After SC rap, UP says Banke Bihari Temple ordinance for better administration
Uttar Pradesh government
informed the
Supreme Court
on Tuesday that its objective for enacting an ordinance for
Banke Bihari Temple
trust was aimed at better administration of the religious place at Vrindavan in Mathura.
On August 4, the top court said it would keep in abeyance its May 15 nod to the ambitious scheme to develop the
Shri Banke Bihari Temple Corridor
at Vrindavan in Mathura for the benefit of devotees as key stakeholders were not heard.
Productivity Tool
Zero to Hero in Microsoft Excel: Complete Excel guide
By Metla Sudha Sekhar
View Program
Finance
Introduction to Technical Analysis & Candlestick Theory
By Dinesh Nagpal
View Program
Finance
Financial Literacy i e Lets Crack the Billionaire Code
By CA Rahul Gupta
View Program
Digital Marketing
Digital Marketing Masterclass by Neil Patel
By Neil Patel
View Program
Finance
Technical Analysis Demystified- A Complete Guide to Trading
By Kunal Patel
View Program
Productivity Tool
Excel Essentials to Expert: Your Complete Guide
By Study at home
View Program
Artificial Intelligence
AI For Business Professionals Batch 2
By Ansh Mehra
View Program
Appearing before a bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi, Additional Solicitor General KM Nataraj said the 2025 ordinance had nothing to do with the pending litigation of ownership of the temple administration.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Cardiologist Reveals: The Simple Morning Habit for a Flatter Belly After 50!
Lulutox
Undo
"Let me clarify at the outset that the ordinance has nothing to do with the pending writ petition. There was a PIL filed for better administration of the temple before the high court and directions were passed," Nataraj said.
He said the ordinance was issued for better administration of the temple which witnesses about two-three lakh devotees every week.
Live Events
The bench then told Nataraj that his arguments might be good, but could be made when the challenge to the ordinance is relegated to the high court.
Nataraj handed over the proposal of the state government to the bench, which upon examination was found to be the same as suggested by the court on August 4.
Senior advocate
Kapil Sibal
, appearing for the petitioners, urged the bench to be allowed to give a proposal and suggestions on the issue of administration of temple by August 8.
The petitioners have challenged the validity of Uttar Pradesh Shri Bankey Bihari Ji Temple Trust Ordinance, 2025, for reportedly taking over the management of the ancient temple and the recall of the top court's May 15 order.
On May 15, the top court allowed an impleadment application filed by the state while paving the way for a Uttar Pradesh government scheme to develop the corridor.
It allowed the state's plea to utilise the funds of the Banke Bihari temple only for the purchase of a five-acre land around the temple to create a holding area.
The top court, however, said the land to be acquired for the purposes of development of the temple and the corridor should be in the name of the deity or the trust.
The bench posted the matter for August 8 while allowing the petitioners to give their suggestions on the issue.
On August 4, the bench deprecated the approach of the state government in moving the court in "clandestine manner" and questioned the hurry for enacting an ordinance.
The top court has said that it would appoint an interim committee headed by a retired high court or district judge to manage the affairs of the temple in the interest of lakhs of devotees besides including the main stakeholders in the managing committee.
It asked Nataraj to seek instruction and submit a proposal for administration of the temple and clarified that the court was at present not adjudicating the constitutionality of the ordinance and the high court will look into it.
The plea before the bench, filed through advocate Tanvi Dubey, of the management committee of the Thakur Shree Banke Bihari Ji Maharaj Temple in Mathura, challenges the ordinance, which vested the control of the shrine's administration with the state.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
a few seconds ago
- New Indian Express
Governor RN Ravi reserves Kalaignar University Bill for President's assent, delays new varsity launch
CHENNAI: Governor RN Ravi has reserved the Kalaignar University Bill, passed by the legislative assembly to form a new university in Kumbakonam with the chief minister as chancellor, for the President's consideration. 'The governor has not given immediate assent to the bill but has instead, referred it to the President for a decision. This will further delay the process of formation of the university as we have to wait for the President's reply, ' said a higher education official. The President can either give assent, withhold assent, or return the bill for state government had announced the new university in the name of former Chief Minister M Karunanidhi in Kumbakonam in this year's budget. The bill proposed that the chief minister (presently MK Stalin) will be the chancellor of the university and the higher education minister would be the pro-chancellor. The bill was moved in the legislative Assembly in April this year and later sent to governor for his assent. Chezhiaan had announced that the university would start functioning from academic year 2025-26 only, however due to delay in governor's assent the department could not inaugurate the varsity, said a higher education official. Stalin and higher education minister Govi Chezhian had expressed their displeasure, claiming the governor had been sitting on the bill for three months and that the government was considering moving the SC again. The Supreme Court's landmark judgment in April approved 10 amendment bills that curtailed the governor's powers to appoint V-Cs in 18 of the 20 state-run universities. However, another bill to amend the University of Madras Act is also pending President's approval. Apart from approving the bills, the SC also set a timeline for governors to act on bills.
New Indian Express
a few seconds ago
- New Indian Express
Madras HC directs TN to decide on horizontal reservation for transgender, intersex persons
CHENNAI: Appreciating the Tamil Nadu government for the implementation of the Tamil Nadu State Policy for Transgender Persons, 2025, the Madras High Court has directed the state to take a decision on the request from the community for horizontal reservation in education and employment. The direction was given by Justice N Anand Venkatesh in an order passed on a petition on Monday. He pointed to Clause 3.7 of the policy which uses the term 'Right to Representation in Employment and Educational Institution'. It is not clear as to whether the government wants to provide horizontal reservation to the transgender and intersex persons as it has always been the request made by the community and has been reflected in many of the earlier orders passed by the various courts, he said. 'Hence, the state government is directed to take a decision in this regard so that the transgender and intersex persons need not knock the doors of this court every time and seek for reservation in public employment and educational institutions,' the judge added. Referring to the constitution of district level committees, the judge asked the state government to ensure representation of at least one transwoman, transman and intersex person in the committee for its effective functioning, and instructed the government to make necessary modifications in this regard. The judge said though marriages of transgender and intersex persons are already recognised by the Supreme Court, the real challenge is faced when registrations of such marriages are sought. Hence, the state government must issue necessary directions to the registrars about the legal sanction of these marriages, he added.
Hindustan Times
a few seconds ago
- Hindustan Times
Interim panel to oversee daily functioning of Mathura temple
The Uttar Pradesh government on Tuesday agreed to a Supreme Court proposal to set up an interim management committee to oversee the daily functioning of the Bankey Bihari temple in Mathura. The arrangement will remain in place while the legality of the state's ordinance to take over the temple's administration is decided by the Allahabad high court. The SC proposal had come from a bench of justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi on Monday when the court expressed concern over the deadlock between the state and the current temple managing committee. (Sonu Mehta/HT PHOTO) The proposal had come from a bench of justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi on Monday when the court expressed concern over the deadlock between the state and the current temple managing committee. It suggested that a retired high court judge head the interim panel and sought suggestions from all stakeholders on the panel's composition. On Tuesday, the UP government, represented by additional solicitor general (ASG) KM Nataraj, submitted a formal response supporting the court's idea. The state said it had 'no objection' to the formation of such a committee and agreed that it should be allowed access to temple funds to begin work on a planned temple corridor. Drawing parallels with the Kashi Vishwanath Temple redevelopment, the state reiterated its commitment to providing financial support for the Bankey Bihari temple's development in partnership with the temple authorities. The state proposed an eight-member panel led by a retired high court judge who is a Sanatan Hindu from the Vaishnav sect. Other suggested members would include the Mathura civil judge, district collector, senior superintendent of police, municipal commissioner, vice-chairman of the Mathura-Vrindavan Development Authority, principal secretary (temple affairs), and a representative of the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI). The bench reserved its final decision on the composition, even as it has given other parties, including the temple's managing committee and members of the Goswami community, until August 9 (when the matter will be heard next) to submit their views and suggest names for the retired judge. The background to the dispute is the UP government's ordinance 'Uttar Pradesh Shri Bankey Bihari Ji Temple Trust Ordinance, 2025' issued in May. The ordinance replaces the current temple management, primarily comprising the Goswami community, with an 18-member state-controlled trust, including 7 ex-officio government members. The Goswami sect claims it has managed the temple for over 500 years under a judicial decree from 1939 and sees the ordinance as a move to displace them. The ordinance and an earlier Supreme Court order allowing the use of temple funds for development are both under challenge by the temple committee. In court on Tuesday, ASG Nataraj defended the ordinance, saying it aimed to improve temple infrastructure and protect public safety. He said the government wanted to build a corridor around the temple to manage growing footfall, without infringing on the religious rights of devotees. The plan involves using about ₹200 crore from the temple's own funds and ₹5 crore from the state for land purchases and development, keeping ownership with the deity. The ordinance followed a November 2023 Allahabad high court order directing better facilities at the temple after a stampede in August 2022 during Janmashtami left two dead. The court had allowed development but restricted the use of temple funds for land purchase. The state later secured Supreme Court permission to use temple funds. The government says the temple, over 160 years old and occupying just 1,200 sq ft, is unable to safely handle the daily footfall of 40,000-50,000 devotees, which surges to over 500,000 during festivals. Meanwhile, the Goswami community continues to oppose the ordinance, calling it a violation of their customary rights and a backdoor attempt to seize control of temple assets. They have promised to submit names and suggestions for the interim committee at the next hearing.
