Why are environmental protesters being criminalized? – DW – 05/18/2025
Climate and environmental protest is rising in line with increasing global temperatures. But new draconian penalties are putting people who rally against climate pollution in jail.
In late 2024, in the industrial city of Newcastle on Australia's east coast, a flotilla of kayaks paddled into the harbor shipping lane to block a massive coal ship from docking.
The "climate defenders" gathered by activist group Rising Tide aimed to temporarily blockade the world's largest coal port and bring attention to a climate crisis caused primarily by burning fossil fuels. It also called for an end to new coal, oil and gas projects.
The New South Wales (NSW) state government and the police had attempted to stop the blockade in the courts. But after a judge lifted an order creating an exclusion zone at the port, the protesters held up the coal tanker for over 30 hours. Some 170 activists were arrested for alleged crimes, including the disruption of a major facility. Most could face fines of up to 22,000 Australian dollars (€12,350) or two years in jail, under a 2022 anti-protest bill.
Climate protesters took to the water to blockade the Newcastle coal port, the world's largest, late last year Image:The law criminalizes public assemblies that disrupt major public infrastructure such as roads, tunnels and ports, and was a response to past blockades by climate protesters. The then-NSW attorney general said that prior laws did not sufficiently penalize the "major inconvenience that incidents like these cause to the community," along with "severe financial impacts" due to "lost productivity."
Zack Schofield, a spokesperson for Rising Tide who was also arrested, said the NSW law is being "used to target climate protesters almost exclusively."
Australia is getting tough
A young climate activist who blockaded a lane on Sydney Harbour Bridge in 2022 was the first to be charged under the NSW law and was initially given a 15-month sentence.
Sue Higginson, a member for the Greens Party in NSW, called the imprisonment of the nonviolent protester "undemocratic," adding that people should not be punished for "engaging in legitimate forms of dissent and civil disobedience."
One in five climate and environment protesters are arrested in Australia, which is the highest rate in the democratic world, according to a 2024 study on climate protest criminalization by researchers at the University of Bristol in the UK.
Harsh anti-protest laws have been passed across the country, the world's third-largest fossil fuel exporter. That includes the island state of Tasmania, where protests at sites of old growth forest logging can incur a $13,000 fine or a two-year prison sentence.
Climate protest crackdown goes global
Similar punitive anti-protest laws have been enacted across Europe and US.
In the UK, recent amendments to the Public Order Act give police increased power to act on "serious disruption" from public protests.
Five Just Stop Oil activists were charged under the revised act for organizing the blockade of a UK motorway in 2022.
Charged with conspiracy to create a "public nuisance," the protesters were sentenced to prison terms of between four and five years in 2024 before their sentences were slightly reduced.
Said to be the longest sentences for a nonviolent protest in British legal history, they were almost on par with the five-year maximum sentence for aggravated assault, noted Global Witness, UK-based campaigners monitoring the criminalization and killing of environmental defenders.
Just Stop Oil climate activists were arrested in 2024 after cutting through a fence at a London airport and spray-painting a private jet Image: Just Stop Oil via AP/picture alliance
The UK law has been used against climate and environmental protest 95% of the time, said Oscar Berglund, a senior lecturer in international public and social policy at the University of Bristol, who co-authored the 2024 report "Criminalisation and Repression of Climate and Environmental Protests."
In Germany, members of the nonviolent climate action group Letzte Generation (Last Generation) were charged in May 2024 with "forming a criminal organization," said Berglund.
The law is typically used against mafia organizations, and has never been applied to a nonviolent activist group, said the researcher.
Meanwhile, anti-terror laws and military action have been used to suppress climate actions, including a blockade of a highway in The Hague, Netherlands, in 2023. This was in contravention of statute law, according to an Amnesty International study that described a "sweeping pattern of systematic attacks" that "undermine peaceful protest" across 21 European countries.
Dutch police employed high-powered water cannons and arrested around 700 climate activists who blocked a highway in The Hague to protest fossil fuel subsidies Image: James Petermeier/ZUMA/picture alliance
Protesters face crippling litigation cases
In addition to anti-protest laws passed by governments, climate activists are facing massive compensation claims from fossil fuel companies for disruptions caused during actions.
Known as strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPP), the anti-protest litigation peaked in March 2025 when a jury in the US state of North Dakota found Greenpeace liable for more than $660 million (€609 million) for its role in an oil pipeline blockade.
The action was bought by oil major, Energy Transfer, which has faced years-long resistance to an oil pipeline running through North Dakota — especially from the local Sioux Tribe, who set up a protest at the Standing Rock Reservation that gained international attention.
"It's part of a renewed push by corporations to weaponize our courts to silence dissent," said Sushma Raman, interim executive director of Greenpeace USA, of the compensation that could force the organization to shut down its US operations.
Beyond the threat of arrest and litigation, some 2,000 environmental defenders were murdered between 2012 and 2023, with 401 cases reported in Brazil and 298 in the Philippines, according to the Bristol University report on the criminalization and suppression of climate and environmental protest.
Greenpeace faces large fine for pipeline protests
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Are laws a tool of the fossil fuel industry?
"You don't have to dig very deep," said Berglund of the influence of oil, gas and coal interests on harsher anti-protest laws and policing. "The protesters are being targeted because they are a threat to fossil fuel profits."
He added that in the UK, anti-protest laws were drafted in consultation with a right-wing think tank, Policy Exchange, which has openly promoted the oil and gas lobby.
But for Luke McNamara, a professor at the Faculty of Law and Justice at the University of New South Wales, these "punitive actions" also reflect "growing intolerance" for the disruption caused by climate protesters resorting to peaceful civil disobedience.
"Australian politicians regularly share their great affection for the right to protest," he said in reference to new local anti-protest laws. However, this principle "tends to crumble each time an innovative climate protest garners attention," he told DW.
Climate protest halts Frankfurt flights
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Back in Newcastle, some 130 Rising Tide protesters who pleaded not guilty remain uncertain about the severity of potential fines or imprisonment when their trial begins later this month.
"If the penalties are disproportionate, we will appeal," said spokesperson Zack Schofield of what could become a test case for judicial willingness to criminalize environmental dissent in Australia — and beyond.
For Berglund, such prosecutions confirm the increasing impact of the climate movement. "Protesters are targeted when they are successful," he said.
Edited by: Jennifer Collins
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
8 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Jury Retires To Decide Verdict In Australia's Mushroom Murder Trial
Jury members retired Monday to decide the fate of an Australian woman accused of murdering three members of her husband's family with a toxic mushroom-laced beef Wellington lunch. Jurors began deliberating their verdict on 50-year-old home cook Erin Patterson after a nine-week trial, with each twist consumed by a global audience. "You must decide whether any of her statements were untrue," judge Christopher Beale said in his final instructions. "You should consider all of the evidence in the case and draw reasonable conclusions based only on the evidence you accept. "Do not guess." Jurors must reach a unanimous verdict -- guilty or not guilty -- for each of the four charges Patterson faces, Beale said. Patterson is charged with murdering her estranged husband's parents and aunt in July 2023 by spiking their beef-and-pastry meal with death cap mushrooms -- the world's deadliest fungi. She is also accused of attempting to murder a fourth guest -- her husband's uncle -- who survived the classic English dish after a long stay in hospital. The 14-person jury was reduced to 12 by ballot before they started debating a verdict at the court in Morwell, southeast of Melbourne. They will be sequestered at night during the deliberations. Patterson has steadfastly denied all charges against her, saying the poisoning of the beef Wellington -- cooked in individual portions -- was a mistake. The trial has focused in forensic detail on the events surrounding the meal at her property in the farming village of Leongatha in Victoria state. Her lunch guests that afternoon were Don and Gail Patterson, the elderly parents of her long-estranged husband Simon. Places were also set for Simon's maternal aunt Heather and her husband Ian, a well-known pastor at the local Baptist church. Simon was urged to come but he declined on the eve of the fatal lunch because he felt "uncomfortable". Within days of the meal, his parents and aunt had died of organ failure. Of the four guests, only the pastor survived. The prosecution alleges Patterson deliberately foraged for death cap mushrooms and hid them in the meal, intending to kill her lunch guests. She took care not to consume the fatal mushrooms and faked being sick after the lunch in a bid to avoid suspicion, the prosecution says. But Patterson's defence lawyer said it was a "terrible accident" and she never intended to kill or harm anyone. She only lied to authorities in panic after the lunch, including about the source of the mushrooms, for fear of being held responsible, her defence says. Patterson told police investigating the deaths that she did not own a food dehydrator, allegedly used to prepare the death cap mushrooms. Security footage showed Patterson dumping a dehydrator at a nearby rubbish facility, and forensic tests found trace amounts of death cap mushrooms on the appliance. "No one knows what they would have done in a similar situation," defence lawyer Colin Mandy told the trial. Patterson ate some of the same dish as her guests but did not fall as sick, her defence argued, saying she suffered from an eating disorder and made herself vomit afterwards. Ian Wilkinson arrives at Latrobe Valley Magistrates' Court where Erin Patterson is due to attend her trial in Morwell on June 30, 2025. Ian Wilkinson, a Baptist pastor who recovered after a lengthy stay in hospital, was a dinner guest of Erin Patterson, 50, who is charged with three murders -- the parents and aunt of her estranged husband -- and the attempted murder of Wilkinson. AFP Infographic explainer on death cap mushroom (Amanita phalloides), the deadliest fungus known to humans. AFP
Int'l Business Times
4 days ago
- Int'l Business Times
Nearly One-third Of Pacific Nation Tuvalu Seeks Australian Climate Visa
Nearly one-third of citizens in Pacific nation Tuvalu are seeking a landmark climate visa to live in Australia as rising seas threaten their palm-fringed shores, official figures obtained by AFP show. Australia is offering visas to 280 Tuvalu citizens each year under a climate migration deal Canberra has billed as "the first agreement of its kind anywhere in the world". More than 3,000 Tuvaluans have already entered a ballot for the first batch of visas, according to official figures on the Australian programme, almost a full third of the nation's population. One of the most climate-threatened corners of the planet, scientists fear Tuvalu will be uninhabitable within the next 80 years. Two of the archipelago's nine coral atolls have already largely disappeared under the waves. "Australia recognises the devastating impact climate change is having on the livelihoods, security, and wellbeing of climate vulnerable countries and people, particularly in the Pacific region," Australia's foreign affairs department told AFP. Australia and Tuvalu inked the groundbreaking Falepili Union in 2024, part of Canberra's efforts to blunt China's expanding reach in the region. Under that pact, Australia opened a new visa category specially set aside for adult citizens of Tuvalu. Already, there are signs the programme will be hugely oversubscribed. Official data on the programme shows 3,125 Tuvaluans entered the random ballot within four days of it opening last week. "This is the first agreement of its kind anywhere in the world, providing a pathway for mobility with dignity as climate impacts worsen," a spokesperson for Australia's foreign affairs department said. Tuvalu is home to 10,643 people, according to census figures collected in 2022. Registration costs Aus$25 (US$16), with the ballot closing on July 18. The visa programme has been hailed as a landmark response to the looming challenge of climate-forced migration. "At the same time, it will provide Tuvaluans the choice to live, study and work in Australia," Australia's foreign affairs department said. But they have also fanned fears that nations like Tuvalu could be rapidly drained of skilled professionals and young talent. University of Sydney geographer John Connell warned that a long-term exodus of workers could imperil Tuvalu's future. "Small states do not have many jobs and some activities don't need that many people," he told AFP. "Atolls don't offer much of a future: agriculture is hard, fisheries offer wonderful potential but it doesn't generate employment," he added. The Falepili pact commits Australia to defending Tuvalu in the face of natural disasters, health pandemics and "military aggression". "For the first time, there is a country that has committed legally to come to the aid of Tuvalu, upon request, when Tuvalu encounters a major natural disaster, a health pandemic or military aggression," Tuvalu Prime Minister Feleti Teo said at the time. "Again, for the first time there is a country that has committed legally to recognise the future statehood and sovereignty of Tuvalu despite the detrimental impact of climate changed-induced sea level rise." The agreement also offers Australia a say in any other defence pacts Tuvalu signs with other countries, raising concerns at the time that the Pacific nation was handing over its sovereignty. Tuvalu is one of just 12 states that still have formal diplomatic relations with Taipei rather than Beijing. Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said last year his country shared a vision for a "peaceful, stable, prosperous and unified region". "It shows our Pacific partners that they can rely on Australia as a trusted and genuine partner." (FILES) A file photo taken on February 19, 2004 shows the serpentine coastline of Funafuti Atoll, home to nearly half of Tuvalu's entire population of 11,500, as king tides threaten to inundate the tiny island nation. The Pacific nation of Tuvalu was once seen as the embodiment of palm-fringed paradise, but nearly a third of its population has applied to leave under a landmark climate and security pact with Australia on June 25, 2025. AFP
DW
6 days ago
- DW
From Iraq to UAE, Iran is surrounded by US military hubs – DW – 06/24/2025
The United States has more than 40,000 troops on land and water across the Middle East. Adding all locations together, US forces are either temporarily or permanently stationed at nearly 30 bases throughout the region. More than 40,000 US soldiers are currently deployed in the Middle East, with many of them on ships, according to the US think tank the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). The number of troops is slightly lower than in October, during the previous escalation of tensions between Israel and Iran. In earlier years, there were far fewer US troops in the Middle East, totaling about 30,000. According to the recent overview by the CFR, the US has military facilities and troops spanning Bahrain, Egypt, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria and the United Arab Emirates — and beyond. US troops also use large bases that are formally operated by allies, such as in Djibouti, in East Africa, and in NATO partner Turkey. The largest US air force presence is the Al-Udeid airbase in Qatar, which was recently targeted with missiles by Iran. Operated by the Qatari air force, the airfield is also used by British and Australian air forces, as well as the US military. Adding all locations together, the US armed forces are either temporarily or permanently stationed at nearly 30 bases across the Middle East. The presence of US troops in the region is often linked to past deployments. The United States has operated several bases in Kuwait since the Gulf War in the early 1990s, when, Iraq attacked its small oil-producing neighbor and was repelled by US forces. After the second Iraq war in 2003, the United States retained its presence in two locations, partly to protect the Kurdish and Yazidi population in the northern region of Erbil. US troops are also still to be found in neighboring Syria: in the south and in the Kurdish-dominated north. In 2015, during the civil war, the United States began deploying special forces to the Rojava region, which is predominantly populated by Syrian Kurds. The Kurds faced extreme persecution by the terror organization the "Islamic State" during the civil war. So far, Iran has limited itself to its rather symbolic attack on Al-Udeid. Casualties were avoided as Tehran alerted the United States in advance, and the missiles were apparently intercepted by air defense. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video It remains doubtful whether Iran could threaten US troops in the region with ballistic missiles on a wider scale, missile and drone expert Fabian Hinz told DW. Hinz, who conducts research for the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), referred to reports from the United States that Iran could produce 50 ballistic missiles every month. "Although this is a considerable production rate, it is still not enough to maintain Iran's current rate of fire," he said — which means that the attacks on Israel since mid-June would quickly decimate its stock.
