
First immigration detainees arrive at Florida center in the Everglades
'People are there,' Press Secretary Jae Williams said, though he didn't immediately provide further details on the number of detainees or when they arrived.
'Next stop: back to where they came from,' Uthmeier said on the X social media platform Wednesday. He's been credited as the architect behind the Everglades proposal.
'Stood up in record time under @GovRonDeSantis ' leadership & in coordination with @DHSgov & @ICEgov, Florida is proud to help facilitate @realDonaldTrump 's mission to enforce immigration law,' the account for the Florida Division of Emergency Management posted to the social media site X on Thursday. Requests for additional information from the office of Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis and FDEM, which is building the site, were not returned early Thursday afternoon.
The facility, at an airport used for training, will have an initial capacity of about 3,000 detainees, DeSantis said. The center was built in eight days and features more than 200 security cameras, 28,000-plus feet (8,500 meters) of barbed wire and 400 security personnel.
Immigrants who are arrested by Florida law enforcement officers under the federal government's 287(g) program will be taken to the facility, according to an official in President Donald Trump's administration. The program is led by Immigration and Customs Enforcement and allows police officers to interrogate immigrants in their custody and detain them for potential deportation.
The facility is expected to be expanded in 500 bed increments until it has an estimated 5,000 beds by early July.
A group of Florida Democratic state lawmakers headed to the facility Thursday to conduct 'an official legislative site visit,' citing concerns about conditions for detainees and the awarding of millions of dollars in state contracts for the construction.
'As lawmakers, we have both the legal right and moral responsibility to inspect this site, demand answers, and expose this abuse before it becomes the national blueprint,' the legislators said in a joint statement ahead of the visit.
Federal agencies signaled their opposition Thursday to a lawsuit brought by environmental groups seeking to halt operations at the detention center. Though Trump applauded the center during an official tour earlier this week, the filing on behalf of the Department of Homeland Security seemed to try to distance his administration from the facility, and said no federal money to date has been spent on it.
'DHS has not implemented, authorized, directed, or funded Florida's temporary detention center. Florida is constructing and operating the facility using state funds on state lands under state emergency authority and a preexisting general delegation of federal authority to implement immigration functions,' the U.S. filing says.
Human rights advocates and Native American tribes have also protested against the center, contending it is a threat to the fragile Everglades system, would be cruel to detainees because of heat and mosquitoes, and is on land the tribes consider sacred.
It's also located at a place prone to frequent heavy rains, which caused some flooding in the tents Tuesday during a visit by President Donald Trump to mark its opening. State officials say the complex can withstand a Category 2 hurricane, which packs winds of between 96 and 110 mph (154 and 177 kph), and that contractors worked overnight to shore up areas where flooding occurred.
According to images shared with the AP, overnight Wednesday, workers put up new signs labeled 'Alligator Alcatraz' along the sole highway leading to the site and outside the entrance of the airfield that has been known as the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport. State officials seized the county-owned land where the facility is located using emergency powers authorized by an executive order issued by the governor.
DeSantis and other state officials say locating the facility in the rugged and remote Florida Everglades is meant as a deterrent — and naming it after the notorious federal prison of Alcatraz, an island fortress known for its brutal conditions, is meant to send a message. It's another sign of how the Trump administration and its allies are relying on scare tactics to try to persuade people in the country illegally to leave voluntarily.
State and federal officials have touted the plans on social media and conservative airwaves, sharing a meme of a compound ringed with barbed wire and 'guarded' by alligators wearing hats labeled 'ICE' for Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The Republican Party of Florida has taken to fundraising off the detention center, selling branded T-shirts and beer koozies emblazoned with the facility's name.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
41 minutes ago
- The Hill
Democrats seek to fight fire with fire on redistricting
Democrats on Capitol Hill are pressing blue-state governors to redraw their House lines in response to a similar push by Texas Republicans, warning it's the party's only chance to flip control of the lower chamber — and provide a check on President Trump — after next year's midterms. The Democrats are quick to maintain that mid-decade redistricting — a rare move defying the traditional decennial process — is a rotten trend to emulate and a bad precedent to set. But the urgency in what Democrats see as an existential fight against Trump demands a bending of the rules, they say, to fight fire with fire. 'If the Republicans are going to redistrict in the middle of the decade, then we have no choice but to do the same,' said Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-N.Y.). 'Because to do otherwise would be unilateral disarmament.' California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) is already heading in that direction, saying he's weighing multiple options for how the state can redraw its lines to counter the Texas GOP. And there's speculation that Democratic leaders in several other blue states, including Illinois and New York, are assessing whether to follow suit. As those discussions evolve, House Democrats say they're facing two bad options: Either they stick to their favored tradition of once-a-decade redistricting and watch Republicans, with a boost from Texas, keep control of the House in 2027, or they hold their noses and adopt the mid-decade re-mapping to neutralize the changes coming from Austin. Given the stakes, many are leaning toward the latter. 'It's a race to the bottom, and I wish we weren't in this place,' said Rep. Jared Huffman (D-Calif.). 'But they have sort of forced the conversation, and I think you can understand why California and some other places feel like they've got no choice but to consider something like that.' 'I mean, are we just going to sit back and take it?' Trump fired off the first salvo this month when he said he was vying to pick up five seats in Texas as Gov. Greg Abbott (R) holds a special session next week to consider redistricting, among other priorities. Republicans in Washington are bracing for the traditional headwinds that accompany the president's party in power during midterm seasons, and a mid-cycle redraw in deep-red Texas could help blunt the Republicans' losses next year. The move quickly infuriated Democrats, who saw Trump and Republicans as trying to game the system and preserve their slim House majority before Democrats decided to change their tune and try to offset potential Republican gains by considering mid-cycle redistricting in blue states. 'We can act holier than thou. We can sit on the sidelines, talk about the way the world should be,' Newsom told reporters during a press conference on Wednesday, 'or we can recognize the existential nature that is this moment.' California uses an independent redistricting commission to draw the state's maps, a body that was initially borne out of a ballot measure that state voters approved in 2008, and that was later updated in 2010. Newsom has floated several ideas over how Democrats could tackle mid-cycle redistricting around the independent commission: One would be to create a constitutional amendment to go before voters, which would likely address the independent redistricting body, so that lawmakers could redraw the House maps. Another would be what he described as a 'novel legal question,' which would ultimately end in lawmakers crafting the lines themselves on the idea that the state constitution doesn't say anything about what happens during mid-cycle redistricting. Members of California's congressional delegation have signaled they're on board even if their initial preference is to adhere to the independent redistricting commission. 'It's out of my hands, it's not really my choice or my process, but I do think that Democrats need to stop bringing [a] butter knife to a gunfight,' said Rep. Dave Min (D-Calif.), who represents a competitive House seat. 'All of us want to see a fair process, but if Republicans are going to try to cheat and redistrict, I think Democratic states need to consider all options,' he added. Huffman said Democrats in California could 'easily' pick up three or four seats through redistricting — and 'maybe more.' As Newsom plots his next move, some Democrats say other blue states should jump on board. Torres said New York laws would make the process tricky, but he's pushing for it just the same, 'to the extent that we can legally.' 'New York is more complicated because of the state constitution,' he said. 'But if Republicans are going to exhaust every means of building political power, then we should reciprocate.' Asked if New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) is considering a mid-cycle redistricting push, her senior communications adviser Jerrel Harvey told The Hill in a statement: 'Governor Hochul is closely monitoring the redistricting developments in Texas and any potential implications they may have.' In Illinois, some Democrats are singing a similar tune, arguing that Texas' moves demand a retaliatory response that might include new maps in Springfield. 'Given the extremity of what Texas is considering, it can't be ruled out,' said Rep. Chuy Garcia (D-Ill.). 'They're dismantling the Voting Rights Act and disenfranchising communities that have been protected in the past, given their historic disenfranchisement.' 'We need to look at all possible recourse to keep the playing field as level as possible,' he added. The official justification for the Texas redistricting was provided by Trump's Justice Department, which sent a July 7 letter to Abbott and Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton saying the district lines are illegal because race was a factor in how they were drawn. The suggestion was that the process discriminated against white voters. Four districts in particular 'currently constitute unconstitutional 'coalition districts' and we urge the State of Texas to rectify these race-based considerations,' Harmeet Dhillon, assistant Attorney General of the DOJ's civil rights division, wrote to the Texas officials. Democrats say that argument strains credulity, since it was Abbott and GOP legislators who drew the current lines just four years ago. They're accusing Republicans of abusing their authority — and diluting the minority vote — in a brazen effort to 'rig' the map to stay in power because they couldn't win otherwise. 'It's painfully clear why Republicans are doing this. They know they are going to lose the majority next year,' said Rep. Suzan DelBene (D-Wash.), the head of the House Democrats' campaign arm. While Democrats believe it's a needed avenue to counteract Republicans' redistricting push in Texas, the party faces several hurdles of its own. For one, some members of the party have expressed qualms over the idea to redistrict mid-cycle, suggesting it's anti-democratic. Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.), however, countered those concerns by saying that voters were 'pissed' that many 'lost their health care under the president's reconciliation bill.' 'They're also pissed that their neighbors are being apprehended by people wearing masks and indefinitely being detained, and these are non-violent people that it's happening to,' Swalwell added. 'So right now, they're saying, 'Protect us,' and this is one break-glass way to protect it.' A more serious hurdle, though, could be how the maps are drawn and whether they violate the Voting Rights Act (VRA). Thomas A. Saenz, president and general counsel of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF), said that shaving down majority-minority seats 'runs the danger of violating the Voting Rights Act.' Saenz said that MALDEF would sue if either party engaged in mid-cycle redistricting that violated the VRA as it pertained to Latino communities. Meanwhile, Democrats across the board say the stakes are high. 'This is not just about Texas or California or any other blue state — this is really the moment where we decide as a country whether our democracy succeeds or fails, because it is about something so much bigger,' said Rep. Veronica Escobar (D-Texas).


The Hill
41 minutes ago
- The Hill
O'Rourke urges Democrats to fight ‘fire with fire' in redistricting battle
Former Rep. Beto O'Rourke (D-Texas) called on his fellow Democrats to fight 'fire with fire' as Republicans in his state move forward with an effort to alter Texas's congressional lines ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. In an interview on CNN's 'State of the Union,' O'Rourke said Democrats need to start playing the same game as Republicans and stop worrying only about doing what is right. 'I think it's time that we match fire with fire. I think Democrats in the past too often have been more concerned with being right than being in power. And we have seen Republicans only care about being in power, regardless of what is right,' O'Rourke said in the interview. In a rare mid-decade redistricting effort, Texas state lawmakers are expected to consider new congressional lines during a special session of the Texas legislature, which GOP Gov. Greg Abbott called. The effort to redraw the Texas map has been made at the request of President Trump, who aims to bolster the GOP's slim House majority to ensure that Republicans maintain control of the lower chamber during his final two years of his second term. In a call to Texas Republicans on Tuesday morning, the president urged lawmakers to draw the districts in a way that would allow Republicans to flip five Democratic seats to the GOP. Trump also said that he would be 'OK' with blue-leaning states, such as New York and California, potentially doing the same to increase the number of seats for Democrats. 'I think we'll get five. And there could be some other states we're going to get another three, or four or five in addition,' Trump said Tuesday. 'Texas would be the biggest one.' O'Rourke — who unsuccessfully ran for senator, governor and president — praised California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) for suggesting that he could pursue a similar approach in his state. 'I think that Democrats have been so scared of being branded as hypocrites or coloring outside of the lines that it has absolutely paralyzed them in this struggle for power in America. You don't see the other side worrying about any of that at all, Donald Trump defying the Constitution, the rule of law, the courts, trying to dismantle our very democracy in front of our eyes right now where we sit,' O'Rourke said. 'We have got to fight back. We cannot roll over. We cannot play dead. We cannot submit to them, as Democrats for far too long have done.'


Politico
42 minutes ago
- Politico
Mamdani's social media savvy comes at a cost
A Democratic consultant who was granted anonymity to frankly discuss campaign strategy said running against a candidate affiliated with the Democratic Socialists of America typically entails two strategies: Paint them as too extreme in an effort to limit their support to only the most loyal leftists, or attack their credibility by exposing personal wealth or some other form of privilege. The pro-Cuomo super PAC chose the former. It did not succeed. 'Fix the City's negative paid ads against Mamdani could have been more successful if there had been a viable third or fourth candidate in the race to steer anti-Cuomo votes to. But particularly in the final weeks, it was very clearly Mamdani vs. Cuomo,' the consultant said. 'This made the PAC's attacks on Mamdani less impactful, because whatever concerns voters had about him — and a lot of Mamdani voters had concerns — he still wasn't Andrew Cuomo.' Epstein, Mamdani's creative director, said the campaign was able to reach vast numbers of voters at a fraction of the cost of broadcast spots, with video shoots typically costing in the low four-figures. In the month before the primary, Mamdani's Instagram content was viewed 236 million times, with 62 percent of those viewers not previously following him. More recently, right-leaning news outfits and influencers have been picking up where Fix the City left off. A 2020 interview with The Far Left Show has spawned multiple reports in the New York Post and other outlets. In the spot, Mamdani told the hosts 'the abolition of private property' would be preferable to the current housing crisis and, when asked whether prisons are obsolete, he responded 'what purpose do they serve?' The Washington Free Beacon cited a separate 2020 interview where Mamdani says police officers shouldn't be the ones to respond to incidents where someone 'is going through domestic violence.' And Fox News reported on an old tweet that showed Mamdani directing his middle finger toward a statue of Christopher Columbus. The efficacy of the latest barrage of negative stories, however, appears limited: They are coming out during the doldrums of summer, just as Mamdani is riding high after his decisive primary win and gaining powerful institutional allies. The articles are appearing in outlets, with the exception of the New York Post, that have little sway in New York City elections. And while Mamdani's past positions have in some cases been expressed more crassly than he would want to convey them as mayor, they are not too far afield of his core ideology to alienate voters.