logo
Appeals court roundup: Hammond man's home invasion conviction upheld

Appeals court roundup: Hammond man's home invasion conviction upheld

Chicago Tribune05-05-2025
The Indiana Court of Appeals issued three opinions Monday, including one case where they upheld a Hammond man's home invasion conviction.
Valentine Torrez initially told police he was a victim, too, on Nov. 13, 2021, when a masked man entered his relative's unlocked door in Hammond, blindfolded, then sexually assaulted her and the woman's 12-year-old daughter.
Later, he was charged when his DNA came back, including on the relative's lower back and the child's neck and underwear. Torrez, 50, got 33 years in May 2024 after he was convicted of rape, a Level 3 felony; child molesting, and criminal confinement — about half his charges.
Prosecutors Arturo Balcazar and Lindsey Lanham alleged Torrez helped plan the home invasion with co-defendant Garrett Whittenburg to assault the female relative and take her credit cards.
In a 3-0 decision, Appeals Judge Mary DeBoer rejected Torrez's argument that there wasn't enough evidence for his conviction. Prosecutors needed to show 'concerted action' with the child's assault.
'His course of conduct during and after the offense also supports that Torrez was an accomplice,' she wrote, later adding, 'Torrez left the home rather than assisting or seeking help for them.'
'Clearly, the jury found (the witness's) testimony credible and could reasonably infer Torrez's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt from the evidence presented at trial,' DeBoer wrote.
At trial, defense lawyer Kerry Connor argued some parts of the woman's story were inconsistent over time. Torrez can appeal to the Indiana Supreme Court.
His earlier release date is in January 2047. Whittenburg's trial is scheduled May 12.
Misdemeanor overturned after Gary man shot police dog
The Appeals Court overturned a misdemeanor conviction for Spencer Patterson — after he shot a police dog when an officer was trying to arrest him — saying it violated double jeopardy.
Patterson, 31, got eight years and has to repay $11,000 to Gary Police. Jurors acquitted him of attempted murder in the case of the officer, but they convicted him of battery by means of a deadly weapon, one count each of felony and misdemeanor resisting law enforcement, and one count of striking a law enforcement animal.
Gary Police Sgt. Angel Lozano and his K-9 Falco were chasing Patterson in July 2023 on the 1000 block of E. 35th Place when Patterson shot the dog.
In a 3-0 decision, DeBoer ordered Judge Salvador Vasquez to vacate — or cancel the lesser misdemeanor conviction, saying what happened was too close in time to be convicted twice. His earlier release date is in October 2030.
Sentence upheld in rape case
The court rejected a former Gary man's argument that his prison sentence was too harsh for a woman's assault.
Tyron Smith, 32, got 16 years in December after he pleaded guilty to aggravated battery. He was originally charged with rape.
In a 3-0 decision, Appeals Judge Elizabeth Tavitas said his sentence was appropriate.
The woman told police she let him stay at her place in February 2024, then woke up overnight as Smith was having sex with her. She was 'very upset' and told him to stop. Smith then forced the woman to perform a sex act, then forcefully raped her, according to court records. He forced her to 'consume cocaine' between assaults, the affidavit alleges. The woman said he was abusive to her when drunk or high in the past, court records show.
'Given the brutal nature of Smith's offense and his poor character, we cannot say that his sixteen-year sentence is inappropriate,' Tavitas wrote.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Man convicted in 2023 fatal shooting of 13-year-old boy in Gary, Indiana
Man convicted in 2023 fatal shooting of 13-year-old boy in Gary, Indiana

CBS News

timea day ago

  • CBS News

Man convicted in 2023 fatal shooting of 13-year-old boy in Gary, Indiana

A man was convicted in the 2023 fatal shooting of a teenage boy in Gary, Indiana. The Gary Police Department announced that 19-year-old Dahvee Brunson was found guilty in the Feb. 15, 2023, killing of 13-year-old Orie Dodson. On that day, officers were called for a well-being check in the 1300 block of Lincoln Street, after a person was found lying face-down in front of a church. That's where they found Dodson, who was unresponsive, with apparent gunshot wounds. He was later pronounced dead at the scene. It was later determined that the shooting stemmed from what Dodson's mother said was a situation that began on social media. In addition to the murder conviction, Brunson was also convicted of a criminal gang enhancement and a firearm enhancement. Brunson remains at the Lake County Jail. He is scheduled to be sentenced on Sept. 26. The video above is from a previous report.

Can prosecutors be impeached? This Indiana lawmaker wants to try to change the law
Can prosecutors be impeached? This Indiana lawmaker wants to try to change the law

Indianapolis Star

time3 days ago

  • Indianapolis Star

Can prosecutors be impeached? This Indiana lawmaker wants to try to change the law

The scrutiny over the Marion County Prosecutor's Office continues in response to a recent spate of gun violence in Indianapolis: this time with a Republican state representative proposing giving legislators impeachment power over the locally elected office. It's not the first hint of state intervention into this locally elected office, but it's certainly the most specific ― and would require a lengthy process of amending the state constitution. After two July weekends of back-to-back violence with multiple people killed, including teenagers, the city's police union president Rick Snyder called on state leaders to "step in," with no further details. Then Gov. Mike Braun said he'd be open to some kind of intervention ― without saying of what sort ― if Indianapolis leaders don't "make a change," specifically pointing the finger at the prosecutor's office, led by Democrat Ryan Mears. "We need to see a significant crackdown," Braun said last week. "Indianapolis' own justice system is not doing the job." Now, Indianapolis state Rep. Andrew Ireland has an idea: allow state lawmakers to impeach Mears, a power the state constitution currently vests in the Indiana Supreme Court. His key claim is that Mears doesn't do enough to keep repeat violent defenders off the streets, citing two recent examples: the case of the alleged IndyGo bus arsonist, Demarcus McCloud, who has a long rap sheet prior to the arson; and Zachary Arnold, who was charged with killing his daughter this year and previously had a violent criminal history. "I just want somebody who will hold the violent offenders accountable, and if Ryan Mears isn't up to that task, then we have to have tools to replace him," Ireland told WIBC's Tony Katz on July 23. A spokesperson for the Marion County Prosecutor's Office responded to Ireland's criticisms with data: In 2024, the office prosecuted nearly a quarter of all criminal trials in the state while maintaining trial conviction rates of 94% for murders, 84% for sex crimes, 83% for attempted murder cases, and 88% for gun cases. Of cases that go to trial, the top five most common offenses were for murder, battery, domestic battery, child molesting and possession of a firearm by serious violent felon, Michael Leffler said. "It's clear that this office is a statewide leader in taking crimes of violence, especially our most serious offenses to trial," he said. What the law says State lawmakers can impeach mayors and other state and local officers for "misdemeanors" while in office. But case law has held that prosecutors are constitutional, judicial officers who are not in the same category as state, county and township executive-branch officers, such as mayors. The constitution further outlines "crime, incapacity, or negligence" as reasons that the General Assembly could impeach a state officer. In the case of prosecutors, however, the state constitution says that the state Supreme Court may remove them, and only if they have been "convicted of corruption or other high crime." IU law professor Joel Schumm points to a Supreme Court opinion from 1914 that states the legislature doesn't have the power to name some other cause, such as "negligence," as a premise for impeachment. Where the legislature could have wiggle room, that opinion states, is in enacting changes to the procedure by which accusations against judges and prosecutors are tried. Those rules would have to be applicable to all judges and prosecutors and provide for a day in court, the court has opined. In short, Schumm said, broadening the basis for removing a prosecutor would require an amendment to the state constitution. That process requires two consecutive sessions of the General Assembly to pass identical language, which would then have to be approved by voters via ballot referendum in the following election. The constitution also enshrines the prosecutor's position as an elected one whose term lasts four years. "If people aren't happy with the work of a prosecutor, they can vote against that person in an election," Schumm said. Braun mulls special prosecutor concept Meanwhile, the governor's office is not tamping down talk of a different not-yet-allowed method of overriding Mears: Braun's appointing a special prosecutor. State law currently says the governor can recommend the state inspector general be named a special prosecutor over a particular case that the county prosecutor declines to take up, but even then, the ultimate decision lies with an appeals court judge. Judges have further powers to appoint special prosecutors in the events that there is evidence of the prosecutor having committed a crime, or to avoid an appearance of impropriety, or if the prosecutor requests one. Braun acknowledged Thursday that state lawmakers would have to pass legislation to grant him the ability to appoint a special prosecutor unilaterally. He reiterated that his preference would be that Marion County leaders "solve their own problems," but said if they don't, the state "can't just stand by doing nothing." "If (state lawmakers) choose to do it, that's fine, because that would have to be done before I have that authority to do so," he said. "I don't think we're there. I think there's going to be enough proactiveness, I'm hoping, but when the need is there before going to that, we're going to be interacting."

New Mexico Attorney General files lawsuit as schools face $45M federal funding freeze
New Mexico Attorney General files lawsuit as schools face $45M federal funding freeze

Yahoo

time17-07-2025

  • Yahoo

New Mexico Attorney General files lawsuit as schools face $45M federal funding freeze

NEW MEXICO (KRQE) – The New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez is trying to stop a federal freeze on some education funding that could halt more than a hundred New Mexico after-school and other learning programs expected to start just weeks from now. Story continues below News: New Mexico Supreme Court throws out embezzlement charges against former official Trending: A 'professional courtesy': How an officer crossed the line Community: Funding for farming internship program at APS in jeopardy KRQE Investigates: Embattled McKinley County DA asks for emergency funding to keep her office running The Trump Administration's funding freeze targets about$ 6 billion for a wide range of education programs. Roughly $45 million is on the line in New Mexico, which stands to have a major effect on K-12 schools, less than a month from now. 'These cuts go to heart of that relationship and undermines a commitment that we all share, Republicans and Democrats, that working families that are in public schools need and support as much as they can get,' said Attorney General Raúl Torrez. Torrez is joining 21 other attorneys general across the US trying to get a judge to get that federal education funding flowing again. The $45 million in play for New Mexico pays for tutoring English language learning and other programs like the 21st Century Community Learning Centers. They run more than 120 before and after-school programs in a lot of New Mexico's rural and underserved communities. Funding for those programs was frozen just one day before it was supposed to be paid out to school districts, who say there's no back-up plan yet. 'This is not about party lines, this is about the future of our students and our kids delaying our denying these funds sends a message that their education in negotiable,' said Superintendent Kristie Medina of Raton Public Schools. The AG also emphasized Wednesday that the federal funding freeze only stands to potentially worsen New Mexico's juvenile crime problem. So far, a federal judge has not scheduled a first hearing on the lawsuit, but the AG expects that the courts could decide on a temporary injunction within the next week. Earlier this month, Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham said she's considering the potential of calling a special session to deal with federal funding cuts, but hasn't said when that could happen. The Republican Party of New Mexico sent this statement: The Republican Party of New Mexico stands with President Trump in his effort to end reckless federal spending that prioritizes radical agendas over the real needs of American children. President Trump has long warned that he will cut funding for programs that promote DEI indoctrination and that cater to illegal immigrants at the expense of our students and our communities. We support this measure because we believe it will help secure the long-term viability of education programs that put New Mexico children first. While Attorney General Torrez claims that a potential freeze of $45 million in K–12 funding will harm schools across our state, it is important to recognize that rural schools—those he says will be hit hardest—have long suffered under current funding structures. These communities already receive fewer resources and face greater challenges than larger, urban districts, in which they over come successfully. Yet, the quality of education statewide has not improved under existing policies. We believe New Mexico students benefit most when local communities have control over their schools. That's why we continue to advocate for school choice. Parents across our state are demanding an end to ideological indoctrination and a return to academic excellence. They want the freedom to choose educational environments that reflect their values and truly prepare their children for the future. This lawsuit from the AG is more about political theater than protecting our kids. The RPNM will always support policies that return power to parents, cut wasteful spending, and focus our limited resources where they belong—on our children's success, not on federal mandates that dilute accountability and outcomes.' Amy Barela, Chairwoman, Republican Party of New Mexico Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store