
A new shot prevents HIV—and breathes new life into a stagnant biotech
Later this month, the Food and Drug Administration is widely expected to approve a groundbreaking twice-yearly injection to prevent HIV—a milestone in the decadeslong fight against a once-devastating disease.
For Gilead Sciences, the dominant player in HIV treatment, the breakthrough is doing what years of splashy but underwhelming acquisitions failed to achieve: It has Wall Street paying attention again. Since reporting last June that just two annual shots of lenacapavir prevented all HIV infections in a study of women and girls, shares have surged 73%.
Gilead still isn't very expensive: It trades at 13.3 times forward earnings—below the industry average of 14, as measured by the NYSE Arca Pharmaceutical Index, and hardly a stretch for a company on the cusp of a new product cycle.
Investors might fear they have seen this movie before. A decade ago, Gilead stock soared on excitement over its hepatitis C cure, only to stall once most patients had been treated and the market dried up. The company then fell into value-trap territory, weighed down by sluggish growth and a string of underwhelming cancer deals.
This time could be different—but only if Gilead can execute. Over 400,000 people in the U.S. are currently on pre-exposure prophylaxis, or PrEP—a medication that protects against HIV infection. To hit the $4 billion in annual sales that some analysts are forecasting by the end of the decade, the company will need to not only convert a big chunk of existing patients but also expand the overall market both at home and abroad. Gilead expects the number of users in the U.S. to grow to over one million in the next decade.
The early signs are promising. For starters, the market is growing fast. Sales of Gilead's daily pill Descovy rose 38% last quarter from a year ago, while GSK's Apretude—a long-acting injection given every two months—jumped 63%. Secondly, many current and potential users say they would prefer a longer-acting injection. A Jefferies survey of more than 500 PrEP users found that 95% would switch to a twice-yearly injection.
In an interview, Gilead's Chief Commercial Officer Johanna Mercier said the key advantage of the company's upcoming HIV prevention shot isn't just efficacy but adherence. 'We know it's challenging to take a daily pill for prevention, and we see an incredible opportunity here," she said, citing data showing that many patients struggle to stay consistent with oral PrEP.
Still, hurdles remain. Stigma continues to hinder PrEP uptake, particularly outside the core demographic of white men who have sex with men. Black Americans account for 39% of new HIV diagnoses but just 14% of PrEP users. Expanding access to underserved populations will require continued insurance coverage. While most current users are covered by commercial insurance, Medicaid will be key to reaching lower-income groups—making recent GOP proposals to cut the program a potential threat to Gilead's growth strategy.
Another risk, according to RBC Capital Markets analyst Brian Abrahams, is cannibalization. Gilead's daily pill Descovy currently accounts for 40% to 45% of the PrEP market, so some of the lenacapavir growth could come at the expense of its existing business.
But Mercier is confident the new product will expand the market both in the U.S. and globally. Gilead is working with governments in countries such as the U.K., where PrEP awareness is low, and planning broader rollout in low-income countries through partnerships with global health organizations. 'We're thinking globally about the public health impact we can have," she said.
Gilead's growth outlook means it is, for now, steering clear of the patent cliff that is about to hit much of the industry as multibillion-dollar blockbuster drugs face generic competition. Gilead's HIV blockbuster, Biktarvy—which is prescribed after infection—retains exclusivity until 2033, with several potential successors already in the pipeline.
Beyond HIV, Gilead is beginning to show signs of turning the corner in cancer, a space where past acquisitions have frustrated investors. There is growing excitement around Trodelvy—an antibody-drug conjugate acquired via its $21 billion Immunomedics deal—after data showed it delayed progression in an aggressive form of breast cancer when combined with Merck's Keytruda. Meanwhile, Gilead's cell therapy program is gaining traction, with the company aiming to challenge Johnson & Johnson in the multibillion-dollar multiple myeloma market, explains Traver Davis, a healthcare strategist at Citi.
'They have been hammered for their acquisitions and execution on the oncology side of the business in the last few years," said Davis. 'The narrative on that is definitely turning."
Gilead spent years trying to move beyond HIV. In the end, it might be HIV prevention that finally delivers the breakthrough investors have been waiting for.
Write to David Wainer at david.wainer@wsj.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NDTV
a day ago
- NDTV
Fungus, Cuts, HIV: That Pedicure Comes With Risks No One Tells You About
It was just another self-care day for 59-year-old Anita House from Flowery Branch, Georgia, when she and her sister headed to their usual local salon for some routine services. It was a place House had visited many times. However, things took a sharp turn when, just two days after her pedicure, a seemingly minor infection on her toe worsened rapidly. The infection grew so severe that House eventually had to get her toes amputated. This incident occurred in 2019. According to House, the infection likely started when a salon worker removed an ingrown toenail on her right foot's big toe. While this practice is quite common in many nail salons, House believes the technician cut a little too deep, causing excessive bleeding. "That's [my guess] of when bacteria got in. I can't prove it in a court of law, but if I was a betting woman, that would be my bet," she told Fox News. Unfortunately, House's story isn't the only one of its kind. In 2021, a Florida nail salon was ordered to pay Rs 14.5 crore (approx $1.75 million) to Clara Shellman, who lost her leg after a botched pedicure. According to Shellman and her lawyer, the salon used dirty tools that led to an infection and aggravated her peripheral arterial disease. Her foot had to be amputated during treatment. The salon, now permanently shut, bore full responsibility for the incident. Pedicures, though generally considered safe, can be dangerous when done incorrectly. From cuts and fungal infections to even life-threatening conditions like sepsis or HIV, poor hygiene and bad technique can have serious consequences. The Fish Pedicure Banned in many parts of the US, Canada and Europe, fish pedicures are becoming increasingly popular in India. You can even spot them being offered on busy street corners. Also known as fish spas or fish therapy, these treatments involve placing your feet in a tank of water filled with Garra rufa (or "doctor fish") that nibble away dead skin. The idea is to leave your feet smooth and exfoliated. But there are hidden risks. A 2018 case study published in JAMA Dermatology warned about a woman in her twenties who developed onychomadesis -- a condition where toenails detach and fall off -- after a fish pedicure. She had gone to a dermatologist after months of unexplained nail shedding. A 2024 report by Dermatocare adds that if someone with an open wound or infection dips their feet into a fish tank, the water can easily become contaminated. This can transmit bacterial infections and viruses like HIV or hepatitis to others. With more salons offering unusual options, from ice cream pedicures to wine soaks, it's clear that indulgent foot treatments are on trend. But when not done right, they can go very, very wrong. So, does this mean you should stop getting pedicures altogether? Not necessarily. But being cautious is key. Things To Keep In Mind Before Getting A Pedicure 1. Avoid shaving your legs beforehand Shaving creates micro-cuts on the skin, making it easier for bacteria to enter. Ideally, avoid shaving for at least 24 hours before your appointment. 2. Inspect the salon's hygiene practices Make sure the tools are sterilised and foot tubs are cleaned thoroughly between clients. Ask if they use disposable liners or hospital-grade disinfectant. 3. Don't let anyone cut your cuticles or ingrown nails Cutting cuticles can create open wounds and increase your infection risk. Push them back gently instead. And never allow a technician to remove ingrown nails; leave that to a medical professional. 4. Bring your own tools if possible If you can, carry your own nail file, buffer, and even clippers, to reduce exposure to reused equipment. 5. Don't get a pedicure if you have open cuts or infections If your feet have wounds, cracked skin, or even a bug bite, postpone your appointment. Bacteria can easily enter through compromised skin. 6. Choose a salon with a licence and trained technicians Not all salons operate within regulations. Opt for one that has visibly displayed licences and employs trained professionals. Pro Tip: Check Google review first. 7. Skip risky treatments like fish pedicures They may look fun and relaxing, but they come with too many hygiene and health risks to be worth it. 8. Diabetics should consult a doctor first If you have diabetes or poor circulation, even a small nick can be dangerous. Speak to a medical professional before booking a pedicure. Final Line While pedicures can be a form of self-care, they shouldn't come at the cost of your health. With just a few precautions and a little bit of awareness, you can enjoy your salon visits without fear. So, go ahead and treat yourself - but smartly.


Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
Health team rushes to Burmu as 3 die of ‘mystery' illness
1 2 Ranchi: District health department on Friday despatched a team to Jamgai village in Burmu block of the district for health check-up of its residents after three people, including two children, died of an unidentified illness on Wednesday. T he deceased were identified as Vikram Ganjhu (24), Omprakash Ganjhu (12) and Abhay Ganjhu (6). Vikram fell ill after returning from New Delhi recently and underwent treatment at a private hospital for cold, cough, and fever. After initial recovery, he suddenly developed acute abdominal pain and died during treatment. Omprakash, who was also under care at a private facility, reportedly died in a similar manner. Abhay also complained of sudden stomach pain and died shortly. Dr Tariq Anwar, the in-charge of local community health centre, lead a four-member team to investigate the causes of death and check the health of other residents. "We interacted with the families and community members to understand the pattern of symptoms and medical history. Samples have been collected and preliminary screening of villagers was carried out. We are particularly monitoring symptoms like abdominal pain, fever, and respiratory distress to trace any common source," he said. Another will be held on Saturday to conduct tests such as HIV, haemoglobin, hepatitis B and blood cell counts, especially among migrant workers who have returned.


Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
US Supreme Court preserves key element of Obamacare preventive care
The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday preserved a key element of the Obamacare law that helps guarantee that health insurers cover preventive care such as cancer screenings and HIV prevention medication at no cost to patients. The 6-3 decision written by conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh reversed a lower court's ruling that the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, which under the 2010 law formally called the Affordable Care Act has a major role in choosing what services will be covered, was not validly appointed. The ruling means that certain life-saving tests and treatments must continue to be provided cost-free under most insurance plans. That allays concerns raised by public health advocates that the court might open the door to insurers subjecting these services to co-pays and deductibles, deterring many Americans from obtaining them. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Join new Free to Play WWII MMO War Thunder War Thunder Play Now Undo The task force's 16 members are selected by the U.S. secretary of health and human services without Senate confirmation. The New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had found that this arrangement violated the U.S. Constitution's provision on the appointment of governmental officers. The case arose when several individual Christian plaintiffs and two small businesses sued in federal court in Texas in 2020 to challenge the task force's structure. It was the latest in a years-long series of challenges to Democratic former President Barack Obama's signature legislative achievement to reach the Supreme Court. Live Events A key question in the case was whether the task force wields power to such an extent that its members, under the Constitution's "appointments clause," are "principal officers" who must be appointed by the president and confirmed by the U.S. Senate or "inferior officers" not subject to these requirements. Kavanaugh wrote that because task force members are adequately supervised by the U.S. secretary of health and human services, members are "inferior officers" and do not need to be appointed by the president and confirmed by the U.S. Senate. "The Task Force members are removable at will by the Secretary of HHS, and their recommendations are reviewable by the Secretary before they take effect," Kavanaugh wrote. "So Task Force members are supervised and directed by the Secretary, who in turn answers to the President, preserving the chain of command," wrote Kavanaugh, who was joined by fellow conservative Justices John Roberts and Amy Coney Barrett, as well as the court's three liberal members. Three conservative justices - Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch - dissented. Before the case was narrowed to the appointments issue, the plaintiffs had included a religious objection to being required to cover pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV. They claimed that such drugs "facilitate and encourage homosexual behavior, prostitution, sexual promiscuity and intravenous drug use." The U.S. government's appeal of the decision by the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals initially was filed by Democratic former President Joe Biden's administration before being taken up by Republican President Donald Trump's administration. The task force is made up of medical experts who serve four-year terms on a volunteer basis. It reviews medical evidence and public feedback and issues recommendations about which preventive services would be most effective for detecting illnesses earlier or addressing ailments before a patient's condition worsens. The task force has identified dozens of preventive services as having a high or moderate net benefit to patients including screenings to detect diabetes and various types of cancer, statin medications to lower the risk of heart disease and stroke, and interventions to help patients quit smoking or unhealthy alcohol use. The 5th Circuit ruled in 2024 that the task force's structure violates the Constitution, as the plaintiffs claimed. The justices during April 21 arguments in the case posed questions over whether the law gives the HHS secretary the appropriate level of supervision over the task force, including the power to influence its recommendations and fire members at will, or if it operates as a largely independent governmental body whose recommendations effectively have the force of law. The Justice Department urged the justices to view the task force's members as "inferior officers." Hashim Mooppan, a Justice Department lawyer, told the justices that the HHS secretary can remove task force members at will, review their recommendations and prevent them from taking effect, and can require the task force to obtain his approval before it issues any recommendations. The plaintiffs contended that the task force's lack of supervision and insulation from removal makes its members "principal officers."