Kansai Electric eyes next-generation reactor at plant in Fukui Prefecture
The company will shortly resume a survey of geological and other conditions for building the new reactor, informed sources said. The survey was suspended after the March 2011 massive earthquake and tsunami that triggered the country's worst nuclear accident at Tokyo Electric Power Company Holding's Fukushima No. 1 plant in northeastern Japan.
This is the first concrete move toward building a new reactor in the country since the disaster.
The move comes after the government adopted a new basic energy plan in February, clarifying its policy of making maximum use of nuclear plants and outlining plans to work on the development and installation of next-generation reactors that are safer than conventional ones.
Still, there is strong opposition to building a new reactor in Japan.
At the Mihama plant, the No. 1 and No. 2 reactors are set to be decommissioned. The No. 3 unit is currently active, but next year, it will mark its 50th year in operation.
In April, Kansai Electric released its fiscal 2025 plan, which calls for creating a business environment to replace nuclear reactors.
If the survey at the Mihama plant finds it feasible to build a new reactor there, the company is expected to submit an application to the Nuclear Regulation Authority and accelerate related moves.
Under the basic energy plan, the government aims to raise the share of nuclear energy in the country's power sources from the current level below 10% to around 20% in fiscal 2040. To meet this target, more than 30 nuclear reactors need to be operational.
Among other power utilities in Japan, Kyushu Electric Power Co. has included a plan to consider developing a next-generation reactor in its management vision for the period until 2035.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Mainichi
34 minutes ago
- The Mainichi
Japan industry, academia team up to build hulking rescue robots
KYOTO (Kyodo) -- Japanese electronics maker Murata Manufacturing Co., Waseda University and two other companies teamed up to develop humanoid search and rescue robots as part of a wider effort to revive Japan's formerly world-leading robotics sector. The four entities, including Kyoto-based robot maker Tmsuk Co. and technology service company Sre Holdings Corp. in Tokyo, said in late June that they plan to develop a robot with all Japan-made components, such as sensors and precision instruments. The robot is designed to stand 3 meters tall, weigh 300 kilograms, walk at around 5 kilometers per hour and lift 100 kg or more. Given its demographic challenges, the companies believe disaster-prone Japan needs to develop such rescue robots. "We want to build a robot that is much stronger than a human and can move rubble," Tmsuk Chairman Yoichi Takamoto said at a press conference in late June. Japan was once a global leader in humanoid robotics, with Waseda University having developed the world's first full-scale bipedal robot, WABOT-1, in 1973. Honda Motor Co. led humanoid robotics technology with ASIMO, whose final model was released in 2011. Hoping to play catch-up with U.S. and Chinese manufacturers, the four partners aim to develop a pilot model by the end of 2026 and a mass-production version by March 2029, they said. "There are many technologies in Japan that we can be proud of," Tomotsugu Oba, a manager at Murata Manufacturing's Mobility Robotics Business Development Section, said at the press conference. Oba said the project is Japan's "first step toward the goal of returning to the global (stage)." There are no humanoid robots anywhere in the world that have been developed to replace humans in search and rescue operations, they said.
The Mainichi
2 hours ago
- The Mainichi
What is 'Expo diplomacy'? How many foreign dignitaries has Japan PM met through it?
The Mainichi Shimbun answers some common questions readers may have about "Expo diplomacy" and the foreign dignitaries Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba has met through it so far. Question: What does "Expo diplomacy" mean in the first place? Answer: "Expo diplomacy" refers to meetings between Japanese Cabinet ministers, including Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya, and foreign leaders and dignitaries visiting Japan for Expo 2025 Osaka, Kansai. A total of 158 countries and regions are participating in the ongoing Expo, and more than 100 dignitaries are expected to have visited Japan by the end of the event on Oct. 13. Many visiting leaders attend their country's "National Day," a daily event at the Expo to showcase their culture, and often meet with Ishiba at the prime minister's office in Tokyo before or after the event. Q: How many foreign leaders has the prime minister met through Expo diplomacy so far? A: Since the Expo opened on April 13, Ishiba has met with the leaders of over 20 countries. He strengthened relations by confirming the upgrade of ties with Bulgaria and Guatemala to a "strategic partnership." Some countries are also sending royalty, such as Luxembourg's Grand Duke Henri, whom Ishiba met on May 28. Q: Is U.S. President Donald Trump visiting the Expo? A: At the Japan-U.S. summit meeting in February, Ishiba requested Trump to visit Japan at an early date, and the president accepted the request. His visit is expected during the Expo period, and Ishiba stated in the Diet that "President Trump showed strong interest in the Expo." However, the presidential visit remains uncertain as there are no signs Japan-U.S. tariff negotiations are approaching an agreement. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and other officials are expected to attend the U.S. "National Day" event at the Expo on July 19. Q: Is "Expo diplomacy" a regular occurrence? A: The last world exposition held in Japan was the Expo 2005 Aichi, during which then Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi also met with foreign dignitaries like then French President Jacques Chirac. Meetings with many visiting world leaders present a valuable diplomatic opportunity unique to the host country of a world exposition.
Japan Today
10 hours ago
- Japan Today
Trump's tariff pressure pushes Asia toward American LNG, but at the cost of climate goals
U.S. Secretary of Energy Chris Wright, Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum and Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry tour the Venture Global's Plaquemines LNG export facility on March 6, 2025, in Plaquemines, La. By ANIRUDDHA GHOSAL Asian countries are offering to buy more U.S. liquefied natural gas in negotiations with the Trump administration as a way to alleviate tensions over U.S. trade deficits and forestall higher tariffs. Analysts warn that strategy could undermine those countries' long-term climate ambitions and energy security. Buying more U.S. LNG has topped the list of concessions Asian countries have offered in talks with Washington over President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs on foreign goods. Vietnam's Prime Minister underlined the need to buy more of the super-chilled fuel in a government meeting, and the government signed a deal in May with an American company to develop a gas import hub. JERA, Japan's largest power generator, signed new 20-year contracts last month to purchase up to 5.5 million metric tons of U.S. gas annually starting around 2030. U.S. efforts to sell more LNG to Asia predate the Trump administration, but they've gained momentum with his intense push to win trade deals. Liquefied natural gas, or LNG, is natural gas cooled to a liquid form for easy storage and transport that is used as a fuel for transport, residential cooking and heating and industrial processes. Trump discussed cooperation on a $44 billion Alaska LNG project with South Korea, prompting a visit by officials to the site in June. The U.S. president has promoted the project as a way to supply gas from Alaska's vast North Slope to a liquefication plant at Nikiski in south-central Alaska, with an eye largely on exports to Asian countries while bypassing the Panama Canal Thailand has offered to commit to a long-term deal for American fuel and shown interest in the same Alaska project to build a nearly 810-mile (1,300-kilometer) pipeline that would funnel gas from The Philippines is also considering importing gas from Alaska while India is mulling a plan to scrap import taxes on U.S. energy shipments to help narrow its trade surplus with Washington. 'Trump has put pressure on a seeming plethora of Asian trading partners to buy more U.S. LNG,' said Tim Daiss, at the APAC Energy Consultancy, pointing out that Japan had agreed to buy more despite being so 'awash in the fuel' that it was being forced to cancel projects and contracts to offload the excess to Asia's growing economies. 'Not good for Southeast Asia's sustainability goals,' he said. Experts say LNG purchasing agreements can slow adoption of renewable energy in Asia. Locking into long-term deals could leave countries with outdated infrastructure as the world shifts rapidly toward cleaner energy sources like solar or wind that offer faster, more affordable ways to meet growing power demand, said Indra Overland, head of the Center for Energy Research at the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs. Building pipelines, terminals, and even household gas stoves creates systems that are expensive and difficult to replace—making it harder to switch to renewables later. 'And you're more likely then to get stuck for longer,' he said. Energy companies that profit from gas or coal are powerful vested interests, swaying policy to favor their business models, he said. LNG burns cleaner than coal, but it's still a fossil fuel that emits greenhouse gases and contributes to climate change. Many LNG contracts include 'take-or-pay' clauses, obliging governments to pay even if they don't use the fuel. Christopher Doleman of the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis warns that if renewable energy grows fast, reducing the need for LNG, countries may still have to pay for gas they no longer need. Pakistan is an example. Soaring LNG costs drove up electricity prices, pushing consumers to install rooftop solar panels. As demand for power drops and gas supply surges, the country is deferring LNG shipments and trying to resell excess fuel. Experts said that although countries are signaling a willingness to import more U.S. LNG, they're unlikely to import enough to have a meaningful impact on U.S. trade deficits. South Korea would need to import 121 million metric tons of LNG in a year — 50% more than the total amount of LNG the U.S. exported globally last year and triple what South Korea imported, said Doleman. Vietnam — with a trade surplus with the U.S. twice the size of Korea's — would need to import 181 million metric tons annually, more than double what the U.S. exported last year. Other obstacles stand in the way. The Alaska LNG project is widely considered uneconomic. Both coal and renewable energy in Asia are so much cheaper that U.S. gas would need to cost less than half its current price to compete. Tariffs on Chinese steel could make building building gas pipelines and LNG terminals more expensive, while longstanding delays to build new gas turbines mean new gas power projects may not come online until 2032. Meanwhile, a global glut in LNG will likely drive prices lower, making it even harder for countries to justify locking into long-term deals with the United States at current higher prices. Committing to long-term U.S. LNG contracts could impact regional energy security at a time of growing geopolitical and market uncertainties, analysts said. A core concern is over the longterm stability of the U.S. as a trading partner, said Overland. 'The U.S. is not a very predictable entity. And to rely on energy from there is a very risky proposition,' he said. LNG only contributes to energy security when it's available and affordable, says Dario Kenner of Zero Carbon Analytics. 'That's the bit that they leave out ... But it's pretty important,' he said. This was the concern during the recent potential disruptions to fuel shipments through the Strait of Hormuz and earlier during the war in Ukraine, when LNG cargoes originally destined for Asia were rerouted to Europe. Despite having contracts, Asian countries like Bangladesh and Sri Lanka were outbid by European buyers. 'Events in Europe, which can seem very far away, can have an impact on availability and prices in Asia,' Kenner said. Asian countries can improve their energy security and make progress toward cutting carbon emissions by building more renewable energy, he said, noting there is vast room for that given that only about 1% of Southeast Asia's solar and wind potential is being used. 'There are genuine choices to meet rising electricity demand. It is not just having to build LNG,' he said. Jintamas Saksornchai in Bangkok contributed to this report. © Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
