Europeans open to buying US arms for Ukraine under Trump plan but need details
Trump said on Monday that Washington will supply Patriot air defence systems, missiles and other weaponry to Ukraine for its war against Russia's invasion and that the arms would be paid for by other NATO countries.
But much remains undisclosed, including the amounts and precise types of weapons to be provided, how quickly they would be supplied and how they would be paid for.
U.S. officials have suggested that European countries will be willing to give up some of their own stocks of weapons for Ukraine and then buy replacements from the United States. But some of the countries involved say they still don't even know what is being asked of them.
Such a move would get weapons to Ukraine more quickly but would leave donor countries' defences more exposed until new systems are ready.
"We are ready to participate. Of course we can't do it on our own, we need others to partner up – but we have a readiness,' Danish Foreign Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen told reporters in Brussels on Tuesday ahead of a meeting of European Union ministers.
Speaking alongside Trump at the White House on Monday, NATO chief Mark Rutte said that Germany, Finland, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Canada want to be part of the new initiative.
Many of those countries have been among the biggest military aid donors to Ukraine, either overall or per capita.
Asked whether Denmark could give U.S. arms from its own stocks as part of the scheme, Rasmussen said: 'We don't have these kind of systems – the Patriot systems – so if we should lean in, and we are absolutely ready to do so, it will be (with) money and we have to work out the details.'
European ministers said they would now need to examine how new purchases of U.S. weapons could be paid for. In many cases, that seems likely to involve countries teaming up to buy U.S. weapons systems.
"Now we need to see how together we can go in and finance, among other things, Patriots, which they plan to send to Ukraine," Sweden's Foreign Minister Maria Malmer Stenergard told Swedish radio.
In Brussels, Dutch Foreign Minister Caspar Veldkamp said his country is looking into the plan 'with a positive inclination'.
Asked about the scheme, Norwegian Defence Minister Tore Sandvik told Reuters that Oslo was 'in close dialogue with Ukraine' on military aid and 'air defence remains a high priority for Ukraine and for the Norwegian military support'.
'Norway has contributed to significant amounts of air defence for Ukraine, including co-financing the donation of a Patriot system and missiles,' he said.
The Finnish Defence Ministry said Helsinki 'will continue to provide material support to Ukraine'.
"The details of the U.S. initiative ... are not yet known and we are interested to hear more about them before we can take more concrete lines on this issue,' it said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
18 minutes ago
- Spectator
Trump's right, there's power in positive non-thinking
Though I'm no fan of Donald Trump, time and again I'm delighted by the alternately crazy and sane things he says, and the way he knows the difference; he's the antithesis of our politicians, who say crazy things they sincerely believe are sane. This week he spoke to the BBC's Gary O'Donoghue, who asked him about the Pennsylvania assassination attempt. As the BBC reported: When asked if the assassination attempt had changed him, the president conveyed a hint of vulnerability as he said he tries to think about it as little as he can. 'I don't like dwelling on it because if I did, it would be, you know, might be life-changing, I don't want it to have to be that.' Elaborating, he said he liked 'the power of positive thinking, or the power of positive non-thinking'. I've believed in the power of positive non-thinking for a long time, and at the ripe old age of 66 it's bounced me through heart-breaking incidents which would have floored a lot of other people – or at least been an excuse for a fully catered pity-party over on Facebook. Of course, one gets the usual misery-buckets muttering about how one is 'in denial' – but that's one of the few ways the poor saps get their kicks, in my experience, so it would be mean to deny them it. There's growing evidence to show that the stiff upper lip is the superior way to tackle life's little speedbumps. A study from the University of Cambridge claims that 'the commonly held belief that attempting to suppress negative thoughts is bad for our mental health could be wrong' after 'researchers at the Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit trained 120 volunteers worldwide to suppress thoughts about negative events that worried them, and found that not only did these become less vivid, but that the participants' mental health also improved.' It seems obvious, doesn't it? As Professor Michael Anderson put it: We're all familiar with the Freudian idea that if we suppress our feelings or thoughts, then these thoughts remain in our unconscious, influencing our behaviour and wellbeing perniciously. The whole point of psychotherapy is to dredge up these thoughts so one can deal with them and rob them of their power. In more recent years, we've been told that suppressing thoughts is intrinsically ineffective and that it actually causes people to think the thought more – it's the classic idea of 'Don't think about a pink elephant'. Suppressing thoughts even improved mental health among participants with likely post-traumatic stress disorder. In general, people with worse mental health symptoms at the outset of the study improved more after suppression training – but only if they suppressed their fears. This directly contradicts the notion that suppression is a maladaptive coping process. Of course, all the misery guts out there will moan that the scientists involved in this jolly experiment are most likely 'in denial' themselves; misery loves company, and as they generally only attract the company of other miseries, it's a vicious circle-jerk of communal caterwauling which is often effective in drowning out any empirical research or common-sense consensus which may arise. We all have friends who appear to get a high from parading their lows; we've all read the stats about educated young women being the most anxious when you'd think it was uneducated old men who had the most to be anxious about in the current climate. Though ostensibly they're worrying about politics, this worrywart tendency often carries into their private lives. When you see groups of men together, they're usually having a laugh; when you see groups of women sitting together, they're often moaning about men – sometimes what's wrong with the ones they've got, and sometimes how they don't have one to moan about. I don't ever recall sitting around with a group of girls moaning about the wrongs men have done me; if you don't like the one you've got, go and get another one. And if you moan about men to women regularly, you're probably a lesbian and afraid to face the fact. Give it a whirl, why don't you – it's fun, so long as you don't talk about your feelings too much, in which case you'll be back on the misery merry-go-round in no time. Though I favour living life on the light side with a minimum of introspection, I allow for a bit of misery in the arts. From Morrissey to Brief Encounter to Madame Bovary, if I can find a piece of art that will leave me feeling good by feeling bad, I'm all over it. Is this how I manage my emotional equilibrium (give or take the odd suicide bid) – by a kind of lyrical bloodletting? Whatever the reason, I thoroughly recommend it – along with the great Stoic quote, for when trouble befalls, from Marcus Aurelius: ''It is my bad luck that this has happened to me.' No, you should rather say: 'It is my good luck that, although this has happened to me, I can bear it without pain, neither crushed by the present nor fearful of the future.' Because such a thing could have happened to any man, but not every man could have borne it without pain. So why see more misfortune in the event than good fortune in your ability to bear it?' I believe that it was Socrates who said that 'the unexamined life is not worth living' – but then the old fool also said that 'no one does wrong voluntarily'. Looking around at the morass of self-pity, which is bankrupting us financially and intellectually, I'd say that it's the over-examined life which isn't worth living. Those of us who exercise President Trump's power of positive non-thinking are the ones who exhibit a resilience which is sorely lacking.
The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
Rep. Jim Jordan may be deposed over OSU sex abuse scandal
Ohio Congressman Jim Jordan could be deposed over allegations he knew about the sexual assaults perpetrated by Ohio State University Dr. Richard Strauss but failed to protect the student wrestlers, according to a report. Jordan, chair of the House Judiciary Committee, served as the assistant coach for the wrestling team from 1978 to 1998. Students discussed their alleged assaults with Jordan and other staff members, according to claims made in a civil suit brought by dozens of former students against the school. The Congressman, who is not a defendant in the case, may be deposed as soon as Friday, four plaintiffs told NBC News. A lawyer for the plaintiffs confirmed to The Independent that Jordan is scheduled to be deposed. Jordan has repeatedly denied any involvement in the alleged cover-up. 'As everyone knows, Chairman Jordan never saw or heard of any abuse, and if he had, he would have dealt with it,' Russell Dye, a spokesperson for Jordan, told The Independent. The expected deposition comes one month after HBO released the documentary Surviving Ohio State, 20 years after Strauss died. Survivors first emerged with allegations in 2018. In the documentary, Dan Ritchie, who wrestled at the university from 1988 to 1992, alleged that Strauss was known to conduct unnecessary genital exams with ungloved hands. Ritchie claimed Jordan addressed these rumors directly with his athletes, telling them: 'If he ever did that to me, I'd snap his neck like a stick of dry balsa wood.' Mike DiSabato, who wrestled for Jordan and was the first to launch allegations against Strauss, told NBC News that he expects the Ohio Republican to 'triple down' on his denials. 'I assume he's going to triple down and follow the same script he followed back in 2018 when he went on Fox and denied knowing about any abuse, denied being told of any abuse, never heard the word 'abuse,'' DiSabato told the outlet. Steve Snyder-Hill, a former OSU student who alleges abuse by Strauss, recalled in the documentary: 'Somebody asked me one time, they said, 'Are you a survivor or are you a victim?' He reflected: 'I had to think about that, and I thought, you know what? I'm a survivor of sexual assault, but I'm a victim of OSU.' He plans to watch the deposition Friday, he told NBC News. 'I expect him to lie under oath,' Snyder-Hill said of Jordan. 'I don't know a nicer way to put it.' Jordan's locker was very close to Strauss so Snyder-Hill doubts Jordan's claims that he didn't know what was going on. Snyder-Hill told the outlet: 'That's hard to believe.' Since the initial investigations emerged, the university has paid more than $60 million in settlement money to nearly 300 survivors. Michael V. Drake, who served as OSU president when the scandal broke and the investigations began, issued a statement on behalf of the school at the time apologizing 'to each person who endured Strauss' abuse.' He said: 'Our institution's fundamental failure at the time to prevent this abuse was unacceptable – as were the inadequate efforts to thoroughly investigate complaints raised by students and staff members.'
The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
Civil rights work is slowing as Trump dismantles the Education Department, agency data shows
The Trump administration insists it hasn't wavered in its duty to protect the civil rights of America's children even as it dismantles the Education Department. Yet its own data shows the agency has resolved far fewer civil rights cases than in past years despite families filing more complaints. The Education Department's civil rights branch lost nearly half its staff amid mass layoffs in March, raising questions about its ability to address a deep backlog of complaints from students alleging discrimination based on disability, sex or race. Pressed on the issue in June, Education Secretary Linda McMahon denied a slowdown. 'Not only are we reducing the backlog, but we are keeping up with the current amount with a reduced staff because we are doing it efficiently,' McMahon said at a Senate budget hearing. By several measures, however, the output of the Office for Civil Rights appears to have fallen sharply in comparison with previous years. A public database of the office's resolution agreements — cases in which schools or universities voluntarily agreed to address civil rights concerns — suggests the office's work has slowed. The database lists just 65 resolutions so far this year, on pace to fall far below previous years' totals. Last year the office logged 380 resolutions in total, following 561 in 2023. During President Donald Trump's first term, the office averaged more than 800 resolutions a year, including 1,300 during his first year in office. Other internal data obtained by The Associated Press show a similar trend. Since Trump took office, the total number of resolved cases is down about 40% from the same time frame last year — including cases that were dismissed, mediated or reached a voluntary resolution. Compared with last year, there also has been a 70% decrease in the number of cases resolved through resolution agreements or action taken by a school to comply with federal law, the internal data shows. Meanwhile, new complaints have increased 9%. The total number of cases has now climbed beyond 25,000. An Education Department spokesperson said the Trump administration is fixing a broken system. 'When staff levels were at their peak, OCR's processes still proved to be ineffective, as evidenced by the chronic backlog of tens of thousands of cases that left students' discrimination claims languishing over many presidential administrations,' spokesperson Julie Hartman said. Many families are waiting for US intervention to address complaints Parents and advocates say they've noticed a difference. Adrienne Hazel filed a complaint in April after her 20-year-old son Ricky, who has autism, was placed in a public school program without a certified teacher and was not given an individual learning plan. Hazel, of Southfield, Michigan, has not heard from the federal office after receiving an automatic reply when she filed the complaint. Things moved faster last year when Hazel filed a separate complaint for her son. The office notified Ricky's school, which Hazel says spurred the district to reach an agreement with her within about three months. This time, she said, it feels like she's on her own. 'There has been zero response to this,' she said. 'He's basically going into a babysitting situation. He's not getting the things that he needs to grow into independence. And he'll just be aging without getting an education.' Marcie Lipsitt, a special education advocate in Michigan who worked with Hazel, said such stories are common. She helps families file complaints but warns it could take at least a year before an investigation opens. Some schools have backtracked on previous agreements, she said, yet parents can't get a response from the federal office. 'It's horrible. I'm watching children suffer like they've never suffered,' she said. 'There is no accountability.' The fate of the Education Department itself is in question as the Trump administration moves ahead with a plan to wind down the agency. A Supreme Court decision Monday cleared the way for the agency to continue mass layoffs and outsource some functions to other agencies. McMahon previously suggested the civil rights work could be managed by the Justice Department. Still, McMahon said in June that the office was making headway after inheriting a backlog of 20,000 cases from the Biden administration. She told senators the office was catching up on the backlog and keeping up with new complaints. With half the staff, many question how that's possible. In a June court order pausing the termination of Office for Civil Rights employees, a federal judge in Boston said the branch is 'currently incapable of addressing the vast majority' of complaints. More than 200 of the office's employees remain on leave while that case is decided. Caseloads have grown for remaining Office for Civil Rights staffers The Office for Civil Rights is responsible for enforcing civil rights laws across the nation's schools and is often a last resort for parents and students facing discrimination from schools. The office reviews complaints and, for those that meet certain criteria, opens investigations. Others are dismissed or move to a mediation process. Of the 65 resolution agreements reported this year, 57 were signed after Trump took office. Of those, the vast majority involve complaints of discrimination based on disability, with smaller numbers based on sex or race. Most of the sex discrimination findings deal with keeping transgender athletes out of women's sports, one of Trump's campaign promises. "OCR will continue to meet its statutory responsibilities while driving to improve efficiency and resolve the longstanding backlog,' Hartman said. Multiple workers in the office who spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of retaliation said caseloads have grown too big to manage. In last year's budget request, the office said it was becoming difficult to keep up when investigative staff averaged 42 cases per person. Some estimates put the current caseload beyond 200. The employees said it means more cases will languish. Another parent in Michigan, Casie Clouse, hasn't heard from the department since she filed a complaint in May. Her son, Brady, who is blind in one eye and has a learning disability, wasn't getting the type of help his school promised, including access to teachers' notes and reduced coursework. Brady, 14, made no academic progress in eighth grade, and he's now heading to high school without the support he needs, his mother said. 'It's been so frustrating not to even have an update at all,' said Clouse, of Ann Arbor. 'He is going to go to high school and fail. I feel like my child will not get a high school diploma if he stays in Ann Arbor Public Schools.' ___ The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at
