AI involves ‘arms race betweeen nations' with ‘no easy option for Ireland', committee hears
involves an 'arms race between nations' in which there are 'no easy options' for Ireland, an Oireachtas committee has heard.
Members of the Government-appointed AI Advisory Council, a voluntary body that includes academics, business people and others with expertise in the field told politicians there are potential costs associated with Ireland seeking to be an international leader in the rapidly emerging field, including the area of energy and climate.
They said these needed to be weighed against potential future losses to the State if it is left behind by international rivals, however, at a time when Government revenues may need to be maximised to deal with a significant number of people whose jobs are made redundant by the technology.
Asked about how a decision to limit the number of data centres built in Ireland in the future or decisions to prevent future developments might impact on Ireland's ability to benefit from AI developments, the chief executive of a firm called Jentic said a key challenge for Ireland is to accelerate its development of renewable energy generation.
READ MORE
'If we want to participate in the supply chain of the future at that level, we need to figure out our energy,' Sean Blanchfield told members of the Joint Committee on Artificial Intelligence.
'I don't think the data centres will be the controversial part if we have an abundance of energy, but I think we already have reached the end of our line in terms of how many data centres we as an economy are willing to build based on fossil fuels.
'So the question is really, what can we do to fix our energy infrastructure so that we can potentially participate in the future economy by helping run the AI and thereby sustain some kind of tax base in the future when we might very sorely need it after it displaces some labour.'
The AI Advisory Council members, including its chair, Dr Patricia Scanlon, said new technologies will present enormous opportunities for society and individuals in areas like education and healthcare, but it is impossible to estimate how many jobs might be created. Mr Blanchfield said some job losses are already apparent.
'I think there's potential for massive economic disruption from AI,' he said.
Data centre development was a potential positive, he suggested, if Ireland can address the energy issue 'because we have excelled at hosting data centres up until recently relative to our size. So we have the established expertise to do that.'
But pressed on when the negative impact of AI on the employment landscape might start to be felt, he said the process was already under way.
'People in my industry are taking this technology and applying it to the first market they know, which is themselves. That's real, that's current,' he said.
'Entry-level programming jobs are largely replaced by AI now, certainly among the leading companies, and the job of the software engineers has moved up to more software architecture. I think if you speak to many lawyers, you find the same things happening in law firms.'
With the technology advancing on a continuous basis, he suggested: 'If it's possible to automate the work of a software developer or a junior lawyer, you can automate a lot of things. It's just a question of repackaging that technology in due course. I think another one would be the customer service.'
Ms Scanlon told the committee difficult choices would have to be made and she was 'not an AI advocate at all costs'.
But asked the question what the cost to the country would have been of failing to engage with the development of the internet, she said, 'I think we need to invest resources'.
'We need task forces, we need experts, we need to collaborate with our European colleagues to solve this in a way that means Europe, Ireland, don't lose out or fall behind or become beholden to the US or Chinese governments, that we're not taking other people's AI because they didn't slow down. It's not easy, but it's a balancing act we have to face up to.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
15 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Domino's text messages labelled ‘likely spam' as new rules come into effect
Domino's Pizza has become one of the first high-profile businesses in Ireland to have its marketing text messages labelled as likely spam following an overhaul of how such communications are managed. On Thursday the communications watchdog ComReg launched a new system aimed at protecting consumers from criminals misrepresenting themselves as legitimate businesses. Companies are now required to register details of their SMS messaging on a database or risk having their communications initially flagged as suspect and ultimately blocked. Irish people and businesses lose about €110 million annually to scammers sending bogus text messages. The scale of the fraud prompted ComReg to introduce new measures. READ MORE The SMS sender ID registry has been designed to protect consumers, services and brands by helping mobile service providers to identify and block fake SMS messages at source. SMS providers will be required to check text messages from SMS sender IDs against the registered SMS sender IDs in the registry. [ Over 8,000 business register with ComReg ahead of anti-scam system roll-out Opens in new window ] More than 8,000 businesses registered on ComReg's register before the deadline on Thursday, with businesses who failed to do so running the risk of having their text messages to customers and potential customers labelled as 'likely scam' after the deadline passed. Earlier this week ComReg urged organisations that had not yet registered their SMS Sender IDs to do so without delay and said registration was 'straightforward and free'. How the wealthy are buying up land to avoid inheritance tax Listen | 22:03 However, the pizza giant, which employs about 3,000 people operating out of stores all over the State, appears to have missed the ComReg warning as messages sent to customers promoting a summer meal deal on Thursday carried the spam warning. The 'likely spam' label attached to the marketing messages would be considered unexpected given the size of the Dominos operation in Ireland and the potential such a label has to harm its reputation and lead to a loss of business. Dominos did not respond to queries from The Irish Times asking whether it had registered its sender IDs with ComReg and if not, why not? It is not the only business to have found its messages being labelled as likely spam, with reports of legitimate sources such as GP practices also falling foul of the new system in is first phase. From October 3rd, SMS messages from unregistered SMS Sender IDs will be blocked.
Irish Times
30 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Why does Ireland's presidential race still have no one at the starting line?
Jack Horgan-Jones and Harry McGee join Hugh Linehan to look back on the week in politics: The drive to inject some impetus into the Irish presidential race has not yielded anything of note just yet with the starter pistol not expected to sound until Fianna Fáil , Fine Gael and Sinn Féin nominate their candidates. The Coalition remains divided over Minister for Further and Higher Education James Lawless's recent assertion that the student contribution could increase by as much as €1,000 next year for third-level students . The pause on Donald Trump's reciprocal tariffs is almost up – is there a plan in place to keep Ireland's pain to a minimum ? Plus, the panel picks their favourite Irish Times pieces of the week: The puffins of Rathlin Island , the digital revolution that didn't turn out as expected, and how the wedding of Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez destroyed quiet luxury.
Irish Times
43 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Judge wants explanation from solicitors over letter saying client had ‘no knowledge' of surveillance of payroll manager
A High Court judge has said he wants an explanation over a letter from the solicitors for human resources (HR) firm Deel Inc saying their client had 'no knowledge' of the following by private investigators of a payroll manager at the centre of a rival business' 'spy' affair. Mr Justice Brian Cregan said he was not going to join Deel as either a defendant or notice party in proceedings being brought by Keith O'Brien, the man who was allegedly paid €5,500 a month to pass on trade secrets of his former employer, HR software firm Rippling, to rival Deel. Rippling is now suing Deel and others, including Mr O'Brien, over the matter. The judge said he would not join Deel in Mr O'Brien's separate case alleging harassment and surveillance because doing so, of the court's own motion, was an exceptional jurisdiction. It was also unfair to the O'Brien side who did not want Deel added anyway, and because of the separate Rippling case against Deel. READ MORE Mr O'Brien's case is against two private investigators which he claims have been involved in harassment of him and his family, including one who allegedly followed him by car to various locations and photographed his children playing in their garden. The investigators, Mark Murran, also known as Rock Investigations, and Cliona Woods of Gotham Services, strongly deny any overt surveillance or claims of harassment and intimidation. That case was back before Mr Justice Cregan on Friday when the judge ruled out joining Deel but said his main outstanding concern was a pre-litigation letter written by Deel's solicitors Hayes LLP in reply to a call from Mr O'Brien's solicitor to desist from the alleged surveillance/harassment. In that letter, Hayes stated their client had no knowledge of the cars allegedly following Mr O'Brien. On Tuesday, the judge described the Hayes letter as either a 'blatant lie or a misrepresentation' because it was later admitted as being incorrect because Deel said it had organised 'discreet' but not overt surveillance on Mr O'Brien. On Friday, he said: 'The question from my point of view is that this is a letter from reputable solicitors who are officers of the court and it is blatantly wrong'. He said Deel's barrister, Paul Gardiner SC, instructed by Hayes, indicated he (judge) should not have said it was a lie or misrepresentation but it seemed to the judge that it is still an issue for the court and should be properly addressed. He said because of that letter, earlier this week in another case in which Hayes were representatives, he had a question as to whether he could rely on it although he did do so in that case. He believed the next step was for Hayes to swear an affidavit as to how that replying letter to the O'Brien side was written. Mr Gardiner said the letter was true at the time and while it turned out to be incorrect because discreet surveillance was commissioned by Deel, when written it was believed to be correct. He felt what the court might be doing is 'putting a wedge' between Deel and its representation. Mr Gardiner also believed the judge was being unfair to both Hayes and Deel in circumstances where fair procedures and due process have yet to take place and where the judge's words were being widely reported. If the court is to have a separate inquiry into this letter, it should at least not take place until the O'Brien harassment proceedings have concluded which may well find there was no harassment, he said. Mr Justice Cregan said he would give two weeks for Mr Gardiner to take instructions and consider the matter more fully and he said his concerns may be assuaged if it is explained in an affidavit. The judge also granted consent orders, sought by Mr Murran and Ms Woods, that Mr O'Brien preserve any information, including on CCTV, dashcam and phone, relating to the allegations against them. He also continued the injunctions restraining further surveillance.
