Americans spent and earned less in May as trade war bites
Amid Stagflation Watch 2025, the latest data dump shows a little more stag-, but no real sign of -flation.
Why it matters: Mainstream economic forecasts see the trade war leading to both higher prices and more sluggish growth.
In May spending and income data out Friday morning, there is more reason to worry about the latter than the former.
By the numbers: The Personal Consumption Expenditures price index targeted by the Fed rose a mere 0.1% in May, with the core gauge — excluding food and energy prices — up 0.2 %.
While core inflation ticked up to 2.7% year-over-year in May, it has risen at only a 1.7% annualized pace over the last three months. That's the lowest since December 2023, and fully consistent with the Fed's 2% inflation target.
Tariff-driven inflation remains the dog that won't bite.
State of play: The worrying aspects of the report weren't on the inflation side of the ledger, but in what Americans are earning and spending.
Adjusted for inflation, consumer spending fell 0.3% after rising by 0.1% in April.
Real disposable income declined by 0.7% last month, the first time since last August that inflation outstripped pay growth.
The new numbers brought Atlanta Fed's GDPNow tracker down to an estimate of 2.9% GDP growth rate in Q2, from 3.4%.
What they're saying: "Consumers cut back on outlays last month, making fewer discretionary purchases as they grapple with softer labor market conditions, increased financial uncertainty and the onset of tariff-induced price increases," wrote EY-Parthenon senior economist Lydia Boussour in a note.
Reality check: The drops in consumption spending and incomes can be at least partly chalked up to one-off events, instead of outright evidence of an economic slowdown.
Consumers are easing spending after a springtime splurge on all sorts of goods, aimed at getting ahead of tariff-related price increases. For instance, the biggest drag on spending was goods, autos in particular — a category that was a key beneficiary of spending earlier in the year.
The drop in personal income came after a spike in recent months, including a 0.7% jump in April alone from a payout of social benefits for teachers, firefighters and police officers, related to recent legislation. Now it is wearing off.
Yes, but: It's clear that the economy had less momentum coming into the second quarter than initially believed.
Revisions out Thursday showed the economy weakened at a faster pace in the first quarter, in part due to a slower rate of consumer spending.
Economic policymakers were reassured that underlying measures of growth held up as tariff front-loading weighed on the headline figure.
But those measures were also revised lower: Real final sales to private domestic purchasers, the sum of consumer spending and investment, rose 1.9% in the first quarter — down 0.6 percentage point from the previous estimate and well below the 3% figure first reported.
Minneapolis Fed president Neel Kashkari pondered Friday how tariffs are likely to impact consumer prices — and why there's so little sign of it in the data so far.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
31 minutes ago
- CNBC
Gas prices are expected to fall: ‘It's going to be the cheapest summer since 2021,' one expert says
As Americans gear up for summer travel, prices at the pump may be cooling off. This summer could bring the lowest gas prices in years, and the national average price of gas could fall below $3 a gallon as early as September, says Patrick De Haan, head of petroleum analysis at GasBuddy. "It's going to be the cheapest summer since 2021, when the economy was heavily influenced by Covid," De Haan says. As of Tuesday, the national average for a gallon of gas in the U.S. was $3.21, up roughly 10 cents from two weeks ago, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. The spike was largely driven by a jump in oil prices due to the Israel-Iran conflict in the Middle East, but now that both countries have agreed to a ceasefire, De Haan says he expects prices to steeply fall and then resume their "slow decline" over the course of the summer. Typically, gas prices tend to drop throughout the summer due to various factors that increase the supply of gas, De Haan says. That includes jolts to gas prices from the switch to a more expensive summer blend of gasoline leveling off, refineries increasing production and consumer demand softening after early summer travel peaks. "Obviously the Middle East situation is an exception, but now that this is, seemingly for now, in de-escalation, gas prices should resume their slow decline over the course of the summer," De Haan says. Adjusted for inflation, gas prices are near the lowest levels we've seen in the last 20 years, De Haan says. The typical American uses about 3% of their income to fill up their tank every year, De Haan says, whether it's with gasoline or diesel. Due to rising incomes, "Americans are actually spending far less of their income on energy than they have in quite some time," De Haan says. Year over year, the price of gas is down 12%, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics' most recent Consumer Price Index report released earlier in June. This is largely due to fears that the U.S. economy is slowing down and an increase in supply of oil from a group of oil-producing nations known OPEC+, CNBC reported in May. Ultimately, De Haan says it's important to remember that most shocks will be temporary. The price of gas is mostly determined by the market for oil, which is constantly reacting to global events — so just as quickly as prices rise, they will often fall once the disruption passes. "Every event that's ever affected us from a pipeline outage … to major hurricanes that impact gas prices, all these events are temporary," De Haan says. "The world is changing every day. It's not always for the worst."
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Credit card rewards are slowly becoming way less rewarding — what's behind that distressing trend
Credit cards are popular with Americans — and so are the points, rewards and perks that come with them. That's why some Americans devote time and energy (and spending) to optimize multiple rewards programs and claim rewards they wouldn't otherwise be able to afford, such as flying business class. The number of credit card accounts in the U.S. has increased steadily over the past 15 years; in 2023, 82% of adults had a credit card. About half of cardholders carry a balance and, in the first quarter of 2025, Americans were carrying a near-record total of $1.18 trillion in credit card balances. But economic uncertainty and pending legislation are about to change the rewards landscape — and not for the better. I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it Rewards have played a part in the growth of credit cards (and debt) by helping credit card providers attract and retain customers. 'The reward point functions as an alternative currency with real economic value, yet it continues to carry aspirational and emotional significance,' So Yeon Chun, an associate professor of technology and operations management at INSEAD, recently told Business Insider. 'In other words,' he said, 'rewards have become a dual-purpose behavioral currency: A tool for economic relief and a channel for emotional and symbolic value.' Redeeming rewards 'can have an outsize effect on satisfaction' on cash-strapped consumers, according to Bain & Company. A few years ago, rewards redemption was a 'routine episode, or interaction that fulfills a need, unlikely to faze customers,' according to the global management consulting firm. 'But it has since become a 'moment of truth' — an episode with a high likelihood to delight or annoy, depending on how well the credit card provider executes the end-to-end process.' At the same time, rewards have economic value that consumers are using to make day-to-day purchases and cover necessities. 'Most consumers, including middle-income earners, now use rewards not just to manage spending, inflation or debt, but also to preserve lifestyle,' Chun told Business Insider. Consumers had amassed reward balances of more than $33 billion by the end of 2022, according to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). And those rewards are 'incredibly popular,' according to the Ipsos Consumer Tracker, summing up the results of a 2024 poll. Seventy-one percent of Americans have a rewards or cashback credit card, and about one in five younger Americans (ages 18-34) use the rewards for experiences they 'couldn't afford otherwise.' But it also found that over a third of respondents said they wouldn't spend as much on their credit cards if rewards weren't offered. Read more: You don't have to be a millionaire to gain access to . In fact, you can get started with as little as $10 — here's how Despite their popularity, economic headwinds may cause a reduction or restructuring of rewards programs similar to what happened during the Great Recession, when 0% balance transfer programs were cut back dramatically. While economic prognosticators disagree as to how likely we are to enter a recession in the near term, continued near-record levels of economic policy uncertainty are having much the same effect on business decisions as a recession. For instance, airline reward programs have already started to lose value — and other perks may soon follow. 'In the more typical downturn, we are likely to see a different kind of shift. Issuers will preserve the appearance of program stability while quietly reducing average value,' Chun told Business Insider. 'Redemption thresholds may rise, expiration timelines may tighten, bonus categories may rotate more frequently, and access to high-value redemptions will become more conditional.' Even more concerning to consumers who've racked up rewards, those programs may disappear altogether in the U.S. — despite their popularity. Senator Dick Durbin, a Democrat from Illinois, and Sen. Roger Marshall, a Republican from Kansas, are driving efforts to move the Credit Card Competition Act through Congress. The bill would reduce interchange fees, which are the fees charged to merchants that allow them to accept credit cards. These fees are a source of revenue for credit card companies and help to fund rewards programs. Some major airlines have already warned that if the legislation passes, frequent flyer programs could disappear. At the same time, credit card providers can devalue your rewards at any time (which can also happen naturally with inflation) — so accumulating and hoarding points may not be in your best interest. This tiny hot Costco item has skyrocketed 74% in price in under 2 years — but now the retail giant is restricting purchases. Here's how to buy the coveted asset in bulk Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Senators prep for a weekend of work to meet Trump's deadline for passing his tax and spending cuts
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate is expected to grind through a rare weekend session as Republicans race to pass President Donald Trump's package of tax breaks and spending cuts by his July Fourth deadline. Republicans are using their majorities in Congress to push aside Democratic opposition, but they have run into a series of political and policy setbacks. Not all GOP lawmakers are on board with proposals to reduce spending on Medicaid, food stamps and other programs as a way to help cover the cost of extending some $3.8 trillion in Trump tax breaks. The 940-page bill was released shortly before midnight Friday. Senators were expected to take a procedural vote Saturday to begin debate on the legislation, but the timing was uncertain and there is a long path ahead, with at least 10 hours of debate time and an all-night voting session on countless amendments. Senate passage could be days away, and the bill would need to return to the House for a final round of votes before it could reach the White House. 'It's evolving,' said Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., as he prepared to close up the chamber late Friday. The weekend session could be a make-or-break moment for Trump's party, which has invested much of its political capital on his signature domestic policy plan. Trump is pushing Congress to wrap it up, even as he sometimes gives mixed signals, allowing for more time. At recent events at the White House, including Friday, Trump has admonished the 'grandstanders' among GOP holdouts to fall in line. 'We can get it done,' Trump said in a social media post. 'It will be a wonderful Celebration for our Country.' The legislation is an ambitious but complicated series of GOP priorities. At its core, it would make permanent many of the tax breaks from Trump's first term that would otherwise expire by year's end if Congress fails to act, resulting in a potential tax increase on Americans. The bill would add new breaks, including no taxes on tips, and commit $350 billion to national security, including for Trump's mass deportation agenda. But the spending cuts that Republicans are relying on to offset the lost tax revenues are causing dissent within the GOP ranks. Some lawmakers say the cuts go too far, particularly for people receiving health care through Medicaid. Meanwhile, conservatives, worried about the nation's debt, are pushing for steeper cuts. Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., said he is concerned about the fundamentals of the package and will not support the procedural motion to begin debate. 'I'm voting no on the motion to proceed,' he said. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., pushing for deeper cuts, said he needed to see the final legislative text. The release of that draft had been delayed as the Senate parliamentarian reviewed the bill to ensure it complied with the chamber's strict 'Byrd Rule,' named for the late Sen. Robert C. Byrd, It largely bars policy matters from inclusion in budget bills unless a provision can get 60 votes to overcome objections. That would be a tall order in a Senate with a 53-47 GOP edge and Democrats unified against Trump's bill. Republicans suffered a series of setbacks after several proposals were determined to be out of compliance by the chief arbiter of the Senate's rules. One plan would have shifted some food stamp costs from the federal government to the states; a second would have gutted the funding structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. But over the past days, Republicans have quickly revised those proposals and reinstated them. The final text includes a proposal for cuts to a Medicaid provider tax that had run into parliamentary objections and opposition from several senators worried about the fate of rural hospitals. The new version extends the start date for those cuts and establishes a $25 billion fund to aid rural hospitals and providers. Most states impose the provider tax as a way to boost federal Medicaid reimbursements. Some Republicans argue that is a scam and should be abolished. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has said that under the House-passed version of the bill, some 10.9 million more people would go without health care and at least 3 million fewer would qualify for food aid. The CBO has not yet publicly assessed the Senate draft, which proposes steeper reductions. Top income-earners would see about a $12,000 tax cut under the House bill, while the poorest Americans would face a $1,600 tax increase, the CBO said. One unresolved issue remains the so-called SALT provision, a deduction for state and local taxes that has been a top priority of lawmakers from New York and other high-tax states. The cap is now $10,000. The White House and House Republicans had narrowed in on a plan for a $40,000 cap, but for five years instead of 10. Republican senators says that's too generous. At least one House GOP holdout, Rep. Nick LaLota of New York, said he cannot support the compromise. 'There's no good reason for Republicans to chase a silly deadline,' Schumer said. House Speaker Mike Johnson, who sent his colleagues home for the weekend with plans to be on call to return to Washington, said they are 'very close' to finishing up. 'We would still like to meet that July Fourth, self-imposed deadline,' said Johnson, R-La. With the narrow Republicans majorities in the House and Senate, leaders need almost every lawmaker on board to ensure passage. Johnson and Thune have stayed close to the White House, relying on Trump to pressure holdout lawmakers.
