‘Salty, crybaby' Ben Stokes becomes centre of Internet's ‘no-handshake' meme fest; Jadeja farms ‘infinte aura'
This time, England captain Ben Stokes was facing the heat for being 'salty' and was called a 'crybaby'. Meanwhile, Indian cricketer Ravindra Jadeja 'farmed infinite aura' points with the netizens.
After KL Rahul and Shubman Gill were dismissed in the first session of play on Day 4 of the Manchester Test, India's hope of securing a draw seemed bleak, and England looked favourites to win the match once again.
However, Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar stuck around batting for two full sessions to ensure that only a draw was likely.
Realising this, English skipper Ben Stokes decided not to put any more pressure on his bowlers and suggested a handshake to end the match ahead of schedule.
As Jadeja was batting on 89 and Washington Sundar on 80, the Indian batters refused the handshake, wanting some kind of reward for their hard-fought innings in the form of centuries.
The English team, however, were not pleased. Stokes and his teammates immediately began trying to convince the Indian players to change their minds, with the England captain even suggesting Jadeja could bring up his ton against part-time bowler Harry Brook.
Both Jadeja and Sundar reached their respective centuries in the coming few overs, and the match eventually ended in a draw once that was done, with Stokes still not looking pleased with how things had turned out.
A social media user said, 'This is how they react… Ben Stokes couldn't handle a little rejection. India said 'no' to his draw offer, and he had a full-blown ego meltdown. Skipped the handshake with Jadeja…he was that hurt! Come on, Ben… don't be salty, be sporty.'
'Seriously Ben Stokes???? No handshake??' asked another.
'What a crybaby. Test hundred is always special for everyone yrrrr,' exclaimed a user. Another added, 'Fcking salty englishmen.'
'Stokes should be grateful Jadeja & Washi walked off after scoring centuries, Virat Kohli would have batted the entire 15 overs had crybaby Ben tried this nonsense with him,' quipped one user.
'No team in world cricket have ever spoken the most about the spirit of game yet played against the spirit of the game as much as Ben Stokes and his team have done,' a netizen highlighted.
'Not seen a more pathetic opponent in Cricket than England,' said another.
An English supporter also slammed Stokes, and said, 'Big England supporter obviously. But this evening's shenanigans exhibit nicely why we are the most disliked team in world cricket.'
Star Sports joined in to say, 'Scored a hundred, saved the Test, farmed infinite aura! Ravindra Jadeja didn't hesitate till the end.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
23 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Divya Deshmukh, 19, beats Koneru Humpy to become Women's World Cup champion and India's 4th woman to be grandmaster
After 24 days of fighting chess, Divya Deshmukh became the FIDE Women's World Cup champion at Georgia's Batumi after defeating the veteran Koneru Humpy in the final via the tiebreaks. Divya's win also makes her eligible to be India's fourth woman to become a grandmaster. This was a battle of generations, with the 19-year-old Divya being half the age of the veteran Humpy, who is India's first woman to become a grandmaster. Since Humpy became a GM, just two women have followed suit and become grandmasters. Thanks to the win today, Divya joins that elusive list. On Monday, after the first game ended in a draw, Divya won the second tiebreak game thanks to a blunder from Humpy. The first two classical games between Humpy and Divya had ended in draws. The first game, which was played on Saturday, was where Divya had the best chances to win, while playing with white pieces. She came with a plan and got a sizeable advantage on the board. But then at the end, she scuffed her lines and allowed Humpy to equalise. Divya had said that that draw had 'felt like a loss' to her. 'I had seen everything (beforehand). So I was disappointed by that,' she said. Humpy too had agreed that Divya was 'clearly better' after 12 moves. 'After that move, I'm not sure what was going on, but it was very complicated,' Humpy admitted. In the second game, the game was ambling along to a draw from the start itself. But Divya said that she had wandered 'into trouble for no apparent reason.' Divya, who is an International Master, was the underdog coming into the tiebreaks, because the games were played in the rapid format and Humpy became the World Rapid Champion for the second time in her career in December last year. Humpy is also currently ranked no 5 in the world in the FIDE ratings list for women while Divya is world no 18 (which makes her the fourth ranked Indian on the list). In other formats too, Humpy is ranked much higher than the teenager from Nagpur: In rapid, Humpy is no 10 in the world while Divya is no 22. In blitz, while the veteran is no 10 in the world among women, Divya is no 18. Just like Divya, Humpy was also a prodigy back in the day. In fact, Humpy was once the youngest woman to achieve the grandmaster title, when she beat Judit Polgar's record by three months to reach there at the age of 15 years, one month and 27 days. Reaching the FIDE Women's World Cup final is a significant achievement for Divya. It was just last year that she was crowned the world junior champion in the girls section. In the 13 months since, she is already fighting for the second-most prestigious title in women's chess. Divya was also the inspiration behind the Indian women's team winning a gold medal at the Chess Olympiad in Budapest last year where she claimed an individual gold as well for her board.
The Hindu
25 minutes ago
- The Hindu
IND vs ENG fifth Test: Shardul, Kamboj likely to be benched as India searches for ‘Perfect 11'
The long-winding five-match Test series in England has hit the home stretch but despite securing a memorable draw at Old Trafford, India continue to search for the "perfect" eleven, more specifically the right bowling combination, heading into the finale at The Oval in three days' time. India's preference to bat till number eight at the expense of a specialist bowler has been constantly questioned over the course of the series and more so after Shardul Thakur, playing in place of the injured Nitish Reddy, was used for only 11 overs at Old Trafford. But with India conceding more than 600 runs for the first time since 2014 at Old Trafford, the case for including an out and out wicket-taker like Kuldeep Yadav, who has been warming the bench for the past 40 days, is stronger than ever. After an underwhelming debut, Anshul Kamboj is likely to make way for a fit-again Akash Deep or Prasidh Krishna. Arshdeep Singh, who too has been a passenger like Kuldeep, has also recovered from a hand injury and would be dreaming of a Test debut in what has been a highly competitive and engaging series. Though head coach Gautam Gambhir declared all the fast bowlers fit in his usual combative tone following the draw on Sunday, there is no denying that the pace pack, especially Jasprit Bumrah and Mohammed Siraj, are part of the tiring bunch on either side of the dressing room. Washington Sundar and Ravindra Jadeja, the architects of a famous draw, formed India's top six in the second innings due to Rishabh Pant's injury and showed remarkable grit to bat out more than two sessions to save the game, completing fine hundreds in the process. If that same template is followed at The Oval, Dhruv Jurel will come in to bat number seven and India can play four specialist bowlers by benching Shardul, who anyway has not been getting enough overs. The fourth bowler can be Kuldeep with the pitch expected to aid spinners or an extra fast bowler. By its own admission, the Indian team management has been consciously trying to fit Kuldeep into the playing eleven but the current template of batting till eight has prevented it from doing that. "So Kuldeep, we are trying to find a way for him, but it is just (that we need) more consistent runs from our top six, so that we can bring a guy like Kuldeep in," said India bowling coach Morne Morkel during the fourth Test. "It's finding when he comes in, how we can find balance and how we can get that batting line-up to be a little bit longer and stronger. We've seen in the past that we've lost wickets in clumps. "Kuldeep is world-class and he's bowling really well at the moment, so we're trying our best to find ways for him to get in," added the South African. Recently-retired Test great R. Ashwin can't understand India's obsession of batting till eight for a few extra runs when a strike bowler like Kuldeep can allow them to play with fewer runs. For him, picking Kuldeep in Manchester was a no brainer. Considering the selection calls thus far, it can be said that India have been pretty firm about having a cushion with the bat in the lower-order. That will need to change if Kuldeep has to come into the scheme of things. Bumrah has already played three Tests but with series on the line, he could turn up at The Oval and someone like Mohammed Siraj, the only Indian pacer to have featured in all the games, would be raising his hand up despite the heavy workload. "On these do not know whether you will lose the toss, you will win the toss. You do not know what sort of a start you are going to get. So when you pick a team, I think you will try and pick a balanced team," said India batting coach Sitanshu Kotak recently when asked about playing an extra bowler over an all-rounder. "You cannot go like 'because last game three guys got 100s, we can play a batter less'. "...sometimes we feel that six bowlers are not getting enough bowling. So when you have six options, anyway captain struggles to bowl all six equally. Picking an 11, you will always try and keep that balance of batting and bowling," he reasoned for India's existing selection approach.
Indian Express
25 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘I have rest of my life to be sad about it, important to move on': Divya Deshmukh after FIDE Women's World Cup final heads to tiebreaks
Young Indian teenage sensation Divya Deshmukh took the FIDE Women's World Cup 2025 final clash against compatriot Koneru Humpy into the tiebreaks after playing two draws in both the Classical games. The first game, where Divya had white pieces, was a topsy-turvy game where the 19-year-old from Nagpur created a lot of chances for herself but failed to close in the game, resulting in a draw. Divya said she was disappointed with her game but did not let the game bother her for long. 'I was quite disappointed with the first game, obviously, because I saw everything and I just always ended up making the wrong choice, and it was quite a pity. The first game did not go my way, and even though it was a draw, it kind of felt like a loss. So I was just trying to recover, and today was considerably easier. I think I got myself into a mess for no reason. It should have been an easy draw. I got into trouble for no reason,' said Divya to FIDE's official broadcaster after the final headed towards a tiebreak. Why was 🇮🇳 Divya Deshmukh smiling? @DivyaDeshmukh05 🎙️ Follow LIVE broadcast: — International Chess Federation (@FIDE_chess) July 26, 2025 On being asked whether she was able to move on from a draw that could have gone her way in the first leg, she said, 'It's absolutely necessary to do that (move on), otherwise you're not going to perform well in the next game. I just tell myself that I have the rest of my life to be sad about it. So just don't be sad today, and then we can be sad about it afterwards.' Divya called Humpy a really strong player but she vowed to give her best in the tiebreaks which will be played in the shorter time controls. 'I'm going to give my best. She's, of course, a really strong player, but I'm hoping things go my way.' The teenager was seen smiling during the first leg and when asked about the instance, she said: 'I was getting spammed on my phone after the game because everybody was like, 'Why is she smiling?' I got so annoyed… I deleted all the apps. I didn't realise, first of all, that I was smiling. I think it must have been some inner joke that I thought of, I think I was just so into calculations, and at that point I was honestly a bit frustrated because I saw queen E2, and my problem was bishop C6. I saw queen C4 and I thought of queen D7 here, but I didn't realise D5, and I mis-evaluated it.'
