logo
Diddy jury reaches verdict on all counts in sex trafficking, racketeering trial

Diddy jury reaches verdict on all counts in sex trafficking, racketeering trial

Fox News4 days ago
The jury in Sean "Diddy" Combs' sex trafficking and racketeering trial reached a verdict on all counts Wednesday.
Diddy returned to the courtroom wearing another beige sweater while the jury continued deliberating. He hugged his lawyers and waved to his mother and a supporter who was whispering, "Hi Diddy" to him. The rapper also made the heart symbol with his hand.
Combs then spoke to the court marshals briefly before standing and facing his family. He said a brief prayer, asking God to watch over his family and bless the jurors. The family all bowed their heads and said "amen" when Diddy finished. The family then clapped.
On Tuesday, after nearly 14 hours of deliberation, the jury revealed they had reached a verdict on four of the five counts Diddy faces.
The jury indicated they couldn't reach a unanimous decision on the racketeering charge, one of the most serious counts against the disgraced music mogul. A federal RICO violation can result in a 20-year sentence. The transportation to engage in prostitution charge could carry a sentence of up to 10 years, while sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion may carry a 20-year sentence.
After receiving the fourth note of substance from the jury, the court directed them to continue deliberating on the racketeering conspiracy. The jury was brought out and a portion of the instructions were re-read by Judge Arun Subramanian.
When the jury was brought back into the courtroom, the judge asked them to keep deliberating, saying it is their duty to discuss among themselves and form opinions. Judge Subramanian said the jurors must reach a unanimous verdict, but must not give up their convictions merely to return a verdict or satisfy the rest of the jurors. The jury was then dismissed back to the jury room.
WATCH: CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEY 'NOT SURPRISED' BY PARTIAL VERDICT IN DIDDY TRIAL
Jurors began deliberating on Monday, June 30, after hearing seven weeks of trial testimony. The prosecution chose to rest the case on June 24. Special Agent Joseph Cerciello was the final witness to take the stand for the prosecution, making him the 34th person to testify. Diddy's defense called no witnesses.
Diddy pleaded not guilty to charges of racketeering, sex trafficking and transportation to engage in prostitution. The disgraced music mogul was arrested in September 2024, months after Homeland Security Investigations raided the Los Angeles and Miami homes of the rapper.
During closing arguments, Diddy's attorney, Marc Agnifilo, insisted the rapper was innocent. He noted that it takes courage for a juror to acquit. "Return him to his family who have been waiting for him."
He also accused the prosecution of bringing a "fake trial" against Diddy, claiming the government went after his "private sex life."
According to his lawyer, none of the prosecution witnesses testified to engaging in racketeering. Agnifilo pointed out the disgraced music mogul's former employees all described working for him as hard, but also said it was like "going to Harvard Business School."
Before the defense's closing arguments, the government explained how the trial testimony proved each charge against Diddy – two counts of sex trafficking, racketeering and two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution – over the course of roughly four hours.
The government emphasized in their argument that Diddy ran an alleged criminal enterprise with full control. The prosecution pointed out that the jury heard testimony, saw texts, viewed bank records and heard audio allegedly showing the "Last Night" rapper committing crime after crime for decades.
Prosecutors argued the disgraced music mogul used his inner circle, money and influence to cover up the alleged crimes he committed.
"Over the last several weeks, you've learned a lot about Sean Combs," Slavik said at the start of closing statements. "He's a leader of a criminal enterprise. He doesn't take no for an answer."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jennifer Aniston teases ‘emotional' season four of The Morning Show
Jennifer Aniston teases ‘emotional' season four of The Morning Show

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Jennifer Aniston teases ‘emotional' season four of The Morning Show

Jennifer Aniston has revealed the plot of the forthcoming fourth season of The Morning Show will be 'complicated'. The 56-year-old stars in the Apple TV+ drama, which follows a fictional breakfast show in the aftermath of a prominent news anchor being hit with a series of allegations, alongside Reese Witherspoon, Billy Crudup and Julianna Margulies. Aniston – who plays the TV anchor Alex Levy on the show alongside executive producing the series with co-star Witherspoon – told People that The Morning Show 'is just a beast to film'. 'It is layered, it's complicated, it's emotional, it hits on a lot of topics and current events, so let's just say, it's not Friends,' she added, referencing the Nineties show in which she played Rachel Green from 1994 to 2004. She continued: 'We're involved in every single aspect of the show, on top of just the performance side, which is a big piece of it. But I've got incredible support, and we have such an incredible team.' Season four of The Morning Show finished shooting in December last year, according to a post from Witherspoon's media company, Hello Sunshine. 'And that's a wrap on Season 4 of #TheMorningShow!' it read. 'Thank you to our incredible cast and crew for bringing this season to life. We can't wait for you all to see what's in store on @AppleTV!' Season three of The Morning show saw a romance begin between Aniston's Alex and the space tech billionaire Paul Marks, played by Jon Hamm. Elsewhere, Witherspoon's Bradley attempted to salvage her reputation as a journalist after she chose not to reveal video evidence of her brother taking part in the insurrection at the US Capitol. Speaking to Deadline, showrunner Charlotte Stoudt said the next season of the show would explore deepfakes and artificial intelligence. 'We blew everything up last year with the biggest bomb we could possibly build,' she said. 'So, we have to ask ourselves how is the band going to get back together, and what will that look like? 'We get into the world of deepfakes and AI and the misinformation in the fog of war that we're seeing now in the Middle East and stuff. 'We're looking at who can trust. And can you trust what you're seeing? Can you trust yourself? Can you trust your news outlet?' The Morning Show returns for season four on Wednesday, 17 September on Apple TV+

Husband Says He Doesn't Want Wife Using Baby Name He 'Secretly' Hates Because It Sounds Like a 'Forest Fairy'
Husband Says He Doesn't Want Wife Using Baby Name He 'Secretly' Hates Because It Sounds Like a 'Forest Fairy'

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Husband Says He Doesn't Want Wife Using Baby Name He 'Secretly' Hates Because It Sounds Like a 'Forest Fairy'

A man says he "hates" the name his wife wants to use for their future child, but waited so long to tell her that she is now mad In a post on Reddit, he writes that he held off on telling the woman he dislikes the name, "because I didn't want to kill her vibe" But now, he feels he has to offer up his opinion, adding, "I want our daughter to have a name that'll command respect in a boardroom, not at a Renaissance Faire"A man says he "secretly hates" the name his wife wants to use for their future child, writing in a Reddit post that the name sounds like something out of a "Renaissance Faire." "We've both been throwing around names for a while, but there's one she's been dead set on ever since we found out we were having a girl: 'Elowyn,' " the anonymous 35-year-old writes in the post. "She says it's 'magical and lyrical' and reminds her of a forest fairy or something." He continues: "I've been nodding along because I didn't want to kill her vibe, pregnancy hormones and all, but honestly, I can't stand it. It sounds like a name someone would give their Dungeons & Dragons character. I want our daughter to have a name that'll command respect in a boardroom, not at a Renaissance Faire." He writes that last week, he finally told his wife that he isn't comfortable with the name. "I suggested alternatives that are still beautiful but more grounded (like Claire or Julia), and she got really upset. She accused me of 'waiting too long' to say something and said I'd been 'deceptive.' I told her I was trying to be supportive and avoid unnecessary stress, but that this is my child too," he writes. Now, his wife isn't speaking to him, other than to say she is 'mourning" the name. "I get that pregnancy is emotional, but that feels a bit theatrical to me," he writes. "I told her we still have 21 weeks to decide and that maybe this is a sign to keep looking." He then asks if he's wrong "for holding my ground and not wanting to name my daughter something that sounds like a Tolkien side character?" Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. While many commenters agree that the name is not their favorite, some are also chiding the man for not being honest sooner. "Why would you not just be honest from the beginning? That makes no sense to hide your feelings from your partner, especially about something they seem dead set on and you are adamantly against," wrote one. Added another commenter: "Naming a baby is like making one: both parties need to agree or it shouldn't happen. The best time to say no might have been earlier, but the second best time is right now. Both are infinitely preferable to never." Read the original article on People

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store