Michael O'Leary criticised for ‘insulting' comments on Dublin metro
Various metro projects for the capital have been proposed in recent decades but none have proceeded to build stage.
On Tuesday, the Government announced that the MetroLink project would get a €2bn boost in funding as part of the national development plan, in what Taoiseach Micheal Martin said was "a very definitive commitment to the metro".
While Finance Minister Paschal Donohoe indicated the latest estimated cost for the MetroLink was 11 billion euro, Mr O'Leary claimed it would cost 20 billion euro, "so about a billion a kilometre".
"Dublin Airport doesn't need it, Dublin Airport passengers won't use it - they're already well-served by buses," he told RTÉ Radio on Wednesday, while claiming that less than a third of the airport's passengers use buses.
He said that while the tube in London runs from Heathrow and through "all of London", the Metro will only serve a section of Dublin city's residents - around 100,000 people, he claimed.
"Here's the madness of this. This thing is going to start at Stephen's Green in the morning. If you want to get to our first wave of departures, which leave at about 6.30 in the morning, you need to be at the airport at 5.30am.
"Are you seriously going to drive into the centre of Stephen's Green, where there's no car parking, to get this metro to get to Dublin Airport for 5.30 in the morning? No, you're not.
"Let me give you the alternative scenario: for €100m, this year we could buy 400 buses, and 400 buses would provide exactly the same capacity as this metro from Dublin Airport, in through Ballymun, in through Drumcondra, on bus lanes that already exist."
He claimed the plan had not been properly costed and hit out at the Government's handling of public finances.
"This Government wasted €330,000 on a bike shed, imagine what they do with an 18-kilometre underground train from an airport?"
He also criticised comments by Mr Martin, who said the Irish capital will not be sustainable without a metro.
"Does he not understand that the buses actually will all be electrified by the end of this decade, which will actually be greener than light rail?"
Labour TD Duncan Smith said Mr O'Leary's criticisms of public infrastructure were as sure "as night follows day".
"Dubliners are stuck in daily gridlock. MetroLink is their best chance at affordable, reliable transport that serves communities, not corporate profits.
"As a consistent advocate for MetroLink in Swords, I find it insulting to hear this kind of drive-by commentary from someone who clearly doesn't rely on public transport to get to work.
"Dublin deserves better than a transport plan from a billionaire whose only experience with buses is when he is pretending to be one."
When asked about his endorsement of Enterprise Minister Peter Burke and junior minister Robert Troy during the general election campaign, Mr O'Leary claimed "they're not in government" and criticised Mr Martin again.
"I endorsed Peter Burke, who actually topped the poll despite the criticism. I also endorsed Robert Troy - and they're not the government."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
4 minutes ago
- Irish Times
‘I'm angry that my abuse as a child does not count' – State must pay for school sexual abuse
Minister for Education Helen McEntee stated recently that those responsible for historical sexual abuse in schools must pay. She is right. But let us be very clear. This includes the State. It cannot be erased or ignored that 11 years ago, following the case taken by Louise O'Keeffe , the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) established that the Irish State had – and continues to have – a positive duty to take steps to protect children from abuse and to provide an effective remedy for those who have suffered sexual abuse in Irish schools. The ECHR ruled the State had been aware of the level of sexual crime by adults against minors in Ireland. The court made it clear the State bears a stand-alone responsibility to every child abused in State schools for its failure, until the early 1990s, to implement national child protection measures. It cannot outsource that responsibility to religious organisations, nor hide behind procedural defences. The Government is well aware of this judgment and is legally bound to comply with it. As recently as January 2024, a plan was submitted to the ECHR, updating it on State progress 'to abide by the final judgment of the European Court of Human Rights ...' which includes the State paying redress of €84,000 to survivors of sexual abuse in schools. READ MORE Strangely, and extremely worryingly, the interdepartmental group who recently published their report on the recommendations of the scoping inquiry, seem to be completely unaware of the European Court decision, or have chosen to act as if Ireland is not party to the European Convention on Human Rights. Their report includes the assertion: 'It has been concluded in case law, at Supreme Court level, that the State does not have such liability.' What the report fails to say is that the European Court of Human Rights directly rejected this view in the O'Keeffe judgment. Survivors have already waited far too long and suffered too much. They cannot now be told that the justice they are owed can only be delivered if and when the State manages somehow to make the churches open their coffers Notwithstanding the fact that the State has failed miserably so far to adequately implement the ruling, it seems extraordinary that senior Government officials should now ignore its very existence. This contradiction raises a more fundamental question about the position of the Government and State with regard to its ECHR obligations. In Europe, the Government has accepted the ECHR ruling and engaged with the court regarding its progress in implementing its terms, albeit it has thrown so many obstacles in front of survivors that to date, only 158 have received redress. At home, the Government is denying its existence, and further delaying justice for the many, increasingly ageing, survivors of abuse. Is it possible that despite what Ireland's representatives are saying in Strasbourg, some elements of the State infrastructure still do not accept the rulings of the European Court? [ Why are the experiences of people, like me, who were resident in Temple Hill forgotten? Opens in new window ] So, what is it exactly that the State is saying to victims of sexual abuse in schools? Can the Government confirm that it accepts the ruling of the European Court which found that the State does bear a responsibility for abuse that occurred in schools? Can it confirm that it will now, finally, deliver redress and fulfil its own obligations to those victims who have waited far too long for justice? To be clear, the legal strategies adopted by religious organisations to avoid restitution to victims are unconscionable. And there are many who – rightly – applaud the Taoiseach when he stated it is the Government's 'intention, commitment and determination' to make religious organisations pay compensation for the abuse they inflicted on children in schools. It is also important to make clear that any individual or private organisation responsible for the abuse of children should be held liable – under both criminal and civil law. But this is not an either/or situation. The Government has overarching responsibility for ensuring survivors of abuse receive appropriate redress. Of course, it should use every power it has to force the churches to make reparations from their very considerable wealth. However, this should have absolutely no impact on its own obligation to fully implement the O'Keeffe judgment immediately and deliver the redress for which it has responsibility. Survivors have already waited far too long and suffered too much. They cannot now be told that the justice they are owed can only be delivered if and when the State manages somehow to make churches open their coffers for the schools they ran on behalf of the State. Meanwhile, current State policy is to leave victims and survivors spending years trying to navigate a complex and hostile legal terrain. This is not justice. This is retraumatising victims. [ Sex abuse in schools: State accused of ignoring its liability for redress Opens in new window ] For example, last December, the Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission wrote to the Minister for Education as part of our ongoing work in pursuit of redress for some of Louise O'Keeffe's classmates at Dunderrow National School (not a religious school) who had been similarly abused. To date, there has been no response from the Government. The 'Dunderrow women' have been known to the State for decades because, like Louise O'Keeffe, many of them provided statements to An Garda Síochána – the very statements that led to prosecution and conviction of their abuser. On hearing of the latest investigation and further delays of redress, one of the Dunderrow women said: 'I feel outraged that the Irish Government haven't put the redress scheme in place for all survivors of sexual abuse. I'm extremely angry that my abuse is not of concern to the Minister, that my abuse as a young girl, a child, does not count. I feel left out and worthless.' McEntee has said those responsible must pay. That means the State. A redress scheme must be established immediately, without the arbitrary and discriminatory conditions in the previous schemes, regardless of any new commission of investigation's outcome. The State must finally comply with the O'Keeffe judgment in full, and it must do so now. Survivors have waited long enough. Justice, truth and dignity, demand no less. Liam Herrick is chief commissioner of the Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission
Irish Independent
6 minutes ago
- Irish Independent
The week ahead in business: trade-deal deadline, bank earnings and results for Euronext and IAG
This year, in complete contrast, August 1 marks the deadline set by US president Donald Trump for a trade deal between America and the EU, or else he imposes a 30pc tariff on imports from Europe. A deal has now been done on the basis of a 15pc baseline tariff. While the details remain scanty this is in line the agreement reached between the US and Japan last week. There is likely to be further back and forth as the two sides quibble over what is and isn't in the deal in the coming days. Mr Trump may not get his way on something else – a cut in US interest rates. The Federal Reserve is due to decide on Wednesday whether to leave rates unchanged at 4.25pc-4.5pc for a fifth consecutive meeting, as it waits for more clarity on the outlook for inflation in particular. The other 'season' that kicks off this week is Irish banks' earnings season, which begins on tomorrow with Bank of Ireland. It will be followed by PTSB on Thursday and AIB on Friday. These should be relatively jolly affairs, given the announcement last week that gross lending amounted to €3.4bn in Q2 2025, which was up 18pc year on year. Davy is forecasting gross mortgage lending of €14bn this year, which would represent 11pc growth. Denis McGoldrick of Goodbody is predicting that capital distributions and loan growth will be key areas of focus for the banks in their interim results. 'We are forecasting that AIB Group will announce an interim dividend – their first since the global financial crisis – of 13c per share and 26c per share for Bank of Ireland. 'Meanwhile at PTSB, we expect confirmation that the updated internal ratings-based mortgage models have been submitted to the regulator which we believe could release as much as c.€200m in capital, once approved. This would allow the bank to begin directed buybacks with the Irish State, increase loan growth ambitions and pursue M&A opportunities which may arise in the non-bank sector, in particular.' Results to watch out for include Euronext, the stock market operator, which will publish its Q2 figures on Thursday, after markets close. IAG, the owner of Aer Lingus, will announce its Q2 results on Friday The Central Statistics Office will have tourism figures for June, which will be closely watched given the recent downward trajectory of visitor numbers.
Irish Independent
6 minutes ago
- Irish Independent
Businesses ask for extension of foreign-earnings tax break
The FED can be claimed by people who are tax-resident in Ireland but who work overseas for part of the year in certain other countries. It provides relief from income tax up to €35,000 of annual pay, which means the most that can be saved in one year is €14,000. The person must spend a minimum of 30 days working in one of the relevant countries in a tax year. First introduced in 1994, the relief was cancelled in 2003, but reintroduced in Budget 2012 by Michael Noonan with the stated aim of supporting 'our export drive by aiding companies seeking to expand into emerging markets'. The original list had just five countries – the so-called BRICS of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. This has been expanded on several occasions since, and the total number of countries now covered is 30. In the push for Asian markets, the likes of Singapore and Korea have been added, and several Middle Eastern countries are there too – including Saudia Arabia, Qatar and Bahrain. The relief is now most often claimed by people working in the United Arab Emirates. The minimum number of qualifying days required in order to be eligible has also been steadily reduced, from an initial 60 to 40 from 2015 onwards, and to the current 30 from 2017. The cost of the tax relief to the Exchequer in 2022 – the most recent year for which data is available – was €3.2m. There were 447 claimants, down from the 720 recorded in 2019, but it is not clear as yet how big an impact the Covid pandemic had. The Department of Finance is currently doing a review of FED, with the final report due to be completed in advance of the Budget on October 7, when minister Paschal Donohoe will announce any tax changes. 'Part of the review process will involve gathering stakeholder feedback and reflecting on their insights,' according to a recently published report by the Tax Strategy Group. 'Based on engagements with industry thus far, stakeholders have asserted that FED plays an important role in encouraging and incentivising Irish businesses to expand their operations internationally. The most common proposals put forward by stakeholders have been to enhance the level of the relief to make trips abroad more worthwhile for employees and to extend the list of qualifying countries to further encourage diversification of markets.' The report by the Tax Strategy Group notes that the current economic uncertainty underlines the importance of building resilience, and that a Government push towards trade diversification could help promote this. In his speech to the National Economic Dialogue, a pre-Budget discussion forum, Foreign Affairs and Trade Minister Simon Harris said the diversification of trade is 'more important than ever before', and that a set of actions focused on trade and market diversification is underway. 'There is an opportunity now for new ambition in our approach to market diversification,' Mr Harris said. 'This can encompass EU, UK or further afield. We are working with Irish exporters in exploring new markets, leveraging existing EU trade agreements, and strengthening their international presence.'
