Buy now, pay later loans will soon affect some credit scores
NEW YORK — Hundreds of millions of 'Buy Now, Pay Later' loans will soon affect credit scores for millions of Americans who use the loans to buy clothing, furniture, concert tickets, and takeout.
Scoring company FICO said Monday that it is rolling out a new model that factors the short-term loans into their consumer scores. A majority of lenders use FICO scores to determine a borrower's credit worthiness. Previously, the loans had been excluded, though Buy Now, Pay Later company Affirm began voluntarily reporting pay-in-four loans to Experian, a separate credit bureau, in April.
The new FICO scores will be available beginning in the fall, as an option for lenders to increase visibility into consumers' repayment behavior, the company said. Still, not all Buy Now, Pay Later companies share their data with the credit bureaus, and not all lenders will opt in to using the new models, so widespread adoption could take time, according to Adam Rust, director of financial services at the nonprofit Consumer Federation of America.
Here's what to know.
Typically, when using Buy Now, Pay Later loans, consumers pay for a given purchase in four installments over six weeks, in a model more similar to layaway than to a traditional credit card. The loans are marketed as zero-interest, and most require no credit check or only a soft credit check.
The main three credit reporting bureaus, Experian, TransUnion, and Equifax, haven't yet incorporated a standard way of including these new financial products in their reports, since they don't adhere to existing models of lending and repayment. FICO, the score of the Fair Isaac Corporation, uses data from the bureaus to calculate its own credit score, and is independently choosing to pilot a new score that takes the loans into account.
BNPL providers promote the plans as safer alternatives to credit cards, while consumer advocates warn about 'loan stacking,' in which consumers take on many loans at once across several companies. So far, there's been little visibility into this practice in the industry, and the opacity has led to warnings of 'phantom debt' that could mask the health of the consumer.
In a statement, FICO said that their new credit score model is accounting for the growing significance of the loans in the U.S. credit ecosystem.
'Buy Now, Pay Later loans are playing an increasingly important role in consumers' financial lives,' said Julie May, vice president and general manager of business-to-business scores at FICO. 'We're enabling lenders to more accurately evaluate credit readiness, especially for consumers whose first credit experience is through BNPL products.'
FICO said the new model will responsibly expand access to credit. Many users of BNPL loans are younger consumers and consumers who may not have good or lengthy credit histories. In a joint study with Affirm, FICO trained its new scores on a sample of more than 500,000 BNPL borrowers and found that consumers with five or more loans typically saw their scores increase or remain stable under the new model.
For consumers who pay back their BNPL loans in a timely way, the new credit scoring model could help them improve their credit scores, increasing access to mortgages, car loans, and apartment rentals. Currently, the loans don't typically contribute directly to improved scores, though missed payments can hurt or ding a score.
Since March, credit scores have declined steeply for millions, as student loan payments resume and many student borrowers find themselves unable to make regular payments on their federal student loans.
Nadine Chabrier, senior policy and litigation counsel at the Center for Responsible Lending, said her main concern is that the integration of the loans into a score could have unexpected negative effects on people who are already credit-restrained.
'There isn't a lot of information out there about how integrating BNPL into credit scoring will work out,' Chabrier said. 'FICO simulated the effect on credit scoring through a study. They saw that some users' scores increased. But if you factor in something that, last week, didn't affect your credit, and this week, it does, without having very much information about the modeling, it's a little hard to tell what the consequences will be.'
Chabrier cited research that's shown that many BNPL users have revolving credit card balances, lower credit scores, delinquencies, and existing debt. Women of color are also more likely to use the loans, she said.
'This is a credit vulnerable community,' said Chabrier.
Rust, of the Consumer Federation of America, said he doesn't expect this to be a game-changer for consumers who already have a credit profile.
'Are we at a point where using BNPL loans will dramatically alter your credit profile? Probably not,' he said. 'I think it's important that people have reasonable expectations.'
Rust said the average BNPL loan is for $135, and that repaying such small loans, even consistently, might not result in changes to a credit score that would significantly move the needle.
'It's not about going from 620 to 624. It's about going from 620 to 780,' he said, referring to the kind of credit score jumps that affect one's credit card offers, interest rates on loans, and the like.
Still, Rust said that increased transparency around the loans could create a more accurate picture of a consumer's debts, which could improve accurate underwriting and keep consumers from over-extending themselves.
'This addresses the problem of 'phantom debt,' and that's a good thing,' he said. 'Because it could be something that keeps people from getting too deeply into debt they can't afford.'
Lewis writes for the Associated Press.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Credit card rewards are slowly becoming way less rewarding — what's behind that distressing trend
Credit cards are popular with Americans — and so are the points, rewards and perks that come with them. That's why some Americans devote time and energy (and spending) to optimize multiple rewards programs and claim rewards they wouldn't otherwise be able to afford, such as flying business class. The number of credit card accounts in the U.S. has increased steadily over the past 15 years; in 2023, 82% of adults had a credit card. About half of cardholders carry a balance and, in the first quarter of 2025, Americans were carrying a near-record total of $1.18 trillion in credit card balances. But economic uncertainty and pending legislation are about to change the rewards landscape — and not for the better. I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it Rewards have played a part in the growth of credit cards (and debt) by helping credit card providers attract and retain customers. 'The reward point functions as an alternative currency with real economic value, yet it continues to carry aspirational and emotional significance,' So Yeon Chun, an associate professor of technology and operations management at INSEAD, recently told Business Insider. 'In other words,' he said, 'rewards have become a dual-purpose behavioral currency: A tool for economic relief and a channel for emotional and symbolic value.' Redeeming rewards 'can have an outsize effect on satisfaction' on cash-strapped consumers, according to Bain & Company. A few years ago, rewards redemption was a 'routine episode, or interaction that fulfills a need, unlikely to faze customers,' according to the global management consulting firm. 'But it has since become a 'moment of truth' — an episode with a high likelihood to delight or annoy, depending on how well the credit card provider executes the end-to-end process.' At the same time, rewards have economic value that consumers are using to make day-to-day purchases and cover necessities. 'Most consumers, including middle-income earners, now use rewards not just to manage spending, inflation or debt, but also to preserve lifestyle,' Chun told Business Insider. Consumers had amassed reward balances of more than $33 billion by the end of 2022, according to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). And those rewards are 'incredibly popular,' according to the Ipsos Consumer Tracker, summing up the results of a 2024 poll. Seventy-one percent of Americans have a rewards or cashback credit card, and about one in five younger Americans (ages 18-34) use the rewards for experiences they 'couldn't afford otherwise.' But it also found that over a third of respondents said they wouldn't spend as much on their credit cards if rewards weren't offered. Read more: You don't have to be a millionaire to gain access to . In fact, you can get started with as little as $10 — here's how Despite their popularity, economic headwinds may cause a reduction or restructuring of rewards programs similar to what happened during the Great Recession, when 0% balance transfer programs were cut back dramatically. While economic prognosticators disagree as to how likely we are to enter a recession in the near term, continued near-record levels of economic policy uncertainty are having much the same effect on business decisions as a recession. For instance, airline reward programs have already started to lose value — and other perks may soon follow. 'In the more typical downturn, we are likely to see a different kind of shift. Issuers will preserve the appearance of program stability while quietly reducing average value,' Chun told Business Insider. 'Redemption thresholds may rise, expiration timelines may tighten, bonus categories may rotate more frequently, and access to high-value redemptions will become more conditional.' Even more concerning to consumers who've racked up rewards, those programs may disappear altogether in the U.S. — despite their popularity. Senator Dick Durbin, a Democrat from Illinois, and Sen. Roger Marshall, a Republican from Kansas, are driving efforts to move the Credit Card Competition Act through Congress. The bill would reduce interchange fees, which are the fees charged to merchants that allow them to accept credit cards. These fees are a source of revenue for credit card companies and help to fund rewards programs. Some major airlines have already warned that if the legislation passes, frequent flyer programs could disappear. At the same time, credit card providers can devalue your rewards at any time (which can also happen naturally with inflation) — so accumulating and hoarding points may not be in your best interest. This tiny hot Costco item has skyrocketed 74% in price in under 2 years — but now the retail giant is restricting purchases. Here's how to buy the coveted asset in bulk Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What is the Strait of Hormuz? Why Iran has threatened to close it after US conflict
As Iran and Israel enter a ceasefire on June 24, the future of the conflict and U.S. involvement remains on unsteady ground, following Iran's retaliatory strike on an overseas U.S. military base one day prior. Turmoil continues to roil the Middle East in a 12-day conflict that reached new heights June 21 after President Donald Trump authorized a series of U.S. missile strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities. Ever since, world leaders, markets and Americans have speculated how Iran might respond, with the first action of retaliation seen on June 23 when Iran fired several missiles at the largest U.S. military base in the region just outside of Doha, Qatar. New Poll: Majority of Americans disapprove of US strikes on Iran Live Updates: Angry Trump says both sides broke ceasefire, tells Israel to 'calm down' While it is unclear if Iran's strikes on the Al Udeid Air Base marked the end of its response, the Islamic Republic still has another chess piece at its disposal should the conflict continue: the Strait of Hormuz. The Strait of Hormuz is a major oil transportation route, ferrying around 20% of the world's oil and gas flow. The narrow channel, whittling down to just 21 miles across at one point, connects the Persian Gulf to the Gulf of Oman and the wider Arabian Sea. The waterway's choke point is sandwiched by the Iranian coastline to one side and a small Omani peninsula on the other. Replay: President Donald Trump addresses the nation after US bombs Iran It is a vital route for exporting oil from major producers like Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Iran, Qatar, and the UAE. The Strait of Hormuz is a vital artery for global energy flows, accounting for about 25% of global seaborne oil shipments and about 20% of liquified natural gas flows. Iran has threatened to mine the strait in recent days to effectively block the transportation of oil, a disruption that would likely result in higher fuel costs for global consumers, including Americans, analysts told USA TODAY. If oil prices surge, the price of almost everything goes up as well. Iran's parliament approved a measure the day after U.S. airstrikes hit three of its nuclear facilities, endorsing the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, making it a possible option for retaliation, though the decision to close the channel ultimately belongs to Iran's Supreme National Security Council. Contributing: Medora Lee and Savannah Kuchar, USA TODAY; Reuters. Kathryn Palmer is a national trending news reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach her at kapalmer@ and on X @KathrynPlmr. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: What is the Strait of Hormuz? Iran threatens to close route


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Map Shows States Americans Are Moving From and To
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. With declining births and slower immigration following the Trump administration's strict deportation policies, domestic migration is bound to become an increasingly more important driver of U.S. population change, a recent study found. Florida and Texas, which have both been among the fastest-growing states in the nation for years, know what a positive impact a booming population can have on the local economy and job market, as well as what happens when this demographic explosion starts to wane. This year's State of the Nation's Housing report, released earlier this week by the Joint Center for Housing Studies (JCHS) of Harvard University, found that the movement of Americans across the country has declined in 2024 all across the country, including in the states that are traditionally the most popular among movers. Last year, according to researchers, the nation reported the lowest rates of household mobility on record since the 1970s. Fewer Americans Are Moving Across the Country According to the latest Current Population Survey, about 8.3 percent of households (10.9 million) reported moving over the past year, a rate unchanged from a year earlier and down from 9.8 percent (12.6 million) before the pandemic, in 2019. In the same year, the homeowner mobility rate dropped to an all-time low of 3.1 percent, down from 3.7 percent in 2023 and 4.3 percent in 2019. That means U.S. homeowners made 24 percent fewer moves last year than in 2019, before the pandemic unleashed a surge of remote workers relocating from large, busy metropolises to smaller, more affordable towns. The South was the main beneficiary of this influx of people relocating to cheaper, more livable parts of the nation, with Florida and Texas adding hundreds of thousands of new residents over the past five years. The rate of domestic migration in Florida increased from 6.5 in 2019 to 8.1 in 2020, 11.4 in 2021, and reached a peak of 14.2 in 2022. In 2023, it fell to 8.2, and in 2024, it plunged to 2.7. In Texas, the rate increased from 4.2 in 2019 to 5.6 in 2020, 6.7 in 2021, 7.4 in 2022, and 6.3 in 2023, only to fall to 2.8 in 2024. While domestic migration remained the main source of population growth last year for 11 states, primarily in the South, net gains from migration fell in several of these states. In North Carolina, domestic migration decreased by 17 percent from the previous year, while in Tennessee, it decreased by 20 percent. Not only has in-migration—the process of relocating permanently to another part of one's home country—slowed down in the states that were most benefiting from it over the past five years, but out-migration from states that were hemorrhaging residents also slowed down last year. The number of residents moving out of California, for example, dropped by 30 percent in 2024, from −344,000 in 2023 to −240,000 in 2024. New York, another state where out-migration has surpassed in-migration in recent years, lost 121,000 people on net to interstate migration in 2024, about 30 percent fewer than in 2023 (−177,000) and 60 percent fewer than in 2022 (−296,000). Why Is Domestic Migration Declining? Since 2019, the cost of homeownership has skyrocketed nationwide, including in states that previously offered more affordable options. The median sale price of a typical U.S. home was $313,000 in the first quarter of 2019, according to data from the U.S. Census Bureau; in the first quarter of 2024, it had surged to $426,800. As of the first quarter of 2025, $416,900. Mortgage rates have also gone through the roof since 2019. If historically low monthly payments during the pandemic spurred a homebuying frenzy nationwide, rates lingering around the 7 percent mark are now hindering demand, pushing buyers to the sidelines. The result is that packing up and moving to another state has become a trickier operation for many Americans, considering the overall cost of purchasing a new property. On top of that, return-to-office orders from companies that had been pressured to offer remote working options during the pandemic are now forcing many employees to go back to the same busy metros they had left. According to the JCHS study, last year there was a slowdown in moves out of urban centers across the U.S., which had accelerated during the pandemic. Net moves from dense urban counties, such as those in New York City, researchers found, fell for the third consecutive year in 2024, down 17 percent from the previous year. At the same time, net moves into suburban counties fell 16 percent year-over-year, while gains in smaller metros and non-metro counties declined by 12 percent and 31 percent, respectively, over the past year; however, these remain higher than pre-pandemic levels.