Biden's son says Clooney undermined father in election
Hunter Biden has accused Democratic advisers of making money but not helping the party's candidates. (AP PHOTO) Credit: AAP
Former US president Joe Biden's son Hunter has criticised actor and Democratic Party donor George Clooney's 2024 decision to call on the elder Biden to abandon his re-election bid.
In a three-hour online interview, Hunter Biden used a string of expletives to describe Clooney when discussing the actor with Andrew Gallagher of Channel 5.
Clooney supported Democrat Joe Biden's bid for a second term and even headlined a record-setting fundraiser for the then-president.
But the actor changed his stance after Biden turned in a lacklustre debate performance against Republican Donald Trump in June 2024 and added his voice to mounting calls for the then-81-year-old president to leave the race.
Clooney made his feelings known in an opinion piece in The New York Times.
Biden ended up leaving the race a few weeks later and endorsed his vice president Kamala Harris, who later lost to Trump.
In the wide-ranging interview, Hunter Biden questioned why anyone should listen to Clooney and said the Ocean's Eleve actor had no right to "undermine" his father.
"What right do you have to step on a man who's given 52 years of his f***ing life to the services of this country and decide that you, George Clooney, are going to take out basically a full page ad in the f***ing New York Times to undermine the president," Hunter Biden said before he trailed off to talk about how Republicans are more unified than Democrats.
Joe Biden served 36 years in the US Senate and eight years as Barack Obama's vice president before he was elected president in 2020.
Referring to Joe Biden's debate performance, Hunter Biden said his father may have been recovering from Ambien, a medication that he had been given to help him sleep following trips in the weeks before the debate to Europe, as well as the Los Angeles fundraiser at which Clooney said his interactions with the elder Biden made him feel the president was not mentally capable.
"They give him Ambien to be able to sleep, and he gets up on the stage and he looks like he's a deer in the headlights," Hunter Biden said.
He also ranted against longtime Democratic advisers he accused of making money off the party and trading off previous electoral successes but not helping candidates' current efforts.
Anita Dunn, a longtime Biden senior adviser, has made "$US40 to $US50 million ($A61 million to $A77 million)" off of work for the Democratic Party, Hunter Biden said.
James Carville, adviser to former president Bill Clinton, "hasn't run a race in 40 f***king years".
Former Obama strategist David Axelrod, Hunter Biden said, "had one success in his political life, and that was Barack Obama - and that was because of Barack Obama".
Other former Obama aides who now host the Pod Save America podcast are "four white millionaires that are dining out on their association with Barack Obama from 16 years ago," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Advertiser
3 hours ago
- The Advertiser
'Gaping hole' in social media ban as YouTube plugged in
Australian children will be barred from having YouTube accounts under an incoming social media ban, but experts are warning of inadequate tools to enforce the measures. The video-sharing website was initially spared from the world-first national ban for under-16s as part of an exemption for health and education services. But after receiving advice from eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant, the federal government decided to include the platform as part of the social media ban. Under the changes, children won't be allowed to have YouTube accounts that allow users to watch age-restricted videos. Children will still be able to access YouTube Kids or view any videos accessible while not logged into the platform. Social media expert Tama Leaver from Curtin University said there was no evidence that the planned tools would be good enough to verify users' ages, although a final report into measures to enforce the ban was still due to be released. "There is a gaping hole in this policy," he told AAP. "We should have the technical road map for how this is expected to work. "The government should have been able to say to platforms, 'these are things that we believe are reliable enough'." Swinburne University media expert Belinda Barnet said YouTube wasn't a "special case" as the company had been arguing, with the platform presenting the same risk of harm as any social media site. "We can expect there's going to be a very difficult period where the platforms make 'first pancake' mistakes in Australia and there's an adjustment period," she said. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese acknowledged parents who had lost their children to suicide following social media abuse and thanked them for their courage in speaking in favour of the ban. "Their stories are felt by countless other parents and by communities right across the country," he told reporters in Canberra on Wednesday. Mia Bannister, who lost her 14-year-old son Ollie in 2024, said parents had been advocating for greater protections for young people. "It wasn't the result of one voice, but the power of many united in purpose, driven by hope and committed to protecting our kids," she said. YouTube said it shares the government's goal to reduce online harm but argues that it differs from others and is not a social media platform. "We will consider the next steps and will continue to engage with the government," a spokesperson said. YouTube also says it is often used as an educational resource by teachers in the classroom. The platform's inclusion was foreshadowed after the online safety watchdog in June cited research that found children were exposed to harmful content on YouTube more than on any other platform. It will join other platforms, such as Snapchat, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok, which were included under the ban when legislation passed parliament in 2024. Communications Minister Anika Wells said social media platforms had been "on notice" since December and were given 12 months to develop verification processes. "We can't control the ocean, but we can police the sharks, and that's why I will not be intimidated by leaving threats when this is a genuine fight for the wellbeing of Australian kids," she said. Opposition communications spokeswoman Melissa McIntosh described the backflip on exempting YouTube as a "blatant broken promise" to Australians. "We are concerned that the eSafety Commissioner is testing boundaries which are moving beyond what Australians are comfortable with," she said. YouTube's parent company Google has already threatened to sue Australia on the grounds that a ban would restricts the implied constitutional freedom of political communication. Educators can continue to use school-approved educational YouTube content through their own accounts. Under the legislation, age-restricted social media platforms will face fines of up to $49.5 million if they fail to prevent people younger than 16 from creating accounts. Lifeline 13 11 14 Kids Helpline 1800 55 1800 (for people aged 5 to 25) Australian children will be barred from having YouTube accounts under an incoming social media ban, but experts are warning of inadequate tools to enforce the measures. The video-sharing website was initially spared from the world-first national ban for under-16s as part of an exemption for health and education services. But after receiving advice from eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant, the federal government decided to include the platform as part of the social media ban. Under the changes, children won't be allowed to have YouTube accounts that allow users to watch age-restricted videos. Children will still be able to access YouTube Kids or view any videos accessible while not logged into the platform. Social media expert Tama Leaver from Curtin University said there was no evidence that the planned tools would be good enough to verify users' ages, although a final report into measures to enforce the ban was still due to be released. "There is a gaping hole in this policy," he told AAP. "We should have the technical road map for how this is expected to work. "The government should have been able to say to platforms, 'these are things that we believe are reliable enough'." Swinburne University media expert Belinda Barnet said YouTube wasn't a "special case" as the company had been arguing, with the platform presenting the same risk of harm as any social media site. "We can expect there's going to be a very difficult period where the platforms make 'first pancake' mistakes in Australia and there's an adjustment period," she said. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese acknowledged parents who had lost their children to suicide following social media abuse and thanked them for their courage in speaking in favour of the ban. "Their stories are felt by countless other parents and by communities right across the country," he told reporters in Canberra on Wednesday. Mia Bannister, who lost her 14-year-old son Ollie in 2024, said parents had been advocating for greater protections for young people. "It wasn't the result of one voice, but the power of many united in purpose, driven by hope and committed to protecting our kids," she said. YouTube said it shares the government's goal to reduce online harm but argues that it differs from others and is not a social media platform. "We will consider the next steps and will continue to engage with the government," a spokesperson said. YouTube also says it is often used as an educational resource by teachers in the classroom. The platform's inclusion was foreshadowed after the online safety watchdog in June cited research that found children were exposed to harmful content on YouTube more than on any other platform. It will join other platforms, such as Snapchat, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok, which were included under the ban when legislation passed parliament in 2024. Communications Minister Anika Wells said social media platforms had been "on notice" since December and were given 12 months to develop verification processes. "We can't control the ocean, but we can police the sharks, and that's why I will not be intimidated by leaving threats when this is a genuine fight for the wellbeing of Australian kids," she said. Opposition communications spokeswoman Melissa McIntosh described the backflip on exempting YouTube as a "blatant broken promise" to Australians. "We are concerned that the eSafety Commissioner is testing boundaries which are moving beyond what Australians are comfortable with," she said. YouTube's parent company Google has already threatened to sue Australia on the grounds that a ban would restricts the implied constitutional freedom of political communication. Educators can continue to use school-approved educational YouTube content through their own accounts. Under the legislation, age-restricted social media platforms will face fines of up to $49.5 million if they fail to prevent people younger than 16 from creating accounts. Lifeline 13 11 14 Kids Helpline 1800 55 1800 (for people aged 5 to 25) Australian children will be barred from having YouTube accounts under an incoming social media ban, but experts are warning of inadequate tools to enforce the measures. The video-sharing website was initially spared from the world-first national ban for under-16s as part of an exemption for health and education services. But after receiving advice from eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant, the federal government decided to include the platform as part of the social media ban. Under the changes, children won't be allowed to have YouTube accounts that allow users to watch age-restricted videos. Children will still be able to access YouTube Kids or view any videos accessible while not logged into the platform. Social media expert Tama Leaver from Curtin University said there was no evidence that the planned tools would be good enough to verify users' ages, although a final report into measures to enforce the ban was still due to be released. "There is a gaping hole in this policy," he told AAP. "We should have the technical road map for how this is expected to work. "The government should have been able to say to platforms, 'these are things that we believe are reliable enough'." Swinburne University media expert Belinda Barnet said YouTube wasn't a "special case" as the company had been arguing, with the platform presenting the same risk of harm as any social media site. "We can expect there's going to be a very difficult period where the platforms make 'first pancake' mistakes in Australia and there's an adjustment period," she said. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese acknowledged parents who had lost their children to suicide following social media abuse and thanked them for their courage in speaking in favour of the ban. "Their stories are felt by countless other parents and by communities right across the country," he told reporters in Canberra on Wednesday. Mia Bannister, who lost her 14-year-old son Ollie in 2024, said parents had been advocating for greater protections for young people. "It wasn't the result of one voice, but the power of many united in purpose, driven by hope and committed to protecting our kids," she said. YouTube said it shares the government's goal to reduce online harm but argues that it differs from others and is not a social media platform. "We will consider the next steps and will continue to engage with the government," a spokesperson said. YouTube also says it is often used as an educational resource by teachers in the classroom. The platform's inclusion was foreshadowed after the online safety watchdog in June cited research that found children were exposed to harmful content on YouTube more than on any other platform. It will join other platforms, such as Snapchat, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok, which were included under the ban when legislation passed parliament in 2024. Communications Minister Anika Wells said social media platforms had been "on notice" since December and were given 12 months to develop verification processes. "We can't control the ocean, but we can police the sharks, and that's why I will not be intimidated by leaving threats when this is a genuine fight for the wellbeing of Australian kids," she said. Opposition communications spokeswoman Melissa McIntosh described the backflip on exempting YouTube as a "blatant broken promise" to Australians. "We are concerned that the eSafety Commissioner is testing boundaries which are moving beyond what Australians are comfortable with," she said. YouTube's parent company Google has already threatened to sue Australia on the grounds that a ban would restricts the implied constitutional freedom of political communication. Educators can continue to use school-approved educational YouTube content through their own accounts. Under the legislation, age-restricted social media platforms will face fines of up to $49.5 million if they fail to prevent people younger than 16 from creating accounts. Lifeline 13 11 14 Kids Helpline 1800 55 1800 (for people aged 5 to 25) Australian children will be barred from having YouTube accounts under an incoming social media ban, but experts are warning of inadequate tools to enforce the measures. The video-sharing website was initially spared from the world-first national ban for under-16s as part of an exemption for health and education services. But after receiving advice from eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant, the federal government decided to include the platform as part of the social media ban. Under the changes, children won't be allowed to have YouTube accounts that allow users to watch age-restricted videos. Children will still be able to access YouTube Kids or view any videos accessible while not logged into the platform. Social media expert Tama Leaver from Curtin University said there was no evidence that the planned tools would be good enough to verify users' ages, although a final report into measures to enforce the ban was still due to be released. "There is a gaping hole in this policy," he told AAP. "We should have the technical road map for how this is expected to work. "The government should have been able to say to platforms, 'these are things that we believe are reliable enough'." Swinburne University media expert Belinda Barnet said YouTube wasn't a "special case" as the company had been arguing, with the platform presenting the same risk of harm as any social media site. "We can expect there's going to be a very difficult period where the platforms make 'first pancake' mistakes in Australia and there's an adjustment period," she said. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese acknowledged parents who had lost their children to suicide following social media abuse and thanked them for their courage in speaking in favour of the ban. "Their stories are felt by countless other parents and by communities right across the country," he told reporters in Canberra on Wednesday. Mia Bannister, who lost her 14-year-old son Ollie in 2024, said parents had been advocating for greater protections for young people. "It wasn't the result of one voice, but the power of many united in purpose, driven by hope and committed to protecting our kids," she said. YouTube said it shares the government's goal to reduce online harm but argues that it differs from others and is not a social media platform. "We will consider the next steps and will continue to engage with the government," a spokesperson said. YouTube also says it is often used as an educational resource by teachers in the classroom. The platform's inclusion was foreshadowed after the online safety watchdog in June cited research that found children were exposed to harmful content on YouTube more than on any other platform. It will join other platforms, such as Snapchat, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok, which were included under the ban when legislation passed parliament in 2024. Communications Minister Anika Wells said social media platforms had been "on notice" since December and were given 12 months to develop verification processes. "We can't control the ocean, but we can police the sharks, and that's why I will not be intimidated by leaving threats when this is a genuine fight for the wellbeing of Australian kids," she said. Opposition communications spokeswoman Melissa McIntosh described the backflip on exempting YouTube as a "blatant broken promise" to Australians. "We are concerned that the eSafety Commissioner is testing boundaries which are moving beyond what Australians are comfortable with," she said. YouTube's parent company Google has already threatened to sue Australia on the grounds that a ban would restricts the implied constitutional freedom of political communication. Educators can continue to use school-approved educational YouTube content through their own accounts. Under the legislation, age-restricted social media platforms will face fines of up to $49.5 million if they fail to prevent people younger than 16 from creating accounts. Lifeline 13 11 14 Kids Helpline 1800 55 1800 (for people aged 5 to 25)
Perth Now
4 hours ago
- Perth Now
Ministers coy on gambling reform as advice kept secret
Ministers have drawn scorn for not disclosing progress on curbing gambling harm and advertising reform, as one senator pushes for more transparency. Independent senator David Pocock forced the social services and communications ministers to table briefing materials about the reforms with a Senate order to produce documents. It relates to the recommendations from a landmark parliamentary gambling harm report handed down in 2023 by late Labor MP Peta Murphy. The keystone recommendations were a ban on gambling advertising and inducements. A draft response to recommendations was ready in November and Senator Pocock has been pushing for its release after Labor shelved any action ahead of the May election. Senator Pocock accused the government of being overly secretive. "Pages of redacted information shows how much this government doesn't want to talk about gambling reform or a proper response to the landmark Murphy review," he told AAP. Aside from a two-page summary of gambling harm statistics, Social Services Minister Tanya Plibersek refused to release the documents to the Senate. The advice stated that young people are more likely to increase their betting behaviour when exposed to gambling advertising, citing the Australian Gambling Research Centre. Betting ads used humour, distinctive voiceovers and celebrities to influence children's attention and recall, the centre found. Ms Plibersek argued she didn't have to comply with a Senate order to release the documents as it would prejudice the policy decision-making process. The release could also impede the government from getting commercially sensitive information from stakeholders in the future and "have a chilling effect on comprehensive and candid advice to ministers", she said in a letter to the Senate. Communications Minister Anika Wells disclosed highly redacted documents outlining meetings with key stakeholders as part of the Senate order but documents about policy development were withheld. Ms Wells said she was still getting her feet under the desk after being sworn into the portfolio in May but that work on the issue continued when asked whether a response to the gambling harm report was forthcoming. "I have met with all the different groups that have a stake in that ongoing work," she told reporters in Canberra on Wednesday. A large number of the report's recommendations sat with the social services minister, she said. Ms Wells is overseeing the response to the recommendations that advised a full advertising ban and the prohibition of betting inducements. The communications minister also pointed to the government implementing the self-exclusion register BetStop as part of the government cracking down on gambling harm, saying more than 44,000 people had signed up. Almost four in five were under the age of 40 and nearly two in five chose a lifetime ban, briefing materials prepared for the communications minister reveal. A review of BetStop is set to be finalised by February 2026. National Gambling Helpline 1800 858 858
SBS Australia
7 hours ago
- SBS Australia
Trump says Virginia Giuffre was among young women Epstein 'stole' from Mar-a-Lago
United States President Donald Trump has expanded on remarks about his falling-out with Jeffrey Epstein years ago, saying Epstein "stole" young women, including Australian Virginia Giuffre, who worked for the spa at his Mar-a-Lago resort. Trump previously said he had banned Epstein from his private club in Florida two decades ago because his one-time friend "stole people that worked for me". At the time, he did not make clear who those workers were. Trump has faced an outcry over his administration's refusal to release more records about Epstein after promises of transparency. Trump expands on fallout with Epstein Aboard Air Force One while returning from Scotland, Trump said he was upset Epstein was "taking people who worked for me". The women, he said, were "taken out of the spa, hired by him — in other words, gone". "I said, listen, we don't want you taking our people," Trump said. When it happened again, Trump said he banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago. Virginia Roberts Giuffre was one of the most prominent accusers of Jeffrey Epstein and Britain's Prince Andrew, before she died by suicide earlier this year. Source: AP / Bebeto Matthews Asked if Virginia Giuffre, who died by suicide earlier this year, was one of the employees poached by Epstein, Trump said: "He stole her." Virginia Giuffre's allegations against Epstein Giuffre claimed convicted sex trafficker and close associate of Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, had spotted her working as a spa attendant at Mar-a-Lago in 2000 when she was a teenager, and hired her as Epstein's masseuse, which led to sexual abuse. Giuffre accused Epstein of pressuring her into having sex with powerful men. Although Giuffre's allegations did not become part of criminal prosecutions against Epstein, she has been central to conspiracy theories about the case. If you or someone you know is impacted by sexual assault, call 1800RESPECT on 1800 737 732, text 0458 737 732, or visit . In an emergency, call 000. Readers seeking crisis support can ring Lifeline on 13 11 14 or text 0477 13 11 14, the Suicide Call Back Service on 1300 659 467 and Kids Helpline on 1800 55 1800 (for young people aged up to 25). More information and support with mental health is available at and on 1300 22 4636.
