Israeli officials signal they want UN to remain key Gaza aid channel, says senior UN official
Israeli officials have signaled they want the United Nations to remain the key avenue for humanitarian deliveries in Gaza, the deputy head of the World Food Programme said on Friday, noting the work of theUS aid group was not discussed.
"They wanted the UN to continue to be the main track for delivery, especially should there be a ceasefire, and they asked us to be ready to scale up," Carl Skau, deputy executive director of the UN food agency, told reporters on Friday after visiting Gaza and Israel last week.
The US, Egypt and Qatar are trying to broker a ceasefire in the war between Israel and Palestinian terrorists Hamas in Gaza. Hamas said on Wednesday that the flow of aid was one of the sticking points.
Israel and the United States have publicly urged the UN to work through the new Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, but the UN has refused, questioning the group's neutrality and accusing the distribution model of militarizing aid and forcing displacement.
Skau said he met with Israeli authorities at different levels last week and that the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation "did not come up in those conversations."
"I think there were rumors of the UN being pushed out, but it was very clear in my engagement that they want the UN to continue to be the main track in delivery," Skau said.
Since Israel lifted an 11-week aid blockade on Gaza on May 19, allowing limited UN deliveries to resume. The GHF launched its operation, using private US security and logistics firms to transport aid to distribution hubs, a week later.
The United Nations human rights office said on Friday that it had recorded 615 deaths near GHF sites and 183 deaths "presumably on the route of aid convoys" operated by the UN and other relief groups.
GHF has repeatedly said there have been no deaths at any of its aid distribution sites. The group said on Friday that it has so far delivered more than 70 million meals in Gaza. The US State Department has approved $30 million in funding for the GHF, which touts its model as "reinventing aid delivery in war zones."
Israel and the United States have accused Hamas of stealing aid from the UN-led operations, which the terrorists deny.
Throughout the conflict, the United Nations has described its humanitarian operation in Gaza as opportunistic - facing problems with Israel's military operation, access restrictions by Israel into and throughout Gaza, and looting by armed gangs.
But the UN has said its aid distribution system works, and that was particularly proven during a two-month ceasefire, which Israel abandoned in mid-March. The UN said it got 600-700 trucks of aid a day into Gaza during the truce and has stressed then when people know there is a steady flow of aid, the looting subsides.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The Hill's Headlines - July 13, 2025
NATIONAL One year since President Trump's assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania ECONOMY The EU is delaying retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods, in hopes of reaching a deal by Aug. 1 INTERNATIONAL Death toll from Israeli attacks on Gaza surpasses 58,000, says health ministry RELIGION Tabernacle Choir to mark 5,000 episodes of 'Music and the Spoken Word' WEATHER Grand Canyon wildfire grows 20-fold over 24 hours as Canadian wildfires smoke blankets U.S. Midwest
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
'Counterproductive incentive': Hardest-hit Gaza border towns slam gov't canceling return grant
The lawyers stated in the letter that the heads of the towns in question will petition the High Court of Justice if the government decision is not repealed. Leaders of the eleven towns hit hardest in the October 7 Hamas massacre, in a meeting labeled 'urgent' in the Knesset Economics Committee, criticized on Monday the government's decision on June 29 to cancel grants to families who return to the towns. The government's abrupt decision on June 29 stated that the 'security obstacles' preventing residents from returning had been removed, and therefore, residents were permitted to return to the area. However, contrary to prior commitments, the governments announced that families are no longer eligible to receive grants, which, based on different criteria, could reach tens of thousands of shekels. In a letter to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Minister in the Finance Ministry Ze'ev Elkin, and Tkuma Directorate head Aviad Friedman, lawyers representing the 11 towns - Be'eri, Kfar Aza, Nir Oz, Nahal Oz, Kissufim, Nirim, Holit, Netiv HaAsara, Re'im, Nir Yitzhak, and Sufa – wrote, 'Retroactively, and without any real discussion, the government of Israel has decided to reverse previous government decisions and explicit commitments made to residents of the 'red zone' communities—those who suffered the worst during the October 7 massacre—regarding one-time 'return home' grants.' The lawyers argued that in similar cases, such as the return of residents to northern communities in March, residents were given a grace period to return home, during which they were still eligible for the grants. In this case, the eligibility was removed without warning. The decision was thus unfair, and also harmed families who had included the grants in their economic planning. The lawyers wrote that the residents were 'stunned' by the decision. 'In an almost incomprehensible move—these are the very residents who bore, and continue to bear, the catastrophic consequences of the October 7 massacre, and who were displaced from their homes for the longest period (nearly two years)—they are the only ones denied a meaningful grant intended to help evacuees return home,' the lawyers wrote. 'The government's breach of its commitment to the red zone residents not only contradicts the prime minister's promise that 'the government of Israel is determined to mend the fracture,' but also severely undermines the trust of these residents in the state—trust that was already shattered by the events of October 7,' the lawyers wrote. 'This decision discriminates against red zone residents compared to evacuees from other communities displaced by the Iron Swords War. While evacuees in both the South and the North received return grants, residents of the red zone are the only ones excluded. Given that these communities were the hardest hit on October 7, the extreme unreasonableness of the decision is even more stark,' the lawyers wrote. 'Furthermore, the decision of June 29, 2025 directly contradicts previous government resolutions that aimed to incentivize residents to return home once security conditions allowed it. While those grants previously encouraged return and community recovery, their cancellation—alongside financial support for those delaying their return—undermines the rehabilitation of the affected communities and creates a completely counterproductive incentive,' the lawyers wrote. They also pointed to procedural flaws that they claimed made the decision illegal, claiming that the government decision was made in a 'rushed process (an expedited phone approval), without any substantive prior discussion n; without any factual basis laid out to justify deviation from previous government decisions; without any preparatory staff work followed by conclusions that might have supported the decision; without the position of the red zone residents being heard; without any relevant considerations being taken into account; without the decision being properly reasoned, based on substantive and weighty arguments; and contrary to the government's obligation to consider the T'kuma region as a national priority area that requires rehabilitation, in accordance with the Broad Rehabilitation Law for the T'kuma Region.' The lawyers stated in the letter that the heads of the towns in question will petition the High Court of Justice if the government decision is not repealed. The Economic Committee meeting concluded with committee chairman MK David Bitan (Likud) setting a meeting with representatives of the Tkuma Directorate and the finance ministry in order to negotiate a solution and set the source of funding for it. Bitan said that he would not enable representatives of the towns to attend the meeting.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
'A miracle it ended with only minor wounds': IDF soldier wounded by accidental fire from Gaza
A bullet fired from the Gaza Strip lightly wounded an IDF soldier near the Sha'ar Hanegev Junction on Sunday. A bullet fired from Gaza hit an IDF vehicle carrying a soldier near the Sha'ar Hanegev Junction on Sunday, the IDF said. According to preliminary information provided to the regional council, the fire was likely accidental and came from IDF troops inside Gaza. The incident resulted in only a minor injury to the soldier and slight damage to the vehicle. The head of the Sha'ar HaNegev Regional Council, Uri Epstein, responded sharply to the incident: 'We view this incident with great seriousness. I spoke with the division commander a few minutes ago and demanded to receive the full results of the military investigation and to know what actions will be taken to prevent similar incidents in the future. I stress that there is no change to the military directives in the area—but it's clear that an event like this cannot be allowed to happen again.' According to Epstein, although the wound was minor, the incident highlights the fragility of the security situation on the ground. He used the opportunity to criticize the state's decision to lift security restrictions in the area: 'The state has determined that there is no longer a security issue in returning to the border communities, but it is not here to understand the consequence of its decisions. We will not accept endangering lives in the council's territory. We call on all security officials and decision-makers to come to the area and ensure firsthand that the safety of our residents is fully protected.' It is worth noting that just two weeks ago, the Israeli government approved, based on the Defense Ministry's recommendation, the removal of security restrictions from 12 of the Gaza border communities, effective on July 1, 2025. These include Be'eri, Kfar Aza, Nirim, Nir Oz, Sufa, Netiv Ha'asara, Nir Yitzhak, Kerem Shalom, Ein Hashlosha, Nahal Oz, Kissufim, and Holit. The decision enables the full return home of citizens and allows preparation for the upcoming school year within the communities themselves. At the same time, the Tekuma Authority announced that reconstruction and renovation work had been completed in Kerem Shalom, Re'im, Nirim, and Ein Hashlosha. Still, many residents and local leaders in the Gaza border communities continue to express reservations about the decision, demanding assurances that the area is truly safe for permanent return. In the meantime, the question continues to echo throughout the region: Is it really time to come home, or is the government acting too hastily in its decisions?
