Starlink under scrutiny: Minister Malatsi backs ICASA's probe into unauthorised services
Image: X / IOLGraphics
Communications and Digital Technologies Minister Solly Malatsi has thrown his weight behind the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (ICASA) to investigate Starlink, a satellite internet service operated by SpaceX, for allegedly operating in the country without authorisation.
This development comes after the uMkhonto weSizwe Party (MK Party) alleged that Starlink was offering its services in South Africa without a licence.
ICASA confirmed that the organisation had launched an investigation into the alleged unlawful use and provision of Starlink services in South Africa.
ICASA spokesperson, Milly Matlou, said: 'ICASA has launched an investigation into the alleged unlawful use and provision of Starlink services in SA. We have also engaged SpaceX for further clarity and have currently deployed inspection teams on the ground to investigate the matter further.'
If found guilty, the company could face enforcement actions, including fines or even a ban on its operations in the country.
'Should the investigation yield any breach with regulatory and legislative frameworks, the authority will explore the applicable enforcement actions within its disposal, which may include, among others, lodging a formal complaint with the International Telecommunication Union (ITU),' Matlou said.
The MKP alleged that Starlink was operating in South Africa without authorisation, using a shadow entity called "ICASAsePUSH" to masquerade its operations.
The party claimed that this operation constitutes a 'blatant' violation of South African telecommunications law and represents a direct affront to the country's Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (B-BBEE) framework.
The party launched its allegations during the Portfolio Committee on Communications and Digital Technologies meeting in Parliament on Tuesday.
'During that session, the MK Party directly challenged the Minister of Communications and Digital Technologies regarding his awareness of this operation. His professed ignorance was not only unacceptable but deeply troubling,' party spokesperson Nhlamulo Ndhlela said.
Malatsi has expressed his full support for ICASA's investigation, stating that it is the regulator's responsibility to manage both licence applications and investigations.
'The minister was made aware of the allegations when they were raised in the portfolio committee on Tuesday. It is now ICASA's responsibility to investigate these allegations, and the minister fully supports this investigation,' Malatsi's spokesperson, Kwena Moloto, said.
This will be the second time the authority investigates Starlink's dealings.
In 2023, ICASA issued a notice, warning that it was illegal for anyone or company to use Starlink, as it doesn't hold a licence to operate in the country.
Meanwhile, during the session on Tuesday, Malatsi defended his recently gazetted proposed ICT policy adjustments, saying that it was intended to attract investment into the sector.
He said it was not a way to allow Elon Musk to operate in South Africa.
'We are not attempting to open a new dispensation for Starlink or any other company or individual,' he told Parliament's Portfolio Committee on Communication.
'We are saying that the regulations in our sector must consistently make provisions for the two choices that exist in any other sector,' Malatsi said after his department on Friday gazetted a proposed policy direction to the ICASA.
Cape Argus
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
2 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
NPA seeks clarity on Omotoso acquittal, defence objects to ‘fishing expedition'
As the State moves to appeal the acquittal of controversial pastor Timothy Omotoso, his legal team has accused the National Prosecuting Authority of abusing court processes by seeking clarification that they argue is aimed at retrospectively revising the judgment. As the State prepares to appeal the acquittal of Nigerian televangelist Timothy Omotoso, his defence counsel has branded their first step as a 'fishing expedition' and an attempt to have the judgment amended in favour of the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA). The NPA brought an application before the Gqeberha Division of the High Court for Judge Irma Schoeman to provide 'clarification' of the judgment that saw Omotoso acquitted on multiple charges of sexual assault and human trafficking. The application, brought before court on Monday, 14 July 2025, did not single out specific aspects of the judgment, but rather sought clarity on the factual findings of Judge Schoeman's entire judgment. This flies in the face of normal procedure as the prosecution has yet to provide its 'legal question' — the specific aspects of the judgment it does not agree with and believes another court might make a different ruling on. Senior State prosecutor Apla Bodlani SC indicated to the court that the State already had a strong basis for its appeal, but sought a better explanation from Judge Schoeman to 'satisfy [themselves] that [their] approach would be sustainable'. Omotoso and his co-accused, Lusanda Sulani and Zukiswa Sitho, were not in court as their presence was not required for these proceedings. South African immigration authorities served the controversial pastor with a five-year ban from the country as he was flying out of OR Tambo International Airport in May. Omotoso's legal counsel Peter Daubermann called the State's application a 'retrospective fishing expedition' and an abuse of court processes in an attempt for the judge to revise her ruling. He said there was no legal mechanism that allowed for this course of action and accused the State of trying to 'reverse engineer a factual foundation' that would provide it with reasons to appeal. Omotoso, Sulani and Sitho were the subjects of an eight-year trial in which they were accused of multiple counts of sexual assault and human trafficking by members of Omotoso's Jesus Dominion International church. The trial was marred by controversy around the NPA's conduct, and in April Judge Schoeman acquitted them on all the charges. Judge Schoeman in her ruling cited flaws in the prosecution's case, including almost no cross-examination challenging the versions of the accused as well as a lack of corroborating evidence led by the State. Following his acquittal Omotoso embarked on a 'New Dawn crusade' in East London. But on the second last day of the April crusade he was arrested on immigration charges at a church where he was meant to preach. He was then declared a prohibited person. That status, however, stemmed not from the criminal proceedings, but from allegations that he had used fraudulent documentation to enter South Africa. During court proceedings on Monday, Daubermann further argued that Judge Schoeman was ' functus officio ', meaning she had completed her duties with regard to this matter. He said her judgment was final and she 'was not unclear or ambiguous'. 'If this application is entertained it will set a precedent, and an accused will never know if a judgment is final or not,' Daubermann said. Bodlani maintained that the intention of the application was not for Judge Schoeman to alter or supplement her judgment. He reiterated that after studying the judgment, the State was still unclear on what the factual findings were, and for it to better prepare their appeal, it required Judge Schoeman to provide clarity on her findings. The judge said she would need time to consider the opposing arguments, and that the judgment would be delivered on 22 July 2025. DM
Daily Maverick
2 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Mbenenge's sexual harassment hearing exposes ripples of discontent in SA's legal profession
Behind the scenes, a rift has occurred in the Pan African Bar Association of South Africa (Pabasa), highlighting the notion of the law as 'apolitical' as understood by a crop of younger members. Last week, the gruelling Judicial Conduct Tribunal investigation into allegations of sexual harassment against Eastern Cape Judge President Selby Mbenenge adjourned to October for argument. It is then that advocates Muzi Sikhakhane for Mbenenge, and Nasreen Rajab-Budlender for the complainant, court secretary Andiswa Mengo, will argue the case of a lifetime. The public inquiry, which began in January and is headed by retired judge Bernard Ngoepe, has not only laid bare the intimate and private lives of Mbenenge and his accuser, but also choppy waters in the legal fraternity (for it is a fraternity) itself. The creaking shifts in the tectonic plates can be traced in the arc of this extraordinary inquiry, which exposed a chasm between old and new, interpretations of language, the law and culture, and the meaning of words themselves. As the Masimanyane Women's Rights International, the Women's Ikhwelo Network and other women's groups noted in a media statement last week, 'words have power — and consequences. 'We are appalled by the misogynistic and patriarchal statements made by Eastern Cape Judge President Selby Mbenenge during his sexual harassment tribunal.' The senior judge's 'invocation of so-called 'cultural norms' to justify sexual misconduct is an affront not only to women but to the integrity of the entire South African Constitution and the judiciary,' the statement continued. Rift in Pabasa Behind the scenes, a rift has occurred in the Pan African Bar Association of South Africa (Pabasa), highlighting the notion of the law as 'apolitical' as understood by a crop of younger members. As reported by Franny Rabkin in the Sunday Times, Rajab-Budlender, Mengo's legal representative in the Mbenenge matter and a founder member of Pabasa, resigned from the organisation at the end of May. Nine other members resigned at the same time. Dali Mpofu is Pabasa secretary, and former Deputy National Director of Public Prosecutions Nomgcobo Jiba (who was struck off the roll in 2016 but restored in 2019), is its deputy chair. Formed in 2018, Pabasa describes itself as 'unapologetically black and women-oriented'. It is also 'committed to independence, professionalism and excellence in the craft of advocacy and the promotion of race and gender equality'. Its aim is also to work with other bars and the Legal Practice Council (LPC) to address unemployment among young graduates. Attacks by Pabasa members on Judge Ratha Mokgoatlheng — who presided over the Senzo Meyiwa trial — and on the LPC had since led to the exodus. Mokgoatlheng made remarks about white lawyers not being late. Since then, 36 advocates have left Pabasa, including the Arcadia and Loftus advocates' chambers in Pretoria, citing the 'politicisation' of Pabasa as the reason. Rabkin reported that a total of 45 members had resigned from other regions as well. Sikhakhane, Mbenenge's legal representative, is also a member of Pabasa and was its first chair. His encouragement of women within the organisation is acknowledged. 'Deep concern' Rise Mzansi leader Songezo Zibi penned a powerful counter to the argument by Mbenenge and his legal team that customary courtship rituals were being rendered 'unconstitutional' by the tribunal. When renowned gender-based violence expert Lisa Vetten pointed out that power imbalances between men and women existed in all societies, she was undermined as a simpleton who had no understanding of African ways. Vetten has been attacked by some of Mbenenge's supporters as a 'Western-paid NGO', which is also no doubt part of the Pizza Conspiracy. Zibi's argument, as a young black African man, as we like to say in South Africa, carries weight, no matter how much some might claim his mind has been 'colonised' or 'whitewashed'. Zibi, who heads the Scopa committee in Parliament, sets out how power relations play out here and in other government spaces where some are viewed as having authority. The kind of deference he experienced was unsettling, he opined, and it took some time to work through these power relations. With regard to cultural impulses that cannot be stopped or controlled, he wrote: 'I hope the Judicial Conduct Tribunal … does not buy this nonsense. 'Yet, this is what Judge President Mbenenge implausibly suggested before the tribunal. This laughable proposition, said with much glee, arrogance and a nauseatingly sexist intellectual superiority complex in respect of the (female) evidence leader (and his own counsel), seems to suppose the rest of us live in the world he has created in his head. 'This is the world where the most powerful individual in every high court building in the Eastern Cape is an equal to a junior secretary for the purposes of random sexual advances via text message.' Zibi also took exception to Mbenenge's insistence on asking for nude photographs even when Mengo had informed him she was not well (as has been testified), and his invocation of culture 'where it is apparently fine for a grey-haired church elder to ask a woman young enough to be his daughter to take off her clothes and send him a revealing picture'. DM
Daily Maverick
2 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Drive to survive — the cost of SA's road safety crisis
South Africa's roads are a death trap — claiming nearly 12,000 lives a year, draining 3% of GDP and enabling corruption through fake vehicle roadworthiness checks. With failing infrastructure, rigged testing stations and weak roadworthiness inspection enforcement, every fake certificate risks another fatal crash. As investigations begin, will the government finally steer policy in the right direction — or keep driving blind? 'To ensure greater safety on our roads, and reduce the devastating toll road accidents have on lives and livelihoods, we aim to reduce road fatalities by 45% by 2029 so we reach the UN target of halving road fatalities by 2030,' said Minister of Transport Barbara Creecy during the ministry's budget vote in Parliament on Wednesday, 2 July Road Traffic Management Corporation (RTMC) puts the crash bill at R186-billion a year – about 2.8% of GDP – well above the global average for middle-income states. Statistics SA shows about 6,423 road deaths were officially recorded in 2019 on death certificates. However, the RTMC State of Road Safety 2023 and international data estimate the real annual toll closer to between 11,883 and 12,000. For context, that places South African road fatalities (25 per 100,000) at levels worse than countries such as Botswana (~18 per 100,000), the UK (~3 per 100,000) and only slightly better than Mozambique (~31 per 100,000). 'We will never have accurate stats of how many accidents are caused by unroadworthy vehicles … we cannot even quantify the cost,' says the Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse's (Outa's) Rudie Heyneke, one of the lead authors of a 2025 report on corruption allegations at vehicle testing stations (VTS). The Stats SA record confirms the 25-39 age group bears the brunt – a direct drain on households, employers and the tax base, let alone the human cost. Heyneke makes this point clear: 'It's not a direct expense, but it's my money, it's your money, that goes into financing that ambulance, that hospital. It's a huge cost to the country.' Why is this happening? Law, tests and stations The National Road Traffic Act of 1996, Regulation 138 and SANS 10047/10216 make it clear: every car must pass a physical inspection at change of ownership, with annual tests for taxis and trucks, and semi-annual for buses. 'Passenger vehicles must be tested only with the change of ownership … so you can think that there's a lot more that can go wrong' says Heyneke. Many of the vehicles on the road today might fail a roadworthiness inspection, and requiring more frequent checks would indeed make our roads safer. However, even when Certificate of Roadworthiness (CoR) checks are required, the answer is not that simple. Second testing The problem, as Heyneke explains, is that many testing centres are vehicles for corruption. For example, if your vehicle fails a test in Gauteng, you can skip repairs or buy a pass in Limpopo or North West, a process enabled by a loophole in the way we manage vehicle roadworthiness fraud has become such an issue that Minister Creecy requested a probe be launched by the Special Investigating Unit (SIU). The National Traffic Information System (NaTIS) does not log failed test data or block a second pass, even if a pass is registered on the system within minutes after failing in another province. The RTMC was not able to provide data on the number of fraudulent CoRs logged and voided in response to written questions by Daily Maverick and referred our queries to the Department of Transport. The department had not responded to any of Daily Maverick's questions by the time of publication almost a week later. Outa's 2025 probe shows dozens of cross-border 'pass buys' every month, heavily used by taxis, buses and mine trucks. Stats SA data show only 54% of Gauteng's road deaths happen where the victim lives – mirroring the same cross-border test routes. 'Your car dies in Gauteng, but it's born 'safe' in Limpopo – that's the scam.' Private stations, public conflict Since the 1990s, private vehicle testing stations have multiplied to boost capacity – but oversight has fallen by the wayside. Limpopo now issues far more CoRs than its national fleet share of about 6% would justify, according to Outa data. Many station owners are also fleet operators, second-hand dealers or local politicians – an obvious conflict. The SIU's investigation falls under Proclamation 191 of 2024, signed by President Cyril Ramaphosa, covering officials, owners and syndicates. Unsafe roads, bad cars, a perfect storm The 2025 Africa Status Report on Road Safety shows South Africa's roads often lack lighting, signage and routine repair – add that to our decaying fleet plus fraud guarantees failures. Many 'driver error' fatalities are actually mechanical failures – worn brakes, broken steering, bald tyres that never saw a real inspection lane. Stats SA shows 27% of victims die in hospital and 13% are dead on arrival – strained public health infrastructure means that weak trauma care and rescue make the damage worse. International data confirm countries enforcing periodic inspections cut fatality rates by half or more. The WHO's Global Status Report on Road Safety of 2023 shows that countries with more frequent mandatory public roadworthiness inspections, which are centrally logged, consistently see fewer road fatalities over time, particularly with regard to mechanical failure-based crashes. The UK mandates annual testing, while Japan and Germany mandate biannual roadworthiness tests – and the numbers all demonstrate the clear efficacy in reducing crashes and fatalities. There has been a welcome decrease in road fatalities this year, with Easter weekend being notably calmer, with a 45.6% change since last year. 'We commend all those who played a role in this outcome,' said Automobile Association (AA) CEO Bobby Ramagwede in a statement earlier this year noting the improvement. 'Through coordinated efforts, we are finally beginning to see measurable improvements in road safety.' DM What this means for you The SIU's large-scale investigation is now live – asset freezes, possible criminal charges could see the light of day to investigate vehicle trading centres and a decline in the number of roadworthy certificates that are improperly issued. Outa hopes to host a national roundtable later this year with the ministry, SIU, fleet groups, taxi councils and VTS owners to push fixes. The fixes are not rocket science, according to Outa's Heyneke: Enforce periodic testing for older cars – the law already allows it; Upgrade NaTIS with a national block: fail once, no second pass without repairs; and Mandate photo and video evidence for every test, meaning no false paperwork. Until the loopholes close, every fake CoR is potentially a road crash tax that's quietly draining nearly 3% of South Africa's GDP – but until paper matches metal, we're paying in blood and billions. DM
