ports in countries like Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Myanmar, and others. Indian Defense Minister Rajnath Singh recently visited China for a meeting of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) defense ministers. It was the first time since the Galwan clashes in 2000. However, he refused to sign the SCO declaration as it did not contain any references to the Pahalgam massacre by Pakistan-backed terrorists (earlier in April 2025). Indian External Affairs Minister Dr S Jaishankar was also in China for the SCO Foreign Ministers' meeting. His presence signalled the gradual resumption of ties. India will continue to give shelter to the Tibetans, as that has been its longstanding position. Of course, it could lead to some tough times in the India-China relationship. New Delhi will have to look for some innovative solutions in this matter because, while India and China do not see eye-to-eye on many issues, there are forums like the BRICS and the SCO where the two countries do cooperate with each other. New Delhi should not cave in to Beijing's pressure on the Dalai Lama issue. Doing so would only lead to further Chinese pressure on other issues. Being the world's largest democracy, India should join hands with democratic countries like the United States and Japan to support a solution to the succession that is in the best interests of the Tibetan people. Author: Dr Rupakjyoti Borah Dr Rupakjyoti Borah is a Senior Research Fellow with the Japan Forum for Strategic Studies. The views expressed here are personal.
Japan Forward
3 hours ago
- Japan Forward
To China Provocations, Ishiba Gov't Response is Truly Pathetic
このページを 日本語 で読む Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya, and Liberal Democratic Party Secretary-General Hiroshi Moriyama all adopted timid stances toward China. This situation is extremely unfortunate as it undermines Japan's national interests. On July 9 and July 10, a Chinese J-H7 fighter-bomber made an abnormal approach towards a Japan Air Self-Defense Force YS-11EB electronic intelligence aircraft over the East China Sea. On both days, the Chinese military aircraft came within about 70 meters of the ASDF plane if measured in a straight line. These were abnormal, dangerous, and provocative manners of flying. The latest incidents came shortly after similar incidents on June 7 and June 8. In those cases, a Chinese military aircraft made an abnormal approach towards a Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force aircraft over the Pacific Ocean. The Chinese military's high-handed behavior is utterly unacceptable. China must reflect on such foolish actions that impair its dignity as a country. But even more concerning is the Ishiba administration's truly pathetic response to these Chinese provocations. This Chinese JH7 fighter bomber approached Japan's Air Self-Defense Force YS11EB electronic measuring device on July 9. (Photo provided by the Ministry of Defense) On July 10, Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya met with his Chinese counterpart Wang Yi in the Malaysian capital of Kuala Lumpur. At that time, Iwaya conveyed Japan's serious concerns about the dangerous approaches of Chinese military aircraft. He also called for China to desist from such behavior. Also, Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs Takehiro Funakoshi expressed serious concern about the incidents to Chinese Ambassador to Japan Wu Jianghao via telephone. However, expressing "serious concerns" is a milder diplomatic response than a formal "protest." How Germany handled a similar incident in early July stands in stark contrast. After a German military aircraft was targeted by a laser on a Chinese warship during a reconnaissance flight over the Red Sea, Germany's Ministry of Foreign Affairs summoned the Chinese ambassador to Germany. When he arrived, German officials delivered a strong protest. Why don't we learn from Germany? Leaders of Japanese political parties attend a pre-election debate in Tokyo on July 2. (©Sankei by Masahiro Sakai) During a street corner campaign speech ahead of the July 20 Upper House election, Ishiba said, "We will not be disrespected." He was referring to the tariff policy of the Trump administration. Yet he refused to speak out in protest regarding abnormal behavior on the part of the Chinese military. It is Chinese behavior that could lead to an accidental military conflict. Ishiba has also been silent on the subject on social media. His responses have been clearly imbalanced. Even after the close encounters over the Pacific in June, the government only expressed "serious concern." Then, too, Prime Minister Ishiba issued no statement on the matter. After this pitiful performance, Japan should expect to be disrespected and once again subjected to dangerous provocations. Clearly, the Japanese government should display more righteous anger. The attitude of LDP Secretary-General Moriyama is also bizarre. On July 11 he met with Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng in Osaka. But according to reports, the main topics discussed were the issue of resuming Japanese beef exports to China and a request for China to loan Japan more giant pandas. Why is it that Moriyama did not press He to engage in a frank and honest exchange regarding the abnormal approaches of Chinese military aircraft? Even more so, why didn't he call for the release of Japanese nationals currently detained by Chinese authorities? The same also holds true for Foreign Minister Iwaya. If our leaders will not speak and act resolutely for the sake of Japan, they are not fit to serve at the nation's helm. Author: Editorial Board, The Sankei Shimbun このページを 日本語 で読む
Winnipeg Free Press
4 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Kansas Republican senate president announces 2026 gubernatorial bid
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Kansas Senate President Ty Masterson entered the race for governor on Sunday as the 2026 Republican primary field gets more crowded. Republicans are keen to recapture the governor's office in GOP-leaning Kansas after Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly narrowly won a second four-year term in 2022. Kelly is term-limited and cannot run again. Masterson, a small-business owner, has been a state senator representing a district in eastern Kansas since 2009. He became Senate president in 2021. He previously served in the Kansas House of Representatives from 2005 to 2008. Other Republicans in the 2026 governor's race include Secretary of State Scott Schwab, who built his public profile pushing back against unfounded election conspiracy theories, and former Gov. Jeff Colyer. Colyer was elevated to the office for about a year in 2018 after former Gov. Sam Brownback resigned. He failed to get past the primary in that year's gubernatorial election, then entered the 2022 governor's race but dropped out early after being diagnosed with prostate cancer.
