Covid guru Devi: How my fight for NHS cancer care laid bare Scotland's waiting list crisis
Professor Devi Sridhar became a leading voice during the pandemic, when she counselled Nicola Sturgeon on the SNP 's COVID response and made regular appearances on television shows like Good Morning Britain and Channel 4 News.
But despite her significant expertise and government influence, the Oxford-educated academic was told she could face a six-month wait to learn whether the abnormal cells discovered in a smear test were cancerous.
Ms Sridhar said: 'I was calling three to four times a day to see if anything was available, saying I could come any time.
'It was scary and it was frustrating because I teach this stuff, right? So I know there's delays in the system and I also know the statistics on treatments. Each day I move forward [before] being treated, my chance goes down by 2 per cent.'
Like 280,000 other Scottish women each year, Sridhar had undergone a routine test to detect signs of HPV, a group of viruses responsible for 95 per cent of cervical cancer cases.
The health expert was shocked to receive a call explaining that 'possibly cancer' was present – but even less prepared for the prognosis of indefinite delays and administrative chaos that accompanied it.
Sridhar repeatedly begged for a date for a follow-up consultation, but was left 'waiting on a letter from the system where you're just a data point'.
Having lost her own father to cancer when he was just 49, the prospect of facing lengthy delays while simply hoping for the best was particularly galling.
She told The Sunday Times: 'Everyone did say, 'he's gonna be alright'. And he wasn't,'
Although the professor is sympathetic to the pressures on NHS staff, she admits that her struggle to beat the backlog reveals the extent of the crisis facing the health service.
She added: 'We're not meeting the targets for even those with an active cancer diagnosis … and that is why our survival outcomes are not as good as other countries.'
Ultimately, Ms Sridhar's persistence paid off and she was given a cancelled appointment slot after two months.
The abnormal cells were frozen to stop them from growing and Sridhar also received the HPV vaccine to increase her immune system's response to the virus.
But she advises that her own experience demonstrates how 'you have to be an active participant in your patient journey' to access timely care – a daunting challenge for those without the academic's medical expertise.
The warning comes after Public Health Scotland revealed that more than a quarter of patients referred with urgent suspicion of cancer are waiting longer than the 62-day target for their first treatment.
Cancer Research UK's public affairs manager in Scotland, Dr Sorcha Hume, criticised the waiting times as 'completely unacceptable'.
She said: 'NHS staff are doing their best but they're battling against under-investment alongside rising cancer cases.
'If we're to turn the tide on the anxiety faced by so many, we need to see adequate funding for staff and equipment.
'Innovative reform and rapid progress against Scotland's cancer strategy is also essential.'
While Ms Sridhar credits the NHS screening programme with protecting her health, she echoed CRUK's call for increased investment in public health initiatives.
She said: 'I don't understand sometimes why we think we're saving money by pulling back from screening programmes, prevention programmes, intervention programmes, when it ends up costing us more in the end.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
.png%3Ftrim%3D0%2C0%2C0%2C0%26width%3D1200%26height%3D800%26crop%3D1200%3A800&w=3840&q=100)
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Family services hubs to opened by all England councils
The Department for Education has announced a nationwide rollout of 'Best Start' family hubs across every council in England. A £500 million investment targets disadvantaged communities, aiming for a hub in every local authority by April 2026, with up to 1,000 hubs by the end of 2028. These hubs will offer a range of services including birth registration, debt advice, midwifery, and support for separated parents. The initiative aims to provide a "lifeline" to families, improve life chances for children, and build on the legacy of previous family support programmes. While charities like Save The Children and the NAHT union welcomed the move, the Conservatives criticised it as a potential rebranding of existing services.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Deadly heatwaves are the new reality – we need to transform the UK's cities and towns to survive them
There's a lot to be anxious about as a new parent, let alone in a heatwave when the thermometer in your one-year-old daughter's room is reading 26C. That's six degrees higher than the upper limit of the recommended temperature for a child's room. After scrolling my phone for advice on how to cool her room, I couldn't help waking up every few hours to check she was OK on the baby monitor. In the UK, we are unprepared at every level for the extreme weather caused by climate breakdown. Whether it's unbearably hot buildings in the summer, our damp and cold homes (some of the leakiest in Europe) filled with mould in the winter, our unprotected towns built on flood plains, or our unfit-for-purpose train tracks that get shut down at the slightest weather warning, the climate crisis is already wreaking havoc on public and private infrastructure – and it's only getting worse. Despite heatwaves becoming more common in the UK, the dangers from extreme heat are not well known. Heatwaves are often described as 'silent killers' – elderly and vulnerable people are at risk of dying alone and in their homes. At the moment, the government's own advisers say that heat deaths could rise several times over to exceed 10,000 in an average year by 2050 without action. Vulnerable groups such as disabled people, elderly people and children are most at risk from extreme heat. But low-paid workers and those forced to work outside are at high risk as well. Take the example of the Spanish street sweeper who died last week in Barcelona after working for hours in the heat of the day, or the construction worker David Azevedo who died in France in 2022. The main solution offered up to us is air conditioning – but it actively worsens climate effects and extreme heat for everyone else by pumping hot air into the streets while using huge amounts of power. Air conditioning can actually raise the temperature of cities by more than 2C, and it was found that cooling measures accounted for an estimated 37% of the increase in US electricity demand during April-September 2024 compared with the same period the year before. Instead of jumping to this as the only solution, we need to embrace practical, low-carbon solutions such as increasing tree cover and greenery in our cities, and utilising the shade they provide to release water vapour into the air and improve air quality. The government could invest in water-cooling methods such as sustainable fountains, splash pads and spray parks, protect bodies of water such as canals, and continue to implement measures to lessen car use – while prioritising air conditioning for the places that need it most such as hospitals, care homes, public transport and nurseries. Redesigning our cities and towns this way could be transformative. For example, Barcelona has a burgeoning network of more than 400 free shelters that offer refuge from sweltering summer heat and the winter cold. And in Singapore, open spaces around buildings have been added in addition to extending green spaces and implementing other measures such as using lighter colours on roofs and walls. Homeowners should be supported, and landlords required to reduce internal heat in houses. Councils and governments should be upgrading social infrastructure, including hospitals and nursing homes, with insulation, reflective surfaces and good ventilation to avoid them from overheating. We could also begin exploring the use of green walls and roofs as well as external shading through trees, awnings, external blinds and shutters. Investing in these measures could be supported by a fairer taxation system, to ensure polluting corporations and those with extreme wealth pay up to help tackle these issues. It's not just regulation and building rules that should be changed – we need to ensure workers' rights are at the heart of adaptation planning too. While there are accepted lower temperature limits for workplaces, there is still no legal upper limit for how hot an office or factory can be. This must be changed to ensure workers are protected and employers invest in heatproofing. The TUC, among other trade union bodies, wants to see a legal maximum temperature for indoor work of 30C (27C for those doing strenuous work). There should also be a legal duty for employers to protect those working outside by providing sun protection and water, and organising work so they are not outside during the hottest part of the day. Local authorities could help the public make sensible decisions by giving timely information on heat warnings. And the NHS must do more to alert vulnerable people with heart and respiratory conditions to the dangers, as rates of death caused by heat start to climb at much lower temperatures than we expect. As we make the case for these necessary and fair adaptations to a warming world, we must not forget that there is still a moral case to reduce our emissions. Every degree of warming makes a difference to the overall impact on our planet and humanity at large – and to approach the adaptation debate with an either/or mindset is to lose on both fronts. It is challenging, but the truth is we must not just accept the trajectory we are on as if we have no power to change course. We must double down on our efforts to push our political leaders to drastically reduce our emissions in a way that is fair, as well as investing in the resilience of communities to ensure we are able to live well as temperatures continue to rise. There is still time. Hannah Martin is the co-director of Green New Deal Rising which is campaigning for a green new deal The rise of climate denialism, with George Monbiot and special guests On Tuesday 16 September, join George Monbiot, Mikaela Loach and other special guests, discussing the forces driving the big climate pushback, live at the Barbican, and livestreamed globally. Book tickets here or at
Press and Journal
2 hours ago
- Press and Journal
Stonehaven mum's brutal reality: no NHS cure, so she must buy more time abroad
Helen Swan's voice is quiet yet urgent when she answers the phone at her home in Stonehaven. It doesn't take long to understand why. When we spoke, the 54-year-old mum was just days away from boarding a flight to Frankfurt, where doctors would inject powerful chemotherapy drugs directly into the tumours spreading through her lungs, bones, liver and soft tissues. It's a procedure called TACE — targeted arterial chemoembolisation — and Helen believes it is her only real hope of slowing down her cancer. She knows from experience that as soon as the drugs enter her body, she's in a race against time to get home before the side effects strike: searing nausea, crushing exhaustion and days where she can barely stand. Yet for Helen, the urgency lies not just in the cancer invading her body, but in something else – the knowledge that if she can't keep raising the money to pay for each £6,000 trip herself, her treatment will stop. TACE is not available on the NHS for the rare form of cancer Helen has been diagnosed with. Doctors in the UK have also warned her she is wasting her time with the treatment, saying it won't save her. Helen doesn't see it like that. While she still holds on to the hope that TACE might one day cure her, what she really wants is more time — time she can spend with her children, especially her youngest son, Harry, just 12 years old. 'It's not easy — it's really hard,' she says. 'I've got to do it. I've got no other options. Either I do this, or I can wait for it to take me over, which will happen very quickly — and I don't want to do that. I need to keep trying.' It's a fight she never imagined when she was first diagnosed nearly five years ago. In 2019, Helen was told she had stage 2B endocervical adenocarcinoma — a rare, aggressive form of cervical cancer that had already spread into surrounding tissue. She underwent months of chemotherapy, radiotherapy and internal brachytherapy at Aberdeen Royal Infirmary. She was given the all-clear in August 2020. But a year later, a routine scan revealed 16 tiny tumours scattered through her lungs. The cancer had returned and was now classed as incurable. Doctors gave her about six months to live. Offered palliative chemotherapy, Helen made the difficult decision to say no. 'It might have bought me a bit of time,' she says. 'But the side effects would have left me too unwell to do anything with my son. I didn't want to spend what time I had in bed.' Instead, she pieced together her own protocol — researching everything she could about boosting her immune system. She changed her diet, took over-the-counter supplements and began regular mistletoe infusions at Camphill Wellbeing Trust in Aberdeen. Her doctors were sceptical — mistletoe infusions aren't routinely available on the NHS and are classed as complementary. But no one could argue with the result: three extra years of life she was never expected to have. 'I made memories with Harry,' she says of that time. 'I was able to travel with him, swim in the sea at Stonehaven, visit friends in Greece and Sweden — just live a normal life as much as I could.' By the end of last year, Helen's cancer started to spread again — pushing into her bones, liver and soft tissues. She found Professor Thomas Vogl at Frankfurt University Hospital. He specialises in TACE — a procedure only approved on the NHS for patients who have primary liver cancer, not for secondary tumours that have spread from elsewhere. In simple terms, TACE involves feeding a tiny tube through an artery in her leg and injecting a high dose of chemotherapy straight into a tumour. Unlike conventional chemo, which floods the whole body, this targets the tumour directly — cutting off its blood supply and killing cancer cells. 'It's like being poisoned for days,' Helen says. After her first treatment, scans showed a 10% reduction in a tumour pressing on her spine — so severe it had threatened to paralyse her. 'Before I started, I felt like I was hanging on by my fingernails. I was losing the use of my leg and arm. Now, I can walk with a stick. I can drive my car. I can be mum again.' Her most recent scans showed further reductions in both her spine and liver tumours. But every session brings brutal side effects, and the fear that missing just one could undo her progress. A single trip to Frankfurt costs Helen around £5,000 to £6,000, covering the procedure itself, flights, hotel and a companion to help her get home. As a single mum unable to work, she has no savings left. 'It's terrifying to think that if I can't raise this money, I can't go — and I'll start to go downhill again within a few weeks. I don't have time on my side.' So far, generous donations through her GoFundMe page and local fundraising events have covered three trips. She needs many more. How many? 'It's case by case,' she explains. 'Some people go 10 or 12 times if it keeps working.' Through it all, her anchor is her children: Sam, 29, Grace, 22, and especially Harry, still just a boy. 'He was six when I was first diagnosed,' she says. 'He's come along on the ride with me. He knows enough, but not everything. He sees me as strong, and I want to keep it that way for as long as I can.' Helen adds: 'Somebody else asked me that too, and I really, genuinely don't feel angry. I think I'd rather it happened to me than to somebody I love — I'm a strong person. And I hope I'm showing my children, or anyone else, that no matter what life throws at you, you just wade through it and you don't give up.' Helen praises the NHS teams that saved her life in the early days — but says the system is limited by what it can fund. 'Germany is about 10 years ahead of the UK in cancer treatment,' she says. 'It's frustrating that the treatment is there, but we can't access it — you have to go abroad or have the money somehow.' She wants policymakers to listen: 'People shouldn't be written off just because the treatment isn't in the NHS box. Even if they can't fund it, they should support people however they can.' After nearly five years fighting, Helen has learned more than she ever wanted to know about cervical cancer — hers is so rare that it doesn't even show up on standard screening tests. She wants other women to know that even regular screening can sometimes miss it. 'There's no handbook for cancer,' she says. 'You have to advocate for yourself. Learn as much as you can, ask questions, don't take no for an answer. You know your body — listen to it.' Above all, Helen hopes her story shows others they don't have to give up. She tells of one woman who went to Professor Vogl's clinic with just weeks to live — and is now cancer free. It's an outcome Helen would love to see for herself. But she's clearsighted on the obstacles ahead, and how quickly things could change if the money runs out. 'I just want more time — more days to be Harry's mum. I'm not ready to die. I've got far too much to live for.'
