Australia has been invaded. And the invader is sure to come back with greater force
The Advertisera day ago
Australia was invaded last week.
The invader did a lot of damage, similar to previous invasions over the past couple of decades.
The invader took people's homes, damaged the power grid, wrecked roads and bridges, and destroyed crops. All the things that invaders do.
And the invader will come again and again in greater force, destroying lives and property.
The invader, of course, is the more violent weather caused by climate change. The same invader that killed at least 78 in Texas in the last week.
This is the biggest national-security threat facing most countries.
This is the national-security threat that the nations of the earth should be spending 3.5 or even 5 per cent of GDP to address.
It provides the answer Australia should give to the preposterous US demand that we spend more on "defence" - a demand that really means wasting more money buying American weapons and adding to the $500 million already handed over to the Americans to bolster their shipyards to build submarines we will never get.
And what rent is the US paying on Pine Gap, the North-West Cape and the Darwin base, if anything? When are we going to question whether it is worth remaining such a close ally of the US?
What is the point of NATO increasing "defence" spending if NATO cannot use its undoubted force and ability to push the Russians out of Ukraine and arrest Putin to be tried for war crimes for which there is copious evidence?
The passing last week of the One Big Beautiful Bill reinforces the fact that the US no longer shares with us common values. The bill slashes food, medical, and educational help from people who desperately need it to give money to the already wealthy who do not - in a way that runs counter to the Australian fair go. Just as the slashing of USAID is contrary to Australia values because it has killed innocent children.
Maybe we could ignore that. But, more profoundly, in the medium to long term, the bill will likely damage the US and its position in the world so much economically that many American allies will question whether any alliance with them is worth continuing.
It is a tragic irony that President Donald Trump whose political success has relied on the slogan "Make America Great Again" has with this bill and earlier actions attacked the two most important contributors to America's historic greatness: the rule of law and technological superiority.
The rule of law provides the basis for economic strength.
First, personal freedom (from arbitrary arrest and attack from government) nourishes individual economic activity.
Secondly, the certainty that contracts will be impartially enforced; civil wrongs will be impartially addressed; and property rights respected underpins business confidence.
Without the rule of law, the risks cause investors to shy away.
Trump has undermined the world trading system and eroded the rule of law - bedrock Australian values - in America. Worse, the Supreme Court and the Congress have supinely allowed the erosion to go unchecked.
Indeed, they have added to it. This is now not just a rogue President, but a nation that is losing any claim to holding the moral high ground.
The second, more corrosive, effect on American greatness comes with the Big Beautiful Bill's attack on American technological progress.
First, the bill makes it harder for Americans to get a college education by slashing student-loan funding and direct funding to universities. This is slashing the arteries of American industrial and technological superiority.
Worse, the Bill removes tax incentives for electric vehicles and renewable electrification generally and provides more tax incentives for fossil vehicles and fossil industries generally.
In short, it hands to China on an electrolysis plate, all of the wealth and technological advantage of the energy revolution. China already manufactures 80 per cent of the world's solar panels, 75 per cent of its batteries and 70 per cent of its EVs. The US is not even trying to catch up.
Developing nations are not going to waste their money and time transitioning through coal and gas as demand for electrical power rises. They will go straight to the Chinese renewable industry because the US has vacated the field.
READ MORE CRISPIN HULL:
It also hands to China the massive industry of making devices more electrically efficient: think LED light globes, induction stoves and the like.
Trump's mad, ideological obsession against renewable energy has driven him to a position where his other obsession - the rise of China - is lost.
Hawks may well support an alliance with an immoral but strong nation, but surely they are misguided to so closely attach itself to a nation that sabotages its own economic and industrial strength?
Trump has also squandered America's intelligence advantage, by surrounding himself with sycophants. Intelligence that tells a leader what he wants to hear is no intelligence at all. Who can forget the imagery of the sycophants who verbally told Putin that they agreed to his Ukraine invasion while their body language said it was mad.
US intelligence officials concocted evidence to say the illegal bombing of Iran neutralised the threat, when all it did was make Iran more determined.
And speaking of China and the rule of law, if the Chinese Communist Party wants to resume the civil war that ended in 1949, Australia should not get involved, even if the US does. We have wasted too much blood and treasure following the US into mad, bad and illegal wars: Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq. None of them achieved anything but death and destruction and more violence.
Taiwan is not a member of the UN. It does not even profess itself to be an independent nation. Yes, 20 million plus people are enjoying democratic rights which is terrific. But we should no more go to war with China to defend those rights than go to any of a score of African countries to do the same thing.
Where is the end game in all this sabre rattling? It is like the lead-up to World War I. It will all be over by Christmas, they said, with more than four years of futile carnage before them.
And when will American jurists, legislators, and American people generally realise they are being led by an ignorant fool of an emperor who has no clothes?
Australia was invaded last week.
The invader did a lot of damage, similar to previous invasions over the past couple of decades.
The invader took people's homes, damaged the power grid, wrecked roads and bridges, and destroyed crops. All the things that invaders do.
And the invader will come again and again in greater force, destroying lives and property.
The invader, of course, is the more violent weather caused by climate change. The same invader that killed at least 78 in Texas in the last week.
This is the biggest national-security threat facing most countries.
This is the national-security threat that the nations of the earth should be spending 3.5 or even 5 per cent of GDP to address.
It provides the answer Australia should give to the preposterous US demand that we spend more on "defence" - a demand that really means wasting more money buying American weapons and adding to the $500 million already handed over to the Americans to bolster their shipyards to build submarines we will never get.
And what rent is the US paying on Pine Gap, the North-West Cape and the Darwin base, if anything? When are we going to question whether it is worth remaining such a close ally of the US?
What is the point of NATO increasing "defence" spending if NATO cannot use its undoubted force and ability to push the Russians out of Ukraine and arrest Putin to be tried for war crimes for which there is copious evidence?
The passing last week of the One Big Beautiful Bill reinforces the fact that the US no longer shares with us common values. The bill slashes food, medical, and educational help from people who desperately need it to give money to the already wealthy who do not - in a way that runs counter to the Australian fair go. Just as the slashing of USAID is contrary to Australia values because it has killed innocent children.
Maybe we could ignore that. But, more profoundly, in the medium to long term, the bill will likely damage the US and its position in the world so much economically that many American allies will question whether any alliance with them is worth continuing.
It is a tragic irony that President Donald Trump whose political success has relied on the slogan "Make America Great Again" has with this bill and earlier actions attacked the two most important contributors to America's historic greatness: the rule of law and technological superiority.
The rule of law provides the basis for economic strength.
First, personal freedom (from arbitrary arrest and attack from government) nourishes individual economic activity.
Secondly, the certainty that contracts will be impartially enforced; civil wrongs will be impartially addressed; and property rights respected underpins business confidence.
Without the rule of law, the risks cause investors to shy away.
Trump has undermined the world trading system and eroded the rule of law - bedrock Australian values - in America. Worse, the Supreme Court and the Congress have supinely allowed the erosion to go unchecked.
Indeed, they have added to it. This is now not just a rogue President, but a nation that is losing any claim to holding the moral high ground.
The second, more corrosive, effect on American greatness comes with the Big Beautiful Bill's attack on American technological progress.
First, the bill makes it harder for Americans to get a college education by slashing student-loan funding and direct funding to universities. This is slashing the arteries of American industrial and technological superiority.
Worse, the Bill removes tax incentives for electric vehicles and renewable electrification generally and provides more tax incentives for fossil vehicles and fossil industries generally.
In short, it hands to China on an electrolysis plate, all of the wealth and technological advantage of the energy revolution. China already manufactures 80 per cent of the world's solar panels, 75 per cent of its batteries and 70 per cent of its EVs. The US is not even trying to catch up.
Developing nations are not going to waste their money and time transitioning through coal and gas as demand for electrical power rises. They will go straight to the Chinese renewable industry because the US has vacated the field.
READ MORE CRISPIN HULL:
It also hands to China the massive industry of making devices more electrically efficient: think LED light globes, induction stoves and the like.
Trump's mad, ideological obsession against renewable energy has driven him to a position where his other obsession - the rise of China - is lost.
Hawks may well support an alliance with an immoral but strong nation, but surely they are misguided to so closely attach itself to a nation that sabotages its own economic and industrial strength?
Trump has also squandered America's intelligence advantage, by surrounding himself with sycophants. Intelligence that tells a leader what he wants to hear is no intelligence at all. Who can forget the imagery of the sycophants who verbally told Putin that they agreed to his Ukraine invasion while their body language said it was mad.
US intelligence officials concocted evidence to say the illegal bombing of Iran neutralised the threat, when all it did was make Iran more determined.
And speaking of China and the rule of law, if the Chinese Communist Party wants to resume the civil war that ended in 1949, Australia should not get involved, even if the US does. We have wasted too much blood and treasure following the US into mad, bad and illegal wars: Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq. None of them achieved anything but death and destruction and more violence.
Taiwan is not a member of the UN. It does not even profess itself to be an independent nation. Yes, 20 million plus people are enjoying democratic rights which is terrific. But we should no more go to war with China to defend those rights than go to any of a score of African countries to do the same thing.
Where is the end game in all this sabre rattling? It is like the lead-up to World War I. It will all be over by Christmas, they said, with more than four years of futile carnage before them.
And when will American jurists, legislators, and American people generally realise they are being led by an ignorant fool of an emperor who has no clothes?
Australia was invaded last week.
The invader did a lot of damage, similar to previous invasions over the past couple of decades.
The invader took people's homes, damaged the power grid, wrecked roads and bridges, and destroyed crops. All the things that invaders do.
And the invader will come again and again in greater force, destroying lives and property.
The invader, of course, is the more violent weather caused by climate change. The same invader that killed at least 78 in Texas in the last week.
This is the biggest national-security threat facing most countries.
This is the national-security threat that the nations of the earth should be spending 3.5 or even 5 per cent of GDP to address.
It provides the answer Australia should give to the preposterous US demand that we spend more on "defence" - a demand that really means wasting more money buying American weapons and adding to the $500 million already handed over to the Americans to bolster their shipyards to build submarines we will never get.
And what rent is the US paying on Pine Gap, the North-West Cape and the Darwin base, if anything? When are we going to question whether it is worth remaining such a close ally of the US?
What is the point of NATO increasing "defence" spending if NATO cannot use its undoubted force and ability to push the Russians out of Ukraine and arrest Putin to be tried for war crimes for which there is copious evidence?
The passing last week of the One Big Beautiful Bill reinforces the fact that the US no longer shares with us common values. The bill slashes food, medical, and educational help from people who desperately need it to give money to the already wealthy who do not - in a way that runs counter to the Australian fair go. Just as the slashing of USAID is contrary to Australia values because it has killed innocent children.
Maybe we could ignore that. But, more profoundly, in the medium to long term, the bill will likely damage the US and its position in the world so much economically that many American allies will question whether any alliance with them is worth continuing.
It is a tragic irony that President Donald Trump whose political success has relied on the slogan "Make America Great Again" has with this bill and earlier actions attacked the two most important contributors to America's historic greatness: the rule of law and technological superiority.
The rule of law provides the basis for economic strength.
First, personal freedom (from arbitrary arrest and attack from government) nourishes individual economic activity.
Secondly, the certainty that contracts will be impartially enforced; civil wrongs will be impartially addressed; and property rights respected underpins business confidence.
Without the rule of law, the risks cause investors to shy away.
Trump has undermined the world trading system and eroded the rule of law - bedrock Australian values - in America. Worse, the Supreme Court and the Congress have supinely allowed the erosion to go unchecked.
Indeed, they have added to it. This is now not just a rogue President, but a nation that is losing any claim to holding the moral high ground.
The second, more corrosive, effect on American greatness comes with the Big Beautiful Bill's attack on American technological progress.
First, the bill makes it harder for Americans to get a college education by slashing student-loan funding and direct funding to universities. This is slashing the arteries of American industrial and technological superiority.
Worse, the Bill removes tax incentives for electric vehicles and renewable electrification generally and provides more tax incentives for fossil vehicles and fossil industries generally.
In short, it hands to China on an electrolysis plate, all of the wealth and technological advantage of the energy revolution. China already manufactures 80 per cent of the world's solar panels, 75 per cent of its batteries and 70 per cent of its EVs. The US is not even trying to catch up.
Developing nations are not going to waste their money and time transitioning through coal and gas as demand for electrical power rises. They will go straight to the Chinese renewable industry because the US has vacated the field.
READ MORE CRISPIN HULL:
It also hands to China the massive industry of making devices more electrically efficient: think LED light globes, induction stoves and the like.
Trump's mad, ideological obsession against renewable energy has driven him to a position where his other obsession - the rise of China - is lost.
Hawks may well support an alliance with an immoral but strong nation, but surely they are misguided to so closely attach itself to a nation that sabotages its own economic and industrial strength?
Trump has also squandered America's intelligence advantage, by surrounding himself with sycophants. Intelligence that tells a leader what he wants to hear is no intelligence at all. Who can forget the imagery of the sycophants who verbally told Putin that they agreed to his Ukraine invasion while their body language said it was mad.
US intelligence officials concocted evidence to say the illegal bombing of Iran neutralised the threat, when all it did was make Iran more determined.
And speaking of China and the rule of law, if the Chinese Communist Party wants to resume the civil war that ended in 1949, Australia should not get involved, even if the US does. We have wasted too much blood and treasure following the US into mad, bad and illegal wars: Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq. None of them achieved anything but death and destruction and more violence.
Taiwan is not a member of the UN. It does not even profess itself to be an independent nation. Yes, 20 million plus people are enjoying democratic rights which is terrific. But we should no more go to war with China to defend those rights than go to any of a score of African countries to do the same thing.
Where is the end game in all this sabre rattling? It is like the lead-up to World War I. It will all be over by Christmas, they said, with more than four years of futile carnage before them.
And when will American jurists, legislators, and American people generally realise they are being led by an ignorant fool of an emperor who has no clothes?
Australia was invaded last week.
The invader did a lot of damage, similar to previous invasions over the past couple of decades.
The invader took people's homes, damaged the power grid, wrecked roads and bridges, and destroyed crops. All the things that invaders do.
And the invader will come again and again in greater force, destroying lives and property.
The invader, of course, is the more violent weather caused by climate change. The same invader that killed at least 78 in Texas in the last week.
This is the biggest national-security threat facing most countries.
This is the national-security threat that the nations of the earth should be spending 3.5 or even 5 per cent of GDP to address.
It provides the answer Australia should give to the preposterous US demand that we spend more on "defence" - a demand that really means wasting more money buying American weapons and adding to the $500 million already handed over to the Americans to bolster their shipyards to build submarines we will never get.
And what rent is the US paying on Pine Gap, the North-West Cape and the Darwin base, if anything? When are we going to question whether it is worth remaining such a close ally of the US?
What is the point of NATO increasing "defence" spending if NATO cannot use its undoubted force and ability to push the Russians out of Ukraine and arrest Putin to be tried for war crimes for which there is copious evidence?
The passing last week of the One Big Beautiful Bill reinforces the fact that the US no longer shares with us common values. The bill slashes food, medical, and educational help from people who desperately need it to give money to the already wealthy who do not - in a way that runs counter to the Australian fair go. Just as the slashing of USAID is contrary to Australia values because it has killed innocent children.
Maybe we could ignore that. But, more profoundly, in the medium to long term, the bill will likely damage the US and its position in the world so much economically that many American allies will question whether any alliance with them is worth continuing.
It is a tragic irony that President Donald Trump whose political success has relied on the slogan "Make America Great Again" has with this bill and earlier actions attacked the two most important contributors to America's historic greatness: the rule of law and technological superiority.
The rule of law provides the basis for economic strength.
First, personal freedom (from arbitrary arrest and attack from government) nourishes individual economic activity.
Secondly, the certainty that contracts will be impartially enforced; civil wrongs will be impartially addressed; and property rights respected underpins business confidence.
Without the rule of law, the risks cause investors to shy away.
Trump has undermined the world trading system and eroded the rule of law - bedrock Australian values - in America. Worse, the Supreme Court and the Congress have supinely allowed the erosion to go unchecked.
Indeed, they have added to it. This is now not just a rogue President, but a nation that is losing any claim to holding the moral high ground.
The second, more corrosive, effect on American greatness comes with the Big Beautiful Bill's attack on American technological progress.
First, the bill makes it harder for Americans to get a college education by slashing student-loan funding and direct funding to universities. This is slashing the arteries of American industrial and technological superiority.
Worse, the Bill removes tax incentives for electric vehicles and renewable electrification generally and provides more tax incentives for fossil vehicles and fossil industries generally.
In short, it hands to China on an electrolysis plate, all of the wealth and technological advantage of the energy revolution. China already manufactures 80 per cent of the world's solar panels, 75 per cent of its batteries and 70 per cent of its EVs. The US is not even trying to catch up.
Developing nations are not going to waste their money and time transitioning through coal and gas as demand for electrical power rises. They will go straight to the Chinese renewable industry because the US has vacated the field.
READ MORE CRISPIN HULL:
It also hands to China the massive industry of making devices more electrically efficient: think LED light globes, induction stoves and the like.
Trump's mad, ideological obsession against renewable energy has driven him to a position where his other obsession - the rise of China - is lost.
Hawks may well support an alliance with an immoral but strong nation, but surely they are misguided to so closely attach itself to a nation that sabotages its own economic and industrial strength?
Trump has also squandered America's intelligence advantage, by surrounding himself with sycophants. Intelligence that tells a leader what he wants to hear is no intelligence at all. Who can forget the imagery of the sycophants who verbally told Putin that they agreed to his Ukraine invasion while their body language said it was mad.
US intelligence officials concocted evidence to say the illegal bombing of Iran neutralised the threat, when all it did was make Iran more determined.
And speaking of China and the rule of law, if the Chinese Communist Party wants to resume the civil war that ended in 1949, Australia should not get involved, even if the US does. We have wasted too much blood and treasure following the US into mad, bad and illegal wars: Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq. None of them achieved anything but death and destruction and more violence.
Taiwan is not a member of the UN. It does not even profess itself to be an independent nation. Yes, 20 million plus people are enjoying democratic rights which is terrific. But we should no more go to war with China to defend those rights than go to any of a score of African countries to do the same thing.
Where is the end game in all this sabre rattling? It is like the lead-up to World War I. It will all be over by Christmas, they said, with more than four years of futile carnage before them.
And when will American jurists, legislators, and American people generally realise they are being led by an ignorant fool of an emperor who has no clothes?
The invader did a lot of damage, similar to previous invasions over the past couple of decades.
The invader took people's homes, damaged the power grid, wrecked roads and bridges, and destroyed crops. All the things that invaders do.
And the invader will come again and again in greater force, destroying lives and property.
The invader, of course, is the more violent weather caused by climate change. The same invader that killed at least 78 in Texas in the last week.
This is the biggest national-security threat facing most countries.
This is the national-security threat that the nations of the earth should be spending 3.5 or even 5 per cent of GDP to address.
It provides the answer Australia should give to the preposterous US demand that we spend more on "defence" - a demand that really means wasting more money buying American weapons and adding to the $500 million already handed over to the Americans to bolster their shipyards to build submarines we will never get.
And what rent is the US paying on Pine Gap, the North-West Cape and the Darwin base, if anything? When are we going to question whether it is worth remaining such a close ally of the US?
What is the point of NATO increasing "defence" spending if NATO cannot use its undoubted force and ability to push the Russians out of Ukraine and arrest Putin to be tried for war crimes for which there is copious evidence?
The passing last week of the One Big Beautiful Bill reinforces the fact that the US no longer shares with us common values. The bill slashes food, medical, and educational help from people who desperately need it to give money to the already wealthy who do not - in a way that runs counter to the Australian fair go. Just as the slashing of USAID is contrary to Australia values because it has killed innocent children.
Maybe we could ignore that. But, more profoundly, in the medium to long term, the bill will likely damage the US and its position in the world so much economically that many American allies will question whether any alliance with them is worth continuing.
It is a tragic irony that President Donald Trump whose political success has relied on the slogan "Make America Great Again" has with this bill and earlier actions attacked the two most important contributors to America's historic greatness: the rule of law and technological superiority.
The rule of law provides the basis for economic strength.
First, personal freedom (from arbitrary arrest and attack from government) nourishes individual economic activity.
Secondly, the certainty that contracts will be impartially enforced; civil wrongs will be impartially addressed; and property rights respected underpins business confidence.
Without the rule of law, the risks cause investors to shy away.
Trump has undermined the world trading system and eroded the rule of law - bedrock Australian values - in America. Worse, the Supreme Court and the Congress have supinely allowed the erosion to go unchecked.
Indeed, they have added to it. This is now not just a rogue President, but a nation that is losing any claim to holding the moral high ground.
The second, more corrosive, effect on American greatness comes with the Big Beautiful Bill's attack on American technological progress.
First, the bill makes it harder for Americans to get a college education by slashing student-loan funding and direct funding to universities. This is slashing the arteries of American industrial and technological superiority.
Worse, the Bill removes tax incentives for electric vehicles and renewable electrification generally and provides more tax incentives for fossil vehicles and fossil industries generally.
In short, it hands to China on an electrolysis plate, all of the wealth and technological advantage of the energy revolution. China already manufactures 80 per cent of the world's solar panels, 75 per cent of its batteries and 70 per cent of its EVs. The US is not even trying to catch up.
Developing nations are not going to waste their money and time transitioning through coal and gas as demand for electrical power rises. They will go straight to the Chinese renewable industry because the US has vacated the field.
READ MORE CRISPIN HULL:
It also hands to China the massive industry of making devices more electrically efficient: think LED light globes, induction stoves and the like.
Trump's mad, ideological obsession against renewable energy has driven him to a position where his other obsession - the rise of China - is lost.
Hawks may well support an alliance with an immoral but strong nation, but surely they are misguided to so closely attach itself to a nation that sabotages its own economic and industrial strength?
Trump has also squandered America's intelligence advantage, by surrounding himself with sycophants. Intelligence that tells a leader what he wants to hear is no intelligence at all. Who can forget the imagery of the sycophants who verbally told Putin that they agreed to his Ukraine invasion while their body language said it was mad.
US intelligence officials concocted evidence to say the illegal bombing of Iran neutralised the threat, when all it did was make Iran more determined.
And speaking of China and the rule of law, if the Chinese Communist Party wants to resume the civil war that ended in 1949, Australia should not get involved, even if the US does. We have wasted too much blood and treasure following the US into mad, bad and illegal wars: Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq. None of them achieved anything but death and destruction and more violence.
Taiwan is not a member of the UN. It does not even profess itself to be an independent nation. Yes, 20 million plus people are enjoying democratic rights which is terrific. But we should no more go to war with China to defend those rights than go to any of a score of African countries to do the same thing.
Where is the end game in all this sabre rattling? It is like the lead-up to World War I. It will all be over by Christmas, they said, with more than four years of futile carnage before them.
And when will American jurists, legislators, and American people generally realise they are being led by an ignorant fool of an emperor who has no clothes?
Australia was invaded last week.
The invader did a lot of damage, similar to previous invasions over the past couple of decades.
The invader took people's homes, damaged the power grid, wrecked roads and bridges, and destroyed crops. All the things that invaders do.
And the invader will come again and again in greater force, destroying lives and property.
The invader, of course, is the more violent weather caused by climate change. The same invader that killed at least 78 in Texas in the last week.
This is the biggest national-security threat facing most countries.
This is the national-security threat that the nations of the earth should be spending 3.5 or even 5 per cent of GDP to address.
It provides the answer Australia should give to the preposterous US demand that we spend more on "defence" - a demand that really means wasting more money buying American weapons and adding to the $500 million already handed over to the Americans to bolster their shipyards to build submarines we will never get.
And what rent is the US paying on Pine Gap, the North-West Cape and the Darwin base, if anything? When are we going to question whether it is worth remaining such a close ally of the US?
What is the point of NATO increasing "defence" spending if NATO cannot use its undoubted force and ability to push the Russians out of Ukraine and arrest Putin to be tried for war crimes for which there is copious evidence?
The passing last week of the One Big Beautiful Bill reinforces the fact that the US no longer shares with us common values. The bill slashes food, medical, and educational help from people who desperately need it to give money to the already wealthy who do not - in a way that runs counter to the Australian fair go. Just as the slashing of USAID is contrary to Australia values because it has killed innocent children.
Maybe we could ignore that. But, more profoundly, in the medium to long term, the bill will likely damage the US and its position in the world so much economically that many American allies will question whether any alliance with them is worth continuing.
It is a tragic irony that President Donald Trump whose political success has relied on the slogan "Make America Great Again" has with this bill and earlier actions attacked the two most important contributors to America's historic greatness: the rule of law and technological superiority.
The rule of law provides the basis for economic strength.
First, personal freedom (from arbitrary arrest and attack from government) nourishes individual economic activity.
Secondly, the certainty that contracts will be impartially enforced; civil wrongs will be impartially addressed; and property rights respected underpins business confidence.
Without the rule of law, the risks cause investors to shy away.
Trump has undermined the world trading system and eroded the rule of law - bedrock Australian values - in America. Worse, the Supreme Court and the Congress have supinely allowed the erosion to go unchecked.
Indeed, they have added to it. This is now not just a rogue President, but a nation that is losing any claim to holding the moral high ground.
The second, more corrosive, effect on American greatness comes with the Big Beautiful Bill's attack on American technological progress.
First, the bill makes it harder for Americans to get a college education by slashing student-loan funding and direct funding to universities. This is slashing the arteries of American industrial and technological superiority.
Worse, the Bill removes tax incentives for electric vehicles and renewable electrification generally and provides more tax incentives for fossil vehicles and fossil industries generally.
In short, it hands to China on an electrolysis plate, all of the wealth and technological advantage of the energy revolution. China already manufactures 80 per cent of the world's solar panels, 75 per cent of its batteries and 70 per cent of its EVs. The US is not even trying to catch up.
Developing nations are not going to waste their money and time transitioning through coal and gas as demand for electrical power rises. They will go straight to the Chinese renewable industry because the US has vacated the field.
READ MORE CRISPIN HULL:
It also hands to China the massive industry of making devices more electrically efficient: think LED light globes, induction stoves and the like.
Trump's mad, ideological obsession against renewable energy has driven him to a position where his other obsession - the rise of China - is lost.
Hawks may well support an alliance with an immoral but strong nation, but surely they are misguided to so closely attach itself to a nation that sabotages its own economic and industrial strength?
Trump has also squandered America's intelligence advantage, by surrounding himself with sycophants. Intelligence that tells a leader what he wants to hear is no intelligence at all. Who can forget the imagery of the sycophants who verbally told Putin that they agreed to his Ukraine invasion while their body language said it was mad.
US intelligence officials concocted evidence to say the illegal bombing of Iran neutralised the threat, when all it did was make Iran more determined.
And speaking of China and the rule of law, if the Chinese Communist Party wants to resume the civil war that ended in 1949, Australia should not get involved, even if the US does. We have wasted too much blood and treasure following the US into mad, bad and illegal wars: Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq. None of them achieved anything but death and destruction and more violence.
Taiwan is not a member of the UN. It does not even profess itself to be an independent nation. Yes, 20 million plus people are enjoying democratic rights which is terrific. But we should no more go to war with China to defend those rights than go to any of a score of African countries to do the same thing.
Where is the end game in all this sabre rattling? It is like the lead-up to World War I. It will all be over by Christmas, they said, with more than four years of futile carnage before them.
And when will American jurists, legislators, and American people generally realise they are being led by an ignorant fool of an emperor who has no clothes?
Australia was invaded last week.
The invader did a lot of damage, similar to previous invasions over the past couple of decades.
The invader took people's homes, damaged the power grid, wrecked roads and bridges, and destroyed crops. All the things that invaders do.
And the invader will come again and again in greater force, destroying lives and property.
The invader, of course, is the more violent weather caused by climate change. The same invader that killed at least 78 in Texas in the last week.
This is the biggest national-security threat facing most countries.
This is the national-security threat that the nations of the earth should be spending 3.5 or even 5 per cent of GDP to address.
It provides the answer Australia should give to the preposterous US demand that we spend more on "defence" - a demand that really means wasting more money buying American weapons and adding to the $500 million already handed over to the Americans to bolster their shipyards to build submarines we will never get.
And what rent is the US paying on Pine Gap, the North-West Cape and the Darwin base, if anything? When are we going to question whether it is worth remaining such a close ally of the US?
What is the point of NATO increasing "defence" spending if NATO cannot use its undoubted force and ability to push the Russians out of Ukraine and arrest Putin to be tried for war crimes for which there is copious evidence?
The passing last week of the One Big Beautiful Bill reinforces the fact that the US no longer shares with us common values. The bill slashes food, medical, and educational help from people who desperately need it to give money to the already wealthy who do not - in a way that runs counter to the Australian fair go. Just as the slashing of USAID is contrary to Australia values because it has killed innocent children.
Maybe we could ignore that. But, more profoundly, in the medium to long term, the bill will likely damage the US and its position in the world so much economically that many American allies will question whether any alliance with them is worth continuing.
It is a tragic irony that President Donald Trump whose political success has relied on the slogan "Make America Great Again" has with this bill and earlier actions attacked the two most important contributors to America's historic greatness: the rule of law and technological superiority.
The rule of law provides the basis for economic strength.
First, personal freedom (from arbitrary arrest and attack from government) nourishes individual economic activity.
Secondly, the certainty that contracts will be impartially enforced; civil wrongs will be impartially addressed; and property rights respected underpins business confidence.
Without the rule of law, the risks cause investors to shy away.
Trump has undermined the world trading system and eroded the rule of law - bedrock Australian values - in America. Worse, the Supreme Court and the Congress have supinely allowed the erosion to go unchecked.
Indeed, they have added to it. This is now not just a rogue President, but a nation that is losing any claim to holding the moral high ground.
The second, more corrosive, effect on American greatness comes with the Big Beautiful Bill's attack on American technological progress.
First, the bill makes it harder for Americans to get a college education by slashing student-loan funding and direct funding to universities. This is slashing the arteries of American industrial and technological superiority.
Worse, the Bill removes tax incentives for electric vehicles and renewable electrification generally and provides more tax incentives for fossil vehicles and fossil industries generally.
In short, it hands to China on an electrolysis plate, all of the wealth and technological advantage of the energy revolution. China already manufactures 80 per cent of the world's solar panels, 75 per cent of its batteries and 70 per cent of its EVs. The US is not even trying to catch up.
Developing nations are not going to waste their money and time transitioning through coal and gas as demand for electrical power rises. They will go straight to the Chinese renewable industry because the US has vacated the field.
READ MORE CRISPIN HULL:
It also hands to China the massive industry of making devices more electrically efficient: think LED light globes, induction stoves and the like.
Trump's mad, ideological obsession against renewable energy has driven him to a position where his other obsession - the rise of China - is lost.
Hawks may well support an alliance with an immoral but strong nation, but surely they are misguided to so closely attach itself to a nation that sabotages its own economic and industrial strength?
Trump has also squandered America's intelligence advantage, by surrounding himself with sycophants. Intelligence that tells a leader what he wants to hear is no intelligence at all. Who can forget the imagery of the sycophants who verbally told Putin that they agreed to his Ukraine invasion while their body language said it was mad.
US intelligence officials concocted evidence to say the illegal bombing of Iran neutralised the threat, when all it did was make Iran more determined.
And speaking of China and the rule of law, if the Chinese Communist Party wants to resume the civil war that ended in 1949, Australia should not get involved, even if the US does. We have wasted too much blood and treasure following the US into mad, bad and illegal wars: Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq. None of them achieved anything but death and destruction and more violence.
Taiwan is not a member of the UN. It does not even profess itself to be an independent nation. Yes, 20 million plus people are enjoying democratic rights which is terrific. But we should no more go to war with China to defend those rights than go to any of a score of African countries to do the same thing.
Where is the end game in all this sabre rattling? It is like the lead-up to World War I. It will all be over by Christmas, they said, with more than four years of futile carnage before them.
And when will American jurists, legislators, and American people generally realise they are being led by an ignorant fool of an emperor who has no clothes?
Australia was invaded last week.
The invader did a lot of damage, similar to previous invasions over the past couple of decades.
The invader took people's homes, damaged the power grid, wrecked roads and bridges, and destroyed crops. All the things that invaders do.
And the invader will come again and again in greater force, destroying lives and property.
The invader, of course, is the more violent weather caused by climate change. The same invader that killed at least 78 in Texas in the last week.
This is the biggest national-security threat facing most countries.
This is the national-security threat that the nations of the earth should be spending 3.5 or even 5 per cent of GDP to address.
It provides the answer Australia should give to the preposterous US demand that we spend more on "defence" - a demand that really means wasting more money buying American weapons and adding to the $500 million already handed over to the Americans to bolster their shipyards to build submarines we will never get.
And what rent is the US paying on Pine Gap, the North-West Cape and the Darwin base, if anything? When are we going to question whether it is worth remaining such a close ally of the US?
What is the point of NATO increasing "defence" spending if NATO cannot use its undoubted force and ability to push the Russians out of Ukraine and arrest Putin to be tried for war crimes for which there is copious evidence?
The passing last week of the One Big Beautiful Bill reinforces the fact that the US no longer shares with us common values. The bill slashes food, medical, and educational help from people who desperately need it to give money to the already wealthy who do not - in a way that runs counter to the Australian fair go. Just as the slashing of USAID is contrary to Australia values because it has killed innocent children.
Maybe we could ignore that. But, more profoundly, in the medium to long term, the bill will likely damage the US and its position in the world so much economically that many American allies will question whether any alliance with them is worth continuing.
It is a tragic irony that President Donald Trump whose political success has relied on the slogan "Make America Great Again" has with this bill and earlier actions attacked the two most important contributors to America's historic greatness: the rule of law and technological superiority.
The rule of law provides the basis for economic strength.
First, personal freedom (from arbitrary arrest and attack from government) nourishes individual economic activity.
Secondly, the certainty that contracts will be impartially enforced; civil wrongs will be impartially addressed; and property rights respected underpins business confidence.
Without the rule of law, the risks cause investors to shy away.
Trump has undermined the world trading system and eroded the rule of law - bedrock Australian values - in America. Worse, the Supreme Court and the Congress have supinely allowed the erosion to go unchecked.
Indeed, they have added to it. This is now not just a rogue President, but a nation that is losing any claim to holding the moral high ground.
The second, more corrosive, effect on American greatness comes with the Big Beautiful Bill's attack on American technological progress.
First, the bill makes it harder for Americans to get a college education by slashing student-loan funding and direct funding to universities. This is slashing the arteries of American industrial and technological superiority.
Worse, the Bill removes tax incentives for electric vehicles and renewable electrification generally and provides more tax incentives for fossil vehicles and fossil industries generally.
In short, it hands to China on an electrolysis plate, all of the wealth and technological advantage of the energy revolution. China already manufactures 80 per cent of the world's solar panels, 75 per cent of its batteries and 70 per cent of its EVs. The US is not even trying to catch up.
Developing nations are not going to waste their money and time transitioning through coal and gas as demand for electrical power rises. They will go straight to the Chinese renewable industry because the US has vacated the field.
READ MORE CRISPIN HULL:
It also hands to China the massive industry of making devices more electrically efficient: think LED light globes, induction stoves and the like.
Trump's mad, ideological obsession against renewable energy has driven him to a position where his other obsession - the rise of China - is lost.
Hawks may well support an alliance with an immoral but strong nation, but surely they are misguided to so closely attach itself to a nation that sabotages its own economic and industrial strength?
Trump has also squandered America's intelligence advantage, by surrounding himself with sycophants. Intelligence that tells a leader what he wants to hear is no intelligence at all. Who can forget the imagery of the sycophants who verbally told Putin that they agreed to his Ukraine invasion while their body language said it was mad.
US intelligence officials concocted evidence to say the illegal bombing of Iran neutralised the threat, when all it did was make Iran more determined.
And speaking of China and the rule of law, if the Chinese Communist Party wants to resume the civil war that ended in 1949, Australia should not get involved, even if the US does. We have wasted too much blood and treasure following the US into mad, bad and illegal wars: Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq. None of them achieved anything but death and destruction and more violence.
Taiwan is not a member of the UN. It does not even profess itself to be an independent nation. Yes, 20 million plus people are enjoying democratic rights which is terrific. But we should no more go to war with China to defend those rights than go to any of a score of African countries to do the same thing.
Where is the end game in all this sabre rattling? It is like the lead-up to World War I. It will all be over by Christmas, they said, with more than four years of futile carnage before them.
And when will American jurists, legislators, and American people generally realise they are being led by an ignorant fool of an emperor who has no clothes?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Telegraph
19 minutes ago
- Daily Telegraph
Russian transport minister Roman Starovoit dies by ‘suicide' after being sacked
Don't miss out on the headlines from World. Followed categories will be added to My News. Russia's transport minister allegedly shot himself just hours after President Vladimir Putin dismissed him from his post. Roman Starovoit was abruptly fired on Monday after just a year in his key position, The New York Post reported. He was then found dead inside his car in Odintsovo, a neighbourhood just west of Moscow where Russia's elite reside. Mr Starovoit was found with a gun that was an official gift from the Kremlin, officials said. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov refused to comment on Mr Starovoit's dismissal, with no reason for his firing listed on the Kremlin's website. Officials also did not give a reason for his reported suicide. Russian transport minister Roman Starovoit was found dead in his car on Monday. Picture: Dmitry Astakhov/Sputnik/Government Pool Photo via AP Russian law enforcement agents carry the body of former Mr Starovoit. Picture: Evgeniy Razumniy/Kommersant Photo via AP Mr Starovoit was tapped as Russia's new transport minister in May 2024 after serving as the governor of the Kursk region, an area at the heart of an embezzlement case that allegedly aided Ukraine's surprise counter-invasion last year. The Kremlin has been investigating allegations that officials in Kursk embezzled state funds meant for fortifying the region around the time Ukraine was planning its major assault on Russian soil. The Kursk invasion was the first time in Russia's history that Moscow lost land to an invader since World War II, leaving Mr Putin humiliated and forcing the Russian army to scramble for months to reclaim the land. Mr Starovoit's successor in Kursk, Alexi Smirnov, was allegedly tied to the incident and arrested on embezzlement charges in April, with Russian media claiming that charges were pending for the transport minister. Russian President Vladimir Putin with Mr Starovoit in January. Picture: Gavriil Grigorov/Sputnik/Kremlin Pool Photo via AP While the Kremlin never made statements on whether Mr Starovoit was under investigation, a transport industry source told Reuters that the minister's position had come into question over the Kursk scandal. Mr Starovoit's dismissal also comes after a weekend of travel chaos plagued Russian airports, with more than 160 flights cancelled and another 240 delayed due to Ukraine's drone attacks. Russian commentators speaking about Mr Starovoit's sacking, however, said that the disruptions have become common due to the frequency of Ukraine's attacks, claiming the weekend chaos likely played no role in his dismissal. Following Mr Starovoit's firing – but before his death was reported – his deputy transport minister, Andrei Nikitin, was tapped as his replacement. 'At present, in the President's opinion, Andrei Nikitin's professional qualities and experience will best contribute to ensuring that this agency, which the President described as extremely important, fulfils its tasks and functions,' Mr Peskov said in a press conference that took place before Mr Starovoit's death became public. This article was originally published by The New York Post and was reproduced with permission Originally published as Russian transport minister Roman Starovoit dies by 'suicide' after being sacked
Sky News AU
29 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Trump should have won Noble Prize during first term for the Abraham Accords: Mick Mulvaney
Former White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney discusses Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's nomination of US President Donald Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize. "Donald Trump probably should have won the Nobel Prize for the Abraham Accords during his first term," Mr Mulvaney told Sky News Australia. "Barack Obama won it for being Barack Obama, Donald Trump actually did something, Abraham Accords … it doesn't surprise me this nomination came today."
The Age
44 minutes ago
- The Age
Penguins on standby as Trump ruffles global trade feathers
The penguins of Heard and McDonald Islands are back quaking in their flippers as they await a tariff letter from Donald Trump. After seeing what an eclectic group of nations is going to face if they sell goods to American consumers, the penguins (and seals) of the frigid outpost closer to Antarctica than Australia can be rightfully more than a little concerned about what the US president has in store for them – having been on the first list of 'liberation day' tariffs in April. The only common element to Trump's initial list of 14 countries to be hit with extra tariffs of between 25 per cent and 40 per cent is each runs a trade deficit with the United States. That stretches between $US69.4 billion with Japan and $US126 million with Bosnia and Herzegovina. The common thread – deficits – is a positive sign (among the bleakness of the economic ramifications of Trump's actions for American consumers) for Prime Minister Anthony Albanese. In his letters to the 14 nations, Trump made clear they were all about the 'significant trade deficit' between that country and the US. In each missive, he accused the affected nation of having a 'closed trading market' to American products. Australia, despite a couple of monthly surpluses this year by enormous movements in gold caused by investors fearful of the impact of Trump's policies on US inflation, continues to run a deficit with America. In Trump's unhinged view of the trading world, an American trade deficit requires retribution. A surplus means a baseline tariff of 10 per cent. The argument that nations will escape a tariff ignores a key part of Trump's economic plan. He needs the tariff revenue to pay for the Big Beautiful Bill that will blow a $US3.3 trillion hole in the US budget over the next decade.
