&w=3840&q=100)
Elon Musk's DOGE slashes $135 mn funding to fight deepfakes, misinformation
Bloomberg
Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency is slashing about $135 million in funding for research grants from the National Science Foundation, a key federal agency supporting artificial intelligence development, according to people familiar with the matter and an internal document viewed by Bloomberg News.
The cuts impact dozens of active grants, including several programmes focused on combating misinformation and AI deepfakes, according to the document. The move came after three members of DOGE began scrutinising programmes related to diversity, equity and inclusion last week, said the people, who asked not to be identified for fear of retaliation. DOGE isn't an official government department, but is part of the White House's push to cut government spending.
The NSF will no longer fund research combating misinformation, according to the agency's website. The realignment of its priorities is intended to adhere to President Donald Trump's executive order in January which said such efforts could infringe on free speech. That policy shift was presaged by Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation-led set of proposals for a second Trump administration, which said the government has 'absolutely no business policing speech.'
However, the decision to cancel grants for research projects aimed at detecting and preventing deepfakes came as a surprise inside the agency, the people said. The cuts risk further eroding federal support for AI safeguards at a time when AI tools are becoming increasingly capable of creating convincing fake images and text that can scam and mislead users.
A spokesman for the NSF declined to comment.
Among the canceled grants are a $5 million programme at the University at Buffalo focused on educating older adults to recognise AI-generated online scams and a deepfake detection tool under development at the Rochester Institute of Technology, according to the document. Similar programmes at the University of South Carolina and University of Mississippi will also lose funding.
In February, the NSF fired 170 employees, including numerous specialists recruited for their expertise in artificial intelligence. A court subsequently ruled these firings illegal, prompting the reinstatement of 84 workers, but many AI experts have not returned to the agency, the people said. Additional cuts are expected in the coming weeks, the people added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
3 minutes ago
- NDTV
AAP, BJP Play Blame Game Over Rising Dengue, Malaria Cases In Delhi
A blame game has started in Delhi between the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) and the BJP-led Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) on Friday over the rising cases of vector-borne diseases in the national capital. Both are trading accusations, while health experts warn of a potential surge if timely interventions are not implemented. To put the Rekha Gupta-led BJP government in the dock, the AAP has alleged that malaria cases in Delhi have broken a 10-year record. According to official figures, Delhi has reported 277 dengue cases, 124 malaria infections, and 18 cases of chikungunya so far this monsoon season. AAP Trains Guns At MCD AAP leader Saurabh Bharadwaj said the rising disease numbers reflected larger issues with civic infrastructure. "Malaria cases in Delhi have broken a 10-year record. This isn't just a number, it's a symptom of how deeply mismanaged the city is," he said during a press conference on Friday. Pointing to the instances of waterlogging in Connaught Place, Sadar Bazar, and Janpath, Mr. Bharadwaj said, "BJP ministers repeatedly claim there's no waterlogging, but the rising malaria cases tell a different story. The AAP has also said it will raise the matter in the Delhi Assembly session on August 4. मलेरिया के आंकड़े पिछले 10 साल में सबसे ज़्यादा‼️ BJP की सरकार ने कहा था कि इस बार दिल्ली में जलभराव नहीं होगा लेकिन इस बार CP और सदर बाजार समेत तमाम जगहों पर जलभराव हुआ लेकिन बीजेपी सरकार ने मानने से ही इनकार कर दिया। अब दिल्ली में मलेरिया के आंकड़े पिछले 10 साल के आंकड़े को… — Saurabh Bharadwaj (@Saurabh_MLAgk) August 1, 2025 Mayor Hits Back Responding to the allegations, Delhi Mayor Sardar Raja Iqbal Singh defended the MCD's efforts and questioned AAP's performance during its tenure at the municipal level. AAP ran the MCD for two-and-a-half years. Did they eradicate mosquito breeding? They didn't even release full data on dengue and malaria cases then," Mr Singh said. He also highlighted the civic body's recent initiatives to prevent mosquito breeding and vector-borne diseases, which include spraying at 49,718 locations, conducting 8.2 lakh home inspections, and issuing over 5,600 legal notices for mosquito breeding violations. "We're acting on a war footing. These baseless accusations by AAP are just a political diversion," Mr Singh said, adding that AAP leaders have not been active participants in health discussions. Between Politics and Public Health, Residents Want Solutions As political back and forth continues, residents say they're more concerned about on-ground response than party positions. "We don't want daily updates on blame. We want clean streets, regular spraying, and health camps," said a resident in West Delhi.
Mint
3 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump fires ‘Biden-appointee' top labour statistics official Erika McEntarfer after weak jobs report: 'Must be fair…'
President Donald Trump has dismissed the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics just hours after a disappointing jobs report was released, sparking concern among economists and policymakers over the future credibility of the agency's data. In a statement posted on social media on Friday, Trump announced he had instructed his team to sack Erika McEntarfer — a Biden appointee — 'IMMEDIATELY.' He added, 'Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes.' Not long after Trump posted about firing the BLS chief on Truth Social, Chavez-DeRemer chimed in on X, naming deputy commissioner William Wiatrowski as acting head of the agency. 'I agree wholeheartedly with @POTUS that our jobs numbers must be fair, accurate, and never manipulated for political purposes,' she wrote, echoing Trump's unfounded claims. Vice President JD Vance and Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer sought to put a positive spin on weak jobs numbers hours before their boss, President Donald Trump, fired the person who oversees the data, claiming without evidence that the dour report was politically motivated. Vance reposted a graphic on X that showed the number of native-born workers increased while employment of foreign-born workers declined, suggesting that was a result of Trump administration immigration policy. Friday's report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics showed payrolls increased 73,000 in July and that the prior two months were revised down by nearly 260,000. In the past three months, employment growth has averaged 35,000 — the worst since the Covid-19 pandemic.
Hindustan Times
3 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Tesla to pay $243 million over fatal autopilot crash
Tesla Inc. was told to pay $243 million in a lawsuit over a 2019 Autopilot crash in Florida that killed a young woman and seriously injured her boyfriend, the first significant court loss for the automaker in litigation related to its driver-assistance technology. Elon Musk's Tesla to pay $243 million in an autopilot crash lawsuit(REUTERS) A jury in Miami federal court found Friday that Tesla was 33% to blame for the collision. A Tesla Model S ran a stop sign at a T intersection in the Florida Keys and rammed into the couple's parked Chevrolet Tahoe while they were standing next to it. Jurors issued their verdict after less than a day of deliberations following a three-week trial. The jury determined that the Tesla S driver was primarily responsible for the crash and that Tesla should pay $42.5 million to compensate the victims for their losses. The panel also ordered Tesla to pay $200 million in punitive damages, but the company said it expects that figure to be reduced by the court. Tesla had argued the driver was entirely at fault because he was distracted when he dropped his mobile phone on the floorboard. 'Today's verdict is wrong and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardize Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement life-saving technology,' Tesla said in a statement. 'We plan to appeal given the substantial errors of law and irregularities at trial.' The Miami suit is one of a handful of crash cases that have gone to trial and the verdict tarnishes Tesla's near-perfect record in court. The electric-vehicle maker prevailed in two previous trials in California over Autopilot-related crashes and has struck confidential accords to resolve several cases that blamed defective technology for deadly accidents. The verdict comes as Tesla Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk faces enormous investor pressure after the company's stock has been battered, first by his close affiliation with President Donald Trump, and then by his dramatic falling out with the president. Musk has staked Tesla's future in part on autonomous driving as the company is launching a robotaxi business. But when Tesla recently announced disappointing second-quarter earnings, Musk warned that the company is in for a few 'rough quarters' as incentives like the EV tax credit go away in the US. At trial, the jury heard testimony from the driver of the Model S, family members of the woman who died, company engineers and various outside experts who discussed whether Autopilot played a role in the collision. George McGee, the driver of the Model S, had engaged his vehicle's driver-assistance system while traveling home from work. In the moments before the collision, data obtained from the vehicle showed that he had pressed the accelerator to 17 miles (27.4 kilometers) per hour over the posted speed limit, leading him to override the vehicle's adaptive cruise control before he went off the road. McGee testified that he had been on hold on with American Airlines trying to modify an upcoming flight. He said his phone fell and he was looking for it just before the crash. As his car left the road, McGee said he felt the texture of the road change under his tires and he remembered 'jamming on the brakes.' During questioning, he told jurors that he knew he was completely responsible for operating the car, but that he expected Autopilot to assist him in the event he made a mistake. 'In that case, I do feel like it failed me,' he said, according to a transcript of his testimony. The family of Naibel Benavides Leon, the woman who was killed, reached a confidential settlement with McGee in 2021 in a separate lawsuit. Lawyers for the estate of Benavides Leon and her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo, argued Tesla's Autopilot encourages complacency and that the company and Musk have overstated the system's capabilities, leading drivers to be overconfident in its abilities. They also alleged that Tesla failed to add safeguards to ensure the software was only available on roadways where it was designed to be used and features to monitor the attentiveness of drivers. 'Today's verdict represents justice for Naibel's tragic death and Dillon's lifelong injuries, holding Tesla and Musk accountable for propping up the company's trillion-dollar valuation with self-driving hype at the expense of human lives,' Brett Schreiber, lead attorney for the crash victims, said in a statement. Tesla, as it has in other cases, blamed driver error for the collision. Lawyers for the company argued repeatedly that McGee was an aggressive driver with a history of speeding, and that he took his eyes off the road and his hands off the wheel despite warnings in the owners' manual that drivers must stay engaged. The company has maintained there were no defects in its software and that Autopilot operated exactly as designed. Throughout the trial, Tesla defense attorney Joel Smith said no driver-assistance technology on the market in 2019 would have been able to prevent the crash. The automotive industry categorizes automation systems in vehicles from Level 0 to 5, based on what features are available. Level 0 features simply pass on information to the driver, like sounding a warning when you're driving out of a traffic lane. Tesla's Autopilot is classified as Level 2 because it requires constant driver input and supervision. The case is Benavides v. Tesla, 1:21-cv-21940, US District Court, Southern District of Florida (Miami). (An earlier version of the story corrected the damages amount. Updates with additional details about damages in third paragraph.) More stories like this are available on ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
