logo
Victorian government to change state's Working with Children Check system

Victorian government to change state's Working with Children Check system

The Victorian government will strengthen its Working with Children Check laws, but the first change will not come into effect until August, the ABC can reveal.
Warning: This story contains details of alleged child sex abuse that may distress some audience members.
On Tuesday, Victoria Police announced a childcare worker in Melbourne's south-west had been charged with more than 70 offences, including sexual assault and producing child abuse material, related to eight alleged victims at the Creative Garden childcare centre in Point Cook.
Police said the accused, who had worked for about 20 childcare centres over about eight years, held a valid Working with Children Check (WWCC).
The ABC understands the Department of Government Services (DGS) recently completed an "initial review" of Victoria's Working with Children scheme.
The review was ordered after the ABC revealed people under investigation for serious offences could still hold one of the permits.
A WWCC is a background check conducted by the government that screens people for criminal history and professional conduct findings.
Currently in Victoria only criminal charges or a regulatory finding can trigger a check being revoked.
For example, someone banned by the education department from working at a preschool for posing a risk of harm to children could still hold a valid WWCC.
The government said that from August, screening regulations would change so DGS could "take into account prohibition notices issued from the Department of Education when determining or revoking a person's clearance to work with children".
"It's clear to us that this system needs to be strengthened," Government Services Minister Natalie Hutchins told the ABC last month, after the ABC's extensive coverage of the issue.
"This is just the first step to strengthen the Working With Children Check system to ensure that awful incidents that have occurred never happen again.
"I will have more to say on outcomes of the review soon."
It has been four years since ABC reporting sparked investigations that would lead to flaws in the WWCC being exposed.
In 2022, the Victorian Ombudsman recommended the state urgently change its laws after a youth worker was cleared to work with children despite facing sexual offence allegations, including rape, in New South Wales.
The state-based changes flagged for August will still not allow the Victorian system to consider a broad range of information such as child protection reports or police intelligence.
Other states and territories can.
Do you know more about this story? Contact Josie Taylor at josiegtaylor@protonmail.com. If you're sharing sensitive information, read our tips on how to contact us confidentially.
It has been 10 years since the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse recommended Australia's eight separate state and territory working-with-children systems be both standardised and nationalised.
In a rare case of a former royal commissioner speaking publicly, Robert Fitzgerald told the ABC it was "shameful" this work had still not been done.
"There doesn't need to be any more reviews or any more inquiries, or any more royal commissions," he said.
"The evidence was overwhelming 10 years ago and it's even more so today," he said.
"Working with children checks are in fact the very first thing you need to do to create child-safe institutions.
"The longer we delay in fixing the system … we continue to leave children at risk."
Mr Fitzgerald, who is now the age discrimination commissioner, called for the federal, state and territory governments to urgently establish a national WWCC system and a real-time national police database.
The Australian Childhood Foundation (ACF) said the alleged abuse case announced by Victoria Police on Tuesday was "one of the most significant and far-reaching cases of [alleged] child sexual abuse ever seen in a childcare setting in Australia".
The Victorian government has established a webpage with information for affected families. Information, including details of the government's dedicated hotline, can be found here.
It called on governments across Australia to swiftly embed mandatory child abuse prevention education into the scheme, an issue it has lobbied on for years.
"We can't always stop people who want to harm children from slipping through the cracks, but governments must act to ensure that the adults around children are trained to recognise risk, respond appropriately and act to protect them," chief executive Janise Mitchell said.
Emma Hakansson, a lead advocate with the ACF, said WWCC holders continued to abuse children.
"At the moment [the scheme] is essentially a screening tool to make sure people convicted of harming children and other dangerous crimes can't work with children," she said.
"But we know that most perpetrators of child sexual abuse don't have any past convictions and they go under the radar.
"Until the WWCC has mandatory child abuse prevention training as part of it, which we are calling for, it will not work."
Ms Hakansson said embedding training into the scheme would make the community safer.
"At the moment, to receive a Working with Children Check you have to do zero training," she said.
"You just need to go through a police screening."
She said people were often trained about how to respond to a direct disclosure of child abuse, but at that point, it was already too late.
"A child has already been abused," she said.
Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan was asked on Tuesday if she supported the proposal to make child abuse prevention education training mandatory as part of the WWCC scheme.
She said the recommendation would be considered.
"This is one of a number of pieces of advice that is already being provided to federal and state ministers as they work through the national framework that sits across the early childhood sector," she said.
"Recommendations around additional training is one of those recommendation that we will examine.
"We understand that there is a need here, to look at what happened, to understand what happened, and to strengthen the regulations."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

AFL 2025: Essendon coach Brad Scott speaks on umpire contact crackdown
AFL 2025: Essendon coach Brad Scott speaks on umpire contact crackdown

News.com.au

time17 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

AFL 2025: Essendon coach Brad Scott speaks on umpire contact crackdown

Essendon coach Brad Scott hopes the AFL conducts investigations into the cause of each umpire contact case after enforcing a crackdown on repeat offenders. The AFL Players Association also called for the entire MRO and Tribunal system to be reviewed declaring it 'wasn't working' after the league introduced the prospect of suspension for players should they be found to have carelessly made contact with an umpire on four occasions. Players will be punished with a hefty fine after the second offence. Scott understands the umpires' view, saying the AFL's 'hand was forced' but wants to see the cause of the contact ruled correctly. 'It seems to be one of those things where their hand was forced, we don't often think about workplace health and safety, especially on field,' he said. 'There's a tribunal, MRO to deal with players, but clearly the umpires in particular feel their safety is being compromised. 'I just hope there's a deep dive going into umpire positioning. There's four umpires on the ground, all of those things. 'Accidental umpire contact results in a fine or a suspension, I'd be very interested in the Players' Association's view on this because there's a lot of fines getting out of control. 'I understand the reasoning for it, the AFL has had their hand forced on this one, but I think everyone has to take responsibility on this, not just the players.' Interim AFLPA boss, Ben Smith said deciding to increase the penalties without consultation was 'disappointing' and called for a forum to discuss such issues 'holistically with the AFL'. 'It's evident to the AFLPA and players that the current MRO and Tribunal system is not working and needs to be reviewed and revised, and we look forward to being a part of that process,' he said. Scott says the best midfielders have started setting up alongside the umpires' lane out of centre bounces and that puts everyone 'in a vulnerable position'. He says the Bombers will implement a strategy around avoiding contact at training this week. 'The ball-ups are the problem, incidental umpire contact around the ground doesn't happen very often,' he said. ' … the AFL have made it clear to us that if you set up behind the umpire when they're backing out and there's contact, then you're liable. 'That's a pretty simple one for the players. What has been a trend is a lot of players, particularly the stars of the competition, setting up there because you have to man them up. 'That puts you in a vulnerable position of making contact with an umpire. We're actually going to work on it at training today just to make sure we don't put ourselves in that position.' Scott says ruling on free kicks and fines for umpire contact is 'retrospective' and needs to be assessed through vision. He also launched to the defence of the playing cohort, saying the volume of fines is 'outrageous'. 'I don't think any player likes money coming out their pocket, but I think they do have a view that they feel when they're fined it's not a penalty,' he said. 'Put umpire contact to one side, any MRO finding where a player gets fined, it's reported as if they've been cleared – the players don't feel like they've been cleared.'

Court rejects parliamentary privilege claim in Walter Sofronoff's bid to overturn corruption findings
Court rejects parliamentary privilege claim in Walter Sofronoff's bid to overturn corruption findings

News.com.au

time17 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

Court rejects parliamentary privilege claim in Walter Sofronoff's bid to overturn corruption findings

Claims parliamentary privilege would prevent a report that found the head of an inquiry into the prosecution of Bruce Lehrmann engaged in 'serious corrupt conduct' from being tendered in court have been rejected by a court. Former Queensland judge Walter Sofronoff KC led the 2023 board of inquiry into Mr Lehrmann's prosecution. An investigation into Mr Sofronoff's conduct during that inquiry, in particular his decision to send a copy of the board's report to two journalists from the ABC and The Australian prior to its official release by the ACT government, was launched by the ACT Integrity Commission. The commission in March found Mr Sofronoff had engaged in 'serious corrupt conduct'; however, he is seeking to have the commission's Operation Juno report overturned in the Federal Court. Lawyers for the Speaker of the ACT Legislative Assembly in May submitted the proceedings should be dismissed over claims the report was covered by parliamentary privilege, meaning it couldn't be tendered in court. Therefore, the retired judge couldn't seek judicial review. Justice Wendy Abraham said she allowed the Speaker to make the submission but ultimately dismissed it on Wednesday morning during a brief case management hearing in the Federal Court. 'I am not satisfied that the conduct of the proceedings on the material on which the applicant seeks to rely involves an infringement of Section 16 of the Parliamentary Privilege Act,' Justice Abraham told the court. 'I'll provide reasons for that in my final judgment.' The matter is scheduled for a final hearing on July 21 and 22. Documents filed by his legal team claim that Mr Sofronoff was given the ability to do 'whatever (he) considers necessary or convenient for the fair and prompt conduct of the inquiry' as head of the inquiry, and he considered it necessary or convenient to engage with journalists 'for the fair and prompt conduct of the inquiry'. The documents also claim Mr Sofronoff's actions were 'incapable of amounting to corrupt conduct' and the findings were 'seriously illogical, irrational and/or unreasonable'. The Federal Court has found that Mr Lehrmann raped Ms Higgins on the civil standard of the balance of probabilities. A criminal trial was aborted due to juror misconduct and a charge against him was dropped. Mr Lehrmann has always denied the allegation and is appealing the Federal Court's finding.

‘Off the charts:' Roadside cameras capture driver offending 81 times since January
‘Off the charts:' Roadside cameras capture driver offending 81 times since January

News.com.au

time20 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

‘Off the charts:' Roadside cameras capture driver offending 81 times since January

One of the nation's worst drivers has been captured by roadside safety cameras doing the wrong thing behind the wheel more than 80 times since January. The Road Safety Commission released a new batch of images taken by roadside cameras across Perth and regional Western Australia over the past six months. The new cameras have been trialled in WA to test their efficiency before authorities begin issuing fines using the technology from October. Drivers were snapped smoking drugs from a meth pipe, drinking beer and using their phone, resting their leg across the dash, not wearing seatbelts, using iPads and nursing children while they were driving on some of the state's busiest roads. One driver was caught offending 81 times, another driver 74 times, another 52 times and 10 people were picked up offending more than 40 times each since January. The cameras recorded 129,000 mobile phone and seatbelt offences, resulting in 44,530 caution notices. Road Safety Minister Reece Whitby said fixed and mobile safety cameras monitored 25 million vehicles since January and the images captured by the roadside technology were 'mind-boggling.' 'We are seeing people doing the wrong thing again and again,' he said. 'I cannot believe that one driver has been caught offending 81 times. That is extreme serial offending; it is off the charts.' Mr Whitby said people continued to blatantly ignore the law and the same people were repeatedly caught speeding. He said extreme cases had been referred to police to pursue in the interest of public safety. 'We are seeing such an extreme and astounding rate of offending by some – not all – in the community that I believe when we start issuing fines from these safety cameras, a huge number of people will lose their licence if they do not change their way,' he said. Road Safety Commissioner Adrian Warner said the technology was implemented to try to change behaviour. 'Just looking at mobile phones, which are the major source of distraction and a major source of crashes, particularly on high-speed country roads, Queensland saw nearly a 75 per cent drop-off in the first months after it introduced similar cameras,' he said. 'We are hopeful that, once we get the message out, particularly in regional areas, that we want people to change behaviour, there will be a significant shift in behaviour once people realise that this is the type of thing that is happening and the risk involved is great.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store