Aldi's £1.25 kitchen staple will eliminate English ivy from your garden & stop it creeping over neighbour's walls
English ivy is a charming-looking plant, which can make your outdoor space look like a serene haven.
2
However, it grows rapidly, and can end up overtaking your garden, and creeping over your neighbour's wall.
Ivy can grow up to a whopping 30m tall, and produces aerial shoots that allow it to easily cling to walls, trees and fences.
Tara Besore, who has a gardening blog called Hammer & Headband revealed how she successfully managed to prevent ivy from taking over her garden.
She said: "Stopping it [ivy] seemed impossible, but eventually I got rid of every last ivy root and vine in my yard.
"Here's what you need to know to remove English ivy for good."
The gardening whizz tried cutting and pulling up the ivy and spraying herbicides on it, but found that neither of these methods worked properly.
However, she revealed that solarisation worked a treat on even the densest patches of ivy.
"It doesn't strain your back, and it doesn't require chemicals", she said.
"All it takes is patience."
To try out this hack, she explained that all you need is a black plastic sheet, such as a bin bag.
Expert Gardening Hacks for a Pet-Friendly Summer Garden
"After spending a summer getting nowhere with brute force, I turned to the solarisation method," Tara said.
"This involves letting the sun scorch the ivy under plastic."
Wrap your ivy in bin bags, and then secure it firmly with bricks or stakes.
Tara explained that this method deprives the plants of water.
Top gardening trends of 2025
Gardening experts at Barnsdale Gardens has shared the top gardening trends of 2025.
Matrix planting
It seems that a top planting trend for this year is going to be Matrix Planting.
In essence, planting in groups or blocks to give an effect of being wild whilst actually being carefully managed.
Selection of the plants is essential, to give year-round interest either with flowers, seed heads or frosted/snowy spent flower heads. Some recommend using plants that seed around, but this could make managing your matrix planting harder to keep under control.
Chrysanthemum comeback
I hope that the humble Chrysanthemum makes as much of a comeback this year as Dahlias have over recent years, because the simple single flowered types, such as 'Innocence' and 'Cottage Apricot' would be spectacular within a matrix scheme.
The hardy varieties are so easy to grow in a sunny spot and give such a valuable burst of late summer and autumn colour that would lift any dull- looking border.
Blended borders
For some time now we have been promoting the growing of veg within ornamental borders and I think this could really take off this year.
The choice of ornamental-looking varieties available in seed catalogues is phenomenal and, if managed correctly, visitors to your garden will not even realise that you have veg growing!
Must-have tool
My secret is out. I discovered the Hori Hori a couple of years ago and now it seems so is everyone else.
It is such a well-made, adaptable tool that can be used as a trowel or weeding tool in the garden that and everyone I speak to who have used it absolutely would not now be without it. Enough said!
"It cooks in the heat, permanently killing the ivy, the roots, and even the seeds so it can't grow back", she said.
Once the ivy has turned brown and brittle, you can easily pull it up out of the ground and clear it away.
Bin bags are super cheap, and you likely have them in your kitchen cupboard.
If not, you can pick them up from Aldi for £1.25.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Can you see circles or rectangles? And does the answer depend on where you grew up?
Do people from different cultures and environments see the world differently? Two recent studies have different takes on this decades-long controversy. The answer might be more complicated, and more interesting, than either study suggests. One study, led by Ivan Kroupin at the London School of Economics, asked how people from different cultures perceived a visual illusion known as the Coffer illusion. They discovered that people in the UK and US saw it mainly in one way, as comprising rectangles – while people from rural communities in Namibia typically saw it another way: as containing circles. To explain these differences, Kroupin and colleagues appeal to a hypothesis raised more than 60 years ago and argued about ever since. The idea is that people in western industrialised countries (these days known by the acronym 'weird' – for western, educated, industrialised, rich and democratic – a summary that is increasingly questionable) see things in a specific way because they are generally exposed to highly 'carpentered' environments, with lots of straight lines, right angles – visual features common in western architecture. By contrast, people from non-'weird' societies – like those in rural Namibia – inhabit environments with fewer sharp lines and angular geometric forms, so their visual abilities will be tuned differently. The study argues that the tendency of rural Namibians to see circles rather than rectangles in the Coffer illusion is due to their environments being dominated by structures such as round huts instead of angular environments. They back up this conclusion with similar results from several other visual illusions, all supposedly tapping into basic brain mechanisms involved in visual perception. So far, so good for the cross-cultural perceptual psychologists, and for the 'carpentered world' hypothesis. The second study, by Dorsa Amir and Chaz Firestone, takes a sledgehammer to this hypothesis, but for the much better-known illusion: the Müller-Lyer illusion. Two lines of equal length seem to be different lengths because of the context provided by inward-pointing, compared with outward-pointing, arrowheads. It's a very powerful illusion. I've seen it on thousands of occasions and it works every time for me. There are many explanations for why the Müller-Lyer illusion is so effective. One of the more popular is that the arrowheads are interpreted by the brain as cues about three-dimensional depth, so our brains implicitly interpret the illusion as representing an object of some kind, with right angles and straight lines. This explanation fits neatly with the 'carpentered world' hypothesis – and indeed a lot of early support for this hypothesis relied on apparent cultural variability in how the Müller-Lyer illusion is perceived. In their study, Amir and Firestone carefully and convincingly dismantle this explanation. They point out that non-human animals experience the illusion, as shown in a range of studies in which animals (including guppies, pigeons and bearded dragons) are trained to prefer the longer of two lines, and then presented with the Müller-Lyer image. They show that it works without straight lines, and for touch as well as vision. They note that it even works for people who until recently have been blind, referencing an astonishing experiment in which nine children, blind from birth because of dense cataracts, were shown the illusion immediately after the cataracts were surgically removed. Not only had these children not seen highly carpentered environments – they hadn't seen anything at all. After you absorb their analysis, it's pretty clear that the Müller-Lyer illusion is not due to culturally specific exposure to carpentry. Why the discrepancy? There are several possibilities. Perhaps there are reasons why cross-cultural variability should be expected for the Coffer but not the Müller-Lyer illusion (one possibility here is that the Coffer illusion is based on how people pay attention to things, rather than on some more basic aspect of perception). It could also be that there are systematic differences in perception between cultures, but that the 'carpentered world' hypothesis is not the correct explanation. It's also worth noting that the Kroupin study has some potential weaknesses. For example, the UK/US and Namibian participants were exposed to the illusions using very different methods. All in all, the jury remains out and – favourite scientist punt coming up – 'more research is needed'. The notion that people from different cultures vary in how they experience things is certainly plausible. There's a wealth of evidence that as we grow up our brains are shaped, at least to some extent, by features of our environments. And just as we all differ in our externally visible characteristics – height, body shape and so on – we will all differ on the inside too. As the author Anaïs Nin put it in quoting the Talmud: 'We do not see things as they are, we see them as we are.' For me, an important implication of this line of thought is that there are likely to be substantial differences in perception within 'groups' as well as between them. This will probably hold however these 'groups' are defined, whether as different cultures or as a contrast between 'neurotypical' and 'neurodivergent' people. I believe that paying more attention to within-group perceptual diversity will help us to better interpret the differences we do find between groups, and equip us with the tools needed to resist relying on simple cultural stereotypes as explanations. More research is needed here too. But it's on the way. In the Perception Census, a project led by my research group at the University of Sussex together with professor Fiona Macpherson at the University of Glasgow, we are studying how perception differs in a large sample of about 40,000 people from more than 100 countries. Our experiment includes not just one or two visual illusions but more than 50 different experiments probing many different aspects of perception. When we're done analysing the data, we hope to deliver a uniquely detailed picture of how people experience their world, both within and between cultures. We'll also make the data openly available for other researchers to explore new ideas in this important area. One critical insight lies behind all these questions. How things seem is not how they are. For each of us, it might seem as though we see the world exactly as it is; as if our senses are transparent windows through with the world pours itself directly into our mind. But how things are is very different. The objective world no doubt exists, but the world we experience is always an active construction, a kind of 'controlled hallucination' in which the brain uses sensory signals to update and calibrate its best interpretation of what's going on. What we experience is this interpretation, not a 'readout' of the sensory information. For me, this is the key insight that underlies any claim about perceptual diversity. When we take it fully on board, it encourages a much-needed humility about our own ways of seeing. We live in perceptual echo chambers, just as we do in those of social media, and the first step to escaping any echo chamber is to realise that you're in one. Anil Seth is a professor of cognitive and computational neuroscience at the University of Sussex, and author of the Sunday Times bestseller Being You: A New Science of Consciousness
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Lottery results and numbers: Lotto and Thunderball draw tonight, July 5, 2025
THE NATIONAL Lottery results are in and it's time to find out who has won a life-changing amount of money tonight (July 5, 2025). Could tonight's £15million jackpot see you handing in your notice, jetting off to the Bahamas or driving a new Porsche off a garage forecourt? 3 3 You can find out by checking your ticket against tonight's numbers below. Good luck! Tonight's National Lottery Lotto winning numbers are: 09, 12, 18, 37, 43, 45 and the Bonus Ball is 15. Tonight's National Lottery Thunderball winning numbers are: 06, 18, 21, 28, 29 and the Thunderball is 08. The first National Lottery draw was held on November 19 1994 when seven winners shared a jackpot of £5,874,778. The largest amount ever to be won by a single ticket holder was £42million, won in 1996. Gareth Bull, a 49-year-old builder, won £41million in November, 2020 and ended up knocking down his bungalow to make way for a luxury manor house with a pool. TOP 5 BIGGEST LOTTERY WINS ACROSS THE WORLD £1.308 billion (Powerball) on January 13 2016 in the US, for which three winning tickets were sold, remains history's biggest lottery prize £1.267 billion (Mega Million) a winner from South Carolina took their time to come forward to claim their prize in March 2019 not long before the April deadline £633.76 million (Powerball draw) from a winner from Wisconsin £625.76 million (Powerball) Mavis L. Wanczyk of Chicopee, Massachusetts claimed the jackpot in August 2017 £575.53 million (Powerball) A lucky pair of winners scooped the jackpot in Iowa and New York in October 2018 Sue Davies, 64, bought a lottery ticket to celebrate ending five months of shielding during the pandemic — and won £500,000. Sandra Devine, 36, accidentally won £300k - she intended to buy her usual £100 National Lottery Scratchcard, but came home with a much bigger prize. The biggest jackpot ever to be up for grabs was £66million in January last year, which was won by two lucky ticket holders. Another winner, Karl managed to bag £11million aged just 23 in 1996. The odds of winning the lottery are estimated to be about one in 14million - BUT you've got to be in it to win it. 3
Telegraph
4 hours ago
- Telegraph
Selfie-taking TikTok pilots ‘putting passengers in danger'
Airline pilots who take in-flight and airside selfies and videos risk putting their passengers in danger, industry associations have warned. The use of cameras and mobile phones in cockpits has been linked to a number of serious incidents in which 'personal devices have impacted flight safety'. Some pilots are attracting thousands of followers on social media platforms, such as Instagram and TikTok, by posting pictures and videos of themselves while flying or manoeuvring the aircraft. But, two separate reports have highlighted growing concerns, including an account of how a camera jammed up against flight controls, causing a 'rapid descent' of the plane which injured passengers. Complaint to whistleblower website A UK whistleblowers' website used by the aviation industry to report concerns received a complaint about an unnamed British pilot 'making a selfie-style video on the ramp while performing safety inspections'. The anonymous report, sent to the CHIRP (Confidential Human Factors Incident Reporting Programme) website complains the pilot posted multiple videos filmed during critical phases of flight, including taxiing, entering the runaway and landing, which ti said 'introduces inevitable distraction to the operation' of the plane. That complaint came after the International Federation of Air Line Pilots Associations (IFALPA) published a position paper that catalogued cases in which mobile phones had 'presented a significant source of distraction from flight deck duties' and affected flight safety. IFALPA, which represents 148,000 pilots in nearly 100 countries, said many passengers were injured on one unidentified flight 'after a pilot's camera pushed the side-stick as he moved his seat forward, causing a rapid descent of the aircraft'. In another incident, it said, a plane's thrust levers were jammed by a device being used for filming and could not be moved. In a third case, 'a mobile phone used by a pilot for personal reasons during the flight' was dropped between the seat and the pedestal and began to generate fumes in the cockpit. Some airlines tolerate pilots' use of social media because it serves as a good form of publicity for both the industry and the companies. However, the latest revelations highlight how the use of mobile phones to make online 'content' could pose real risks, including revealing sensitive airside security information. CHIRP, which campaigns to improve air and sea safety, explained: 'Such 'selfie' activities are very common these days and there is a difficult balance to be struck between beneficially promoting the airline/industry and negatively impacting safety. 'Filming or taking photos when conducting aviation tasks at the same time has clear risks of distraction and lack of situational awareness.' Its report says consideration should be given by pilots when 'pulling out a personal mobile when airside or airborne' to ensure that they are not breaking any rules and that 'any published videos could stand up to scrutiny in the court of public opinion'. It is not illegal for a pilot to film or take photographs from the cockpit, but it is a criminal offence to endanger the operation of any aircraft. Most airlines prohibit cabin crew from using mobile phones or cameras during critical stages of any flight, including taxiing, take-off and landing. 'Pilot egos are huge' One senior air traffic controller, who asked not to be named, told The Telegraph the use of social media was 'narcissism, pure and simple'. 'Some pilot egos are just so huge, there's barely room for any crew on the plane,' she said. 'They should be totally focused on flying the aircraft, but love putting on their Aviators and filming themselves at the controls. It's the little boy in them.' Joji Waites, the director for flight safety at BALPA, the pilots' union, said it endorses the IFALPA report, adding: 'We recognise the vast majority of pilots behave in a professional and responsible manner and appreciate the risks associated with inappropriate use of personal devices whilst on duty. 'However, the aviation industry is not immune to the popularity of posting social media content and the risk of unintended consequences is real.' A UK Civil Aviation Authority spokesman said: 'As the UK's aviation safety regulator it is our role to ensure that airline operators are managing their risks appropriately. 'There is a responsibility on operators to manage risks that they can prevent, and we expect the 'secure flight deck' to be adhered to, which removes distractions from the pilots during critical phases of flight.'
