Egg prices war in U.S. : Will there be supply shortage of egg products?
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Egg Prices
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
The Trump administration is suing the state of California to block animal welfare laws that it says unconstitutionally helped send egg prices soaring. But a group that spearheaded the requirements pushed back, blaming bird flu for the hit to consumers' pocketbooks. The lawsuit, filed in federal court in California on Wednesday, challenges voter initiatives that passed in 2018 and 2008. They require that all eggs sold in California come from cage-free hens.The Trump administration claimed that the law imposes burdensome red tape on the production of eggs and egg products across the country because of the California's outsize role in the national economy.Egg prices soared last year and earlier this year due in large part to bird flu, which has forced producers to destroy nearly 175 million birds since early 2022. But prices have come down sharply recently. While the Trump administration claims credit for that, seasonal factors are also important. Avian influenza, which is spread by wild birds, tends to spike during the spring and fall migrations and drop in summer.The average national price for a dozen Grade A eggs declined to $5.12 in April and $4.55 in May after reaching a record $6.23 in March, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. But the May price was still 68.5 per cent higher than a year earlier.'Trump's back to his favorite hobby: blaming California for literally everything,' Governor Gavin Newsom's office said in a social media post.The federal complaint alleges that California contributed to the rise in egg prices with regulations that forced farmers across the country to adopt more expensive production practices. The lawsuit also asserts that it is the federal government's legal prerogative to regulate egg production. So it seeks to permanently block enforcement of the California regulations that flowed from the two ballot measures.'Americans across the country have suffered the consequences of liberal policies causing massive inflation for everyday items like eggs,' Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a statement. 'Under President Trump's leadership, we will use the full extent of federal law to ensure that American families are free from oppressive regulatory burdens and restore American prosperity.'While 2018's Proposition 12 also banned the sale of pork and veal in California from animals raised in cages that don't meet minimum size requirements, the lawsuit only focuses on the state's egg rules.Humane World for Animals, which was named the Humane Society of the United States when it spearheaded the passage of Proposition 12, says avian influenza and other factors drove up egg prices, not animal welfare laws. And it says much of the U.S. egg industry went cage-free anyway because of demand from consumers who don't want eggs from hens confined to tiny spaces.'California has prohibited the sale of cruelly produced eggs for more than a decade — law that has been upheld by courts at every level, including the Supreme Court. Blaming 2025 egg prices on these established animal welfare standards shows that this case is about pure politics, not constitutional law,' Sara Amundson, president of the Humane World Action Fund, said in a statement.The American Egg Board, which represents the industry, said on Friday that it will monitor the progress of the lawsuit while continuing to comply with California's laws, and that it appreciates Rollins' efforts to support farmers in their fight against bird flu and to stabilize the egg supply.'Egg farmers have been both responsive and responsible in meeting changing demand for cage-free eggs, while supporting all types of egg production, and continuing to provide options in the egg case for consumers,' the board said in a statement.A1. Governor of California is Gavin Newsom.A2. The average national price for a dozen Grade A eggs declined to $5.12 in April and $4.55 in May after reaching a record $6.23 in March, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. But the May price was still 68.5 per cent higher than a year earlier.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Cheater-In-Chief: Watch Trump 'Caught Cheating' In Scotland Golf Game; Meme Fest Erupts Online
A viral video from Trump Turnberry shows Donald Trump's caddie tossing a ball near a bunker—seemingly to improve his lie. The clip reignites long-standing accusations that Trump cheats at golf, a claim famously detailed in Rick Reilly's book Commander in Cheat. Trump, who was golfing with his son Eric and U.S. Ambassador Warren Stephens, has not responded to the latest controversy. Social media is divided, with critics slamming his ethics and others mocking the focus on golf amid trade talks.#TrumpCheating #Turnberry #GolfGate #CommanderInCheat #TrumpScandal #ViralVideo #GolfControversy Read More
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
3 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Trump gets economy he wants, but growth risks may spoil his victory lap
President Donald Trump is getting his way with the world economy. Trading partners from the European Union to Japan to Vietnam appear to be acceding to the president's demands to accept higher costs in the form of high tariffs for the privilege of selling their wares to the United States. For Trump, the agreements driven by a mix of threats and cajoling, are a fulfillment of a decades-long belief in protectionism and a massive gamble that it will pay off politically and economically with American consumers. On Sunday, the United States and the 27-member state European Union announced that they had reached a trade framework agreement: The EU agreed to accept 15 per cent US tariffs on most its goods, easing fears of a catastrophic trans-Atlantic trade war. There were also commitments by the EU to buy $750 billion in US energy products and make $600 billion in new investments through 2028, according to the White House. We just signed a very big trade deal, the biggest of them all, Trump said Monday. But there's no guarantee that Trump's radical overhaul of US trade policy will deliver the happy ending he's promised. The framework agreement was exceedingly spare on details. Most trade deals require months and even years of painstaking negotiation that rise and fall on granular details. High-stakes negotiations break Trump's way Financial markets, at first panicked by the president's protectionist agenda, seem to have acquiesced to a world in which US import taxes tariffs are at the highest rates they've been in roughly 90 years. Several billion in new revenues from his levies on foreign goods are pouring into the US Treasury and could somewhat offset the massive tax cuts he signed into law on July 4. Outside economists say that high tariffs are still likely to raise prices for American consumers, dampen the Federal Reserve's ability to lower interest rates and make the US economy less efficient over time. Democrats say the middle class and poor will ultimately pay for the tariffs. It's pretty striking that it's seen as a sigh of relief moment, said Daniel Hornung, a former Biden White House economic official who now holds fellowships at Housing Finance Policy Centre and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. But if the new baseline across all trading partners is 15 per cent, that is a meaningful drag on growth that increases recession risks, while simultaneously making it harder for the Fed to cut. The EU agreement came just four days after Japan also agreed to 15 per cent US tariffs and to invest in the United States. Earlier, the United States reached deals that raised tariffs on imports from Vietnam, Indonesia, the Philippines and the United Kingdom considerably from where they'd been before Trump returned to the White House. More one-sided trade deals are likely as countries try to beat a Friday deadline after which Trump will impose even higher tariffs on countries that refuse to make concessions. Trump's long-held theory now faces reality The US president has long claimed that America erred by not taking advantage of its clout as the world's biggest economy and erecting a wall of tariffs, in effect making other countries ante up for access to America's massive consumer market. To his closest aides, Trump's use of tariffs has validated their trust in his skills as a negotiator and their belief that the economists who warned of downturns and inflation were wrong. Stocks rose slightly on Monday morning on tariffs that once seemed unthinkably risky. Where are the experts' now? Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick posted on X. But the story is not over. For one thing, many of the details of Trump's trade deals remain somewhat hazy and have not been captured in writing. The US and Japan, for instance, have offered differing descriptions of Japan's agreement to invest $550 billion in the United States. The trade deals do seem to count as a qualified win for Trump, with other countries giving the US favourable trade terms while accepting US tariffs, said Eswar Prasad, a Cornell University economist. "However, certain terms of the deals, such as other countries' investments in the US, seem more promising in the abstract than they might prove in reality over time.' Trump is also facing a court challenge from states and businesses arguing that the president overstepped his authority by declaring national emergencies to justify the tariffs on most of the world's economies. In May, a federal court struck down those tariffs. And an appeals court, which agreed to let the government continue collecting the tariffs for now, will hear oral arguments in the case Thursday. And he's yet to reach an accord with China which has deftly used the threat of retaliatory tariffs and withholding exports of rare earth minerals that are desperately needed for electric vehicles, computer chips and wind turbines to avoid caving in to Trump's demands. The US and China are talking this week in Stockholm, Sweden. Economists remain sceptical of the impacts for US consumers There is also skepticism that tariffs will produce the economic boom claimed by Trump. Analysts at Morgan Stanley said the most likely outcome is slow growth and firm inflation, but not a recession. After all, the 15 per cent tariffs on the EU and Japan are a slight increase from the 10 per cent rate that Trump began charging in April during a negotiation period. While autos made in the EU and Japan will no longer face the 25 per cent tariffs Trump had imposed, they will still face a 15 per cent tax that has yet to appear in prices at US dealerships. The administration has said the lack of auto price increases suggests that foreign producers are absorbing the costs, but it might ultimately just reflect the buildup of auto inventories to front-run the import taxes. Dealers built stocks ahead of tariff implementation, damping the immediate impact on retail prices. That cushion is starting to wear thin, Morgan Stanley said in a separate note. Our Japan auto analyst notes that as pre-tariff inventory clears, replacement vehicles will likely carry higher price tags. Economist Mary Lovely of the Peterson Institute for International Economics warned of a slow-burn efficiency loss' as US companies scramble to adjust to Trump's new world. For decades, American companies have mostly paid the same tariffs and often none at all on imported machinery and raw materials from all over the world. Now, as a result of Trump's trade deals, tariffs vary by country. US firms have to change their designs and get inputs from different places based on these variable tariff rates,' she said. It's an incredible administrative burden. There's all these things that are acting as longer-term drags on economy, but their effect will show up only slowly.' Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics, said that the United States' effective tariff rate has risen to 17.5 per cent from around 2.5 per cent at the start of the year. I wouldn't take a victory lap,' Zandi said. The economic damage caused by the higher tariffs will mount in the coming months. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Mint
3 minutes ago
- Mint
If Trump's tariffs are so bad, where's the recession?
Donald Trump's trade policy is in danger of demonstrating the truth about one of those old definitions of an economist: someone who sees something working in practice and explains why it will never work in theory. We have been told, by adherents of diverse creeds of the dismal pseudoscience, that the president's sweeping tariff plans would be a short route to economic disaster: Smoot-Hawley, the Sequel. Set aside that the infamous 1930 legislation was probably only a mere contributor to the calamity that followed rather than its author, the history and received wisdom are clear, premised on basic economic principles: Tariffs are a tax that have especially adverse consequences—increasing prices paid by importers and, ultimately, consumers; and, because of the income effect of a tax rise, at the same time depressing demand. But even as the U.S. has been transformed in just six months into a high-tariff economy, there is scant sign of the economic disaster we were promised. Deals signed in the past week with two of our largest trading partners indicate that a 15% tariff is now the likely new floor for most U.S. imports, with higher duties still in place on some goods. Yet economists surveyed by the Journal this month estimate the economy grew by about 2% in the second quarter, accelerating out of the first three months of the year. They think the odds of a recession in the next year are just 1 in 3. Core inflation remains below 3%, down from 3.5% at the end of last year. Equity markets are reaching new highs as investors have recovered from their panic attack of April. Having broken most of the rules of politics, has Mr. Trump really smashed one of the supposedly iron laws of economics too? There are three possible answers: First, it's too early to tell. Most of the tariffs announced haven't been in place long. Strangely enough, the uncertainty from Mr. Trump's dizzying policy changes that was expected to have been especially destabilizing may be helping soften the blow. If importers aren't sure whether announced duties will stay or change, they may be holding off on big price increases until they have clarity. And as we saw with the outcome of the U.S.-Japan deal last week, when the actual tariff levels come in lower than the worst fears, the psychological effect can be positive; that odd feeling of contentment you get when you discover that the $100 bill you thought you had dropped on the sidewalk was only a $20. But still, for all the unclarity, the average tariff paid by importers has indeed risen sharply—to more than 15%, up from less than 3% a year ago, so far with limited adverse consequences. Which leads us to the second possibility—the tariffs thus far have just not been big enough to cause the harm economists warned us about from full-on protectionism. The U.S. is a relatively closed economy, with imports accounting for less than 15% of gross domestic product. Perhaps the U.S. economy is simply resilient enough to withstand even bad policy, more capable of withstanding a moderate tariff shock. But this is incomplete. The average 15% tariff rate now is historically large; five times the level that prevailed previously, it is close to the average rate of around 20% on all imports under Smoot-Hawley. If the economy were simply to shrug off that level of protection, could it be that we are missing something? So third, and tantalizingly, perhaps the conventional wisdom is wrong. Or, more precisely, since no one can deny the effect of taxes are real, perhaps, in their rush to emphasize the negatives, economists have overlooked the countervailing forces at work with tariffs: The redistribution of the burden of duties between foreign exporters, U.S. importers and consumers may be reordering the balance of benefit between domestic and foreign businesses and between companies and consumers. Federal tariff revenue up to $300 billion a year will produce gains for Americans. The relative advantage of doing business in the U.S. may, as promised, start to be reflected in stronger inward investment flows. The strikingly one-sided deal Mr. Trump just inked with the European Union certainly suggests the sheer economic muscle of the U.S. has been previously under-utilized in opening up markets overseas. At this point, only the first answer can be given in confidence: It is too early to tell. But if the second or third turns out to be true, if the U.S. shrugs off or even gains from its embrace of protectionism, it will represent another blow to the already battered reputation of what was recently the West's so-called economic consensus. The 2007-08 global financial crisis and its aftermath shattered faith in the post-Cold War economic certainties, the idea that human history had reached some ideological endpoint of progress. Collapsing faith in the democratic institutions of the West in the years since has shattered similar faith in the enduring supremacy of Western liberalism. If the world's largest economy can run supposedly discredited economic policies and still thrive, the policy orthodoxies of most of the past half century will have been shattered too. The rising voices of those who argue for a nationalist, statist, corporatist governing program will be able to add a dose of empirical evidence to their ideological arguments, as theory once again races to catch up with practice.
