Tucker Carlson leads MAGA's worried warriors in questioning Trump
But few were prominent enough to face a direct response from the president.
'Somebody please explain to kooky Tucker Carlson that, 'IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON!'' Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform.
'I don't know what Tucker Carlson is saying,' Trump said in response to a reporter's question at the Group of Seven summit the same day. 'Let him go get a television network and say it so that people listen.'
In the course of a few weeks, Trump has faced a surprising level of pushback from prominent supporters as he moved to strike nuclear facilities in Iran, floated a new policy to allow undocumented farmworkers to remain in the United States and castigated allies for demanding more information related to the late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Even in that environment, Carlson, regarded as a MAGA standard-bearer, stood out.
'I like Trump. I campaigned for Trump,' Carlson said in an interview, adding: 'But I've got my views. I assume that we will overlap on most things, and I hope that, by the way, the bombing of the nuclear sites in Iran, which I did not support, I hope it works out great, and I'll be grateful if it does. And I'll be the first to say I was wrong for the millionth time in my life.'
In June, Carlson said Trump was ' complicit in the act of war ' as Israel launched attacks on Iran. (Trump later said Carlson ' called and apologized.') One month before, Carlson echoed concerns about Trump's business dealings in the Middle East, saying ' it seems like corruption ' when Shawn Ryan, a guest on his program, raised alarm about new Trump properties in the region. And now, he is taking the administration to task for declining to release additional information about Epstein, with whom Trump had a yearslong friendship before a falling-out.
'The fact that the U.S. government, the one that I voted for, refused to take my question seriously and instead said, 'Case closed, shut up conspiracy theorist,' was too much for me,' Carlson said Friday at the Turning Point USA Student Action Summit, where he devoted his speech to the issue. 'And I don't think the rest of us should be satisfied with that.'
Carlson emphasized his personal admiration for Trump but took issue with his response to the furor over the Epstein files. At a Cabinet meeting last week, Trump brushed off growing discontent and said it was 'a desecration' to ask about Epstein after flooding in Texas killed dozens.
'It's not adequate to say anyone who asked [questions] is somehow desecrating the memory of little girls who died in Texas,' Carlson said in his speech Friday, adding: 'I don't care who gives that answer. That is not acceptable.'
Carlson's frustrations represent broader discontent in MAGA world with the policies of the man who brought them together. It's a key moment for the movement, which for the past decade has been largely in lockstep, testing whether it's willing to truly break with Trump and whether anyone besides Trump can shape its direction.
'I was never an important adviser to Trump'
Asked about his direct discussions with Trump, Carlson said he 'certainly had a lot of conversations with him,' though he declined to say when the two men last spoke.
'I'm not a policymaker,' he said. 'I'm just a guy with opinions. I don't work there. I've never worked in any government. I've never taken any money from any politician or any government, and I just have strong views, which, by the way, are sometimes wrong, really wrong. I supported the Iraq War. So my track record is spotty.'
And Carlson said he was unaware whether his influence in the White House has waned in light of his recent commentary.
'I was never an important adviser to Trump,' he said. 'It was always kind of overstated.'
Carlson was center stage among MAGA influencers arguing for the United States to stay out of Iran, a position that has gained popularity on the right as some right-wing influencers have increasingly viewed the U.S.-Israel alliance with skepticism. That stance is also informed by Trump's having promoted similar anti-war and anti-interventionist views for years, even as he has used military force as president. Ultimately, Carlson said, the most important voice arguing the case to Trump for the U.S. bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities was Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
'Turns out a head of state of an important ally has a more compelling message than I do,' he said. 'That seems reasonable to me. I still disagree, but I don't think it's like Trump has changed his views entirely.'
Some around Trump have taken a victory lap given that he ultimately didn't ally with Carlson on military action in Iran.
'The Iran operation was both a shot at the Iranians, but it was also a shot at the restrainers of the administration and at Tucker and everyone else who said the president is never going to do this,' a Trump ally close to the administration said. 'They think he's an ideologue like they are, and he isn't. These guys overplayed their hands.'
Trump's relationship with Carlson has had peaks and valleys dating to his first administration. Most notably, during Dominion Voting Systems' 2023 court battle against Fox News, the judge made public text messages showing Carlson's trashing Trump amid his effort to overturn his 2020 loss, in which he privately said, ' I hate him passionately.'
'He's never been a natural ally of the president,' a second Trump ally said, pointing to the texts.
But the two reconciled during Trump's third run for the White House as both were in exile: Carlson having been ousted from Fox News as part of the fallout over the Dominion lawsuit and Trump facing multiple indictments, including in connection with his role in trying to reverse his 2020 defeat.
When Carlson was forced out of his show in 2023, Trump said he was 'shocked,' adding, 'He's a very good person and a very good man and very talented, as you know, and he had very high ratings.' The strengthening of their relationship led Carlson to campaign for Trump, including in a prime-time speaking slot at last summer's Republican convention.
Given Carlson's stature in the MAGA movement, prominent Trump allies have come to his defense. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., said last month that Carlson 'is one of my favorite people.' Arguing against intervention in Iran, she added, was 'not kooky.'
Steve Bannon, the former White House aide and MAGA media personality, who occupies a perch similar to Carlson's, said the brouhaha between the two men comes during 'a time of turmoil' when Trump is handling a number of crises at once. He said Carlson is 'still one of the leaders of our movement and an incredibly strong, independent voice.'
'Tucker has always worked at this a little more with a jaundiced eye,' Bannon said. 'He came to this movement late. He waited and measured it. He respects President Trump; he supported President Trump. When Tucker took on the ruling class, it was a seminal moment for MAGA — because he did it on Fox prime time. Since then, Tucker has been there for 'America First,' especially when it mattered most.'
More broadly, Bannon said, MAGA influencers and thought leaders have to call out policy decisions that veer from base expectations in hope of ensuring their perspective is represented.
'You've got to represent every day and continue to make sure that people understand, particularly people around President Trump, and sometimes even the president himself, understands where we think core values lie,' Bannon said.
'A dissident figure'
It's not as if Carlson hadn't publicly criticized Trump or his administration before. He similarly sounded the alarm in 2020 when the United States killed Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani, and he criticized Trump's handling of national protests after Minneapolis police murdered George Floyd later that year. While such pushback isn't new, a person close to Carlson said he has never crossed the line into all-consuming criticism like Matt Drudge or Ann Coulter, other conservative media personalities who have sharply broken with Trump.
'Tucker's not being malicious towards the president at all,' a source close to the White House said. 'You can very easily still support somebody and disagree with a specific policy decision. Agree with him or disagree with him, Tucker is at least coming from a sincere place of love and concern for the president. He just wants the president to be successful and is worried that issues like amnesty, Epstein, Ukraine funding and war in the Middle East could eventually lead to his presidency being derailed.'
Trump maintains high approval ratings with the Republican base, which is informing how he and the White House view the pushback online. An Economist/YouGov survey published Tuesday found that 87% of Republicans approve of Trump's handling of his job so far.
'The president cares deeply about the MAGA base; he is very responsive to them,' a person familiar with the White House's thinking said.
This person pointed to online chatter last week about whether Trump would offer some sort of 'amnesty' after he talked up an effort at a rally to allow undocumented farmworkers to stay in the country, noting that at a Cabinet meeting, Trump was responsive to the concerns and said there would be 'no amnesty.'
'Things like that are notable when thinking about how the president balances the viewpoints he's getting,' the person added. 'And a lot of what he's done recently are direct responses to so many of the campaign promises made to the base.'
A MAGA thought leader described Trump and Carlson as 'two of the great minds of MAGA,' saying the movement wouldn't exist in its current form without either one. This person worried the MAGA perspective was 'getting a little squeezed out of the inner circle' at the White House on several issues of note.
'People are not going to go along with endless war,' this person said. 'And when they see the capitulation on Epstein, it just hurts. The Trump administration made overtures that they were serious about this. But six months in and kind of trying to tie a bow around it, it's just not satisfying. That's not going to sit well.'
No other issue has tested the MAGA base's commitment to Trump like the Epstein files.
For years, many on the right — including some people who are now in the Trump administration — have called for the release of all government documents related to Epstein. Epstein died in custody in 2019, and a medical examiner ruled his death a suicide. He was facing sex trafficking and conspiracy charges.
Last week, Attorney General Pam Bondi released a memo saying the Justice Department's review turned up no 'client list' of powerful men alleged to have participated in Epstein's schemes, enraging the MAGA base, who are calling on her to be fired. Trump's defense of Bondi and his attempts to tell his supporters to move on from the issue have done little to quell the furor.
On Saturday, Trump wrote 'LET PAM BONDI DO HER JOB — SHE'S GREAT!' on Truth Social, adding the United States should 'not waste Time and Energy on Jeffrey Epstein, somebody that nobody cares about.'
In his NBC News interview, Carlson said he now believes the Justice Department actually doesn't have 'much relevant information about Jeffrey Epstein's sex crimes.'
'Rather than just admit that, Pam Bondi made a bunch of ludicrous claims on cable news shows that she couldn't back up, and this current outrage is the result,' he said.
A Republican Senate aide thinks Carlson is actually having a bit of a 'revival' as he carves out distinct space on the right.
'He's more of a dissident figure now,' this person said. 'For whatever else you're going to say, Tucker is just kind of saying what he thinks.'
No recent moment generated more buzz for Carlson than his contentious and combative interview with Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, which put the MAGA divide over the conflict between Israel and Iran on full display. Even with the administration not siding with him, Carlson said he's 'really grateful' that there's significant debate on the right over a litany of policy issues.
As for his assessment of the first six months of Trump's second presidency, he said, 'I think they're trying.'
'The most important thing, not just for Republicans, not even for all the first-time Republican voters who supported Trump, but just for the country,' Carlson said, 'is to make it clear that you're trying to achieve what you said you would achieve.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Statesman
27 minutes ago
- New Statesman
Trump is serious about getting tough on Putin. No, really.
Photo byDonald Trump appears, belatedly, to be reaching the conclusion that Vladimir Putin cannot be entirely trusted. 'We get a lot of bullshit thrown at us by Putin, if you want to know the truth,' he remarked during a cabinet meeting last week (8 July). 'He's very nice to us all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless.' He expanded on that theme during a meeting with Nato secretary-general Mark Rutte in the Oval Office on 14 July, where the US president was expected to deliver a 'major announcement' on Russia. After speaking to Putin on the phone, he said, 'I always hang up and say, well that was a nice phone call, and then missiles are launched into Kyiv or some other city, and I say, 'strange.' And after that happens three or four times, you say, 'the talk doesn't mean anything.'' Even the first lady, Melania Trump, had noted the discrepancy between his 'lovely' phone conversations with Putin and the devastating war he is waging against Ukraine. 'I go home, I tell the first lady, 'you know I spoke to Vladimir today, we had a wonderful conversation,'' Trump recounted. 'She said, 'oh, really? Another city was just hit.'' Since returning to power in January – whereupon he had promised to end the war within 24 hours – Trump had believed a peace deal with Putin was within reach 'about four times,' he opined, 'but it just keeps going on and on and on.' With this pattern so clearly established and Putin so demonstrably uninterested in serious peace talks, there was growing anticipation in Washington that Trump was about to signal a radically new approach. Perhaps the major announcement would turn out to be an unequivocal declaration of support for Ukraine and a commitment to pass the bipartisan sanctions package that is currently gathering momentum in the senate and would impose a 500 percent tariff on countries that buy Russian oil and uranium (such as China and India). Fool Trump four times, one might think, and, to quote George W. Bush, 'you can't get fooled again.' To be fair, Trump did announce that Ukraine would now receive the air defence systems and other crucial weaponry that Volodymyr Zelensky has repeatedly requested – and which his own administration had previously suspended – which is unequivocally good news for Kyiv. Although he was characteristically vague on the details of what, exactly, would be sent. 'Everything. It's Patriots [the US-made missile defence system]. It's all of them,' Trump said as Rutte nodded along encouragingly. The one detail he did want to stress was that the US would not be paying for them. Instead, they would be sending the weapons to Nato, where 'rich' European countries would apparently foot the bill, and then send the weapons on to Ukraine. 'This is really big,' Rutte interjected, demonstrating, once again, his fluency in Trumpian rhetoric and his apparent comfort with public acts of self-abasement in an attempt to secure the US president's support for European security. (During their previous meeting, Rutte referred to Trump as 'Daddy.') 'This is Europeans stepping up.' If he was Putin, Rutte suggested, he would now be left with little choice but to take these negotiations 'more seriously.' Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Alas, this is an unlikely outcome. Far from offering a stirring invocation of the need for Ukraine to prevail and Washington's unending commitment to standing with Europe against Russian aggression, Trump repeatedly distanced himself from the war. 'This is a Biden war. This is a Democrat war,' he said. 'Not a Republican or Trump war.' 'This is not Trump's,' he stressed again as he answered reporters' questions. 'We're here to get it finished and stopped.' Twice, he pointed out, 'they're not Americans dying,' noting that he and 'JD [Vance]' have a 'problem' with the war, which they had both campaigned on a promise to bring to an expedited end. 'There are no winners here,' Trump concluded, as though he was surveying a bad real estate deal. 'This is a loser.' His comments did not exactly signal robust support. As for the senate's sanctions package, which is being touted in DC as a 'sledgehammer' that will enable Trump to end the conflict, the president himself sounded noncommittal, offering only that it was 'good that they're doing it.' Instead, he promised to impose 'very severe tariffs if we don't have a deal in 50 days.' Those tariffs would be set 'at about 100 percent,' Trump said, calling them 'secondary tariffs' but offering no further details as to what this meant. (Secondary sanctions are generally imposed on third countries trading with a targeted nation, so this could mean imposing 100 percent tariffs on US imports from countries that trade with Russia, but it is not clear.) Asked how much further he was prepared to go if Putin continued to escalate his attacks on Ukraine, which has been subjected in recent weeks to the heaviest aerial bombardment since the start of the war as the Russian military, Trump responded: 'Don't ask me a question like that.' For all the dramatic billing, the problem with Trump's latest strategy is that it is essentially the same strategy that he has already tried. He is threatening Putin with very serious consequences if he doesn't end the war, while signalling that he, personally, and the US in general, has no real interest in that war beyond ensuring that 'we get it finished.' Agreeing to continue supplying Ukraine with the weapons it needs to defend itself, or at least to sell those weapons to Nato, is better than the alternative for Kyiv and allows the Ukrainian military to keep fighting, but it is not the same as committing meaningful funds and political capital to ensure Ukraine's survival against the Russian onslaught and European security. Trump has the votes to pass a massive new military aid package in congress immediately if he so desires. Evidently, he does not. There is no doubt that Trump's tone on Putin has decidedly soured in recent days. Perhaps he is genuinely reconsidering his previously admiring assessment of the Russian president, and a more consequential policy shift will eventually follow. But for now, he is choosing to respond to Putin's habitual obfuscation and clear track record of stringing him along by giving him another chance – this time another 50 days – to mend his ways, and warning that this time is really serious about getting tough. Perhaps the fifth time will turn out to be the charm, and Putin will now be persuaded to enter serious negotiations and call an end to his assault. But it is more likely that he will interpret Trump's announcement as giving him another 50 days to bombard Ukraine and grind forward on the battlefield, where he believes the Russian military has the upper hand, albeit at a glacial pace and tremendous cost. Tellingly, the Russian stock market rose after Trump's announcement. Moscow, it seems, was bracing for much worse. [See also: Putin's endgame] Related
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
I'm disappointed but not done with Putin, Trump tells BBC
Donald Trump has said that he is disappointed but not done with Vladimir Putin, in an exclusive phone call with the US president was pressed on whether he trusts the Russian leader, and replied: "I trust almost no-one." Trump was speaking hours after he announced plans to send weapons to Ukraine and warned of severe tariffs on Russia if there was no ceasefire deal in 50 days. In a wide-ranging interview from the Oval Office, the president also endorsed Nato, having once described it as obsolete, and affirmed his support for the organisation's common defence principle. The president made the phone call, which lasted 20 minutes, to the BBC after conversations about a potential interview to mark one year on since the attempt on his life at a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania. Asked about whether surviving the assassination attempt had changed him, Trump said he liked to think about it as little as possible. "I don't like to think about if it did change me," Trump said. Dwelling on it, he added, "could be life-changing". Having just met with Nato chief Mark Rutte at the White House, however, the president spent a significant portion of the interview expanding on his disappointment with the Russian leader. Trump said that he had thought a deal was on the cards with Russia four different times. When asked by the BBC if he was done with Putin, the president replied: "I'm disappointed in him, but I'm not done with him. But I'm disappointed in him." Pressed on how Trump would get Putin to "stop the bloodshed" the US president said: "We're working it, Gary.""We'll have a great conversation. I'll say: 'That's good, I'll think we're close to getting it done,' and then he'll knock down a building in Kyiv." The conversation moved onto Nato, which Trump has previously criticised as "obsolete". Asked if he still thought this was the case, he said: "No. I think Nato is now becoming the opposite of that" because the alliance was "paying their own bills". He said he still believed in collective defence, because it meant smaller countries could defend themselves against larger ones. President Trump was also asked about the UK's future in the world and said he thought it was a "great place - you know I own property there".He spoke about how he was looking forward to an unprecedented second state visit to the UK in September this year. On what he wanted to achieve during the visit, Trump said: "Have a good time and respect King Charles, because he's a great gentleman."
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Did Melania convince Trump to back Ukraine?
A huge 180 for Trump on the Ukraine war. The US president announced a weapons deal with NATO, and gave Vladimir Putin a 50-day deadline to strike peace. Did Melania Trump convince her husband to make the U-turn? Martha's been out on the streets of LA, meeting the people leading the fight against the Trump administration's immigration raids. Plus: POTUS finds himself in the middle of a football trophy lift. What could possibly go wrong? If you've got a question you'd like the Trump100 team to answer, you can email it to trump100@ You can also watch all episodes on our YouTube channel.
