Australian PM Touts Practical Cooperation During Shanghai Visit
The Australian leader's comments were carried in a statement posted on the Shanghai local government's official Wechat account.
Canberra hopes to further strengthen economic and trade cooperation and jointly promote green and low-carbon development, Albanese told Shanghai Communist Party Secretary Chen Jining. Shanghai welcomes Australian companies to invest in the city, China's second largest, Chen said.
'We know the one in four of Australia's jobs depends upon free and fair trade. And our biggest export partner is China,' Albanese said in a video carried on the Global Times' official Wechat account. 'Engaging with China is in our interests to build a stable and secure region.'
Albanese was visiting China for the first time since being re-elected in a landslide in May. He's trying to balance an increasingly confrontational relationship between the US and China — respectively, Australia's historic security ally and its biggest trading partner.
He also needs to navigate a more complicated regional security environment as China becomes more assertive in the Asia-Pacific. China in February conducted live-fire naval exercises in the Tasman Sea off Australia's east coast, which Albanese said at the time was within international law but for which he would have liked more notice.
The prime minister will visit through Shanghai, Beijing and Chengdu, describing the visit as a 'further demonstration of the good relations' between the nations. China's economic heft is significant given it takes a quarter of Australia's exports, from iron ore to lobsters and wine.
Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong warned on Thursday about 'the worrying pace of China's nuclear and conventional military build up,' highlighting that Beijing aims to change the balance of power in the region.
A delegation of corporate executives — including from Macquarie Bank Ltd. and HSBC Holdings Plc's Australia arm, as well as Fortescue Ltd., BlueScope Steel Ltd., Rio Tinto Ltd. and BHP Group Ltd is traveling with Albanese. His visit will includes a CEO round table in Beijing on Tuesday and an international supply chain Expo that China is hosting.
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
Asian shares edge up, Japanese bond yields rise
Synopsis Asian stocks saw a rise, mirroring gains in the US market. Traders are not much worried about President Trump's tariff threats. They see them as negotiation tactics. Australian and Japanese shares increased. South Korean shares decreased. Bitcoin fell after hitting a record high. Japan's bond yield reached its highest point since 2008.
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Too murky to presume that AI boosts productivity
There's been much talk recently – especially among politicians – about productivity. And for good reason: Australia's labour productivity growth sits at a 60-year low. To address this issue, its Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has convened a productivity round table next month. This will coincide with the release of an interim report from the Productivity Commission, which is looking at five pillars of reform. One of these is the role of data and digital technologies, including artificial intelligence (AI). This will be music to the ears of the tech and business sectors, which have been enthusiastically promoting the productivity benefits of AI. In fact, the Business Council of Australia also said last month that AI is the single greatest opportunity in a generation to lift productivity. But what do we really know about how AI impacts productivity? What is productivity? Put simply, productivity is how much output (goods and services) we can produce from a given number of inputs (such as labour and raw materials). It matters because higher productivity typically translates to a higher standard of living. Productivity growth has accounted for 80 per cent of Australia's income growth over the past three decades. Productivity can be thought of as individual, organisational or national. Your individual productivity is how efficiently you manage your time and resources to complete tasks. How many emails can you respond to in an hour? How many products can you check for defects in a day? Organisational productivity is how well an organisation achieves its goals. For example, in a research organisation, how many top-quality research papers are produced? National productivity is the economic efficiency of a nation, often measured as gross domestic product per hour worked. It is effectively an aggregate of the other forms. But it's notoriously difficult to track how changes in individual or organisational productivity translate into national GDP per hour worked. AI and individual productivity: The nascent research examining the relationship between AI and individual productivity shows mixed results. A 2025 real-world study of AI and productivity involved 776 experienced product professionals at US multinational company Procter & Gamble. The study showed that individuals randomly assigned to use AI performed as well as a team of two without. A similar study in 2023 with 750 consultants from Boston Consulting Group found tasks were 18 per cent faster with generative AI. The same year a paper reported on an early generative AI system in a Fortune 500 software company used by 5,200 customer support agents. The system showed a 14 per cent increase in the number of issues resolved per hour. For less experienced agents, productivity increased by 35 per cent. However, AI doesn't always increase individual productivity. A survey of 2,500 professionals found generative AI increased workload for 77 per cent of workers. Some 47 per cent said that they didn't know how to unlock productivity benefits. The study points to barriers such as the need to verify and/or correct AI outputs, the need for AI upskilling, and unreasonable expectations about what AI can do. A recent CSIRO study examined the daily use of Microsoft 365 Copilot by 300 employees of a government organisation. While the majority self-reported productivity benefits, a sizeable minority (30 per cent) did not. Even those workers who reported productivity improvements expected greater productivity benefits than were delivered. AI and organisational productivity: It's difficult, if not impossible, to attribute changes in an organisation's productivity to the introduction of AI. Businesses are sensitive to many social and organisational factors, any one of which could be the reason for a change in productivity. Nevertheless, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has estimated the productivity benefits of traditional AI – that is, machine learning applied for an industry-specific task – to be zero to 11 per cent at the organisational level. A 2024 summary paper cites independent studies showing increases in organisational productivity from AI in Germany, Italy and Taiwan. In contrast, a 2022 analysis of three lakh US firms didn't find a significant correlation between AI adoption and productivity but did for other technologies such as robotics and cloud computing. The likely explanations are that AI hasn't yet had an effect on many firms, or simply that it's too hard to disentangle the impact of AI given it's never applied in isolation. AI productivity increases can also sometimes be masked by additional human labour needed to train or operate AI systems. Take Amazon's Just Walk Out technology for shops. Publicly launched in 2018, it was intended to reduce labour as customer purchases would be fully automated. But it reportedly relied on hiring around 1,000 workers in India for quality control. Amazon has labelled these reports 'erroneous'. More generally, think about the unknown number (but likely millions) of people paid to label data for AI models. AI and national productivity: The picture at a national level is even murkier. Clearly, AI hasn't yet impacted national productivity. It can be argued that technology developments take time to affect national productivity, as companies need to figure out how to use the technology and put the necessary infrastructure and skills in place. However, this is not guaranteed. For example, while there is consensus that the internet led to productivity improvements, the effects of mobile phones and social media are more contested, and their impacts are more apparent in some industries (such as entertainment) than others. Productivity is not about doing things faster: The common narrative around AI and productivity is that AI automates mundane tasks, making us faster at doing things and giving us more time for creative pursuits. This, however, is a naive view of how work happens. Just because you can deal with your inbox more quickly doesn't mean you'll spend your afternoon on the beach. The more emails you fire off, the more you'll receive back, and the never-ending cycle continues. Faster isn't always better. Sometimes, we need to slow down to be more productive. That's when great ideas happen. Imagine a world in which AI isn't simply about speeding up tasks but proactively slows us down, to give us space to be more innovative, and more productive. That's the real untapped opportunity with AI. (The writer is from CSIRO, Canberra)
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Trump gives Russia 50-day deadline to broker peace deal with Ukraine: ‘…or 100% tariff, sanctions on nations buying oil'
Donald Trump said that US will likely impose a 100% tariff on Russia and threatened sanctions on buyers of Russian exports, including oil, if it does not end hostilities with Ukraine. But Trump's threat of sanctions came with a 50-day grace period, a move that was welcomed by investors in Russia where the rouble recovered from earlier losses and stock markets rose. 'We're going to be doing very severe tariffs if we don't have a deal in 50 days, tariffs at about 100%,' Trump said Monday during a meeting with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte at the White House. Trump said the levies would come in the form of 'secondary tariffs,' without providing details. On responding to the question if Trump was referring to a secondary sanctions, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said that sanctions and tariffs were 'both tools in his toolbox' and that 'you can do either one.' A White House official said Russia could face both measures if it fails to sign a ceasefire deal by early September. Trump's threat to impose so-called secondary sanctions on Russia, if carried out, would be a major shift in Western sanctions policy. Throughout the more than three-year-old war, Western countries have cut most of their own financial ties to Moscow, but have held back from taking steps that would restrict Russia from selling its oil elsewhere. That has allowed Moscow to continue earning hundreds of billions of dollars from shipping oil to buyers such as China and India. This comes a day after Trump said the US was sending a 'top-of-the-line weapons' package to Ukraine that includes Patriot air defense batteries. The president said that NATO member states will pay for the weapons to be sent to Ukraine. 'We're not buying it, but we will manufacture it,' Trump said. 'They're going to be paying for it.' Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said on Telegram he had spoken to Trump and "thanked him for his readiness to support Ukraine and to continue working together to stop the killings and establish a lasting and just peace." Zelensky held talks with Trump's envoy Keith Kellogg on Monday. (With inputs from Bloomberg and Reuters)
