Harvard Fights Back Against Trump International Student Ban With Lawsuit
Following a move that has stunned the global academic community and sparked widespread legal and diplomatic outrage, Harvard University filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration after the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) revoked its ability to enroll international students under the F-1 visa program.
The adverse decision impacts over 7,000 current students and scholars, many of whom contribute not only to Harvard's academic fabric but also to the broader U.S. innovation and research ecosystem.
Harvard's response was swift and unapologetic. The university called the DHS decision an 'unlawful and unwarranted action' and a clear act of political retaliation for refusing to cede to government demands to reshape its curriculum and institutional governance. Harvard President Alan Garber reaffirmed the school's commitment to its international community, stating, 'Without its international students, Harvard is not Harvard.'
This legal showdown isn't just about student visas. It's a flashpoint in a broader campaign by the Trump administration to reshape American higher education by coercing elite institutions into aligning with its ideological views. The administration's move also risks undermining the United States' standing as a global leader in education, research, and intellectual diplomacy.
For decades, international students have been a cornerstone of the U.S. higher education system, bringing cultural diversity, fresh perspectives, and often, significant financial contributions. At Harvard alone, 27% of the student body hails from over 140 countries. These students often pay full tuition, rarely qualify for federal aid, and are deeply embedded in research labs and academic projects that fuel the nation's global competitiveness.
Harvard's lawsuit accuses DHS of violating the First Amendment and the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The suit states that the federal government is punishing the university for resisting its attempt to police academic ideology and student political activity, particularly protests the administration has labeled 'anti-American' or 'pro-terrorist.' DHS claims the ban stems from Harvard's 'failure to condemn antisemitism' and for allegedly creating an 'unsafe' environment for Jewish students. Yet Harvard contends it met all DHS requests for information and was given no opportunity to contest the revocation before it was imposed. Source: Boston Globe / Getty
The potential damage is staggering. Harvard's research labs—already burdened by a freeze on $2.2 billion in federal funding—now face the prospect of losing critical contributors. The Medical School and School of Public Health have begun scaling back operations, a direct consequence of political interference. According to one professor, if this policy is enacted, 'many labs will empty out.'
The implications reach far beyond Cambridge. If allowed to stand, the decision sets a dangerous precedent for how the federal government can weaponize immigration law to punish academic dissent. It's also a poor strategic move for the country; U.S. universities are one of its strongest soft power tools, attracting top minds from around the globe and fostering international goodwill. Alienating these students not only harms America's reputation but opens the door for other nations, like China, to swoop in and offer alternatives.
Indeed, the backlash abroad has already begun. Chinese officials condemned the decision, with Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning warning that the move 'will only damage [America's] own image and international credibility.' China, which sends over 1,200 students to Harvard annually, sees the move as another escalation in an already tense bilateral relationship. Hong Kong University of Science and Technology even issued a public offer to affected Harvard students, promising a smooth transfer and full academic support.
Meanwhile, student leaders and faculty on campus have rallied around their international peers. Harvard's chapter of the American Association of University Professors issued a blistering statement denouncing the move as 'an unconstitutional assault' on students and academia. Student government leaders like Abdullah Shahid Sial are actively working with the administration to support affected students, including exploring transfer options.
The legal path forward is uncertain, but Harvard has made it clear that it will not capitulate to political pressure at the expense of its core values. This fight isn't just about visas—it's about the soul of American higher education. And as Harvard's lawsuit states plainly: 'With the stroke of a pen, the government has sought to erase a quarter of Harvard's student body.' The stakes could not be higher.
SEE ALSO:
NYU Withholds Diploma From Student Who Denounced Gaza War
Malcolm X's Legacy Is The Blueprint For Black Self-Sufficiency
SEE ALSO
Harvard Fights Back Against Trump International Student Ban With Lawsuit was originally published on newsone.com
Black America Web Featured Video
CLOSE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US and China to talk in Stockholm on trade with eye on Trump-Xi summit later this year
WASHINGTON (AP) — When top U.S. and Chinese officials meet in Stockholm, they are almost certain to agree to at least leaving tariffs at the current levels while working toward a meeting between their presidents later this year for a more lasting trade deal between the world's two largest economies, analysts say. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng are set to hold talks for the third time this year — this round in the Swedish capital, nearly four months after President Donald Trump upset global trade with his sweeping tariff proposal, including an import tax that shot up to 145% on Chinese goods. 'We have the confines of a deal with China,' Trump said Friday before leaving for Scotland. Bessent told MSNBC on Wednesday that the two countries after talks in Geneva and London have reached a 'status quo,' with the U.S. taxing imported goods from China at 30% and China responding with a 10% tariff, on top of tariffs prior to the start of Trump's second term. 'Now we can move on to discussing other matters in terms of bringing the economic relationship into balance,' Bessent said. He was referring to the U.S. running a $295.5 billion trade deficit last year. The U.S. seeks an agreement that would enable it to export more to China and shift the Chinese economy more toward domestic consumer spending. The Chinese embassy in Washington said Beijing hopes 'there will be more consensus and cooperation and less misperception' coming out of the talks. With an eye on a possible leaders' summit, Stockholm could provide some answers as to the timeline and viability of that particular goal ahead of a possible meeting between Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping. 'The meeting will be important in starting to set the stage for a fall meeting between Trump and Xi,' said Wendy Cutler, a former U.S. trade negotiator and now vice president at the Asia Society Policy Institute. 'Beijing will likely insist on detailed preparations before they agree to a leaders' meeting.' In Stockholm, the two sides are likely to focus on commercial announcements to be made at a leaders' summit as well as agreements to address 'major irritants,' such as China's industrial overcapacity and its lack of control over chemicals used to make fentanyl, also to be announced when Xi and Trump should meet, Cutler said. Sean Stein, president of the U.S.-China Business Council, said Stockholm could be the first real opportunity for the two governments to address structural reform issues including market access in China for U.S. companies. What businesses will be seeking coming out of Stockholm would largely be 'the atmosphere' — how the two sides characterize the discussions. They will also look for clues about a possible leaders' summit because any real deal will hinge on the two presidents meeting each other, he said. Fentanyl-related tariffs are likely a focus for China In Stockholm, Beijing will likely demand the removal of the 20% fentanyl-related tariff that Trump imposed earlier this year, said Sun Yun, director of the China program at the Washington-based Stimson Center. This round of the U.S.-China trade dispute began with fentanyl, when Trump in February imposed a 10% tariff on Chinese goods, citing that China failed to curb the outflow of the chemicals used to make the drug. The following month, Trump added another 10% tax for the same reason. Beijing retaliated with extra duties on some U.S. goods, including coal, liquefied natural gas, and farm products such as beef, chicken, pork and soy. In Geneva, both sides climbed down from three-digit tariffs rolled out following Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs in April, but the U.S. kept the 20% 'fentanyl' tariffs, in addition to the 10% baseline rate — to which China responded by keeping the same 10% rate on U.S. products. These across-the-board duties were unchanged when the two sides met in London a month later to negotiate over non-tariff measures such as export controls on critical products. The Chinese government has long protested that American politicians blame China for the fentanyl crisis in the U.S. but argued the root problem lies with the U.S. itself. Washington says Beijing is not doing enough to regulate precursor chemicals that flow out of China into the hands of drug dealers. In July, China placed two fentanyl ingredients under enhanced control, a move seen as in response to U.S. pressure and signaling goodwill. Gabriel Wildau, managing director at the consultancy Teneo, said he doesn't expect any tariff to go away in Stockholm but that tariff relief could be part of a final trade deal. 'It's possible that Trump would cancel the 20% tariff that he has explicitly linked with fentanyl, but I would expect the final tariff level on China to be at least as high as the 15-20% rate contained in the recent deals with Japan, Indonesia, Vietnam,' Wildau said. US wants China to dump less, buy less oil from Russia and Iran China's industrial overcapacity is as much a headache for the United States as it is for the European Union. Even Beijing has acknowledged the problem but suggested it might be difficult to address. America's trade imbalance with China has decreased from a peak of $418 billion in 2018, according to the Census Bureau. But China has found new markets for its goods and as the world's dominant manufacturer ran a global trade surplus approaching $1 trillion last year — somewhat larger than the size of the U.S. overall trade deficit in 2024. And China's emergence as a manufacturer of electric vehicles and other emerging technologies has suddenly made it more of a financial and geopolitical threat for those same industries based in the U.S., Europe, Japan and South Korea. 'Some enterprises, especially manufacturing enterprises, feel more deeply that China's manufacturing capabilities are too strong, and Chinese people are too hardworking. Factories run 24 hours a day,' Chinese Premier Li Qiang said on Thursday when hosting European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in Beijing. 'Some people think this will cause some new problems in the balance of supply and demand in world production.' 'We see this problem too,' Li said. Bessent also said the Stockholm talks could address Chinese purchases of Russian and Iranian oil. However, Wildau of Teneo said China could demand some U.S. security concessions in exchange, such as a reduced U.S. military presence in East Asia and scaled-back diplomatic support for Taiwan and the Philippines. This would likely face political pushback in Washington. The Stockholm talks will be 'geared towards building a trade agreement based around Chinese purchase commitments and pledges of investment in the U.S. in exchange for partial relief from U.S. tariffs and export controls,' Wildau said. He doubts there will be a grand deal. Instead, he predicts 'a more limited agreement based around fentanyl.' 'That,' he said, 'is probably the preferred outcome for China hawks in the Trump administration, who worry that an overeager Trump might offer too much to Xi.' ___ Associated Press writer Paul Wiseman contributed to this report Sign in to access your portfolio
New York Post
3 minutes ago
- New York Post
The EU trade agreement — with its favorable terms for the US — proves Trump's a great dealmaker
President Donald Trump prides himself on his dealmaking skills, and with the agreement he reached Sunday on European trade, he's got a right to be proud. The deal calls for at least $1.35 trillion in European investments and purchases of US energy and military equipment. Advertisement And while European tariffs on many US exports will drop to zero, European goods will face 15% duties. Plus, neither side will slap any duties at all on 'a number of strategic products,' including aircraft and aircraft parts, certain chemicals, semiconductor equipment, critical raw materials and more. This is a great deal for both sides, and avoids a trade war that would've involved 44% of the world's economy. Advertisement 'I think it's the biggest deal ever made,' boasted Trump — and it certainly was big: The European Union, which includes 27 countries, is America's largest trading partner, with total trade of nearly $2 trillion last year. And make no mistake: These were no easy negotiations; Trump reached terms with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen after talks in Scotland she described as 'very difficult.' On Friday, Trump put the chances of agreement at 50-50. President Donald Trump speaks, while sat with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, after an announcement of a trade deal between the US and EU, in Turnberry, Scotland, Britain, July 27, 2025. REUTERS Advertisement But Von der Leyen praised the prez as a tough dealmaker; Trump said he thought both sides 'wanted to make a deal,' and that it would 'bring us very close together.' Hmm: Just a few months ago, his critics blasted his tariff program — predicting practically every disaster but the full collapse of the worldwide economy. Yet Trump has now secured key trade deals with Japan, the United Kingdom, Indonesia, Vietnam, the Philippines, China (at least partially) — and now the EU. That's going to bring much stability to the markets and relief for businesses trying to plan ahead. Advertisement Sure, there's more work to be done: Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs kick in Friday for nations that lack a deal. But his accomplishment in rebalancing international trade to America's benefit are already enormously impressive. Even his critics ought to give him some hearty props here.
4 minutes ago
US and China to talk trade with eye on Trump-Xi summit later this year
WASHINGTON -- When top U.S. and Chinese officials meet in Stockholm, they are almost certain to agree to at least leaving tariffs at the current levels while working toward a meeting between their presidents later this year for a more lasting trade deal between the world's two largest economies, analysts say. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng are set to hold talks for the third time this year — this round in the Swedish capital, nearly four months after President Donald Trump upset global trade with his sweeping tariff proposal, including an import tax that shot up to 145% on Chinese goods. 'We have the confines of a deal with China,' Trump said Friday before leaving for Scotland. Bessent told MSNBC on Wednesday that the two countries after talks in Geneva and London have reached a 'status quo,' with the U.S. taxing imported goods from China at 30% and China responding with a 10% tariff, on top of tariffs prior to the start of Trump's second term. 'Now we can move on to discussing other matters in terms of bringing the economic relationship into balance,' Bessent said. He was referring to the U.S. running a $295.5 billion trade deficit last year. The U.S. seeks an agreement that would enable it to export more to China and shift the Chinese economy more toward domestic consumer spending. The Chinese embassy in Washington said Beijing hopes 'there will be more consensus and cooperation and less misperception' coming out of the talks. With an eye on a possible leaders' summit, Stockholm could provide some answers as to the timeline and viability of that particular goal ahead of a possible meeting between Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping. 'The meeting will be important in starting to set the stage for a fall meeting between Trump and Xi,' said Wendy Cutler, a former U.S. trade negotiator and now vice president at the Asia Society Policy Institute. 'Beijing will likely insist on detailed preparations before they agree to a leaders' meeting.' In Stockholm, the two sides are likely to focus on commercial announcements to be made at a leaders' summit as well as agreements to address 'major irritants,' such as China's industrial overcapacity and its lack of control over chemicals used to make fentanyl, also to be announced when Xi and Trump should meet, Cutler said. Sean Stein, president of the U.S.-China Business Council, said Stockholm could be the first real opportunity for the two governments to address structural reform issues including market access in China for U.S. companies. What businesses will be seeking coming out of Stockholm would largely be 'the atmosphere' — how the two sides characterize the discussions. They will also look for clues about a possible leaders' summit because any real deal will hinge on the two presidents meeting each other, he said. In Stockholm, Beijing will likely demand the removal of the 20% fentanyl-related tariff that Trump imposed earlier this year, said Sun Yun, director of the China program at the Washington-based Stimson Center. This round of the U.S.-China trade dispute began with fentanyl, when Trump in February imposed a 10% tariff on Chinese goods, citing that China failed to curb the outflow of the chemicals used to make the drug. The following month, Trump added another 10% tax for the same reason. Beijing retaliated with extra duties on some U.S. goods, including coal, liquefied natural gas, and farm products such as beef, chicken, pork and soy. In Geneva, both sides climbed down from three-digit tariffs rolled out following Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs in April, but the U.S. kept the 20% 'fentanyl' tariffs, in addition to the 10% baseline rate — to which China responded by keeping the same 10% rate on U.S. products. These across-the-board duties were unchanged when the two sides met in London a month later to negotiate over non-tariff measures such as export controls on critical products. The Chinese government has long protested that American politicians blame China for the fentanyl crisis in the U.S. but argued the root problem lies with the U.S. itself. Washington says Beijing is not doing enough to regulate precursor chemicals that flow out of China into the hands of drug dealers. In July, China placed two fentanyl ingredients under enhanced control, a move seen as in response to U.S. pressure and signaling goodwill. Gabriel Wildau, managing director at the consultancy Teneo, said he doesn't expect any tariff to go away in Stockholm but that tariff relief could be part of a final trade deal. 'It's possible that Trump would cancel the 20% tariff that he has explicitly linked with fentanyl, but I would expect the final tariff level on China to be at least as high as the 15-20% rate contained in the recent deals with Japan, Indonesia, Vietnam,' Wildau said. China's industrial overcapacity is as much a headache for the United States as it is for the European Union. Even Beijing has acknowledged the problem but suggested it might be difficult to address. America's trade imbalance with China has decreased from a peak of $418 billion in 2018, according to the Census Bureau. But China has found new markets for its goods and as the world's dominant manufacturer ran a global trade surplus approaching $1 trillion last year — somewhat larger than the size of the U.S. overall trade deficit in 2024. And China's emergence as a manufacturer of electric vehicles and other emerging technologies has suddenly made it more of a financial and geopolitical threat for those same industries based in the U.S., Europe, Japan and South Korea. 'Some enterprises, especially manufacturing enterprises, feel more deeply that China's manufacturing capabilities are too strong, and Chinese people are too hardworking. Factories run 24 hours a day,' Chinese Premier Li Qiang said on Thursday when hosting European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in Beijing. 'Some people think this will cause some new problems in the balance of supply and demand in world production.' 'We see this problem too,' Li said. Bessent also said the Stockholm talks could address Chinese purchases of Russian and Iranian oil. However, Wildau of Teneo said China could demand some U.S. security concessions in exchange, such as a reduced U.S. military presence in East Asia and scaled-back diplomatic support for Taiwan and the Philippines. This would likely face political pushback in Washington. The Stockholm talks will be 'geared towards building a trade agreement based around Chinese purchase commitments and pledges of investment in the U.S. in exchange for partial relief from U.S. tariffs and export controls,' Wildau said. He doubts there will be a grand deal. Instead, he predicts 'a more limited agreement based around fentanyl.' 'That,' he said, 'is probably the preferred outcome for China hawks in the Trump administration, who worry that an overeager Trump might offer too much to Xi.'
