
Insight: Rare earth magnet users jolted into paying premium prices for ex-China supply
But after April 4, when Beijing imposed new restrictions on the super-strong magnets used in electric vehicles and wind turbines, Suleman retired his sales pitch. He didn't need it any more.
Ever since China's export controls tightened some rare earth exports to a trickle in the midst of a trade war with the U.S., causing chaos in supply chains and some auto plant shutdowns, "the phone is ringing off the hook", said Suleman.
Companies starting new plants in Europe, the U.S. and Asia had previously reported difficult talks on deals that embedded the higher costs to make magnets outside China, which benefits from cheaper labour costs and economies of scale as well as government support via tax refunds.
But the crisis has led many customers to soften or drop objections about paying those premiums as they scramble to hammer out deals, according to a dozen industry participants including automakers, magnet makers, rare earth producers, consultants and government officials interviewed by Reuters.
While rare earths magnets from China are beginning to flow again, customers remain on edge about the threat of future shortages.
Suleman's company, Neo Performance Materials (NEO.TO), opens new tab, launched output of permanent magnets at its Estonia plant in May. Now, he said, "everybody wants to talk about how (they can) satisfy their demand out of our facility".
He said he has no worries about lining up enough customers who will pay a premium - $10 to $30 per kg, with EVs typically holding 2-4 kg of magnets per vehicle - over the price they usually pay for Chinese magnets.
Output at Neo's factory in Estonia is starting small, providing samples to its first customer, which Suleman declined to identify. German auto parts supplier Schaeffler (SHAn.DE), opens new tab told Reuters it is a customer of the plant, but declined to comment on how much it is paying.
In Korea, customers of NovaTech (285490.KQ), opens new tab, which produces magnets in China, are prepared to pay 15% to 20% more for magnets made in Vietnam, a company source told Reuters, adding there was "a growing sense of crisis among customers".
The company, which sells China-made magnets used in Samsung's phones and tablets, is investing at least 10 billion won ($7.39 million) in a plant in Vietnam launching early next year to make magnets using locally processed rare earths from a partner, the person and another company official told Reuters.
Britain's Less Common Metals, one of the few firms outside China involved in a key step of rare earths processing - making rare earth metals and alloys - says it is battling to cope with new enquiries.
"Now, post-April 4, it's like someone stuck a cattle prod into the whole industry," said Grant Smith, its majority owner and chairman.
He said LCM has held discussions with numerous companies that use magnets as they seek alternative supply sources, though he declined to name them. The firm now has plans to expand into France and other countries.
Despite the new willingness to pay a premium, it will take many years or even decades to build up production outside of China, which accounts for 90% of global permanent magnet supply, industry participants said.
And the question of how much more should be paid for rare earths and magnets outside of China is a tricky one.
Too high a premium for mined rare earths could see consumers cutting down their use, while premiums that are too low would not be enough to allow for construction of ex-China projects, analysts and consultants say.
Automakers are willing to pay more to guarantee ex-China supplies, but they are also in the midst of an EV price war that has left them with razor-thin margins, and will still be queasy at what they regard as excessive premiums, according to industry participants.
One executive at a rare earths company said their firm has held discussions with automakers that are prepared to pay $80 per kg for neodymium-praseodymium oxide (NdPr), a rare earth needed for magnets used in motors and generators - a figure Reuters has not independently verified.
That is already a significant - near 30% - premium over the Chinese price of $62 based on data from price reporting agency Fastmarkets.
"The purchasing departments have it in their DNA to save each cent or fraction of a cent, but things are changing," said the executive, who declined to be identified because he is not authorised to speak to the media.
"They're realising they're losing more by having to close a plant for a month than paying a premium to guarantee supplies.'
Critical minerals consultancy Project Blue says that for NdPr, a price of $75 to $105 per kg is needed to support enough production to meet demand.
Australia's Barrenjoey goes further, saying NdPr prices need to be $120 to $180 per kg to fund a substantial wave of production that would encompass around 20 global mining projects.
One executive at a European automaker said his industry could not afford to pay excessive premiums. His company has agreed deals for other critical minerals at a 5% to 10% premium, based on certification they are produced sustainably, he said.
His company sold cars globally, he said, and could not make a profit if it had to pay a high premium for all the raw materials produced outside of China.
Some automakers, such as BMW (BMWG.DE), opens new tab, have developed EVs that do not use rare earths, while others have reduced the amount of rare earths in their vehicles. However, getting rid of rare earths is not feasible in the medium term, analysts say.
Neo's Suleman said everyone in the industry had to work together to create a supply of rare earths outside China.
"I don't think that we're looking at this and saying the floodgates are open, let's just charge whatever we want, we need to be responsible," he said.
"Customers understand there is a premium that is required, but if that premium gets too big, we're looking at demand destruction."
($1 = 1,353.6800 won)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
37 minutes ago
- The Independent
China issues fresh warning over Trump's trade war
Chinese vice president Han Zheng warned against tariff and trade wars, stating there would be no winners, as Beijing and Washington intensify efforts to resolve their disputes. The Chinese commerce ministry expressed hope that the US would continue to meet it halfway to maintain stable bilateral trade and economic relations, which were impacted by tariffs imposed by Donald Trump. China had retaliated against tariffs by suspending exports of critical minerals and magnets but committed to removing these restrictions during trade talks in Geneva. A breakthrough occurred in London, where both sides agreed on a framework to implement the Geneva agreement, leading to the US lifting some restrictive measures against China. While a trade truce means China avoids higher levies after the pause on Donald Trump's tariffs ends, experts suggest his trade deals with other countries might still indirectly target China .


Times
38 minutes ago
- Times
Mike Ashley's Frasers Group warns Hugo Boss over dividends
Frasers Group has warned Hugo Boss that it will vote against any future dividend payments, stepping up boardroom pressure on the German fashion house in which it owns a significant stake. The billionaire Mike Ashley's retail group considers Hugo Boss shares to be undervalued and argues that the company should prioritise increasing its market valuation over returning cash to shareholders. 'Frasers Group does not agree with Hugo Boss's current dividend policy and believes Hugo Boss should not pay any dividend at this time,' the company said. Hugo Boss products are sold by Frasers in stores and online HUGO BOSS 'The retained cash could then be used by Hugo Boss for other value-enhancing measures within the business which would better support Hugo Boss's long-term growth and financial flexibility. Therefore, if necessary, Frasers group intends to vote against any proposed dividend.'


Reuters
42 minutes ago
- Reuters
Markets' 90-day tariff pause rollercoaster nears an uncertain end
GDANSK/LONDON, July 4 (Reuters) - The deadline U.S. President Donald Trump set for major trading partners to strike deals with Washington or face hefty tariffs expires next week, bringing to a close 90 days of volatility but leaving global investors in the dark over what will happen next. Trump's propensity to issue a threat, or impose a new tariff, only to reverse course shortly afterwards has led to turmoil over the past three months. Investors, however, have now become somewhat inured to this sort of policymaking on the fly. And, as a result, there is little evidence at this point that many are preparing for fireworks on July 9. Instead, most expect some kind of delay, pause or compromise. What that will look like, however, is anyone's guess. Here is a snapshot of where major markets are now, relative to where they were when Trump dropped his initial tariffs bombshell on April 2: Global stock markets have staged a strong recovery following the intense volatility triggered by Trump's tariff announcement. The MSCI World index (.MIWD00000PUS), opens new tab, which fell 10% between April 2 and April 9, the day Trump paused the tariffs, has hit successive record highs and gained over 11% since the original "Liberation Day" announcement. Global equities got another boost in May, when the U.S. and China reached a temporary truce, pausing many tariffs for another 90 days. Geopolitical tensions, including Israel's recent strikes on Iran and Washington's subsequent bombing of Iranian nuclear sites, briefly reined in sentiment but have not derailed the broader rally. The S&P 500 (.SPX), opens new tab, which had lagged other major equity markets earlier in the year, has closed those gaps, gaining over 10% since April 2, and is neck and neck with the MSCI all-country index, which excludes the United States (.MIWU00000PUS), opens new tab. There's an important caveat, however. The S&P has only hit record highs in dollar terms. The weakness in the U.S. currency has eroded the returns for overseas investors. In euro or Swiss franc terms, for example, the index is still about 10% below February's record high, while in pounds, it's 7% below the sterling-denominated peak. The U.S. dollar, widely regarded as the world's most powerful and stable currency, has suffered a knock to its reputation from Trump's tariffs and the subsequent 90-day pause. The dollar index , which reflects the U.S. currency's performance against a basket of six others including the euro and the Japanese yen, suffered its worst first half of the year since 1973, declining by approximately 11%. It has fallen by 6.6% since April 2 alone. Against the currencies of some of the United States' biggest trading partners, the decline has been even more marked. It has lost some 8% against the euro and the Mexican peso since then and 5% against the Canadian dollar . Vincent Mortier, the CIO of Europe's largest asset manager Amundi, said the euro has plenty more room to run, especially as U.S. debt worries are also driving the dollar down. "I won't be surprised if by the end of next year we start to revisit the $1.30 level," he said, highlighting that at its 2008 peak, the euro got as high as $1.60. European shares have more than recovered losses suffered since Trump's "Liberation Day". But strength in the euro and anxiety over tariffs have kept them below March's record highs. Large exporting sectors such as pharma and autos, which make up around one-third of EU exports to the United States, have rebounded too, but have been more volatile. Brussels is reportedly open to a U.S. deal that would apply a universal 10% tariff on many of its exports, something several investors would view favourably should it be confirmed. Citi said markets risk being caught offside if tariffs are reimposed at 20% or reach 50%. "Trump is truly unpredictable, but if it's really around 10%, I think the markets will react very well," said Carlo Franchini, head of institutional clients at Banca Ifigest. The impact of the trade talks extends beyond Europe, however, with automakers in Japan also being watched. Citi's base case is for a sustained 25% tariff, while a surprise cut to 10% could unlock a 50% upside for Japanese auto stocks. Gold has featured as the hedge of choice against an array of risks, from tariff-induced inflation, to geopolitical risk and a shift away from the U.S. dollar. The price has hit record after record, rising 26% so far this year to around $3,330 an ounce. Gold has eclipsed bitcoin , which has gained about 14% year to date, and even Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab, the maker of chips that power AI capabilities, whose shares went parabolic last year and have risen about 18% this year. Since April 2, gold's ascent has gathered pace, fuelled by purchases from central banks, fund managers and even individuals. A survey by UBS Asset Management this week showed 39% of respondents said they planned to increase their gold holdings, compared with 15% last year. The independence of the Federal Reserve - whose chair, Jerome Powell, Trump has berated repeatedly for not cutting interest rates fast enough - is one of the key concerns cited in the survey.